Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty

Purpose: To determine which factors affect the refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 38 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with naturally...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cataract and refractive surgery 1998-01, Vol.24 (1), p.35-41
Hauptverfasser: Ghiselli, Gary, Manche, Edward E., Maloney, Robert K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 41
container_issue 1
container_start_page 35
container_title Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
container_volume 24
creator Ghiselli, Gary
Manche, Edward E.
Maloney, Robert K.
description Purpose: To determine which factors affect the refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 38 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with naturally occurring hyperopia who had automated lamellar keratoplasty by one surgeon. Mean attempted correction was 3.80 diopters (D) (range of 1.50 to 6.00 D); 34 eyes were followed for 3 months. The effect of applanation lens diameter, keratometry, age, corneal thickness, absolute flap thickness in microns, thickness of the posterior lamellae in microns, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness were determined using multivariate linear regression. Results: With current nomograms, mean undercorrection 3 months after hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was 1.26 D ± 0.91 (SD); 14 of 34 eyes were within ± 1.00 D of the attempted correction. The best predictive factors of achieved correction were applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns, which accounted for 54% of the variability in outcome. Keratometry, corneal thickness, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness had no significant additional predictive value. Conclusion: The refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was primarily determined by applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns. Current nomograms suggest that flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness is a major determinant of effect, but this factor appears unimportant to the refractive effect of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. We hypothesize that it is slight swelling of the anterior corneal stroma rather than the bulging of the posterior cornea that causes the hyperopic correction in hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80072-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79719434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0886335098800722</els_id><sourcerecordid>79719434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99b569cce8b97e1919361173a5413192b80803301b835658dd7f496cbbae7e853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EKuXjJyBlQAiGgB3bsT0hqCggITEAs-U4FzAkdbATpP57XFp1Zbrhnvfu1YPQCcGXBJPy6gVLWeaUcnyu5IXEWBR5sYOmRAqaM46LXTTdIvvoIMZPjDErKJ-giWKKSSWm6HZu7OBDzNyiaUdYWLd4z4YPyPw4WN-l2WQfyx6C753NWtNB25qQfUEwg-9bE4flEdprTBvheDMP0dv87nX2kD893z_Obp5yS6UacqUqXiprQVZKAFFE0ZIQQQ1nhBJVVBJLTCkmlaS85LKuRcNUaavKgADJ6SE6W9_tg_8eIQ66c9Gu-izAj1ELJYhilCWQr0EbfIwBGt0H15mw1ATrlTv9506vxGgl9Z87XaTcyebBWHVQb1MbWWl_utmbaE3bBJN0xS1WEJb6koRdrzFIMn4cBB2tS2ahdgHsoGvv_inyC-VOilY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79719434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ghiselli, Gary ; Manche, Edward E. ; Maloney, Robert K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghiselli, Gary ; Manche, Edward E. ; Maloney, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To determine which factors affect the refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 38 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with naturally occurring hyperopia who had automated lamellar keratoplasty by one surgeon. Mean attempted correction was 3.80 diopters (D) (range of 1.50 to 6.00 D); 34 eyes were followed for 3 months. The effect of applanation lens diameter, keratometry, age, corneal thickness, absolute flap thickness in microns, thickness of the posterior lamellae in microns, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness were determined using multivariate linear regression. Results: With current nomograms, mean undercorrection 3 months after hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was 1.26 D ± 0.91 (SD); 14 of 34 eyes were within ± 1.00 D of the attempted correction. The best predictive factors of achieved correction were applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns, which accounted for 54% of the variability in outcome. Keratometry, corneal thickness, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness had no significant additional predictive value. Conclusion: The refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was primarily determined by applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns. Current nomograms suggest that flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness is a major determinant of effect, but this factor appears unimportant to the refractive effect of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. We hypothesize that it is slight swelling of the anterior corneal stroma rather than the bulging of the posterior cornea that causes the hyperopic correction in hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-3350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4502</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80072-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9494897</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCSUEV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cornea - physiopathology ; Cornea - surgery ; Corneal Transplantation ; Humans ; Hyperopia - physiopathology ; Hyperopia - surgery ; Lens, Crystalline - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Refraction, Ocular - physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the eye and orbit ; Surgical Flaps ; Treatment Outcome ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 1998-01, Vol.24 (1), p.35-41</ispartof><rights>1998 American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99b569cce8b97e1919361173a5413192b80803301b835658dd7f496cbbae7e853</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99b569cce8b97e1919361173a5413192b80803301b835658dd7f496cbbae7e853</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80072-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,4022,27922,27923,27924,45994,58549</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2144961$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9494897$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghiselli, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manche, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><title>Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty</title><title>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: To determine which factors affect the refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 38 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with naturally occurring hyperopia who had automated lamellar keratoplasty by one surgeon. Mean attempted correction was 3.80 diopters (D) (range of 1.50 to 6.00 D); 34 eyes were followed for 3 months. The effect of applanation lens diameter, keratometry, age, corneal thickness, absolute flap thickness in microns, thickness of the posterior lamellae in microns, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness were determined using multivariate linear regression. Results: With current nomograms, mean undercorrection 3 months after hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was 1.26 D ± 0.91 (SD); 14 of 34 eyes were within ± 1.00 D of the attempted correction. The best predictive factors of achieved correction were applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns, which accounted for 54% of the variability in outcome. Keratometry, corneal thickness, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness had no significant additional predictive value. Conclusion: The refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was primarily determined by applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns. Current nomograms suggest that flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness is a major determinant of effect, but this factor appears unimportant to the refractive effect of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. We hypothesize that it is slight swelling of the anterior corneal stroma rather than the bulging of the posterior cornea that causes the hyperopic correction in hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cornea - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cornea - surgery</subject><subject>Corneal Transplantation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hyperopia - surgery</subject><subject>Lens, Crystalline - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the eye and orbit</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0886-3350</issn><issn>1873-4502</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EKuXjJyBlQAiGgB3bsT0hqCggITEAs-U4FzAkdbATpP57XFp1Zbrhnvfu1YPQCcGXBJPy6gVLWeaUcnyu5IXEWBR5sYOmRAqaM46LXTTdIvvoIMZPjDErKJ-giWKKSSWm6HZu7OBDzNyiaUdYWLd4z4YPyPw4WN-l2WQfyx6C753NWtNB25qQfUEwg-9bE4flEdprTBvheDMP0dv87nX2kD893z_Obp5yS6UacqUqXiprQVZKAFFE0ZIQQQ1nhBJVVBJLTCkmlaS85LKuRcNUaavKgADJ6SE6W9_tg_8eIQ66c9Gu-izAj1ELJYhilCWQr0EbfIwBGt0H15mw1ATrlTv9506vxGgl9Z87XaTcyebBWHVQb1MbWWl_utmbaE3bBJN0xS1WEJb6koRdrzFIMn4cBB2tS2ahdgHsoGvv_inyC-VOilY</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Ghiselli, Gary</creator><creator>Manche, Edward E.</creator><creator>Maloney, Robert K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty</title><author>Ghiselli, Gary ; Manche, Edward E. ; Maloney, Robert K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99b569cce8b97e1919361173a5413192b80803301b835658dd7f496cbbae7e853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cornea - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cornea - surgery</topic><topic>Corneal Transplantation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hyperopia - surgery</topic><topic>Lens, Crystalline - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Refraction, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the eye and orbit</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghiselli, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manche, Edward E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maloney, Robert K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghiselli, Gary</au><au>Manche, Edward E.</au><au>Maloney, Robert K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Cataract Refract Surg</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>41</epage><pages>35-41</pages><issn>0886-3350</issn><eissn>1873-4502</eissn><coden>JCSUEV</coden><abstract>Purpose: To determine which factors affect the refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. Setting: Jules Stein Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. Methods: This retrospective study comprised 38 consecutive eyes of 25 patients with naturally occurring hyperopia who had automated lamellar keratoplasty by one surgeon. Mean attempted correction was 3.80 diopters (D) (range of 1.50 to 6.00 D); 34 eyes were followed for 3 months. The effect of applanation lens diameter, keratometry, age, corneal thickness, absolute flap thickness in microns, thickness of the posterior lamellae in microns, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness were determined using multivariate linear regression. Results: With current nomograms, mean undercorrection 3 months after hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was 1.26 D ± 0.91 (SD); 14 of 34 eyes were within ± 1.00 D of the attempted correction. The best predictive factors of achieved correction were applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns, which accounted for 54% of the variability in outcome. Keratometry, corneal thickness, and flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness had no significant additional predictive value. Conclusion: The refractive outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty was primarily determined by applanation lens diameter and absolute flap thickness in microns. Current nomograms suggest that flap thickness as a percentage of corneal thickness is a major determinant of effect, but this factor appears unimportant to the refractive effect of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty. We hypothesize that it is slight swelling of the anterior corneal stroma rather than the bulging of the posterior cornea that causes the hyperopic correction in hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9494897</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80072-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-3350
ispartof Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 1998-01, Vol.24 (1), p.35-41
issn 0886-3350
1873-4502
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79719434
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cornea - physiopathology
Cornea - surgery
Corneal Transplantation
Humans
Hyperopia - physiopathology
Hyperopia - surgery
Lens, Crystalline - physiology
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Refraction, Ocular - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the eye and orbit
Surgical Flaps
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity - physiology
title Factors influencing the outcome of hyperopic lamellar keratoplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A39%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Factors%20influencing%20the%20outcome%20of%20hyperopic%20lamellar%20keratoplasty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cataract%20and%20refractive%20surgery&rft.au=Ghiselli,%20Gary&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=41&rft.pages=35-41&rft.issn=0886-3350&rft.eissn=1873-4502&rft.coden=JCSUEV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0886-3350(98)80072-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79719434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79719434&rft_id=info:pmid/9494897&rft_els_id=S0886335098800722&rfr_iscdi=true