Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I

From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1979, 425 cases of endometrial carcinoma, FIGO stage I, were treated at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan. Three different surgical approaches were used: total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 1990-04, Vol.37 (1), p.6-8
Hauptverfasser: Candiani, G.B., Belloni, C., Maggi, R., Colombo, G., Frigoli, A., Carinelli, S.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 1
container_start_page 6
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 37
creator Candiani, G.B.
Belloni, C.
Maggi, R.
Colombo, G.
Frigoli, A.
Carinelli, S.G.
description From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1979, 425 cases of endometrial carcinoma, FIGO stage I, were treated at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan. Three different surgical approaches were used: total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and selective pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 245 women, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in 100, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 80. Five-year survival was evaluated as a function of risk factors (histological grade, depth of myometrial invasion, metastatic nodes) in the three groups of patients, and we conclude that lymphadenectomy is useful for prognostic purposes but does not confer a therapeutic benefit.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90297-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79709078</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>009082589090297X</els_id><sourcerecordid>79709078</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff9296f8e6113be0ccf0fe3d083fe408076adeb2c3a0fa026bcf7d0a3e968a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KRJel_6CVfAHRQ8rYzibxBQkhKEhIvYDEzZo448VVPhbbQeq_r7e7gltPc5jnfTXzMPZVwA8BoroA0FA0ctWca_iuQeq6eP7EFgL0qqialT5gi3fkMzuO8TcAKBDyiB1JJVUlygVrb96wnzH5aeST4513jgKNicc5rL3FnuNmEya0LxS5H3l6IZ4CYRq2UE7Q2E0DpeAzanG0FDgmfuvXE48J18TvT9ihwz7Sl_1csqfbm8fru-Lh18_766uHwpYrlQrhnJa6cg1VQqiWwFoHjlQHjXJUQgN1hR210ioEhyCr1rq6A1SkqwZBLdnZrjff-zpTTGbw0VLf40jTHE2t66yjbjJY7kAbphgDObMJfsDwxwgwW7Vm681svZk8_6k1zzn2bd8_twN176G9y7w_3e8xZnEuZBs-fnRrJUuRX1uyyx1HWcabp2Ci9ZTNdT6QTaab_P8P-QvPkJaJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79709078</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Candiani, G.B. ; Belloni, C. ; Maggi, R. ; Colombo, G. ; Frigoli, A. ; Carinelli, S.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Candiani, G.B. ; Belloni, C. ; Maggi, R. ; Colombo, G. ; Frigoli, A. ; Carinelli, S.G.</creatorcontrib><description>From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1979, 425 cases of endometrial carcinoma, FIGO stage I, were treated at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan. Three different surgical approaches were used: total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and selective pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 245 women, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in 100, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 80. Five-year survival was evaluated as a function of risk factors (histological grade, depth of myometrial invasion, metastatic nodes) in the three groups of patients, and we conclude that lymphadenectomy is useful for prognostic purposes but does not confer a therapeutic benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0090-8258(90)90297-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2323614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GYNOA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Female genital diseases ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hysterectomy - methods ; Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods ; Lymph Node Excision ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness ; Neoplasm Staging ; Ovariectomy ; Risk Factors ; Survival Rate ; Tumors ; Uterine Neoplasms - mortality ; Uterine Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 1990-04, Vol.37 (1), p.6-8</ispartof><rights>1990</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff9296f8e6113be0ccf0fe3d083fe408076adeb2c3a0fa026bcf7d0a3e968a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff9296f8e6113be0ccf0fe3d083fe408076adeb2c3a0fa026bcf7d0a3e968a03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90297-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19324111$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2323614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Candiani, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloni, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carinelli, S.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1979, 425 cases of endometrial carcinoma, FIGO stage I, were treated at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan. Three different surgical approaches were used: total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and selective pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 245 women, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in 100, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 80. Five-year survival was evaluated as a function of risk factors (histological grade, depth of myometrial invasion, metastatic nodes) in the three groups of patients, and we conclude that lymphadenectomy is useful for prognostic purposes but does not confer a therapeutic benefit.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Female genital diseases</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Ovariectomy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhq0KRJel_6CVfAHRQ8rYzibxBQkhKEhIvYDEzZo448VVPhbbQeq_r7e7gltPc5jnfTXzMPZVwA8BoroA0FA0ctWca_iuQeq6eP7EFgL0qqialT5gi3fkMzuO8TcAKBDyiB1JJVUlygVrb96wnzH5aeST4513jgKNicc5rL3FnuNmEya0LxS5H3l6IZ4CYRq2UE7Q2E0DpeAzanG0FDgmfuvXE48J18TvT9ihwz7Sl_1csqfbm8fru-Lh18_766uHwpYrlQrhnJa6cg1VQqiWwFoHjlQHjXJUQgN1hR210ioEhyCr1rq6A1SkqwZBLdnZrjff-zpTTGbw0VLf40jTHE2t66yjbjJY7kAbphgDObMJfsDwxwgwW7Vm681svZk8_6k1zzn2bd8_twN176G9y7w_3e8xZnEuZBs-fnRrJUuRX1uyyx1HWcabp2Ci9ZTNdT6QTaab_P8P-QvPkJaJ</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>Candiani, G.B.</creator><creator>Belloni, C.</creator><creator>Maggi, R.</creator><creator>Colombo, G.</creator><creator>Frigoli, A.</creator><creator>Carinelli, S.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I</title><author>Candiani, G.B. ; Belloni, C. ; Maggi, R. ; Colombo, G. ; Frigoli, A. ; Carinelli, S.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-1ff9296f8e6113be0ccf0fe3d083fe408076adeb2c3a0fa026bcf7d0a3e968a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Female genital diseases</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Ovariectomy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Candiani, G.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Belloni, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maggi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombo, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frigoli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carinelli, S.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Candiani, G.B.</au><au>Belloni, C.</au><au>Maggi, R.</au><au>Colombo, G.</au><au>Frigoli, A.</au><au>Carinelli, S.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>6-8</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><coden>GYNOA3</coden><abstract>From January 1, 1970 to December 31, 1979, 425 cases of endometrial carcinoma, FIGO stage I, were treated at the First Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Milan. Three different surgical approaches were used: total abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and selective pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 245 women, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in 100, and vaginal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in 80. Five-year survival was evaluated as a function of risk factors (histological grade, depth of myometrial invasion, metastatic nodes) in the three groups of patients, and we conclude that lymphadenectomy is useful for prognostic purposes but does not confer a therapeutic benefit.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2323614</pmid><doi>10.1016/0090-8258(90)90297-X</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 1990-04, Vol.37 (1), p.6-8
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79709078
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Female genital diseases
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Hysterectomy - methods
Hysterectomy, Vaginal - methods
Lymph Node Excision
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness
Neoplasm Staging
Ovariectomy
Risk Factors
Survival Rate
Tumors
Uterine Neoplasms - mortality
Uterine Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Neoplasms - surgery
title Evaluation of different surgical approaches in the treatment of endometrial cancer at Figo stage I
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A22%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20different%20surgical%20approaches%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20endometrial%20cancer%20at%20Figo%20stage%20I&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Candiani,%20G.B.&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=6-8&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft.coden=GYNOA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0090-8258(90)90297-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79709078%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79709078&rft_id=info:pmid/2323614&rft_els_id=009082589090297X&rfr_iscdi=true