Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests

Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31
Hauptverfasser: PEASE, W. S, PITZER, N. L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 1
container_start_page 28
container_title American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
container_volume 69
creator PEASE, W. S
PITZER, N. L
description Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79613025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79613025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1PwzAMjRBojMFPQMoFboWkaZLmiCa-pElcdq_SxJGK2mQkLdL-PRkrwxdbz8_P9kMIU_JAiZKPJEdJBCmoUoeKkOIAyTO0pJzJQrKan6MlqVVVKEr5JbpK6TMzuGJygRYlIyVjfIk2zz2YMQbfGey6foSIwbkMJRw89iEOusdDGEPE2lucwKcQ99hD_AZsgreTGbvMHCGN6RpdON0nuJnzCm1fnrfrt2Lz8fq-ftoUpiJiLLiginCurDbOUlES0E5ay4gCU1KrmKhqy4StaJ1fbClwaIltdYak4oKt0P1RdhfD15QXN0OXDPS99hCm1EglaP6PZ2J9JJoYUorgml3sBh33DSXNwcfmz8fm5OMvJPPo7bxjagewp8HZuNy_m_s6Gd27qL3p0r--ypdSUrMfbbt6vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79613025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</creator><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><description>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-7385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2302335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Central nervous system ; Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation ; Electronics ; Electrophysiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Median Nerve ; Middle Aged ; Motor Neurons ; Neural Conduction ; Reference Values ; Sensory Receptor Cells ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical medicine &amp; rehabilitation, 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19795108$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2302335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><title>American journal of physical medicine &amp; rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Median Nerve</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Neurons</subject><subject>Neural Conduction</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0894-9115</issn><issn>1537-7385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1PwzAMjRBojMFPQMoFboWkaZLmiCa-pElcdq_SxJGK2mQkLdL-PRkrwxdbz8_P9kMIU_JAiZKPJEdJBCmoUoeKkOIAyTO0pJzJQrKan6MlqVVVKEr5JbpK6TMzuGJygRYlIyVjfIk2zz2YMQbfGey6foSIwbkMJRw89iEOusdDGEPE2lucwKcQ99hD_AZsgreTGbvMHCGN6RpdON0nuJnzCm1fnrfrt2Lz8fq-ftoUpiJiLLiginCurDbOUlES0E5ay4gCU1KrmKhqy4StaJ1fbClwaIltdYak4oKt0P1RdhfD15QXN0OXDPS99hCm1EglaP6PZ2J9JJoYUorgml3sBh33DSXNwcfmz8fm5OMvJPPo7bxjagewp8HZuNy_m_s6Gd27qL3p0r--ypdSUrMfbbt6vw</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>PEASE, W. S</creator><creator>PITZER, N. L</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><author>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Median Nerve</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Neurons</topic><topic>Neural Conduction</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine &amp; rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PEASE, W. S</au><au>PITZER, N. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine &amp; rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>28-31</pages><issn>0894-9115</issn><eissn>1537-7385</eissn><abstract>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>2302335</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0894-9115
ispartof American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31
issn 0894-9115
1537-7385
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79613025
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Action Potentials
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Central nervous system
Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation
Electronics
Electrophysiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Median Nerve
Middle Aged
Motor Neurons
Neural Conduction
Reference Values
Sensory Receptor Cells
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A12%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20filter%20effects%20on%20normal%20motor%20and%20sensory%20nerve%20conduction%20tests&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20medicine%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=PEASE,%20W.%20S&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=28-31&rft.issn=0894-9115&rft.eissn=1537-7385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79613025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79613025&rft_id=info:pmid/2302335&rfr_iscdi=true