Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridiz...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 153 |
container_title | Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Durm, Markus Sorokine‐Durm, Irène Haar, Frank‐Martin Hausmann, Michael Ludwig, Horst Voisin, Philippe Cremer, Christoph |
description | Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3<153::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-M |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79741045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4462-f11087b51bd7bfb8a44d4b8e7f64a2f4ceda64bdf173473c90b5bdc31526343c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN9q1EAUxgdR6rb6CMJcSQvNeiYzyWy2opTo2kBLLlpRrw4zyYyNTJJ1JkF65yP4jD6JWbP2RkE4cOD8-b6PHyGvGSwZQPzi-LrIixMGmYyAx3DMsmwFHNgJZ2v-kiV8vT4v3kT5p5syfsWXsMzLszi6ekAW9z8PyQJYlkZCpvwxOQzhCwBkqeAH5CBLWCKZWJByo8Lw8_uPTXF9QQdT3XbN19FQ23vq1bapT2lo2tENqjP9GKhT2rim-0x7S5Vz9HZsVUcr0w2-b4034Ql5ZJUL5um-H5H3m7c3-UV0Wb4r8vPLqBIijSPLGKykTpiupbZ6pYSohV4ZaVOhYisqU6tU6NoyyYXkVQY60XXFWRKnXPCKH5Hns-7W91PgMGDbhMo4NwdFmUnBQCTT4Yf5sPJ9CN5Y3PqmVf4OGeAONeIONe6w4Q4b_kGNfCqcUCNOqPE36mkAmJcY49Wk_GwfYdStqe9192yn_cd5_61x5u4v2_-6_st0HvBf0NSbSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79741045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-4763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3<153::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-M</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9515714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>all‐human centromere probe ; Cells, Cultured ; Centromere ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosomes, Human ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 ; DNA Probes ; fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH) ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Lymphocytes - radiation effects ; quantitative microscopy ; radiobiological dosimetry ; α‐satellite probe</subject><ispartof>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0320%2819980301%2931%3A3%3C153%3A%3AAID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0320%2819980301%2931%3A3%3C153%3A%3AAID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9515714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><title>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>all‐human centromere probe</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Centromere</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1</subject><subject>DNA Probes</subject><subject>fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH)</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</subject><subject>quantitative microscopy</subject><subject>radiobiological dosimetry</subject><subject>α‐satellite probe</subject><issn>0196-4763</issn><issn>1097-0320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN9q1EAUxgdR6rb6CMJcSQvNeiYzyWy2opTo2kBLLlpRrw4zyYyNTJJ1JkF65yP4jD6JWbP2RkE4cOD8-b6PHyGvGSwZQPzi-LrIixMGmYyAx3DMsmwFHNgJZ2v-kiV8vT4v3kT5p5syfsWXsMzLszi6ekAW9z8PyQJYlkZCpvwxOQzhCwBkqeAH5CBLWCKZWJByo8Lw8_uPTXF9QQdT3XbN19FQ23vq1bapT2lo2tENqjP9GKhT2rim-0x7S5Vz9HZsVUcr0w2-b4034Ql5ZJUL5um-H5H3m7c3-UV0Wb4r8vPLqBIijSPLGKykTpiupbZ6pYSohV4ZaVOhYisqU6tU6NoyyYXkVQY60XXFWRKnXPCKH5Hns-7W91PgMGDbhMo4NwdFmUnBQCTT4Yf5sPJ9CN5Y3PqmVf4OGeAONeIONe6w4Q4b_kGNfCqcUCNOqPE36mkAmJcY49Wk_GwfYdStqe9192yn_cd5_61x5u4v2_-6_st0HvBf0NSbSg</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Durm, Markus</creator><creator>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creator><creator>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creator><creator>Hausmann, Michael</creator><creator>Ludwig, Horst</creator><creator>Voisin, Philippe</creator><creator>Cremer, Christoph</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><author>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4462-f11087b51bd7bfb8a44d4b8e7f64a2f4ceda64bdf173473c90b5bdc31526343c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>all‐human centromere probe</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Centromere</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1</topic><topic>DNA Probes</topic><topic>fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH)</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</topic><topic>quantitative microscopy</topic><topic>radiobiological dosimetry</topic><topic>α‐satellite probe</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durm, Markus</au><au>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</au><au>Haar, Frank‐Martin</au><au>Hausmann, Michael</au><au>Ludwig, Horst</au><au>Voisin, Philippe</au><au>Cremer, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>153-162</pages><issn>0196-4763</issn><eissn>1097-0320</eissn><abstract>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>9515714</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3<153::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-M</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-4763 |
ispartof | Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162 |
issn | 0196-4763 1097-0320 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741045 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | all‐human centromere probe Cells, Cultured Centromere Chromosome Aberrations Chromosomes, Human Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 DNA Probes fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH) Gamma Rays Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods Lymphocytes - radiation effects quantitative microscopy radiobiological dosimetry α‐satellite probe |
title | Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%E2%80%90FISH%20technique%20for%20rapid,%20simultaneous%20labeling%20of%20all%20human%20centromeres&rft.jtitle=Cytometry%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Durm,%20Markus&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=153-162&rft.issn=0196-4763&rft.eissn=1097-0320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3%3C153::AID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO;2-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79741045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79741045&rft_id=info:pmid/9515714&rfr_iscdi=true |