Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests
Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | PEASE, W. S PITZER, N. L |
description | Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79613025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79613025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUE1PwzAMjRBojMFPQMoFboWkaZLmiCa-pElcdq_SxJGK2mQkLdL-PRkrwxdbz8_P9kMIU_JAiZKPJEdJBCmoUoeKkOIAyTO0pJzJQrKan6MlqVVVKEr5JbpK6TMzuGJygRYlIyVjfIk2zz2YMQbfGey6foSIwbkMJRw89iEOusdDGEPE2lucwKcQ99hD_AZsgreTGbvMHCGN6RpdON0nuJnzCm1fnrfrt2Lz8fq-ftoUpiJiLLiginCurDbOUlES0E5ay4gCU1KrmKhqy4StaJ1fbClwaIltdYak4oKt0P1RdhfD15QXN0OXDPS99hCm1EglaP6PZ2J9JJoYUorgml3sBh33DSXNwcfmz8fm5OMvJPPo7bxjagewp8HZuNy_m_s6Gd27qL3p0r--ypdSUrMfbbt6vw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79613025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</creator><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><description>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-9115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-7385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2302335</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Action Potentials ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Central nervous system ; Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation ; Electronics ; Electrophysiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Median Nerve ; Middle Aged ; Motor Neurons ; Neural Conduction ; Reference Values ; Sensory Receptor Cells ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19795108$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2302335$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><title>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</description><subject>Action Potentials</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electronics</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Median Nerve</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Neurons</subject><subject>Neural Conduction</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sensory Receptor Cells</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0894-9115</issn><issn>1537-7385</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUE1PwzAMjRBojMFPQMoFboWkaZLmiCa-pElcdq_SxJGK2mQkLdL-PRkrwxdbz8_P9kMIU_JAiZKPJEdJBCmoUoeKkOIAyTO0pJzJQrKan6MlqVVVKEr5JbpK6TMzuGJygRYlIyVjfIk2zz2YMQbfGey6foSIwbkMJRw89iEOusdDGEPE2lucwKcQ99hD_AZsgreTGbvMHCGN6RpdON0nuJnzCm1fnrfrt2Lz8fq-ftoUpiJiLLiginCurDbOUlES0E5ay4gCU1KrmKhqy4StaJ1fbClwaIltdYak4oKt0P1RdhfD15QXN0OXDPS99hCm1EglaP6PZ2J9JJoYUorgml3sBh33DSXNwcfmz8fm5OMvJPPo7bxjagewp8HZuNy_m_s6Gd27qL3p0r--ypdSUrMfbbt6vw</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>PEASE, W. S</creator><creator>PITZER, N. L</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</title><author>PEASE, W. S ; PITZER, N. L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-56190559dacfd1620eaf7dd309ec21d93648d36d418060b1e5eb0dba36d79563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Action Potentials</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electronics</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Median Nerve</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Neurons</topic><topic>Neural Conduction</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sensory Receptor Cells</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PEASE, W. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PITZER, N. L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PEASE, W. S</au><au>PITZER, N. L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests</atitle><jtitle>American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>28-31</pages><issn>0894-9115</issn><eissn>1537-7385</eissn><abstract>Electronic filtering of the recorded signal is a significant aspect of all electro-diagnostic testing, but the filter type and frequency band are infrequently reported. Although the effects of different high- and low-frequency filters have been hypothesized, they have been the subject of little study under actual clinical conditions. This investigation showed clinically and statistically (p less than 0.01) significant alterations in both motor and sensory nerve evoked responses produced by modification of filter settings within the range routinely used for recording. As the low-frequency filter was varied from 3 to 20 Hz; large differences were seen in amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. When the high-frequency filter was changed from 10 to 2 kHz, the mean amplitude of the sensory nerve action potential decreased by 12% and the mean latency was increased 0.1 ms. We conclude that filter parameters must remain constant when determining normal values and when performing serial studies on any patient. Filter settings should be reported as part of all electro-diagnostic reports and scientific manuscripts.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>2302335</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-9115 |
ispartof | American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 1990-02, Vol.69 (1), p.28-31 |
issn | 0894-9115 1537-7385 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79613025 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Action Potentials Adult Biological and medical sciences Central nervous system Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation Electronics Electrophysiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Median Nerve Middle Aged Motor Neurons Neural Conduction Reference Values Sensory Receptor Cells Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs |
title | Electronic filter effects on normal motor and sensory nerve conduction tests |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A12%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electronic%20filter%20effects%20on%20normal%20motor%20and%20sensory%20nerve%20conduction%20tests&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20physical%20medicine%20&%20rehabilitation&rft.au=PEASE,%20W.%20S&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=28-31&rft.issn=0894-9115&rft.eissn=1537-7385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002060-199002000-00007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79613025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79613025&rft_id=info:pmid/2302335&rfr_iscdi=true |