Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia
Glottographic signals may be superior to acoustic signals for tracking glottal source perturbations, since supraglottal vocal tract effects on glottographic signals are relatively minimal compared with the acoustic signal as measured beyond the lips. This study compared the ability of differing sign...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 1998-01, Vol.108 (1), p.18-25 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 25 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 18 |
| container_title | The Laryngoscope |
| container_volume | 108 |
| creator | Lin, Emily Jiang, Jack Hanson, David G. |
| description | Glottographic signals may be superior to acoustic signals for tracking glottal source perturbations, since supraglottal vocal tract effects on glottographic signals are relatively minimal compared with the acoustic signal as measured beyond the lips. This study compared the ability of differing signals to differentiate among normal voices and abnormal voices that were due to two categories of biomechanical disease. Acoustic, electroglottographic, and photoglottographic signals recorded during vowel phonation sustained by 26 normal subjects and 65 patients were measured for perturbations of frequency and amplitude. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that amplitude perturbation measures from photoglottographic signals significantly differentiated neuromuscular from mass lesion sources of dysphonia. Acoustic and electroglottographic signal perturbations differentiated between normal and abnormal voices but did not distinguish between the dysphonic characteristics of neuromuscular disorders and those of mass lesions of the vocal folds. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00005537-199801000-00004 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79656613</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79656613</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4884-dd478b86b1043207ebbba5fcbaa3b7d2bb20816fa8961ca8d97722bd962f3a4c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtvEzEUhS0EKqHwE5C8QOyG2uP3sjQlIIVHaBGwsmyP3Rgm48GeCObfd4aErPHmyueee-7VBwDE6BVGSlyg6TFGRIWVkghPv2qW6AOwwIzgiirFHoIFQjWpJKu_PQZPSvmBEBaEoTNwpiipEccLsFm1aRjSXTb9Njp4E-8608JPPg_7bM0QUwdjB1_HtPNua7roTNuOcBlD8Nl3A7wde19gCnA5ln6bumiegkfBtMU_O9Zz8OXN9e3V22r9cfXu6nJdOSolrZqGCmkltxjNtwhvrTUsOGsMsaKpra2RxDwYqTh2RjZKiLq2jeJ1IIY6cg5eHnL7nH7tfRn0Lhbn29Z0Pu2LFoozzjGZjPJgdDmVkn3QfY47k0eNkZ5p6n809YnmX4lOo8-PO_Z255vT4BHf1H9x7JsykQnZdC6Wk63GmCnCJtvyYPsdWz_-93q9vvz8nTGK0azO11SHmFgG_-cUY_JPzQURTH_9sNKr9c17vpFCb8g96HefDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79656613</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lin, Emily ; Jiang, Jack ; Hanson, David G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Emily ; Jiang, Jack ; Hanson, David G.</creatorcontrib><description>Glottographic signals may be superior to acoustic signals for tracking glottal source perturbations, since supraglottal vocal tract effects on glottographic signals are relatively minimal compared with the acoustic signal as measured beyond the lips. This study compared the ability of differing signals to differentiate among normal voices and abnormal voices that were due to two categories of biomechanical disease. Acoustic, electroglottographic, and photoglottographic signals recorded during vowel phonation sustained by 26 normal subjects and 65 patients were measured for perturbations of frequency and amplitude. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that amplitude perturbation measures from photoglottographic signals significantly differentiated neuromuscular from mass lesion sources of dysphonia. Acoustic and electroglottographic signal perturbations differentiated between normal and abnormal voices but did not distinguish between the dysphonic characteristics of neuromuscular disorders and those of mass lesions of the vocal folds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199801000-00004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9432061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LARYA8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Algorithms ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Electrophysiology ; Glottis - physiopathology ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Technology ; Voice Disorders - etiology ; Voice Disorders - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 1998-01, Vol.108 (1), p.18-25</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 The Triological Society</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4884-dd478b86b1043207ebbba5fcbaa3b7d2bb20816fa8961ca8d97722bd962f3a4c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4884-dd478b86b1043207ebbba5fcbaa3b7d2bb20816fa8961ca8d97722bd962f3a4c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1097%2F00005537-199801000-00004$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1097%2F00005537-199801000-00004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,1411,4036,4037,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2115935$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9432061$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, David G.</creatorcontrib><title>Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Glottographic signals may be superior to acoustic signals for tracking glottal source perturbations, since supraglottal vocal tract effects on glottographic signals are relatively minimal compared with the acoustic signal as measured beyond the lips. This study compared the ability of differing signals to differentiate among normal voices and abnormal voices that were due to two categories of biomechanical disease. Acoustic, electroglottographic, and photoglottographic signals recorded during vowel phonation sustained by 26 normal subjects and 65 patients were measured for perturbations of frequency and amplitude. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that amplitude perturbation measures from photoglottographic signals significantly differentiated neuromuscular from mass lesion sources of dysphonia. Acoustic and electroglottographic signal perturbations differentiated between normal and abnormal voices but did not distinguish between the dysphonic characteristics of neuromuscular disorders and those of mass lesions of the vocal folds.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Glottis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Technology</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtvEzEUhS0EKqHwE5C8QOyG2uP3sjQlIIVHaBGwsmyP3Rgm48GeCObfd4aErPHmyueee-7VBwDE6BVGSlyg6TFGRIWVkghPv2qW6AOwwIzgiirFHoIFQjWpJKu_PQZPSvmBEBaEoTNwpiipEccLsFm1aRjSXTb9Njp4E-8608JPPg_7bM0QUwdjB1_HtPNua7roTNuOcBlD8Nl3A7wde19gCnA5ln6bumiegkfBtMU_O9Zz8OXN9e3V22r9cfXu6nJdOSolrZqGCmkltxjNtwhvrTUsOGsMsaKpra2RxDwYqTh2RjZKiLq2jeJ1IIY6cg5eHnL7nH7tfRn0Lhbn29Z0Pu2LFoozzjGZjPJgdDmVkn3QfY47k0eNkZ5p6n809YnmX4lOo8-PO_Z255vT4BHf1H9x7JsykQnZdC6Wk63GmCnCJtvyYPsdWz_-93q9vvz8nTGK0azO11SHmFgG_-cUY_JPzQURTH_9sNKr9c17vpFCb8g96HefDg</recordid><startdate>199801</startdate><enddate>199801</enddate><creator>Lin, Emily</creator><creator>Jiang, Jack</creator><creator>Hanson, David G.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199801</creationdate><title>Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia</title><author>Lin, Emily ; Jiang, Jack ; Hanson, David G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4884-dd478b86b1043207ebbba5fcbaa3b7d2bb20816fa8961ca8d97722bd962f3a4c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Glottis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Technology</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Voice Disorders - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Jack</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanson, David G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Emily</au><au>Jiang, Jack</au><au>Hanson, David G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>The Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>1998-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>25</epage><pages>18-25</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><coden>LARYA8</coden><abstract>Glottographic signals may be superior to acoustic signals for tracking glottal source perturbations, since supraglottal vocal tract effects on glottographic signals are relatively minimal compared with the acoustic signal as measured beyond the lips. This study compared the ability of differing signals to differentiate among normal voices and abnormal voices that were due to two categories of biomechanical disease. Acoustic, electroglottographic, and photoglottographic signals recorded during vowel phonation sustained by 26 normal subjects and 65 patients were measured for perturbations of frequency and amplitude. One‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed that amplitude perturbation measures from photoglottographic signals significantly differentiated neuromuscular from mass lesion sources of dysphonia. Acoustic and electroglottographic signal perturbations differentiated between normal and abnormal voices but did not distinguish between the dysphonic characteristics of neuromuscular disorders and those of mass lesions of the vocal folds.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>9432061</pmid><doi>10.1097/00005537-199801000-00004</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
| ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 1998-01, Vol.108 (1), p.18-25 |
| issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79656613 |
| source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Acoustics Algorithms Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Electrophysiology Glottis - physiopathology Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Miscellaneous. Technology Voice Disorders - etiology Voice Disorders - physiopathology |
| title | Glottographic Signal Perturbation in Biomechanically Different Types of Dysphonia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A35%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Glottographic%20Signal%20Perturbation%20in%20Biomechanically%20Different%20Types%20of%20Dysphonia&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Lin,%20Emily&rft.date=1998-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=25&rft.pages=18-25&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft.coden=LARYA8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00005537-199801000-00004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79656613%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79656613&rft_id=info:pmid/9432061&rfr_iscdi=true |