Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences

We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 1998-02, Vol.9 (1), p.48-54
Hauptverfasser: Stechmann, Alexandra, Schlegel, Martin, Lynn, Denis H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 54
container_issue 1
container_start_page 48
container_title Molecular phylogenetics and evolution
container_volume 9
creator Stechmann, Alexandra
Schlegel, Martin
Lynn, Denis H.
description We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features. The complete coding regions of the prostomes,Prorodon teresandColeps hirtus,and of the colpodean,Bursaria truncatella,were determined and compared to the database and the literature. The prostomes and colpodeans are strongly supported as monophyletic groups in all analyses. A sister-group relationship between prostomes and colpodeans is strongly supported by parsimony analysis and moderately supported by distance matrix analyses. There was no support for a close relationship between colpodeans and nassophoreans or between colpodeans and litostomes. In all analyses, these four classes branch late in the ciliate tree. This finding further supports the new view of ciliate phylogeny that so-called ancestral taxa, such as the “primitive” prostomes, are in fact derived and that so-called “highly evolved” groups, such as the heterotrichs, branch off very early in the ciliate tree.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/mpev.1997.0435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79700808</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1055790397904358</els_id><sourcerecordid>79700808</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3df9b9f7fee2384219cb74ac937c7040d933e7a4d08daa95cf73d2f3b61ac1e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EgvK4ckPyiVuKXcd1fKwqXlIFiMLZcuwNNXLiEDug_nsSteLGaVfamVnNh9AlJVNKyPymbuF7SqUUU5IzfoAmlEieSU7Z4bhznglJ2Ak6jfGTEEq55MfoWOZCziWbIPey2frwAQ0kZ_AreJ1caOLGtRGXkH4AGvzShZhCDVg3Fi-Db4MF3eCl804niPgNYgKLyy1e19p7vO7LvnEJd69PC7yGrx4aA_EcHVXaR7jYzzP0fnf7tnzIVs_3j8vFKjM54SljtpKlrEQFMGNFPqPSlCLXRjJhBMmJlYyB0LklhdVaclMJZmcVK-dUGzp4ztD1LrftwvA6JlW7aMB73UDooxJSEFKQYhBOd0Iz9IsdVKrtXK27raJEjWzVyFaNbNXIdjBc7ZP7sgb7J9_DHO7F7g5DvW8HnYrGjd2t68AkZYP7L_oXDruKkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79700808</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Stechmann, Alexandra ; Schlegel, Martin ; Lynn, Denis H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stechmann, Alexandra ; Schlegel, Martin ; Lynn, Denis H.</creatorcontrib><description>We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features. The complete coding regions of the prostomes,Prorodon teresandColeps hirtus,and of the colpodean,Bursaria truncatella,were determined and compared to the database and the literature. The prostomes and colpodeans are strongly supported as monophyletic groups in all analyses. A sister-group relationship between prostomes and colpodeans is strongly supported by parsimony analysis and moderately supported by distance matrix analyses. There was no support for a close relationship between colpodeans and nassophoreans or between colpodeans and litostomes. In all analyses, these four classes branch late in the ciliate tree. This finding further supports the new view of ciliate phylogeny that so-called ancestral taxa, such as the “primitive” prostomes, are in fact derived and that so-called “highly evolved” groups, such as the heterotrichs, branch off very early in the ciliate tree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1055-7903</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9513</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/mpev.1997.0435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9479693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Ciliophora - genetics ; Computational Biology ; Evolution, Molecular ; Molecular Sequence Data ; Phylogeny ; RNA, Ribosomal - genetics ; Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><ispartof>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 1998-02, Vol.9 (1), p.48-54</ispartof><rights>1998 Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3df9b9f7fee2384219cb74ac937c7040d933e7a4d08daa95cf73d2f3b61ac1e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3df9b9f7fee2384219cb74ac937c7040d933e7a4d08daa95cf73d2f3b61ac1e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1055790397904358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9479693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stechmann, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Denis H.</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences</title><title>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</title><addtitle>Mol Phylogenet Evol</addtitle><description>We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features. The complete coding regions of the prostomes,Prorodon teresandColeps hirtus,and of the colpodean,Bursaria truncatella,were determined and compared to the database and the literature. The prostomes and colpodeans are strongly supported as monophyletic groups in all analyses. A sister-group relationship between prostomes and colpodeans is strongly supported by parsimony analysis and moderately supported by distance matrix analyses. There was no support for a close relationship between colpodeans and nassophoreans or between colpodeans and litostomes. In all analyses, these four classes branch late in the ciliate tree. This finding further supports the new view of ciliate phylogeny that so-called ancestral taxa, such as the “primitive” prostomes, are in fact derived and that so-called “highly evolved” groups, such as the heterotrichs, branch off very early in the ciliate tree.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Ciliophora - genetics</subject><subject>Computational Biology</subject><subject>Evolution, Molecular</subject><subject>Molecular Sequence Data</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>RNA, Ribosomal - genetics</subject><subject>Sequence Analysis, DNA</subject><issn>1055-7903</issn><issn>1095-9513</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtPwzAQhC0EgvK4ckPyiVuKXcd1fKwqXlIFiMLZcuwNNXLiEDug_nsSteLGaVfamVnNh9AlJVNKyPymbuF7SqUUU5IzfoAmlEieSU7Z4bhznglJ2Ak6jfGTEEq55MfoWOZCziWbIPey2frwAQ0kZ_AreJ1caOLGtRGXkH4AGvzShZhCDVg3Fi-Db4MF3eCl804niPgNYgKLyy1e19p7vO7LvnEJd69PC7yGrx4aA_EcHVXaR7jYzzP0fnf7tnzIVs_3j8vFKjM54SljtpKlrEQFMGNFPqPSlCLXRjJhBMmJlYyB0LklhdVaclMJZmcVK-dUGzp4ztD1LrftwvA6JlW7aMB73UDooxJSEFKQYhBOd0Iz9IsdVKrtXK27raJEjWzVyFaNbNXIdjBc7ZP7sgb7J9_DHO7F7g5DvW8HnYrGjd2t68AkZYP7L_oXDruKkA</recordid><startdate>199802</startdate><enddate>199802</enddate><creator>Stechmann, Alexandra</creator><creator>Schlegel, Martin</creator><creator>Lynn, Denis H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199802</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences</title><author>Stechmann, Alexandra ; Schlegel, Martin ; Lynn, Denis H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-3df9b9f7fee2384219cb74ac937c7040d933e7a4d08daa95cf73d2f3b61ac1e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Ciliophora - genetics</topic><topic>Computational Biology</topic><topic>Evolution, Molecular</topic><topic>Molecular Sequence Data</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>RNA, Ribosomal - genetics</topic><topic>Sequence Analysis, DNA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stechmann, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Denis H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stechmann, Alexandra</au><au>Schlegel, Martin</au><au>Lynn, Denis H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences</atitle><jtitle>Molecular phylogenetics and evolution</jtitle><addtitle>Mol Phylogenet Evol</addtitle><date>1998-02</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>48</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>48-54</pages><issn>1055-7903</issn><eissn>1095-9513</eissn><abstract>We analyzed the phylogenetic relationships among the four ciliate classes, Prostomatea, Colpodea, Nassophorea, and Litostomatea, by small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequence comparison to test several phylogenetic hypotheses that had been proposed for these classes, based on ultrastructural features. The complete coding regions of the prostomes,Prorodon teresandColeps hirtus,and of the colpodean,Bursaria truncatella,were determined and compared to the database and the literature. The prostomes and colpodeans are strongly supported as monophyletic groups in all analyses. A sister-group relationship between prostomes and colpodeans is strongly supported by parsimony analysis and moderately supported by distance matrix analyses. There was no support for a close relationship between colpodeans and nassophoreans or between colpodeans and litostomes. In all analyses, these four classes branch late in the ciliate tree. This finding further supports the new view of ciliate phylogeny that so-called ancestral taxa, such as the “primitive” prostomes, are in fact derived and that so-called “highly evolved” groups, such as the heterotrichs, branch off very early in the ciliate tree.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9479693</pmid><doi>10.1006/mpev.1997.0435</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1055-7903
ispartof Molecular phylogenetics and evolution, 1998-02, Vol.9 (1), p.48-54
issn 1055-7903
1095-9513
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79700808
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Ciliophora - genetics
Computational Biology
Evolution, Molecular
Molecular Sequence Data
Phylogeny
RNA, Ribosomal - genetics
Sequence Analysis, DNA
title Phylogenetic Relationships between Prostome and Colpodean Ciliates Tested by Small Subunit rRNA Sequences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T16%3A14%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20Relationships%20between%20Prostome%20and%20Colpodean%20Ciliates%20Tested%20by%20Small%20Subunit%20rRNA%20Sequences&rft.jtitle=Molecular%20phylogenetics%20and%20evolution&rft.au=Stechmann,%20Alexandra&rft.date=1998-02&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=48-54&rft.issn=1055-7903&rft.eissn=1095-9513&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/mpev.1997.0435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79700808%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79700808&rft_id=info:pmid/9479693&rft_els_id=S1055790397904358&rfr_iscdi=true