What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study

Metallic tapes have been shown to protect combustible endotracheal tubes from the CO2 laser; however, no adequate means of protecting such tubes from the Nd-YAG laser has yet been found. In this investigation, five different metallic tapes were evaluated as protection for red rubber endotracheal tub...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 1990-03, Vol.72 (3), p.553-555
Hauptverfasser:	SOSIS, M, DILLON, F
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesia: equipment, devices Biological and medical sciences Equipment Safety Evaluation Studies as Topic Fires - prevention & control Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Laser Therapy Lasers - adverse effects Medical sciences
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	555
container_issue	3
container_start_page	553
container_title	Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume	72
creator	SOSIS, M DILLON, F
description	Metallic tapes have been shown to protect combustible endotracheal tubes from the CO2 laser; however, no adequate means of protecting such tubes from the Nd-YAG laser has yet been found. In this investigation, five different metallic tapes were evaluated as protection for red rubber endotracheal tubes from an Nd-YAG laser set to 50 W. Radio Shack no. 44-1155 and 3M no. 1430 were quickly perforated by the laser. Laser contact with the adhesive side of 3M no. 433 resulted in combustion. The nonadhesive side of the Venture copper tape was not affected by the laser; however, when its adhesive side was struck, a fire occurred. 3M no. 425 tape provided the best protection: no effect was seen when the laser was aimed at its nonadhesive side for 1 min, with only smoking of the tape evident when its adhesive side was tested. Finally, 3M no. 425 and Venture copper foil tapes were shown to be resistant to an Nd-YAG laser set to 110 watts in an atmosphere of 98% O2.
doi_str_mv	10.1097/00000542-199003000-00025
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79661932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79661932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-808750d295e36de33e3a4bfee9500298044d2c0af6b1ad54a8493d583dca83b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UNtKxDAQDaKs6-UThDyIb9VcmjZ5kkV0FURfFPGpTJOpW-m2a5IK-_dmdd3AkJk5Z26HEMrZJWemvGKbp3KRcWMYkynIkgm1R6ZcCZ1xXqp9Mk05mUkmxCE5CuEzhaWSekImQvIElVPSvy0g0jbQuEAaoMEQaTO0HY2wwuR5ir0boge7QEjZsUa68kNEG9uhp270bf9Bn1z2PpvTDgJ6Gkb_gX59TWfUDssVeIjtd2oeR7c-IQcNdAFPt_8xeb27fbm5zx6f5w83s8fM5jqPmWa6VMwJo1AWDqVECXndIBqVrjSa5bkTlkFT1BycykHnRjqlpbOgZW3kMbn465t2_RrTUdWyDRa7DnocxlCVpii4kSIR9R_R-iEEj0218u0S_LrirNpIXf1LXe2krn6lTqVn2xljvUS3K9xqm_DzLQ7BQtd46G0bdrRCl6xMG_wA62uGNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79661932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>SOSIS, M ; DILLON, F</creator><creatorcontrib>SOSIS, M ; DILLON, F</creatorcontrib><description>Metallic tapes have been shown to protect combustible endotracheal tubes from the CO2 laser; however, no adequate means of protecting such tubes from the Nd-YAG laser has yet been found. In this investigation, five different metallic tapes were evaluated as protection for red rubber endotracheal tubes from an Nd-YAG laser set to 50 W. Radio Shack no. 44-1155 and 3M no. 1430 were quickly perforated by the laser. Laser contact with the adhesive side of 3M no. 433 resulted in combustion. The nonadhesive side of the Venture copper tape was not affected by the laser; however, when its adhesive side was struck, a fire occurred. 3M no. 425 tape provided the best protection: no effect was seen when the laser was aimed at its nonadhesive side for 1 min, with only smoking of the tape evident when its adhesive side was tested. Finally, 3M no. 425 and Venture copper foil tapes were shown to be resistant to an Nd-YAG laser set to 110 watts in an atmosphere of 98% O2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199003000-00025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2310037</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthesia: equipment, devices ; Biological and medical sciences ; Equipment Safety ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Fires - prevention & control ; Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation ; Laser Therapy ; Lasers - adverse effects ; Medical sciences</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1990-03, Vol.72 (3), p.553-555</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-808750d295e36de33e3a4bfee9500298044d2c0af6b1ad54a8493d583dca83b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=6870732$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2310037$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>SOSIS, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILLON, F</creatorcontrib><title>What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>Metallic tapes have been shown to protect combustible endotracheal tubes from the CO2 laser; however, no adequate means of protecting such tubes from the Nd-YAG laser has yet been found. In this investigation, five different metallic tapes were evaluated as protection for red rubber endotracheal tubes from an Nd-YAG laser set to 50 W. Radio Shack no. 44-1155 and 3M no. 1430 were quickly perforated by the laser. Laser contact with the adhesive side of 3M no. 433 resulted in combustion. The nonadhesive side of the Venture copper tape was not affected by the laser; however, when its adhesive side was struck, a fire occurred. 3M no. 425 tape provided the best protection: no effect was seen when the laser was aimed at its nonadhesive side for 1 min, with only smoking of the tape evident when its adhesive side was tested. Finally, 3M no. 425 and Venture copper foil tapes were shown to be resistant to an Nd-YAG laser set to 110 watts in an atmosphere of 98% O2.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Equipment Safety</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Fires - prevention & control</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Laser Therapy</subject><subject>Lasers - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UNtKxDAQDaKs6-UThDyIb9VcmjZ5kkV0FURfFPGpTJOpW-m2a5IK-_dmdd3AkJk5Z26HEMrZJWemvGKbp3KRcWMYkynIkgm1R6ZcCZ1xXqp9Mk05mUkmxCE5CuEzhaWSekImQvIElVPSvy0g0jbQuEAaoMEQaTO0HY2wwuR5ir0boge7QEjZsUa68kNEG9uhp270bf9Bn1z2PpvTDgJ6Gkb_gX59TWfUDssVeIjtd2oeR7c-IQcNdAFPt_8xeb27fbm5zx6f5w83s8fM5jqPmWa6VMwJo1AWDqVECXndIBqVrjSa5bkTlkFT1BycykHnRjqlpbOgZW3kMbn465t2_RrTUdWyDRa7DnocxlCVpii4kSIR9R_R-iEEj0218u0S_LrirNpIXf1LXe2krn6lTqVn2xljvUS3K9xqm_DzLQ7BQtd46G0bdrRCl6xMG_wA62uGNg</recordid><startdate>19900301</startdate><enddate>19900301</enddate><creator>SOSIS, M</creator><creator>DILLON, F</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900301</creationdate><title>What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study</title><author>SOSIS, M ; DILLON, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c484t-808750d295e36de33e3a4bfee9500298044d2c0af6b1ad54a8493d583dca83b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia: equipment, devices</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Equipment Safety</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Fires - prevention & control</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Laser Therapy</topic><topic>Lasers - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SOSIS, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DILLON, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SOSIS, M</au><au>DILLON, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>1990-03-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>553</spage><epage>555</epage><pages>553-555</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>Metallic tapes have been shown to protect combustible endotracheal tubes from the CO2 laser; however, no adequate means of protecting such tubes from the Nd-YAG laser has yet been found. In this investigation, five different metallic tapes were evaluated as protection for red rubber endotracheal tubes from an Nd-YAG laser set to 50 W. Radio Shack no. 44-1155 and 3M no. 1430 were quickly perforated by the laser. Laser contact with the adhesive side of 3M no. 433 resulted in combustion. The nonadhesive side of the Venture copper tape was not affected by the laser; however, when its adhesive side was struck, a fire occurred. 3M no. 425 tape provided the best protection: no effect was seen when the laser was aimed at its nonadhesive side for 1 min, with only smoking of the tape evident when its adhesive side was tested. Finally, 3M no. 425 and Venture copper foil tapes were shown to be resistant to an Nd-YAG laser set to 110 watts in an atmosphere of 98% O2.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>2310037</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-199003000-00025</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof	Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1990-03, Vol.72 (3), p.553-555
issn	0003-3022 1528-1175
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79661932
source	MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects	Anesthesia Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Anesthesia: equipment, devices Biological and medical sciences Equipment Safety Evaluation Studies as Topic Fires - prevention & control Intubation, Intratracheal - instrumentation Laser Therapy Lasers - adverse effects Medical sciences
title	What is the safest foil tape for endotracheal tube protection during Nd-YAG laser surgery? A comparative study
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=What%20is%20the%20safest%20foil%20tape%20for%20endotracheal%20tube%20protection%20during%20Nd-YAG%20laser%20surgery?%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=SOSIS,%20M&rft.date=1990-03-01&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=553&rft.epage=555&rft.pages=553-555&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-199003000-00025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79661932%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79661932&rft_id=info:pmid/2310037&rfr_iscdi=true