A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study
Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, doub...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 1990-05, Vol.322 (20), p.1405-1411 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1411 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 1405 |
container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
container_volume | 322 |
creator | Bracken, Michael B Shepard, Mary Jo Collins, William F Holford, Theodore R Young, Wise Baskin, David S Eisenberg, Howard M Flamm, Eugene Leo-Summers, Linda Maroon, Joseph Marshall, Lawrence F Perot, Phanor L Piepmeier, Joseph Sonntag, Volker K.H Wagner, Franklin C Wilberger, Jack E Winn, H. Richard |
description | Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurologic examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury.
After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups.
We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury. (N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1405–11.)
ACUTE spinal-cord injury has been extraordinarily resistant to effective treatment. The improved longevity of patients with spinal-cord injuries is almost certainly due to general advances in nursing and acute medical and rehabilitational care.
1
There have not been accompanying improvements in neurologic outcome.
Interest in the pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal-cord injury dates |
doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJM199005173222001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79741268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d94dedf1c85cdd09fe910c9099749ef1419928226584a220dcb304e5bfd9313c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModa3-AhECijc6ms-Z5HJZqm1pK2i9HrLJGTpLPrbJDLj-erPs0osizU0C7_O-55wchN5S8oUS2X69Obu8ploTImnHGWOE0GdoQSXnjRCkfY4WhDDViE7zl-hVKRtSDxX6BJ0w1ikp5AKFJf5pokth_AvuM16lOOXkPTh8m0fjcRrwNUx3O7_N4OJYkk8RcMr4xvj0Z_8eI57uoOJgpgBx2luWdp4A_9qO0fhmlbLDF3Ez591r9GIwvsCb432Kfn87u12dN1c_vl-slleN5YpNjdPCgRuoVdI6R_QAmhKridad0DBQUadmirFWKmHq3M6uOREg14PTnHLLT9HHQ-42p_sZytSHsVjw3kRIc-m7GkRZqyr4_hG4SXOuXZeeasWZoFKxSvEDZXMqJcPQb_MYTN71lPT7VfT_WUV1vTtmz-sA7sFz_Puqfzjqpljjh2yiHcsDJlqqBdvHfDpgIZQ-wiY8WfQf5XSb7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983241582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Bracken, Michael B ; Shepard, Mary Jo ; Collins, William F ; Holford, Theodore R ; Young, Wise ; Baskin, David S ; Eisenberg, Howard M ; Flamm, Eugene ; Leo-Summers, Linda ; Maroon, Joseph ; Marshall, Lawrence F ; Perot, Phanor L ; Piepmeier, Joseph ; Sonntag, Volker K.H ; Wagner, Franklin C ; Wilberger, Jack E ; Winn, H. Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Bracken, Michael B ; Shepard, Mary Jo ; Collins, William F ; Holford, Theodore R ; Young, Wise ; Baskin, David S ; Eisenberg, Howard M ; Flamm, Eugene ; Leo-Summers, Linda ; Maroon, Joseph ; Marshall, Lawrence F ; Perot, Phanor L ; Piepmeier, Joseph ; Sonntag, Volker K.H ; Wagner, Franklin C ; Wilberger, Jack E ; Winn, H. Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurologic examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury.
After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups.
We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury. (N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1405–11.)
ACUTE spinal-cord injury has been extraordinarily resistant to effective treatment. The improved longevity of patients with spinal-cord injuries is almost certainly due to general advances in nursing and acute medical and rehabilitational care.
1
There have not been accompanying improvements in neurologic outcome.
Interest in the pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal-cord injury dates back at least 20 years.
2
In an earlier trial (the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study, or NASCIS 1) we compared a 1000-mg infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate with a 100-mg dose of methylprednisolone given as a bolus and daily thereafter for 10 days. No significant difference in . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199005173222001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2278545</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NEJMAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analgesics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body weight ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug dosages ; Epidemiology ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Infusions, Intravenous ; Injections, Intravenous ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Metabolism ; Methylprednisolone ; Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage ; Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Motor Activity ; Multicenter Studies as Topic ; Naloxone ; Naloxone - administration & dosage ; Naloxone - therapeutic use ; Neurology ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ; Sensation ; Sodium ; Spinal cord injuries ; Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy ; Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology ; Time Factors ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 1990-05, Vol.322 (20), p.1405-1411</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Massachusetts Medical Society May 17, 1990</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d94dedf1c85cdd09fe910c9099749ef1419928226584a220dcb304e5bfd9313c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM199005173222001$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199005173222001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4619421$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2278545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bracken, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holford, Theodore R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Wise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskin, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Howard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo-Summers, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Lawrence F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perot, Phanor L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepmeier, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonntag, Volker K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Franklin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilberger, Jack E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winn, H. Richard</creatorcontrib><title>A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurologic examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury.
After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups.
We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury. (N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1405–11.)
ACUTE spinal-cord injury has been extraordinarily resistant to effective treatment. The improved longevity of patients with spinal-cord injuries is almost certainly due to general advances in nursing and acute medical and rehabilitational care.
1
There have not been accompanying improvements in neurologic outcome.
Interest in the pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal-cord injury dates back at least 20 years.
2
In an earlier trial (the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study, or NASCIS 1) we compared a 1000-mg infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate with a 100-mg dose of methylprednisolone given as a bolus and daily thereafter for 10 days. No significant difference in . . .</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infusions, Intravenous</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Motor Activity</subject><subject>Multicenter Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Naloxone</subject><subject>Naloxone - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Naloxone - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Sensation</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1rFDEUhoModa3-AhECijc6ms-Z5HJZqm1pK2i9HrLJGTpLPrbJDLj-erPs0osizU0C7_O-55wchN5S8oUS2X69Obu8ploTImnHGWOE0GdoQSXnjRCkfY4WhDDViE7zl-hVKRtSDxX6BJ0w1ikp5AKFJf5pokth_AvuM16lOOXkPTh8m0fjcRrwNUx3O7_N4OJYkk8RcMr4xvj0Z_8eI57uoOJgpgBx2luWdp4A_9qO0fhmlbLDF3Ez591r9GIwvsCb432Kfn87u12dN1c_vl-slleN5YpNjdPCgRuoVdI6R_QAmhKridad0DBQUadmirFWKmHq3M6uOREg14PTnHLLT9HHQ-42p_sZytSHsVjw3kRIc-m7GkRZqyr4_hG4SXOuXZeeasWZoFKxSvEDZXMqJcPQb_MYTN71lPT7VfT_WUV1vTtmz-sA7sFz_Puqfzjqpljjh2yiHcsDJlqqBdvHfDpgIZQ-wiY8WfQf5XSb7Q</recordid><startdate>19900517</startdate><enddate>19900517</enddate><creator>Bracken, Michael B</creator><creator>Shepard, Mary Jo</creator><creator>Collins, William F</creator><creator>Holford, Theodore R</creator><creator>Young, Wise</creator><creator>Baskin, David S</creator><creator>Eisenberg, Howard M</creator><creator>Flamm, Eugene</creator><creator>Leo-Summers, Linda</creator><creator>Maroon, Joseph</creator><creator>Marshall, Lawrence F</creator><creator>Perot, Phanor L</creator><creator>Piepmeier, Joseph</creator><creator>Sonntag, Volker K.H</creator><creator>Wagner, Franklin C</creator><creator>Wilberger, Jack E</creator><creator>Winn, H. Richard</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900517</creationdate><title>A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury</title><author>Bracken, Michael B ; Shepard, Mary Jo ; Collins, William F ; Holford, Theodore R ; Young, Wise ; Baskin, David S ; Eisenberg, Howard M ; Flamm, Eugene ; Leo-Summers, Linda ; Maroon, Joseph ; Marshall, Lawrence F ; Perot, Phanor L ; Piepmeier, Joseph ; Sonntag, Volker K.H ; Wagner, Franklin C ; Wilberger, Jack E ; Winn, H. Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-d94dedf1c85cdd09fe910c9099749ef1419928226584a220dcb304e5bfd9313c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infusions, Intravenous</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Motor Activity</topic><topic>Multicenter Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Naloxone</topic><topic>Naloxone - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Naloxone - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Sensation</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bracken, Michael B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, Mary Jo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, William F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holford, Theodore R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Wise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baskin, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenberg, Howard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flamm, Eugene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo-Summers, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maroon, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marshall, Lawrence F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perot, Phanor L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepmeier, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sonntag, Volker K.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Franklin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilberger, Jack E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winn, H. Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bracken, Michael B</au><au>Shepard, Mary Jo</au><au>Collins, William F</au><au>Holford, Theodore R</au><au>Young, Wise</au><au>Baskin, David S</au><au>Eisenberg, Howard M</au><au>Flamm, Eugene</au><au>Leo-Summers, Linda</au><au>Maroon, Joseph</au><au>Marshall, Lawrence F</au><au>Perot, Phanor L</au><au>Piepmeier, Joseph</au><au>Sonntag, Volker K.H</au><au>Wagner, Franklin C</au><au>Wilberger, Jack E</au><au>Winn, H. Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>1990-05-17</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>322</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>1405</spage><epage>1411</epage><pages>1405-1411</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><coden>NEJMAG</coden><abstract>Studies in animals indicate that methylprednisolone and naloxone are both potentially beneficial in acute spinal-cord injury, but whether any treatment is clinically effective remains uncertain.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone and naloxone in a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, 95 percent of whom were treated within 14 hours of injury. Methylprednisolone was given to 162 patients as a bolus of 30 mg per kilogram of body weight, followed by infusion at 5.4 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Naloxone was given to 154 patients as a bolus of 5.4 mg per kilogram, followed by infusion at 4.0 mg per kilogram per hour for 23 hours. Placebos were given to 171 patients by bolus and infusion. Motor and sensory functions were assessed by systematic neurologic examination on admission and six weeks and six months after injury.
After six months the patients who were treated with methylprednisolone within eight hours of their injury had significant improvement as compared with those given placebo in motor function (neurologic change scores of 16.0 and 11.2, respectively; P = 0.03) and sensation to pinprick (change scores of 11.4 and 6.6; P = 0.02) and touch (change scores, 8.9 and 4.3; P = 0.03). Benefit from methylprednisolone was seen in patients whose injuries were initially evaluated as neurologically complete, as well as in those believed to have incomplete lesions. The patients treated with naloxone, or with methylprednisolone more than eight hours after their injury, did not differ in their neurologic outcomes from those given placebo. Mortality and major morbidity were similar in all three groups.
We conclude that in patients with acute spinal-cord injury, treatment with methylprednisolone in the dose used in this study improves neurologic recovery when the medication is given in the first eight hours. We also conclude that treatment with naloxone in the dose used in this study does not improve neurologic recovery after acute spinal-cord injury. (N Engl J Med 1990; 322:1405–11.)
ACUTE spinal-cord injury has been extraordinarily resistant to effective treatment. The improved longevity of patients with spinal-cord injuries is almost certainly due to general advances in nursing and acute medical and rehabilitational care.
1
There have not been accompanying improvements in neurologic outcome.
Interest in the pharmacologic treatment of acute spinal-cord injury dates back at least 20 years.
2
In an earlier trial (the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study, or NASCIS 1) we compared a 1000-mg infusion of methylprednisolone sodium succinate with a 100-mg dose of methylprednisolone given as a bolus and daily thereafter for 10 days. No significant difference in . . .</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>2278545</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJM199005173222001</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 1990-05, Vol.322 (20), p.1405-1411 |
issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741268 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
subjects | Acute Disease Adolescent Adult Analgesics Biological and medical sciences Body weight Double-Blind Method Drug dosages Epidemiology Evidence-based medicine Female Humans Infusions, Intravenous Injections, Intravenous Male Medical sciences Metabolism Methylprednisolone Methylprednisolone - administration & dosage Methylprednisolone - therapeutic use Middle Aged Morbidity Motor Activity Multicenter Studies as Topic Naloxone Naloxone - administration & dosage Naloxone - therapeutic use Neurology Neurosurgery Patients Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Sensation Sodium Spinal cord injuries Spinal Cord Injuries - drug therapy Spinal Cord Injuries - physiopathology Time Factors Trauma |
title | A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Methylprednisolone or Naloxone in the Treatment of Acute Spinal-Cord Injury: Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A24%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Randomized,%20Controlled%20Trial%20of%20Methylprednisolone%20or%20Naloxone%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Acute%20Spinal-Cord%20Injury:%20Results%20of%20the%20Second%20National%20Acute%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Bracken,%20Michael%20B&rft.date=1990-05-17&rft.volume=322&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=1405&rft.epage=1411&rft.pages=1405-1411&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft.coden=NEJMAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJM199005173222001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79741268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983241582&rft_id=info:pmid/2278545&rfr_iscdi=true |