Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics

Vital signs are an integral part of the field assessment of patients. A two-part study was undertaken to determine which vital signs are taken in the field assessment of pediatric patients and to determine whether the frequency of vital signs taken is influenced by base station contact, patient'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 1990-02, Vol.19 (2), p.173-178
Hauptverfasser: Gausche, Marianne, Henderson, Deborah P, Seidel, James S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 178
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 19
creator Gausche, Marianne
Henderson, Deborah P
Seidel, James S
description Vital signs are an integral part of the field assessment of patients. A two-part study was undertaken to determine which vital signs are taken in the field assessment of pediatric patients and to determine whether the frequency of vital signs taken is influenced by base station contact, patient's severity of illness or injury, or paramedic demographic factors such as parenting and field experience. An initial pilot study of prehospital care records (run sheets) from two base hospitals in Los Angeles County revealed that there were significant differences between field vital sign assessment in pediatric and adult patients ( P < .0001). A retrospective review of 6,756 pediatric run sheets from Los Angeles County showed that the frequency of vital sign assessment varied with the age of the pediatric patient ( P < .05) (ie, the frequency of vital sign assessment increased correspondingly with the age of the patient). Base hospital contact occurred in 26% of the runs; when contact was made, vital signs were more likely to be taken in all age groups studied. Vital signs often were not assessed in children less than 2 years old, even if the patient's chief complaint suggested the possibility of a major illness or trauma. The second part of the study was a field assessment survey that was distributed to 1,253 active paramedics in Los Angeles County; the results showed that paramedics were less confident in their ability to assess vital signs in children less than 2 years old. Confidence increased with age of the patient. The number of runs a provider made during a 24-hour shift was the only demographic factor related to the level of provider confidence. Future emergency medical services research must link field vital sign assessment to outcome to determine the value of this type of field assessment in the pediatric age group.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81804-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79609275</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064405818049</els_id><sourcerecordid>79609275</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2a229be5a77dffb2b85373e5ba890cb502997389fb75dcdcaf51c1b3863696253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOBCEQRYnR6Pj4BJPeaHTRWsAAjRszMb4SExc-tgRoWjE90y3VY-LfyzyiS1cs7rlV1CHkkMIZBSrPn4BqWYIcj09AnFa0gnGpN8iIglalVBI2yegX2SG7iB8AoMeMbpNtxoEqLUfEvcbBtgXGtxkWFovepqHommJ4D0WfwnuH_RKwiAFxGmZ_aaijHVL0uTPEHFwUkwLn6St8L5A8yE4z4nGfbDW2xXCwfvfIy83189Vd-fB4e381eSg91zCUzDKmXRBWqbppHHOV4IoH4WylwTsBTGvFK904JWpfe9sI6qnjleRSSyb4Hjleze1T9zkPOJhpRB_a1s5CN0eT7wXN1AIUK9CnDjGFxvQpTm36NhTMwq1ZujULcQaEWbo1OvcO1wvmLp_221rLzPnROrfobdskO_MR_4ZrAYJzyNzligvZxlcMyaDPAn22lYIfTN3Ff37yA3qhllk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79609275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gausche, Marianne ; Henderson, Deborah P ; Seidel, James S</creator><creatorcontrib>Gausche, Marianne ; Henderson, Deborah P ; Seidel, James S</creatorcontrib><description>Vital signs are an integral part of the field assessment of patients. A two-part study was undertaken to determine which vital signs are taken in the field assessment of pediatric patients and to determine whether the frequency of vital signs taken is influenced by base station contact, patient's severity of illness or injury, or paramedic demographic factors such as parenting and field experience. An initial pilot study of prehospital care records (run sheets) from two base hospitals in Los Angeles County revealed that there were significant differences between field vital sign assessment in pediatric and adult patients ( P &lt; .0001). A retrospective review of 6,756 pediatric run sheets from Los Angeles County showed that the frequency of vital sign assessment varied with the age of the pediatric patient ( P &lt; .05) (ie, the frequency of vital sign assessment increased correspondingly with the age of the patient). Base hospital contact occurred in 26% of the runs; when contact was made, vital signs were more likely to be taken in all age groups studied. Vital signs often were not assessed in children less than 2 years old, even if the patient's chief complaint suggested the possibility of a major illness or trauma. The second part of the study was a field assessment survey that was distributed to 1,253 active paramedics in Los Angeles County; the results showed that paramedics were less confident in their ability to assess vital signs in children less than 2 years old. Confidence increased with age of the patient. The number of runs a provider made during a 24-hour shift was the only demographic factor related to the level of provider confidence. Future emergency medical services research must link field vital sign assessment to outcome to determine the value of this type of field assessment in the pediatric age group.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81804-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2301796</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEMED3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Temperature ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Emergency and intensive care: injuries, diseases due to physical agents. Diving. Drowning. Disaster medicine ; Emergency Medical Services - methods ; Emergency Medical Technicians - education ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Infant ; Inservice Training ; Intensive care medicine ; Los Angeles ; Medical sciences ; paramedics ; patient assessment ; pediatric prehospital care ; Pilot Projects ; Retrospective Studies ; vital signs</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 1990-02, Vol.19 (2), p.173-178</ispartof><rights>1990 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2a229be5a77dffb2b85373e5ba890cb502997389fb75dcdcaf51c1b3863696253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2a229be5a77dffb2b85373e5ba890cb502997389fb75dcdcaf51c1b3863696253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81804-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19505330$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2301796$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gausche, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Deborah P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, James S</creatorcontrib><title>Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Vital signs are an integral part of the field assessment of patients. A two-part study was undertaken to determine which vital signs are taken in the field assessment of pediatric patients and to determine whether the frequency of vital signs taken is influenced by base station contact, patient's severity of illness or injury, or paramedic demographic factors such as parenting and field experience. An initial pilot study of prehospital care records (run sheets) from two base hospitals in Los Angeles County revealed that there were significant differences between field vital sign assessment in pediatric and adult patients ( P &lt; .0001). A retrospective review of 6,756 pediatric run sheets from Los Angeles County showed that the frequency of vital sign assessment varied with the age of the pediatric patient ( P &lt; .05) (ie, the frequency of vital sign assessment increased correspondingly with the age of the patient). Base hospital contact occurred in 26% of the runs; when contact was made, vital signs were more likely to be taken in all age groups studied. Vital signs often were not assessed in children less than 2 years old, even if the patient's chief complaint suggested the possibility of a major illness or trauma. The second part of the study was a field assessment survey that was distributed to 1,253 active paramedics in Los Angeles County; the results showed that paramedics were less confident in their ability to assess vital signs in children less than 2 years old. Confidence increased with age of the patient. The number of runs a provider made during a 24-hour shift was the only demographic factor related to the level of provider confidence. Future emergency medical services research must link field vital sign assessment to outcome to determine the value of this type of field assessment in the pediatric age group.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Temperature</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: injuries, diseases due to physical agents. Diving. Drowning. Disaster medicine</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - methods</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Technicians - education</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Inservice Training</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Los Angeles</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>paramedics</subject><subject>patient assessment</subject><subject>pediatric prehospital care</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>vital signs</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOBCEQRYnR6Pj4BJPeaHTRWsAAjRszMb4SExc-tgRoWjE90y3VY-LfyzyiS1cs7rlV1CHkkMIZBSrPn4BqWYIcj09AnFa0gnGpN8iIglalVBI2yegX2SG7iB8AoMeMbpNtxoEqLUfEvcbBtgXGtxkWFovepqHommJ4D0WfwnuH_RKwiAFxGmZ_aaijHVL0uTPEHFwUkwLn6St8L5A8yE4z4nGfbDW2xXCwfvfIy83189Vd-fB4e381eSg91zCUzDKmXRBWqbppHHOV4IoH4WylwTsBTGvFK904JWpfe9sI6qnjleRSSyb4Hjleze1T9zkPOJhpRB_a1s5CN0eT7wXN1AIUK9CnDjGFxvQpTm36NhTMwq1ZujULcQaEWbo1OvcO1wvmLp_221rLzPnROrfobdskO_MR_4ZrAYJzyNzligvZxlcMyaDPAn22lYIfTN3Ff37yA3qhllk</recordid><startdate>19900201</startdate><enddate>19900201</enddate><creator>Gausche, Marianne</creator><creator>Henderson, Deborah P</creator><creator>Seidel, James S</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19900201</creationdate><title>Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics</title><author>Gausche, Marianne ; Henderson, Deborah P ; Seidel, James S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-2a229be5a77dffb2b85373e5ba890cb502997389fb75dcdcaf51c1b3863696253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Temperature</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: injuries, diseases due to physical agents. Diving. Drowning. Disaster medicine</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - methods</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Technicians - education</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Inservice Training</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Los Angeles</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>paramedics</topic><topic>patient assessment</topic><topic>pediatric prehospital care</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>vital signs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gausche, Marianne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Deborah P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seidel, James S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gausche, Marianne</au><au>Henderson, Deborah P</au><au>Seidel, James S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>1990-02-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>178</epage><pages>173-178</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><coden>AEMED3</coden><abstract>Vital signs are an integral part of the field assessment of patients. A two-part study was undertaken to determine which vital signs are taken in the field assessment of pediatric patients and to determine whether the frequency of vital signs taken is influenced by base station contact, patient's severity of illness or injury, or paramedic demographic factors such as parenting and field experience. An initial pilot study of prehospital care records (run sheets) from two base hospitals in Los Angeles County revealed that there were significant differences between field vital sign assessment in pediatric and adult patients ( P &lt; .0001). A retrospective review of 6,756 pediatric run sheets from Los Angeles County showed that the frequency of vital sign assessment varied with the age of the pediatric patient ( P &lt; .05) (ie, the frequency of vital sign assessment increased correspondingly with the age of the patient). Base hospital contact occurred in 26% of the runs; when contact was made, vital signs were more likely to be taken in all age groups studied. Vital signs often were not assessed in children less than 2 years old, even if the patient's chief complaint suggested the possibility of a major illness or trauma. The second part of the study was a field assessment survey that was distributed to 1,253 active paramedics in Los Angeles County; the results showed that paramedics were less confident in their ability to assess vital signs in children less than 2 years old. Confidence increased with age of the patient. The number of runs a provider made during a 24-hour shift was the only demographic factor related to the level of provider confidence. Future emergency medical services research must link field vital sign assessment to outcome to determine the value of this type of field assessment in the pediatric age group.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>2301796</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81804-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 1990-02, Vol.19 (2), p.173-178
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79609275
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adolescent
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Body Temperature
Child
Child, Preschool
Emergency and intensive care: injuries, diseases due to physical agents. Diving. Drowning. Disaster medicine
Emergency Medical Services - methods
Emergency Medical Technicians - education
Hemodynamics
Humans
Infant
Inservice Training
Intensive care medicine
Los Angeles
Medical sciences
paramedics
patient assessment
pediatric prehospital care
Pilot Projects
Retrospective Studies
vital signs
title Vital signs as part of the prehospital assessment of the pediatric patient: A survey of paramedics
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A29%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vital%20signs%20as%20part%20of%20the%20prehospital%20assessment%20of%20the%20pediatric%20patient:%20A%20survey%20of%20paramedics&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Gausche,%20Marianne&rft.date=1990-02-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=178&rft.pages=173-178&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft.coden=AEMED3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81804-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79609275%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79609275&rft_id=info:pmid/2301796&rft_els_id=S0196064405818049&rfr_iscdi=true