The discrimination of patient-generated and randomly generated MMPIs

A discriminant analysis was applied to 34 randomly generated and 34 patient-generated Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) profiles. The discriminant was able to differentiate the two sets at greater than 97% accuracy. A cross validation based on derived unstandardized canonical discri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personality assessment 1990-03, Vol.54 (1-2), p.24-29
Hauptverfasser: CARLIN, A. S, HEWITT, P. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A discriminant analysis was applied to 34 randomly generated and 34 patient-generated Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) profiles. The discriminant was able to differentiate the two sets at greater than 97% accuracy. A cross validation based on derived unstandardized canonical discriminant functions was carried out on an additional 10 random and 10 patient MMPIs. It attained 95% accuracy. Eight experienced clinical psychologists attained less than 70% accuracy--six of the eight did no better than chance. The importance of including actuarial data in validity judgments was discussed.
ISSN:0022-3891
1532-7752
DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5401&2_3