Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function
The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1251 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1245 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | MOULTON, K. P MEDCALF, T LAZZARA, R |
description | The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79692102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79692102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOj72boQsxF1rXm0m7mTwBYIiug530hutts2YtKL_3o4zKK4uh_OdA_cQcshZznnJTxnPXR3zKc9VzoUqNsiEF0JlqpBmk0wYYybTUogdspvS6yhLqYttss1Lw0quJsTeR2yhHyLSD-z6WLuhgUhdaBcNftI2xMVLaMLzFz2jQFuIbxipD5E26Pt_kdTHwf0UQVdRP3Sur0O3T7Y8NAkP1nePPF1ePM6us9u7q5vZ-W3mlBZ9ViIIxQCm3M2N1mZecSW1BuGULEB7ZgDRg0NVOCHnfuqL0kkshZCsqhTIPXKy6l3E8D5g6m1bJ4dNAx2GIVltSiM4EyPIVqCLIaWI3i5iPf71ZTmzy00t43Z282Cn3Cq73HSMHK27h3mL1V9gNeLoH699SA4aH6FzdfrF1MgwbeQ3XCeBOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79692102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</creator><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><description>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1690614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Angiography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology ; Echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart - physiopathology ; Heart Ventricles ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4614079$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1690614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDCALF, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOj72boQsxF1rXm0m7mTwBYIiug530hutts2YtKL_3o4zKK4uh_OdA_cQcshZznnJTxnPXR3zKc9VzoUqNsiEF0JlqpBmk0wYYybTUogdspvS6yhLqYttss1Lw0quJsTeR2yhHyLSD-z6WLuhgUhdaBcNftI2xMVLaMLzFz2jQFuIbxipD5E26Pt_kdTHwf0UQVdRP3Sur0O3T7Y8NAkP1nePPF1ePM6us9u7q5vZ-W3mlBZ9ViIIxQCm3M2N1mZecSW1BuGULEB7ZgDRg0NVOCHnfuqL0kkshZCsqhTIPXKy6l3E8D5g6m1bJ4dNAx2GIVltSiM4EyPIVqCLIaWI3i5iPf71ZTmzy00t43Z282Cn3Cq73HSMHK27h3mL1V9gNeLoH699SA4aH6FzdfrF1MgwbeQ3XCeBOA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>MOULTON, K. P</creator><creator>MEDCALF, T</creator><creator>LAZZARA, R</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><author>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDCALF, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOULTON, K. P</au><au>MEDCALF, T</au><au>LAZZARA, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1251</epage><pages>1245-1251</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>1690614</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79692102 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Angiography Biological and medical sciences Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology Echocardiography Electrocardiography Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Heart - diagnostic imaging Heart - physiopathology Heart Ventricles Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Medical sciences Middle Aged Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Premature%20ventricular%20complex%20morphology%20:%20a%20marker%20for%20left%20ventricular%20structure%20and%20function&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=MOULTON,%20K.%20P&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1251&rft.pages=1245-1251&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79692102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79692102&rft_id=info:pmid/1690614&rfr_iscdi=true |