Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridiz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cytometry (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162
Hauptverfasser: Durm, Markus, Sorokine‐Durm, Irène, Haar, Frank‐Martin, Hausmann, Michael, Ludwig, Horst, Voisin, Philippe, Cremer, Christoph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 3
container_start_page 153
container_title Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 31
creator Durm, Markus
Sorokine‐Durm, Irène
Haar, Frank‐Martin
Hausmann, Michael
Ludwig, Horst
Voisin, Philippe
Cremer, Christoph
description Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3<153::AID-CYTO2>3.0.CO;2-M
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79741045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4462-f11087b51bd7bfb8a44d4b8e7f64a2f4ceda64bdf173473c90b5bdc31526343c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN9q1EAUxgdR6rb6CMJcSQvNeiYzyWy2opTo2kBLLlpRrw4zyYyNTJJ1JkF65yP4jD6JWbP2RkE4cOD8-b6PHyGvGSwZQPzi-LrIixMGmYyAx3DMsmwFHNgJZ2v-kiV8vT4v3kT5p5syfsWXsMzLszi6ekAW9z8PyQJYlkZCpvwxOQzhCwBkqeAH5CBLWCKZWJByo8Lw8_uPTXF9QQdT3XbN19FQ23vq1bapT2lo2tENqjP9GKhT2rim-0x7S5Vz9HZsVUcr0w2-b4034Ql5ZJUL5um-H5H3m7c3-UV0Wb4r8vPLqBIijSPLGKykTpiupbZ6pYSohV4ZaVOhYisqU6tU6NoyyYXkVQY60XXFWRKnXPCKH5Hns-7W91PgMGDbhMo4NwdFmUnBQCTT4Yf5sPJ9CN5Y3PqmVf4OGeAONeIONe6w4Q4b_kGNfCqcUCNOqPE36mkAmJcY49Wk_GwfYdStqe9192yn_cd5_61x5u4v2_-6_st0HvBf0NSbSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79741045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</creator><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-4763</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3&lt;153::AID-CYTO2&gt;3.0.CO;2-M</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9515714</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>all‐human centromere probe ; Cells, Cultured ; Centromere ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Chromosomes, Human ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1 ; DNA Probes ; fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH) ; Gamma Rays ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods ; Lymphocytes - radiation effects ; quantitative microscopy ; radiobiological dosimetry ; α‐satellite probe</subject><ispartof>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0320%2819980301%2931%3A3%3C153%3A%3AAID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F%28SICI%291097-0320%2819980301%2931%3A3%3C153%3A%3AAID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO%3B2-M$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9515714$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><title>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><description>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>all‐human centromere probe</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Centromere</subject><subject>Chromosome Aberrations</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human</subject><subject>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1</subject><subject>DNA Probes</subject><subject>fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH)</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</subject><subject>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</subject><subject>quantitative microscopy</subject><subject>radiobiological dosimetry</subject><subject>α‐satellite probe</subject><issn>0196-4763</issn><issn>1097-0320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN9q1EAUxgdR6rb6CMJcSQvNeiYzyWy2opTo2kBLLlpRrw4zyYyNTJJ1JkF65yP4jD6JWbP2RkE4cOD8-b6PHyGvGSwZQPzi-LrIixMGmYyAx3DMsmwFHNgJZ2v-kiV8vT4v3kT5p5syfsWXsMzLszi6ekAW9z8PyQJYlkZCpvwxOQzhCwBkqeAH5CBLWCKZWJByo8Lw8_uPTXF9QQdT3XbN19FQ23vq1bapT2lo2tENqjP9GKhT2rim-0x7S5Vz9HZsVUcr0w2-b4034Ql5ZJUL5um-H5H3m7c3-UV0Wb4r8vPLqBIijSPLGKykTpiupbZ6pYSohV4ZaVOhYisqU6tU6NoyyYXkVQY60XXFWRKnXPCKH5Hns-7W91PgMGDbhMo4NwdFmUnBQCTT4Yf5sPJ9CN5Y3PqmVf4OGeAONeIONe6w4Q4b_kGNfCqcUCNOqPE36mkAmJcY49Wk_GwfYdStqe9192yn_cd5_61x5u4v2_-6_st0HvBf0NSbSg</recordid><startdate>19980301</startdate><enddate>19980301</enddate><creator>Durm, Markus</creator><creator>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creator><creator>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creator><creator>Hausmann, Michael</creator><creator>Ludwig, Horst</creator><creator>Voisin, Philippe</creator><creator>Cremer, Christoph</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980301</creationdate><title>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</title><author>Durm, Markus ; Sorokine‐Durm, Irène ; Haar, Frank‐Martin ; Hausmann, Michael ; Ludwig, Horst ; Voisin, Philippe ; Cremer, Christoph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4462-f11087b51bd7bfb8a44d4b8e7f64a2f4ceda64bdf173473c90b5bdc31526343c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>all‐human centromere probe</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Centromere</topic><topic>Chromosome Aberrations</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human</topic><topic>Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1</topic><topic>DNA Probes</topic><topic>fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH)</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods</topic><topic>Lymphocytes - radiation effects</topic><topic>quantitative microscopy</topic><topic>radiobiological dosimetry</topic><topic>α‐satellite probe</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Durm, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haar, Frank‐Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hausmann, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ludwig, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voisin, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cremer, Christoph</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Durm, Markus</au><au>Sorokine‐Durm, Irène</au><au>Haar, Frank‐Martin</au><au>Hausmann, Michael</au><au>Ludwig, Horst</au><au>Voisin, Philippe</au><au>Cremer, Christoph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres</atitle><jtitle>Cytometry (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cytometry</addtitle><date>1998-03-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>153-162</pages><issn>0196-4763</issn><eissn>1097-0320</eissn><abstract>Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has become a powerful tool in chromosome analysis. This report describes the systematic optimization of the Fast‐FISH technique for centromere labeling of human metaphase chromosomes for radiobiological dosimetry purposes. For the present study, the hybridization conditions and the efficiency of two commercially available α‐satellite DNA probes were compared (“human chromosome 1 specific”, Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD, vs. “all‐human chromosomes specific”, Boehringer‐Mannheim, Germany). These probes were hybridized to human lymphocyte metaphase plates by using a hybridization buffer without formamide and without any other equivalent denaturing chemical agents. The results indicate the suitability of the method for automated image analysis on the basis of thresholding. The optimal conditions concerning hybridization time and temperature were determined by a systematic quantitative evaluation of the fluorescent labeling sites after the hybridization procedures. Under defined “low stringency” conditions, we found that the “human chromosome 1 specific” DNA probe labeled not only the centromere of the human chromosome 1 but also the other human centromeres in the same way as the “all‐human chromosome specific” DNA probe. The optimized conditions to complete all centromere labeling were applied to the detection of dicentric chromosomes on irradiated human lymphocyte samples (γ‐rays of 60Co source, 0.5 Gy/min, for doses of 1, 3, and 4 Gy). The yield of dicentrics was determined after Fast‐FISH and compared with results obtained after Giemsa staining. These results are very compatible and indicate that, because of its simplicity, this optimized Fast‐FISH procedure would be useful for fast screening purposes in biological dosimetry after accidental overexposure. Cytometry 31:153–162, 1998. © 1998 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>9515714</pmid><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3&lt;153::AID-CYTO2&gt;3.0.CO;2-M</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-4763
ispartof Cytometry (New York, N.Y.), 1998-03, Vol.31 (3), p.153-162
issn 0196-4763
1097-0320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79741045
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects all‐human centromere probe
Cells, Cultured
Centromere
Chromosome Aberrations
Chromosomes, Human
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 1
DNA Probes
fast fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fast‐FISH)
Gamma Rays
Humans
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence - methods
Lymphocytes - radiation effects
quantitative microscopy
radiobiological dosimetry
α‐satellite probe
title Fast‐FISH technique for rapid, simultaneous labeling of all human centromeres
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T10%3A20%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fast%E2%80%90FISH%20technique%20for%20rapid,%20simultaneous%20labeling%20of%20all%20human%20centromeres&rft.jtitle=Cytometry%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Durm,%20Markus&rft.date=1998-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=153-162&rft.issn=0196-4763&rft.eissn=1097-0320&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19980301)31:3%3C153::AID-CYTO2%3E3.0.CO;2-M&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79741045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79741045&rft_id=info:pmid/9515714&rfr_iscdi=true