Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses

PURPOSE: The term “regression dilution” describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of epidemiology 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.56-63
Hauptverfasser: Knuiman, Matthew W., Divitini, Mark L., Buzas, Jeffrey S., Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 56
container_title Annals of epidemiology
container_volume 8
creator Knuiman, Matthew W.
Divitini, Mark L.
Buzas, Jeffrey S.
Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.
description PURPOSE: The term “regression dilution” describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for “regression dilution” that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00107-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79680285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1047279797001075</els_id><sourcerecordid>16342027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-47dcb9f188171f76971a565babd6f008dda0d7d35f29e905748bcbaceb4a72013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKxDAQhoMonh9B2CvRi-qkbTrJlSzraUEQPFyHNJlKpIc1aYV9e7vuKt4JAzMw38wPH2MnHC448OLymUOOSYoKzxSeA3DARGyxfS4xS1IhxfY4_yB77CDGdwBAieku21V5IZQS-2w-de9D7Btq-0nVhckTvQWK0Xft5NrXQ78afDu5WXhHje_q7s1bU__Fpq2pl5HiEdupTB3peNMP2evtzcvsPnl4vJvPpg-JzRTvkxydLVXFpeTIKywUciMKUZrSFRWAdM6AQ5eJKlWkQGAuS1saS2VuMAWeHbLT9d9F6D4Gir1ufLRU16albogaVSEhleJfkBdZnkKKIyjWoA1djIEqvQi-MWGpOeiVa_3tWq9E6rG-XetVwMkmYCgbcr9XG7nj_mq9p1HHp6ego_XUWnI-kO216_w_CV9OH47m</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16342027</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Knuiman, Matthew W. ; Divitini, Mark L. ; Buzas, Jeffrey S. ; Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Knuiman, Matthew W. ; Divitini, Mark L. ; Buzas, Jeffrey S. ; Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: The term “regression dilution” describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for “regression dilution” that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1047-2797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2585</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00107-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9465995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Bias ; Busselton Study ; Cardiovascular Disease ; Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology ; Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality ; Cohort Study ; Confidence Intervals ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Epidemiologic Methods ; Health Surveys ; Humans ; Intraclass Correlation ; Linear Models ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Measurement Error ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Regression Dilution ; Reliability Coefficient ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk ; Risk Factors ; Western Australia - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Annals of epidemiology, 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.56-63</ispartof><rights>1998 Elsevier Science Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-47dcb9f188171f76971a565babd6f008dda0d7d35f29e905748bcbaceb4a72013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-47dcb9f188171f76971a565babd6f008dda0d7d35f29e905748bcbaceb4a72013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00107-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9465995$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Knuiman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divitini, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzas, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses</title><title>Annals of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Ann Epidemiol</addtitle><description>PURPOSE: The term “regression dilution” describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for “regression dilution” that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Busselton Study</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Disease</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</subject><subject>Cohort Study</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Methods</subject><subject>Health Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intraclass Correlation</subject><subject>Linear Models</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Measurement Error</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Regression Dilution</subject><subject>Reliability Coefficient</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Western Australia - epidemiology</subject><issn>1047-2797</issn><issn>1873-2585</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKxDAQhoMonh9B2CvRi-qkbTrJlSzraUEQPFyHNJlKpIc1aYV9e7vuKt4JAzMw38wPH2MnHC448OLymUOOSYoKzxSeA3DARGyxfS4xS1IhxfY4_yB77CDGdwBAieku21V5IZQS-2w-de9D7Btq-0nVhckTvQWK0Xft5NrXQ78afDu5WXhHje_q7s1bU__Fpq2pl5HiEdupTB3peNMP2evtzcvsPnl4vJvPpg-JzRTvkxydLVXFpeTIKywUciMKUZrSFRWAdM6AQ5eJKlWkQGAuS1saS2VuMAWeHbLT9d9F6D4Gir1ufLRU16albogaVSEhleJfkBdZnkKKIyjWoA1djIEqvQi-MWGpOeiVa_3tWq9E6rG-XetVwMkmYCgbcr9XG7nj_mq9p1HHp6ego_XUWnI-kO216_w_CV9OH47m</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Knuiman, Matthew W.</creator><creator>Divitini, Mark L.</creator><creator>Buzas, Jeffrey S.</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses</title><author>Knuiman, Matthew W. ; Divitini, Mark L. ; Buzas, Jeffrey S. ; Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-47dcb9f188171f76971a565babd6f008dda0d7d35f29e905748bcbaceb4a72013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Busselton Study</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Disease</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality</topic><topic>Cohort Study</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Methods</topic><topic>Health Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intraclass Correlation</topic><topic>Linear Models</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Measurement Error</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Regression Dilution</topic><topic>Reliability Coefficient</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Western Australia - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Knuiman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Divitini, Mark L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzas, Jeffrey S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Knuiman, Matthew W.</au><au>Divitini, Mark L.</au><au>Buzas, Jeffrey S.</au><au>Fitzgerald, Patrick E.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses</atitle><jtitle>Annals of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>56</spage><epage>63</epage><pages>56-63</pages><issn>1047-2797</issn><eissn>1873-2585</eissn><abstract>PURPOSE: The term “regression dilution” describes the dilution/attenuation in a regression coefficient that occurs when a single measured value of a covariate is used instead of the usual or average value over a period of time. This paper reviews the current knowledge concerning a simple method of adjusting for regression dilution in single and multiple covariate situations and illustrates the adjustment procedure. METHODS: Formulation of the regression dilution problem as a measurement error problem allows existing measurement error theory to be applied to developing methods of adjustment for regression dilution. This theory leads to a precise method of adjustment for linear regression and approximate methods for logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. The method involves obtaining the naive estimates of coefficients by assuming that covariates are not measured with error, and then adjusting these coefficients using reliability estimates for the covariates. Methods for estimating the reliability of covariates from the reliability and main study data and a method for the calculation of standard errors and confidence intervals for adjusted coefficients are described. RESULTS: An illustration involving logistic regression analysis of risk factors for death from cardiovascular disease based on cohort and reliability data from the Busselton Health Study shows that the different methods for estimating the adjustment factors give very similar adjusted estimates of coefficients, that univariate adjustment procedures may lead to inappropriate adjustments in multiple covariate situations, whether or not other covariates have intra-individual variation, and when the reliability study is moderate to large, the precision of the estimates of reliability coefficients has little impact on the standard errors of adjusted regression coefficients. CONCLUSIONS: The simple method of adjusting regression coefficients for “regression dilution” that arises out of measurement error theory is applicable to many epidemiological settings and is easily implemented. The choice of method to estimate the reliability coefficient has little impact on the results. The practice of applying univariate adjustments in multiple covariate situations is not recommended.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9465995</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00107-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1047-2797
ispartof Annals of epidemiology, 1998-01, Vol.8 (1), p.56-63
issn 1047-2797
1873-2585
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79680285
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Analysis of Variance
Bias
Busselton Study
Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiovascular Diseases - etiology
Cardiovascular Diseases - mortality
Cohort Study
Confidence Intervals
Cross-Sectional Studies
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Epidemiologic Methods
Health Surveys
Humans
Intraclass Correlation
Linear Models
Logistic Models
Male
Measurement Error
Proportional Hazards Models
Regression Dilution
Reliability Coefficient
Reproducibility of Results
Risk
Risk Factors
Western Australia - epidemiology
title Adjustment for Regression Dilution in Epidemiological Regression Analyses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A07%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Adjustment%20for%20Regression%20Dilution%20in%20Epidemiological%20Regression%20Analyses&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Knuiman,%20Matthew%20W.&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=56&rft.epage=63&rft.pages=56-63&rft.issn=1047-2797&rft.eissn=1873-2585&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00107-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16342027%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16342027&rft_id=info:pmid/9465995&rft_els_id=S1047279797001075&rfr_iscdi=true