Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos
Standard protocols for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) include transfer of two or three embryos. Not surprisingly, the rate of twin pregnancy after IVF is high (about 24% of all pregnancies). Routine transfer of one, rather than two, embryos would be expected to result in a much lower rate of twin preg...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 1998-01, Vol.13 (1), p.88-94 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 94 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 88 |
container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Wølner-Hanssen, P Rydhstroem, H |
description | Standard protocols for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) include transfer of two or three embryos. Not surprisingly, the rate of twin pregnancy after IVF is high (about 24% of all pregnancies). Routine transfer of one, rather than two, embryos would be expected to result in a much lower rate of twin pregnancies at the cost of a lower take-home baby rate. The aim of this study was to compare hypothetical costs to society incurred by pregnancies achieved with IVF protocols based on the transfer of one or two embryos. We compared actual (for two-embryo transfers) and hypothetical (for one-embryo transfers) take-home baby rates; risks of twin pregnancies; and costs of sick leave and hospitalization during pregnancy, deliveries, neonatal intensive care, and handicap care after transfer of one or two embryos. The study showed that even when more treatments might be needed to achieve similar baby take-home rates after transfer of one compared with two embryos, the lower twin pregnancy rate of the former approach caused it to be more cost-efficient than the latter. In conclusion, IVF costs are the sum of fertilization treatment costs and the costs for health care of the pregnant women and their offspring. Considering the association of the latter costs with numbers of embryos transferred, studies of one-embryo transfer protocols are urgently needed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/13.1.88 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79742546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/13.1.88</oup_id><sourcerecordid>79742546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-31bd0fd942ad1ba2c3096dae2c70fc9833b0c97bc03c369a4a410d98df2beca13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtvFDEURi1EFJZAS4fkAiFRzMaP2RmbLlrxiBQpTagtj-cajGbswdcTtNT8cLzaVVoqW_7OPdb9CHnD2ZYzLa9_rHOG5ZrLLd8q9YxseNuxRsgde042THSq4bzjL8hLxJ-M1avqLsml3nFRmQ35u09YGvAeXAmPEAGR2minAwakydMQm8dQcqIecglT-GNLSPEjBSxhtgVG6qoA6QKZ4upcnffrRJcM36ON7kCtLzUq2UasiqMyRaCpPv1OFOYhHxK-IhfeTgivz-cV-fb508P-a3N3_-V2f3PXOKllaSQfRuZH3Qo78sEKJ5nuRgvC9cw7raQcmNP94Jh0stO2tS1no1ajFwM4y-UVeX_yLjn9WusKZg7oYJpshLSi6XXfil3bVXB7Al1OiBm8WXJdNx8MZ-ZYuznVbrg03ChVB96ezesww_iEn3uu-btzbtHZydc6XMAnTPBeMXbEPpywtC7_-_IfYdieBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79742546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Wølner-Hanssen, P ; Rydhstroem, H</creator><creatorcontrib>Wølner-Hanssen, P ; Rydhstroem, H</creatorcontrib><description>Standard protocols for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) include transfer of two or three embryos. Not surprisingly, the rate of twin pregnancy after IVF is high (about 24% of all pregnancies). Routine transfer of one, rather than two, embryos would be expected to result in a much lower rate of twin pregnancies at the cost of a lower take-home baby rate. The aim of this study was to compare hypothetical costs to society incurred by pregnancies achieved with IVF protocols based on the transfer of one or two embryos. We compared actual (for two-embryo transfers) and hypothetical (for one-embryo transfers) take-home baby rates; risks of twin pregnancies; and costs of sick leave and hospitalization during pregnancy, deliveries, neonatal intensive care, and handicap care after transfer of one or two embryos. The study showed that even when more treatments might be needed to achieve similar baby take-home rates after transfer of one compared with two embryos, the lower twin pregnancy rate of the former approach caused it to be more cost-efficient than the latter. In conclusion, IVF costs are the sum of fertilization treatment costs and the costs for health care of the pregnant women and their offspring. Considering the association of the latter costs with numbers of embryos transferred, studies of one-embryo transfer protocols are urgently needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/13.1.88</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9512235</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Cost-Benefit Analysis ; Embryo Transfer - economics ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro - economics ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Rate ; Pregnancy, Multiple ; Sterility. Assisted procreation ; Treatment Outcome ; Twins</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 1998-01, Vol.13 (1), p.88-94</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-31bd0fd942ad1ba2c3096dae2c70fc9833b0c97bc03c369a4a410d98df2beca13</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1583,4022,27921,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2178005$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9512235$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wølner-Hanssen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydhstroem, H</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Standard protocols for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) include transfer of two or three embryos. Not surprisingly, the rate of twin pregnancy after IVF is high (about 24% of all pregnancies). Routine transfer of one, rather than two, embryos would be expected to result in a much lower rate of twin pregnancies at the cost of a lower take-home baby rate. The aim of this study was to compare hypothetical costs to society incurred by pregnancies achieved with IVF protocols based on the transfer of one or two embryos. We compared actual (for two-embryo transfers) and hypothetical (for one-embryo transfers) take-home baby rates; risks of twin pregnancies; and costs of sick leave and hospitalization during pregnancy, deliveries, neonatal intensive care, and handicap care after transfer of one or two embryos. The study showed that even when more treatments might be needed to achieve similar baby take-home rates after transfer of one compared with two embryos, the lower twin pregnancy rate of the former approach caused it to be more cost-efficient than the latter. In conclusion, IVF costs are the sum of fertilization treatment costs and the costs for health care of the pregnant women and their offspring. Considering the association of the latter costs with numbers of embryos transferred, studies of one-embryo transfer protocols are urgently needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - economics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Multiple</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Twins</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtvFDEURi1EFJZAS4fkAiFRzMaP2RmbLlrxiBQpTagtj-cajGbswdcTtNT8cLzaVVoqW_7OPdb9CHnD2ZYzLa9_rHOG5ZrLLd8q9YxseNuxRsgde042THSq4bzjL8hLxJ-M1avqLsml3nFRmQ35u09YGvAeXAmPEAGR2minAwakydMQm8dQcqIecglT-GNLSPEjBSxhtgVG6qoA6QKZ4upcnffrRJcM36ON7kCtLzUq2UasiqMyRaCpPv1OFOYhHxK-IhfeTgivz-cV-fb508P-a3N3_-V2f3PXOKllaSQfRuZH3Qo78sEKJ5nuRgvC9cw7raQcmNP94Jh0stO2tS1no1ajFwM4y-UVeX_yLjn9WusKZg7oYJpshLSi6XXfil3bVXB7Al1OiBm8WXJdNx8MZ-ZYuznVbrg03ChVB96ezesww_iEn3uu-btzbtHZydc6XMAnTPBeMXbEPpywtC7_-_IfYdieBw</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Wølner-Hanssen, P</creator><creator>Rydhstroem, H</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos</title><author>Wølner-Hanssen, P ; Rydhstroem, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-31bd0fd942ad1ba2c3096dae2c70fc9833b0c97bc03c369a4a410d98df2beca13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - economics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro - economics</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Multiple</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Twins</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wølner-Hanssen, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rydhstroem, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wølner-Hanssen, P</au><au>Rydhstroem, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>Hum Reprod</stitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>88</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>88-94</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>Standard protocols for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) include transfer of two or three embryos. Not surprisingly, the rate of twin pregnancy after IVF is high (about 24% of all pregnancies). Routine transfer of one, rather than two, embryos would be expected to result in a much lower rate of twin pregnancies at the cost of a lower take-home baby rate. The aim of this study was to compare hypothetical costs to society incurred by pregnancies achieved with IVF protocols based on the transfer of one or two embryos. We compared actual (for two-embryo transfers) and hypothetical (for one-embryo transfers) take-home baby rates; risks of twin pregnancies; and costs of sick leave and hospitalization during pregnancy, deliveries, neonatal intensive care, and handicap care after transfer of one or two embryos. The study showed that even when more treatments might be needed to achieve similar baby take-home rates after transfer of one compared with two embryos, the lower twin pregnancy rate of the former approach caused it to be more cost-efficient than the latter. In conclusion, IVF costs are the sum of fertilization treatment costs and the costs for health care of the pregnant women and their offspring. Considering the association of the latter costs with numbers of embryos transferred, studies of one-embryo transfer protocols are urgently needed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9512235</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/13.1.88</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 1998-01, Vol.13 (1), p.88-94 |
issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79742546 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Cost-Benefit Analysis Embryo Transfer - economics Female Fertilization in Vitro - economics Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Medical sciences Middle Aged Pregnancy Pregnancy Rate Pregnancy, Multiple Sterility. Assisted procreation Treatment Outcome Twins |
title | Cost-effectiveness analysis of in-vitro fertilization: estimated costs per successful pregnancy after transfer of one or two embryos |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A34%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20in-vitro%20fertilization:%20estimated%20costs%20per%20successful%20pregnancy%20after%20transfer%20of%20one%20or%20two%20embryos&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=W%C3%B8lner-Hanssen,%20P&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=88&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=88-94&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/13.1.88&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79742546%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79742546&rft_id=info:pmid/9512235&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/13.1.88&rfr_iscdi=true |