Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure

Previous studies assessing vascular responses in nonexercising beds during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have yielded varying results. We proposed that the clinical and hemodynamic severity of heart failure may explain some of the variation. We reasoned that diastolic ventric...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart and vessels 1998-01, Vol.13 (6), p.278-289
Hauptverfasser: Atherton, J J, Dryburgh, L G, Thomson, H L, Moore, T D, Wright, K N, Muehle, G W, Fitzpatrick, L E, Frenneaux, M P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 289
container_issue 6
container_start_page 278
container_title Heart and vessels
container_volume 13
creator Atherton, J J
Dryburgh, L G
Thomson, H L
Moore, T D
Wright, K N
Muehle, G W
Fitzpatrick, L E
Frenneaux, M P
description Previous studies assessing vascular responses in nonexercising beds during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have yielded varying results. We proposed that the clinical and hemodynamic severity of heart failure may explain some of the variation. We reasoned that diastolic ventricular interaction (DVI), by limiting the ability of such patients to increase left ventricular (LV) volume and stroke volume during exercise, would attenuate baroreflex activation, resulting in increased sympathetic activation and hence exaggerated vasoconstriction. We hypothesized therefore that vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds would be exaggerated in patients with symptomatic and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. We measured forearm vascular resistance (FVR) during semierect cycle exercise in 22 CHF patients and 23 control subjects. DVI was assessed by measuring changes in ventricular volumes (radionuclide ventriculography) during volume unloading (-30 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure) in the heart failure patients and was inferred when LV end-diastolic volume paradoxically increased. Patients with symptoms of heart failure developed larger increases in FVR during exercise than did asymptomatic patients. There were significant correlations between the change in FVR during peak exercise and the resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. CHF patients with DVI developed exaggerated increases in FVR (median [25th to 75th percentile]) compared with the remaining patients during low-workload exercise (138 [66 to 171] vs 6.4 [-4.3 to 28] units, P = 0.002) and during peak exercise (160 [90 to 384] vs 61 [-7.4 to 75] units, P < 0.02). Vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds is exaggerated in CHF patients with clinically and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. This may explain some of the reported variation in the degree of sympathetic activation that occurs during exercise in CHF patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/bf03257232
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79617458</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1897387948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c8c2d285f8525354195337cd8a87fac48325ef4fde13bbead2f2a9796c60c56b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLxDAUBeAgio6PjT9AshIRqnk0TbLUwVFhwI2uXJQ0TWYibTImqTr_3g6j4MrV5cLHgXMAOMXoCiPErxuLKGGcULIDJrjCrBg_ugsmSGJUCEr4AThM6Q0hzCSW--AAo4phzNEEvM5CNCr28EOloINPOTqdXfCwHaLzC9iuveqdhp1ZQPNlonbJQOfhSmVnfE7w0-Ul1MsY_KiWY1aGVrluiOYY7FnVJXPyc4_Ay-zuefpQzJ_uH6c380JTXOVCC01aIpgVjDDKSiwZpVy3QglulS7HAszY0rYG06YxqiWWKMllpSukWdXQI3C-zV3F8D6YlOveJW26TnkThlSPFPOSiRFe_AuxkJwKLssNvdxSHUNK0dh6FV2v4rrGqN6sXt_Oflcf8dlP7tD0pv1DtzPTb1nkfXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1897387948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Atherton, J J ; Dryburgh, L G ; Thomson, H L ; Moore, T D ; Wright, K N ; Muehle, G W ; Fitzpatrick, L E ; Frenneaux, M P</creator><creatorcontrib>Atherton, J J ; Dryburgh, L G ; Thomson, H L ; Moore, T D ; Wright, K N ; Muehle, G W ; Fitzpatrick, L E ; Frenneaux, M P</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies assessing vascular responses in nonexercising beds during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have yielded varying results. We proposed that the clinical and hemodynamic severity of heart failure may explain some of the variation. We reasoned that diastolic ventricular interaction (DVI), by limiting the ability of such patients to increase left ventricular (LV) volume and stroke volume during exercise, would attenuate baroreflex activation, resulting in increased sympathetic activation and hence exaggerated vasoconstriction. We hypothesized therefore that vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds would be exaggerated in patients with symptomatic and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. We measured forearm vascular resistance (FVR) during semierect cycle exercise in 22 CHF patients and 23 control subjects. DVI was assessed by measuring changes in ventricular volumes (radionuclide ventriculography) during volume unloading (-30 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure) in the heart failure patients and was inferred when LV end-diastolic volume paradoxically increased. Patients with symptoms of heart failure developed larger increases in FVR during exercise than did asymptomatic patients. There were significant correlations between the change in FVR during peak exercise and the resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. CHF patients with DVI developed exaggerated increases in FVR (median [25th to 75th percentile]) compared with the remaining patients during low-workload exercise (138 [66 to 171] vs 6.4 [-4.3 to 28] units, P = 0.002) and during peak exercise (160 [90 to 384] vs 61 [-7.4 to 75] units, P &lt; 0.02). Vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds is exaggerated in CHF patients with clinically and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. This may explain some of the reported variation in the degree of sympathetic activation that occurs during exercise in CHF patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0910-8327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-2573</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/bf03257232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10651170</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Japan</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Exercise ; Exercise Tolerance ; Female ; Forearm - blood supply ; Heart Failure - physiopathology ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Radionuclide Ventriculography ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology ; Vascular Resistance ; Vasoconstriction ; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><ispartof>Heart and vessels, 1998-01, Vol.13 (6), p.278-289</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c8c2d285f8525354195337cd8a87fac48325ef4fde13bbead2f2a9796c60c56b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c8c2d285f8525354195337cd8a87fac48325ef4fde13bbead2f2a9796c60c56b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10651170$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atherton, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryburgh, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, H L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muehle, G W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenneaux, M P</creatorcontrib><title>Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure</title><title>Heart and vessels</title><addtitle>Heart Vessels</addtitle><description>Previous studies assessing vascular responses in nonexercising beds during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have yielded varying results. We proposed that the clinical and hemodynamic severity of heart failure may explain some of the variation. We reasoned that diastolic ventricular interaction (DVI), by limiting the ability of such patients to increase left ventricular (LV) volume and stroke volume during exercise, would attenuate baroreflex activation, resulting in increased sympathetic activation and hence exaggerated vasoconstriction. We hypothesized therefore that vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds would be exaggerated in patients with symptomatic and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. We measured forearm vascular resistance (FVR) during semierect cycle exercise in 22 CHF patients and 23 control subjects. DVI was assessed by measuring changes in ventricular volumes (radionuclide ventriculography) during volume unloading (-30 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure) in the heart failure patients and was inferred when LV end-diastolic volume paradoxically increased. Patients with symptoms of heart failure developed larger increases in FVR during exercise than did asymptomatic patients. There were significant correlations between the change in FVR during peak exercise and the resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. CHF patients with DVI developed exaggerated increases in FVR (median [25th to 75th percentile]) compared with the remaining patients during low-workload exercise (138 [66 to 171] vs 6.4 [-4.3 to 28] units, P = 0.002) and during peak exercise (160 [90 to 384] vs 61 [-7.4 to 75] units, P &lt; 0.02). Vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds is exaggerated in CHF patients with clinically and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. This may explain some of the reported variation in the degree of sympathetic activation that occurs during exercise in CHF patients.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Exercise</subject><subject>Exercise Tolerance</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm - blood supply</subject><subject>Heart Failure - physiopathology</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radionuclide Ventriculography</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Vascular Resistance</subject><subject>Vasoconstriction</subject><subject>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</subject><issn>0910-8327</issn><issn>1615-2573</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLxDAUBeAgio6PjT9AshIRqnk0TbLUwVFhwI2uXJQ0TWYibTImqTr_3g6j4MrV5cLHgXMAOMXoCiPErxuLKGGcULIDJrjCrBg_ugsmSGJUCEr4AThM6Q0hzCSW--AAo4phzNEEvM5CNCr28EOloINPOTqdXfCwHaLzC9iuveqdhp1ZQPNlonbJQOfhSmVnfE7w0-Ul1MsY_KiWY1aGVrluiOYY7FnVJXPyc4_Ay-zuefpQzJ_uH6c380JTXOVCC01aIpgVjDDKSiwZpVy3QglulS7HAszY0rYG06YxqiWWKMllpSukWdXQI3C-zV3F8D6YlOveJW26TnkThlSPFPOSiRFe_AuxkJwKLssNvdxSHUNK0dh6FV2v4rrGqN6sXt_Oflcf8dlP7tD0pv1DtzPTb1nkfXA</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Atherton, J J</creator><creator>Dryburgh, L G</creator><creator>Thomson, H L</creator><creator>Moore, T D</creator><creator>Wright, K N</creator><creator>Muehle, G W</creator><creator>Fitzpatrick, L E</creator><creator>Frenneaux, M P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure</title><author>Atherton, J J ; Dryburgh, L G ; Thomson, H L ; Moore, T D ; Wright, K N ; Muehle, G W ; Fitzpatrick, L E ; Frenneaux, M P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c8c2d285f8525354195337cd8a87fac48325ef4fde13bbead2f2a9796c60c56b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Exercise</topic><topic>Exercise Tolerance</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm - blood supply</topic><topic>Heart Failure - physiopathology</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radionuclide Ventriculography</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Vascular Resistance</topic><topic>Vasoconstriction</topic><topic>Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atherton, J J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dryburgh, L G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, H L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, T D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muehle, G W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzpatrick, L E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenneaux, M P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart and vessels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atherton, J J</au><au>Dryburgh, L G</au><au>Thomson, H L</au><au>Moore, T D</au><au>Wright, K N</au><au>Muehle, G W</au><au>Fitzpatrick, L E</au><au>Frenneaux, M P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure</atitle><jtitle>Heart and vessels</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Vessels</addtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>278</spage><epage>289</epage><pages>278-289</pages><issn>0910-8327</issn><eissn>1615-2573</eissn><abstract>Previous studies assessing vascular responses in nonexercising beds during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) have yielded varying results. We proposed that the clinical and hemodynamic severity of heart failure may explain some of the variation. We reasoned that diastolic ventricular interaction (DVI), by limiting the ability of such patients to increase left ventricular (LV) volume and stroke volume during exercise, would attenuate baroreflex activation, resulting in increased sympathetic activation and hence exaggerated vasoconstriction. We hypothesized therefore that vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds would be exaggerated in patients with symptomatic and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. We measured forearm vascular resistance (FVR) during semierect cycle exercise in 22 CHF patients and 23 control subjects. DVI was assessed by measuring changes in ventricular volumes (radionuclide ventriculography) during volume unloading (-30 mm Hg lower-body negative pressure) in the heart failure patients and was inferred when LV end-diastolic volume paradoxically increased. Patients with symptoms of heart failure developed larger increases in FVR during exercise than did asymptomatic patients. There were significant correlations between the change in FVR during peak exercise and the resting mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. CHF patients with DVI developed exaggerated increases in FVR (median [25th to 75th percentile]) compared with the remaining patients during low-workload exercise (138 [66 to 171] vs 6.4 [-4.3 to 28] units, P = 0.002) and during peak exercise (160 [90 to 384] vs 61 [-7.4 to 75] units, P &lt; 0.02). Vasoconstriction in nonexercising beds is exaggerated in CHF patients with clinically and hemodynamically severe heart failure, particularly if associated with DVI. This may explain some of the reported variation in the degree of sympathetic activation that occurs during exercise in CHF patients.</abstract><cop>Japan</cop><pmid>10651170</pmid><doi>10.1007/bf03257232</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0910-8327
ispartof Heart and vessels, 1998-01, Vol.13 (6), p.278-289
issn 0910-8327
1615-2573
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79617458
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Analysis of Variance
Exercise
Exercise Tolerance
Female
Forearm - blood supply
Heart Failure - physiopathology
Hemodynamics
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radionuclide Ventriculography
Statistics, Nonparametric
Sympathetic Nervous System - physiopathology
Vascular Resistance
Vasoconstriction
Ventricular Dysfunction, Left - physiopathology
title Forearm vasoconstriction during dynamic leg exercise in patients with chronic heart failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A38%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forearm%20vasoconstriction%20during%20dynamic%20leg%20exercise%20in%20patients%20with%20chronic%20heart%20failure&rft.jtitle=Heart%20and%20vessels&rft.au=Atherton,%20J%20J&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=278&rft.epage=289&rft.pages=278-289&rft.issn=0910-8327&rft.eissn=1615-2573&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/bf03257232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1897387948%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1897387948&rft_id=info:pmid/10651170&rfr_iscdi=true