Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection

An eight-year study was conducted to define the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infection in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native (Native) breeds of sheep, and to determine if the Native sheep is more resistant to infection. For the initial three years, each breed grazed separate pastures where a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary parasitology 1998-01, Vol.74 (1), p.55-74
Hauptverfasser: Miller, J.E., Bahirathan, M., Lemarie, S.L., Hembry, F.G., Kearney, M.T., Barras, S.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Veterinary parasitology
container_volume 74
creator Miller, J.E.
Bahirathan, M.
Lemarie, S.L.
Hembry, F.G.
Kearney, M.T.
Barras, S.R.
description An eight-year study was conducted to define the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infection in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native (Native) breeds of sheep, and to determine if the Native sheep is more resistant to infection. For the initial three years, each breed grazed separate pastures where anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis. For the last five years, both breeds grazed concurrently; anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis for the first three years, and to all animals, when treatment criteria were met, for the last two years. The fecal egg count (FEC) and blood packed cell volume (PCV) were monitored, and tracer lamb nematode burdens were determined. Overall, FEC for both breeds increased in the spring (periparturient rise) for most years and in the summer for all years. Under separate grazing conditions, Native ewes and lambs had consistently lower infection levels than Suffolk ewes and lambs. During the haemonchosis season (June–September) each year, Suffolk ewe and lamb PCV decreased, and Native ewe and lamb PCV remained relatively stable. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 27 treatments for Suffolk and one for Native ewes; similarly for lambs, 13 for Suffolk and zero for Native. Tracer lambs grazed with their respective breed, and the FEC and mean total nematode burden corresponded with the pattern of infection for their respective breed. The predominant nematodes found in Suffolk and Native tracer lambs were Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp., respectively. Under concurrent grazing conditions, the same seasonal repeatable pattern of infection was present and was exhibited by both breeds, with the Native ewes and lambs being consistently and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower for FEC and higher for PCV. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 57 and zero treatments for Suffolk and Native ewes, respectively; for lambs, 46 and 11. Tracer lamb nematode burdens again corresponded to their respective breed pattern of infection, with H. contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. being predominant in Suffolk and Native lambs, respectively. Data from all tracer lambs showed a relatively low level of hypobiosis (H. contortus only), and, although there was no consistent hypobiosis season, the tendency was for a higher level to occur in the fall. These results showed that the classic repeatable seasonal pattern of gastrointestinal nematode infection occurr
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00094-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79716077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0304401797000940</els_id><sourcerecordid>79716077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-8ede38114934f544d334b2346aff98d1387e65a59384e01afab3bd6454353ade3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCoLIWfUMknBIeAvXbi5ITQqrRIq3IonC0nHu8OJHawnVb7p_iNuN1VOXIaS-9jxu8RcsHZB8548_GWCSYrybh616n3jLFOVuwZWfFWiWpd1-w5WT1RXpJXKf0sJMkadUbOOtkJwdmK_Lmc0cKEYQy7Aw2O7kzKMaDPkDJ6M1IPk8nBAp1NNAkzpomip7eLc2H8RY239GoZHd2EoqQ3JuMd0LQHmOk95j1NMwxYfGCa90WfaPA0wnjiLWmAOWOPI-YDzYFeG5iCH_ZLokPwOcRcXugdDBmDf01eODMmeHOa5-THl8vvm-tq--3q6-bzthqkkLlqwYJoOS-_lK6W0goh-7WQjXGuay0XrYKmNnUnWgmMG2d60dtG1lLUwhTtOXl79J1j-L2UKPSE5dJxNB7CkrTqFG-YUoVYH4lDDClFcHqOOJl40Jzph570Y0_6oQTdKf3Yk2ZFd3FasPQT2CfVqZh_uDNBm13EpG-2vOtaVozEuuCfjjiUFO4Qok4Dgh_AYixRaRvwPxf8BZ9kr94</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79716077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Miller, J.E. ; Bahirathan, M. ; Lemarie, S.L. ; Hembry, F.G. ; Kearney, M.T. ; Barras, S.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, J.E. ; Bahirathan, M. ; Lemarie, S.L. ; Hembry, F.G. ; Kearney, M.T. ; Barras, S.R.</creatorcontrib><description>An eight-year study was conducted to define the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infection in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native (Native) breeds of sheep, and to determine if the Native sheep is more resistant to infection. For the initial three years, each breed grazed separate pastures where anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis. For the last five years, both breeds grazed concurrently; anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis for the first three years, and to all animals, when treatment criteria were met, for the last two years. The fecal egg count (FEC) and blood packed cell volume (PCV) were monitored, and tracer lamb nematode burdens were determined. Overall, FEC for both breeds increased in the spring (periparturient rise) for most years and in the summer for all years. Under separate grazing conditions, Native ewes and lambs had consistently lower infection levels than Suffolk ewes and lambs. During the haemonchosis season (June–September) each year, Suffolk ewe and lamb PCV decreased, and Native ewe and lamb PCV remained relatively stable. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 27 treatments for Suffolk and one for Native ewes; similarly for lambs, 13 for Suffolk and zero for Native. Tracer lambs grazed with their respective breed, and the FEC and mean total nematode burden corresponded with the pattern of infection for their respective breed. The predominant nematodes found in Suffolk and Native tracer lambs were Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp., respectively. Under concurrent grazing conditions, the same seasonal repeatable pattern of infection was present and was exhibited by both breeds, with the Native ewes and lambs being consistently and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower for FEC and higher for PCV. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 57 and zero treatments for Suffolk and Native ewes, respectively; for lambs, 46 and 11. Tracer lamb nematode burdens again corresponded to their respective breed pattern of infection, with H. contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. being predominant in Suffolk and Native lambs, respectively. Data from all tracer lambs showed a relatively low level of hypobiosis (H. contortus only), and, although there was no consistent hypobiosis season, the tendency was for a higher level to occur in the fall. These results showed that the classic repeatable seasonal pattern of gastrointestinal nematode infection occurred in both breeds of sheep, and that Native sheep were more resistant to infection (specifically H. contortus) than Suffolk sheep.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0304-4017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00094-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9493310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal Feed ; Animals ; Anthelmintics - therapeutic use ; Blood Volume ; Disease Susceptibility ; EPIDEMIOLOGIA ; EPIDEMIOLOGIE ; EPIDEMIOLOGY ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - parasitology ; Gastrointestinal Diseases - veterinary ; Haemonchiasis - epidemiology ; Haemonchiasis - immunology ; Haemonchiasis - veterinary ; Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification ; HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS ; Immunity, Innate ; Incidence ; INFECCIONES POR NEMATODOS ; Louisiana - epidemiology ; Nematoda ; Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification ; NEMATODE INFECTIONS ; Nematode Infections - epidemiology ; Nematode Infections - immunology ; Nematode Infections - veterinary ; NEMATODOSE ; OVIN ; OVINOS ; Parasite Egg Count ; PEST RESISTANCE ; Resistance ; RESISTANCE AUX ORGANISMES NUISIBLES ; RESISTENCIA A LAS PLAGAS ; Seasons ; SHEEP ; Sheep Diseases - epidemiology ; Species Specificity</subject><ispartof>Veterinary parasitology, 1998-01, Vol.74 (1), p.55-74</ispartof><rights>1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-8ede38114934f544d334b2346aff98d1387e65a59384e01afab3bd6454353ade3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-8ede38114934f544d334b2346aff98d1387e65a59384e01afab3bd6454353ade3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00094-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9493310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahirathan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemarie, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hembry, F.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barras, S.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection</title><title>Veterinary parasitology</title><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><description>An eight-year study was conducted to define the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infection in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native (Native) breeds of sheep, and to determine if the Native sheep is more resistant to infection. For the initial three years, each breed grazed separate pastures where anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis. For the last five years, both breeds grazed concurrently; anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis for the first three years, and to all animals, when treatment criteria were met, for the last two years. The fecal egg count (FEC) and blood packed cell volume (PCV) were monitored, and tracer lamb nematode burdens were determined. Overall, FEC for both breeds increased in the spring (periparturient rise) for most years and in the summer for all years. Under separate grazing conditions, Native ewes and lambs had consistently lower infection levels than Suffolk ewes and lambs. During the haemonchosis season (June–September) each year, Suffolk ewe and lamb PCV decreased, and Native ewe and lamb PCV remained relatively stable. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 27 treatments for Suffolk and one for Native ewes; similarly for lambs, 13 for Suffolk and zero for Native. Tracer lambs grazed with their respective breed, and the FEC and mean total nematode burden corresponded with the pattern of infection for their respective breed. The predominant nematodes found in Suffolk and Native tracer lambs were Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp., respectively. Under concurrent grazing conditions, the same seasonal repeatable pattern of infection was present and was exhibited by both breeds, with the Native ewes and lambs being consistently and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower for FEC and higher for PCV. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 57 and zero treatments for Suffolk and Native ewes, respectively; for lambs, 46 and 11. Tracer lamb nematode burdens again corresponded to their respective breed pattern of infection, with H. contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. being predominant in Suffolk and Native lambs, respectively. Data from all tracer lambs showed a relatively low level of hypobiosis (H. contortus only), and, although there was no consistent hypobiosis season, the tendency was for a higher level to occur in the fall. These results showed that the classic repeatable seasonal pattern of gastrointestinal nematode infection occurred in both breeds of sheep, and that Native sheep were more resistant to infection (specifically H. contortus) than Suffolk sheep.</description><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Blood Volume</subject><subject>Disease Susceptibility</subject><subject>EPIDEMIOLOGIA</subject><subject>EPIDEMIOLOGIE</subject><subject>EPIDEMIOLOGY</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Diseases - veterinary</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - immunology</subject><subject>Haemonchiasis - veterinary</subject><subject>Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS</subject><subject>Immunity, Innate</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>INFECCIONES POR NEMATODOS</subject><subject>Louisiana - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nematoda</subject><subject>Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>NEMATODE INFECTIONS</subject><subject>Nematode Infections - epidemiology</subject><subject>Nematode Infections - immunology</subject><subject>Nematode Infections - veterinary</subject><subject>NEMATODOSE</subject><subject>OVIN</subject><subject>OVINOS</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count</subject><subject>PEST RESISTANCE</subject><subject>Resistance</subject><subject>RESISTANCE AUX ORGANISMES NUISIBLES</subject><subject>RESISTENCIA A LAS PLAGAS</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>SHEEP</subject><subject>Sheep Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><issn>0304-4017</issn><issn>1873-2550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUU1v1DAQtRCoLIWfUMknBIeAvXbi5ITQqrRIq3IonC0nHu8OJHawnVb7p_iNuN1VOXIaS-9jxu8RcsHZB8548_GWCSYrybh616n3jLFOVuwZWfFWiWpd1-w5WT1RXpJXKf0sJMkadUbOOtkJwdmK_Lmc0cKEYQy7Aw2O7kzKMaDPkDJ6M1IPk8nBAp1NNAkzpomip7eLc2H8RY239GoZHd2EoqQ3JuMd0LQHmOk95j1NMwxYfGCa90WfaPA0wnjiLWmAOWOPI-YDzYFeG5iCH_ZLokPwOcRcXugdDBmDf01eODMmeHOa5-THl8vvm-tq--3q6-bzthqkkLlqwYJoOS-_lK6W0goh-7WQjXGuay0XrYKmNnUnWgmMG2d60dtG1lLUwhTtOXl79J1j-L2UKPSE5dJxNB7CkrTqFG-YUoVYH4lDDClFcHqOOJl40Jzph570Y0_6oQTdKf3Yk2ZFd3FasPQT2CfVqZh_uDNBm13EpG-2vOtaVozEuuCfjjiUFO4Qok4Dgh_AYixRaRvwPxf8BZ9kr94</recordid><startdate>19980115</startdate><enddate>19980115</enddate><creator>Miller, J.E.</creator><creator>Bahirathan, M.</creator><creator>Lemarie, S.L.</creator><creator>Hembry, F.G.</creator><creator>Kearney, M.T.</creator><creator>Barras, S.R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980115</creationdate><title>Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection</title><author>Miller, J.E. ; Bahirathan, M. ; Lemarie, S.L. ; Hembry, F.G. ; Kearney, M.T. ; Barras, S.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-8ede38114934f544d334b2346aff98d1387e65a59384e01afab3bd6454353ade3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthelmintics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Blood Volume</topic><topic>Disease Susceptibility</topic><topic>EPIDEMIOLOGIA</topic><topic>EPIDEMIOLOGIE</topic><topic>EPIDEMIOLOGY</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Diseases - veterinary</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - immunology</topic><topic>Haemonchiasis - veterinary</topic><topic>Haemonchus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS</topic><topic>Immunity, Innate</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>INFECCIONES POR NEMATODOS</topic><topic>Louisiana - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nematoda</topic><topic>Nematoda - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>NEMATODE INFECTIONS</topic><topic>Nematode Infections - epidemiology</topic><topic>Nematode Infections - immunology</topic><topic>Nematode Infections - veterinary</topic><topic>NEMATODOSE</topic><topic>OVIN</topic><topic>OVINOS</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count</topic><topic>PEST RESISTANCE</topic><topic>Resistance</topic><topic>RESISTANCE AUX ORGANISMES NUISIBLES</topic><topic>RESISTENCIA A LAS PLAGAS</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>SHEEP</topic><topic>Sheep Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, J.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahirathan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemarie, S.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hembry, F.G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kearney, M.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barras, S.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, J.E.</au><au>Bahirathan, M.</au><au>Lemarie, S.L.</au><au>Hembry, F.G.</au><au>Kearney, M.T.</au><au>Barras, S.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary parasitology</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Parasitol</addtitle><date>1998-01-15</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>55-74</pages><issn>0304-4017</issn><eissn>1873-2550</eissn><abstract>An eight-year study was conducted to define the epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode infection in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native (Native) breeds of sheep, and to determine if the Native sheep is more resistant to infection. For the initial three years, each breed grazed separate pastures where anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis. For the last five years, both breeds grazed concurrently; anthelmintic treatments were administered to individual animals on a salvage basis for the first three years, and to all animals, when treatment criteria were met, for the last two years. The fecal egg count (FEC) and blood packed cell volume (PCV) were monitored, and tracer lamb nematode burdens were determined. Overall, FEC for both breeds increased in the spring (periparturient rise) for most years and in the summer for all years. Under separate grazing conditions, Native ewes and lambs had consistently lower infection levels than Suffolk ewes and lambs. During the haemonchosis season (June–September) each year, Suffolk ewe and lamb PCV decreased, and Native ewe and lamb PCV remained relatively stable. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 27 treatments for Suffolk and one for Native ewes; similarly for lambs, 13 for Suffolk and zero for Native. Tracer lambs grazed with their respective breed, and the FEC and mean total nematode burden corresponded with the pattern of infection for their respective breed. The predominant nematodes found in Suffolk and Native tracer lambs were Haemonchus contortus and Trichostrongylus spp., respectively. Under concurrent grazing conditions, the same seasonal repeatable pattern of infection was present and was exhibited by both breeds, with the Native ewes and lambs being consistently and significantly (p ≤ 0.05) lower for FEC and higher for PCV. The salvage treatment protocol resulted in 57 and zero treatments for Suffolk and Native ewes, respectively; for lambs, 46 and 11. Tracer lamb nematode burdens again corresponded to their respective breed pattern of infection, with H. contortus and Trichostrongylus spp. being predominant in Suffolk and Native lambs, respectively. Data from all tracer lambs showed a relatively low level of hypobiosis (H. contortus only), and, although there was no consistent hypobiosis season, the tendency was for a higher level to occur in the fall. These results showed that the classic repeatable seasonal pattern of gastrointestinal nematode infection occurred in both breeds of sheep, and that Native sheep were more resistant to infection (specifically H. contortus) than Suffolk sheep.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>9493310</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00094-0</doi><tpages>20</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0304-4017
ispartof Veterinary parasitology, 1998-01, Vol.74 (1), p.55-74
issn 0304-4017
1873-2550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79716077
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal Feed
Animals
Anthelmintics - therapeutic use
Blood Volume
Disease Susceptibility
EPIDEMIOLOGIA
EPIDEMIOLOGIE
EPIDEMIOLOGY
Female
Gastrointestinal Diseases - epidemiology
Gastrointestinal Diseases - parasitology
Gastrointestinal Diseases - veterinary
Haemonchiasis - epidemiology
Haemonchiasis - immunology
Haemonchiasis - veterinary
Haemonchus - isolation & purification
HAEMONCHUS CONTORTUS
Immunity, Innate
Incidence
INFECCIONES POR NEMATODOS
Louisiana - epidemiology
Nematoda
Nematoda - isolation & purification
NEMATODE INFECTIONS
Nematode Infections - epidemiology
Nematode Infections - immunology
Nematode Infections - veterinary
NEMATODOSE
OVIN
OVINOS
Parasite Egg Count
PEST RESISTANCE
Resistance
RESISTANCE AUX ORGANISMES NUISIBLES
RESISTENCIA A LAS PLAGAS
Seasons
SHEEP
Sheep Diseases - epidemiology
Species Specificity
title Epidemiology of gastrointestinal nematode parasitism in Suffolk and Gulf Coast Native sheep with special emphasis on relative susceptibility to Haemonchus contortus infection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A29%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Epidemiology%20of%20gastrointestinal%20nematode%20parasitism%20in%20Suffolk%20and%20Gulf%20Coast%20Native%20sheep%20with%20special%20emphasis%20on%20relative%20susceptibility%20to%20Haemonchus%20contortus%20infection&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20parasitology&rft.au=Miller,%20J.E.&rft.date=1998-01-15&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=55-74&rft.issn=0304-4017&rft.eissn=1873-2550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00094-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79716077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79716077&rft_id=info:pmid/9493310&rft_els_id=S0304401797000940&rfr_iscdi=true