Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function

The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251
Hauptverfasser: MOULTON, K. P, MEDCALF, T, LAZZARA, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1251
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1245
container_title Circulation (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 81
creator MOULTON, K. P
MEDCALF, T
LAZZARA, R
description The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.
doi_str_mv 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79692102</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79692102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOj72boQsxF1rXm0m7mTwBYIiug530hutts2YtKL_3o4zKK4uh_OdA_cQcshZznnJTxnPXR3zKc9VzoUqNsiEF0JlqpBmk0wYYybTUogdspvS6yhLqYttss1Lw0quJsTeR2yhHyLSD-z6WLuhgUhdaBcNftI2xMVLaMLzFz2jQFuIbxipD5E26Pt_kdTHwf0UQVdRP3Sur0O3T7Y8NAkP1nePPF1ePM6us9u7q5vZ-W3mlBZ9ViIIxQCm3M2N1mZecSW1BuGULEB7ZgDRg0NVOCHnfuqL0kkshZCsqhTIPXKy6l3E8D5g6m1bJ4dNAx2GIVltSiM4EyPIVqCLIaWI3i5iPf71ZTmzy00t43Z282Cn3Cq73HSMHK27h3mL1V9gNeLoH699SA4aH6FzdfrF1MgwbeQ3XCeBOA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79692102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</creator><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><description>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1690614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Angiography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging ; Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology ; Echocardiography ; Electrocardiography ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart - physiopathology ; Heart Ventricles ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3687,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4614079$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1690614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDCALF, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Ventricles</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtLxDAUhYMoOj72boQsxF1rXm0m7mTwBYIiug530hutts2YtKL_3o4zKK4uh_OdA_cQcshZznnJTxnPXR3zKc9VzoUqNsiEF0JlqpBmk0wYYybTUogdspvS6yhLqYttss1Lw0quJsTeR2yhHyLSD-z6WLuhgUhdaBcNftI2xMVLaMLzFz2jQFuIbxipD5E26Pt_kdTHwf0UQVdRP3Sur0O3T7Y8NAkP1nePPF1ePM6us9u7q5vZ-W3mlBZ9ViIIxQCm3M2N1mZecSW1BuGULEB7ZgDRg0NVOCHnfuqL0kkshZCsqhTIPXKy6l3E8D5g6m1bJ4dNAx2GIVltSiM4EyPIVqCLIaWI3i5iPf71ZTmzy00t43Z282Cn3Cq73HSMHK27h3mL1V9gNeLoH699SA4aH6FzdfrF1MgwbeQ3XCeBOA</recordid><startdate>19900401</startdate><enddate>19900401</enddate><creator>MOULTON, K. P</creator><creator>MEDCALF, T</creator><creator>LAZZARA, R</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900401</creationdate><title>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</title><author>MOULTON, K. P ; MEDCALF, T ; LAZZARA, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-6ea240aa81cb9779bd14377a2c435a7f09aeeface45c23bf8f56c3e62230dd4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Ventricles</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MOULTON, K. P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEDCALF, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LAZZARA, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MOULTON, K. P</au><au>MEDCALF, T</au><au>LAZZARA, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1990-04-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1245</spage><epage>1251</epage><pages>1245-1251</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>The shape of a premature ventricular complex (PVC) might reflect the presence or absence of myocardial disease. To test this, 100 patients with a PVC on a 12-lead electrocardiogram at cardiac catheterization or nuclear angiography were classified according to PVC morphology. Group 1 (n = 50) had PVC QRS complexes with either smooth and uninterrupted contour or with narrow (less than 40 msec) notching. Group 2 (n = 50) demonstrated PVC with broad (greater than or equal to 40 msec) notching or shelves. Clinical, electrocardiographic and angiographic variables were assessed to define group differences. All patients had one or more etiological forms of heart disease none of which distinguished either group. Groups 1 and 2 differed with respect to a history of congestive heart failure (12% vs. 66%, p = 0.0004), dilated cardiomyopathy (2% vs. 38%, p = 0.0005), and the presence of mitral regurgitation (13% vs. 58%, p = 0.001), respectively. In group 1, 45 of 50 (90%) patients with a PVC had no notching. Patients in group 2 had greater PVC QRS duration as compared with patients in group 1 (181 +/- 6 vs. 134 +/- 3 msec, p = 0.0001). End-diastolic volume index (EDVI) (78 +/- 3 vs. 139 +/- 11 ml/m2, p = 0.0000) and ejection fraction (EF) (0.59 +/- 0.02 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.03, p = 0.0000) significantly discriminated between group 1 and 2, respectively.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>1690614</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0009-7322
ispartof Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1990-04, Vol.81 (4), p.1245-1251
issn 0009-7322
1524-4539
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79692102
source MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Angiography
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnosis
Cardiac Complexes, Premature - diagnostic imaging
Cardiac Complexes, Premature - physiopathology
Echocardiography
Electrocardiography
Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording
Heart - diagnostic imaging
Heart - physiopathology
Heart Ventricles
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Premature ventricular complex morphology : a marker for left ventricular structure and function
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T11%3A43%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Premature%20ventricular%20complex%20morphology%20:%20a%20marker%20for%20left%20ventricular%20structure%20and%20function&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=MOULTON,%20K.%20P&rft.date=1990-04-01&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1245&rft.epage=1251&rft.pages=1245-1251&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.cir.81.4.1245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79692102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79692102&rft_id=info:pmid/1690614&rfr_iscdi=true