Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss

Application of the Doppler principle can provide relatively noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output. However, it is based on certain assumptions that may introduce error. Esophageal Doppler cardiac output was compared with Fick cardiac output during acute blood loss (35-45% estimate...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesiology (Philadelphia) 1990, Vol.72 (1), p.95-99
Hauptverfasser: KAMAL, G. D, SYMRENG, T, STARR, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)
container_volume 72
creator KAMAL, G. D
SYMRENG, T
STARR, J
description Application of the Doppler principle can provide relatively noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output. However, it is based on certain assumptions that may introduce error. Esophageal Doppler cardiac output was compared with Fick cardiac output during acute blood loss (35-45% estimated blood volume) in eight anesthetized pigs. Mean Fick cardiac output decreased from 4.8 to 1.9 l/min, mean Doppler cardiac output from 4.9 to 2.9 l/min. This was accompanied by a decrease in mean arterial pressure from 119 to 55 mmHg and increase in heart rate from a mean of 115 to 156 beats/min. There was an inconsistent association between the two methods both within and between individual animals. Cubic polynomial regression equations of cardiac output with time indicated small measurement error in Fick (R2: mean 0.93, range 0.99-0.75) as opposed to Doppler (R2: mean 0.67, range 0.93-0.16) cardiac output. In one animal Doppler cardiac output showed an increase with time and in one the Doppler cardiac output measurements were unrelated to time. There was highly variable association comparing Fick versus Doppler cardiac output with correlations ranging from -0.76 to 0.98. A sign test for mean differences indicated that Doppler derived cardiac output was higher than Fick cardiac output, and the chance of this occurring if the true difference was zero was less than 1 in 1,000. A test for homogeneity of correlations was also rejected. Inaccuracies in individual assumptions in the computation of esophageal Doppler cardiac output, especially unaccounted changes in aortic diameter, are responsible for the inconsistent and unpredictable values of Doppler cardiac output obtained in this experimental model of hemorrhage.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00000542-199001000-00017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79589569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79589569</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-314de9ae736c259ccd4b6c422ad852c3e29b043e2c263e2fe8cae39500a9a1353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEGmPwE5ByQNwK-WybI5oYTJrEBc5RmrijKGtK0h7492RszJJtOX5tRw9CmJIHSlT1SPYmBSuoUoTQXBTZaXWG5lSyuqC0kudont94wQljl-gqpa9cVpLXMzRjggjB6Ryt1r0NferSCP2IIYXh02zBeOzCMHiI2JroOmNxmMZhGrGbYtdvsbHTCLjxITjsQ0rX6KI1PsHNMS_Qx-r5fflabN5e1sunTWEFrceCU-FAGah4aZlU1jrRlFYwZlwtmeXAVENETpaVObZQWwNcSUKMMpRLvkD3h71DDN8TpFHvumTBe9NDmJKulKyVLFUW1gehjfl7EVo9xG5n4o-mRO8R6n-E-oRQ_yHMo7fHG1OzA3caPDLL_btj3yRrfBtNb7t0kpWVIEpS_gtNIXjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79589569</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>KAMAL, G. D ; SYMRENG, T ; STARR, J</creator><creatorcontrib>KAMAL, G. D ; SYMRENG, T ; STARR, J</creatorcontrib><description>Application of the Doppler principle can provide relatively noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output. However, it is based on certain assumptions that may introduce error. Esophageal Doppler cardiac output was compared with Fick cardiac output during acute blood loss (35-45% estimated blood volume) in eight anesthetized pigs. Mean Fick cardiac output decreased from 4.8 to 1.9 l/min, mean Doppler cardiac output from 4.9 to 2.9 l/min. This was accompanied by a decrease in mean arterial pressure from 119 to 55 mmHg and increase in heart rate from a mean of 115 to 156 beats/min. There was an inconsistent association between the two methods both within and between individual animals. Cubic polynomial regression equations of cardiac output with time indicated small measurement error in Fick (R2: mean 0.93, range 0.99-0.75) as opposed to Doppler (R2: mean 0.67, range 0.93-0.16) cardiac output. In one animal Doppler cardiac output showed an increase with time and in one the Doppler cardiac output measurements were unrelated to time. There was highly variable association comparing Fick versus Doppler cardiac output with correlations ranging from -0.76 to 0.98. A sign test for mean differences indicated that Doppler derived cardiac output was higher than Fick cardiac output, and the chance of this occurring if the true difference was zero was less than 1 in 1,000. A test for homogeneity of correlations was also rejected. Inaccuracies in individual assumptions in the computation of esophageal Doppler cardiac output, especially unaccounted changes in aortic diameter, are responsible for the inconsistent and unpredictable values of Doppler cardiac output obtained in this experimental model of hemorrhage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1175</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199001000-00017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2404431</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANESAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Acute Disease ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac Output ; Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics ; Esophagus ; Hemorrhage - physiopathology ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Monitoring ; Swine ; Ultrasonics ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1990, Vol.72 (1), p.95-99</ispartof><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-314de9ae736c259ccd4b6c422ad852c3e29b043e2c263e2fe8cae39500a9a1353</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6740951$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2404431$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>KAMAL, G. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYMRENG, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARR, J</creatorcontrib><title>Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss</title><title>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</title><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><description>Application of the Doppler principle can provide relatively noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output. However, it is based on certain assumptions that may introduce error. Esophageal Doppler cardiac output was compared with Fick cardiac output during acute blood loss (35-45% estimated blood volume) in eight anesthetized pigs. Mean Fick cardiac output decreased from 4.8 to 1.9 l/min, mean Doppler cardiac output from 4.9 to 2.9 l/min. This was accompanied by a decrease in mean arterial pressure from 119 to 55 mmHg and increase in heart rate from a mean of 115 to 156 beats/min. There was an inconsistent association between the two methods both within and between individual animals. Cubic polynomial regression equations of cardiac output with time indicated small measurement error in Fick (R2: mean 0.93, range 0.99-0.75) as opposed to Doppler (R2: mean 0.67, range 0.93-0.16) cardiac output. In one animal Doppler cardiac output showed an increase with time and in one the Doppler cardiac output measurements were unrelated to time. There was highly variable association comparing Fick versus Doppler cardiac output with correlations ranging from -0.76 to 0.98. A sign test for mean differences indicated that Doppler derived cardiac output was higher than Fick cardiac output, and the chance of this occurring if the true difference was zero was less than 1 in 1,000. A test for homogeneity of correlations was also rejected. Inaccuracies in individual assumptions in the computation of esophageal Doppler cardiac output, especially unaccounted changes in aortic diameter, are responsible for the inconsistent and unpredictable values of Doppler cardiac output obtained in this experimental model of hemorrhage.</description><subject>Acute Disease</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac Output</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</subject><subject>Esophagus</subject><subject>Hemorrhage - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0003-3022</issn><issn>1528-1175</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEGmPwE5ByQNwK-WybI5oYTJrEBc5RmrijKGtK0h7492RszJJtOX5tRw9CmJIHSlT1SPYmBSuoUoTQXBTZaXWG5lSyuqC0kudont94wQljl-gqpa9cVpLXMzRjggjB6Ryt1r0NferSCP2IIYXh02zBeOzCMHiI2JroOmNxmMZhGrGbYtdvsbHTCLjxITjsQ0rX6KI1PsHNMS_Qx-r5fflabN5e1sunTWEFrceCU-FAGah4aZlU1jrRlFYwZlwtmeXAVENETpaVObZQWwNcSUKMMpRLvkD3h71DDN8TpFHvumTBe9NDmJKulKyVLFUW1gehjfl7EVo9xG5n4o-mRO8R6n-E-oRQ_yHMo7fHG1OzA3caPDLL_btj3yRrfBtNb7t0kpWVIEpS_gtNIXjk</recordid><startdate>1990</startdate><enddate>1990</enddate><creator>KAMAL, G. D</creator><creator>SYMRENG, T</creator><creator>STARR, J</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1990</creationdate><title>Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss</title><author>KAMAL, G. D ; SYMRENG, T ; STARR, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-314de9ae736c259ccd4b6c422ad852c3e29b043e2c263e2fe8cae39500a9a1353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Acute Disease</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac Output</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics</topic><topic>Esophagus</topic><topic>Hemorrhage - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>KAMAL, G. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SYMRENG, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>STARR, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>KAMAL, G. D</au><au>SYMRENG, T</au><au>STARR, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesiology (Philadelphia)</jtitle><addtitle>Anesthesiology</addtitle><date>1990</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>0003-3022</issn><eissn>1528-1175</eissn><coden>ANESAV</coden><abstract>Application of the Doppler principle can provide relatively noninvasive and continuous measurement of cardiac output. However, it is based on certain assumptions that may introduce error. Esophageal Doppler cardiac output was compared with Fick cardiac output during acute blood loss (35-45% estimated blood volume) in eight anesthetized pigs. Mean Fick cardiac output decreased from 4.8 to 1.9 l/min, mean Doppler cardiac output from 4.9 to 2.9 l/min. This was accompanied by a decrease in mean arterial pressure from 119 to 55 mmHg and increase in heart rate from a mean of 115 to 156 beats/min. There was an inconsistent association between the two methods both within and between individual animals. Cubic polynomial regression equations of cardiac output with time indicated small measurement error in Fick (R2: mean 0.93, range 0.99-0.75) as opposed to Doppler (R2: mean 0.67, range 0.93-0.16) cardiac output. In one animal Doppler cardiac output showed an increase with time and in one the Doppler cardiac output measurements were unrelated to time. There was highly variable association comparing Fick versus Doppler cardiac output with correlations ranging from -0.76 to 0.98. A sign test for mean differences indicated that Doppler derived cardiac output was higher than Fick cardiac output, and the chance of this occurring if the true difference was zero was less than 1 in 1,000. A test for homogeneity of correlations was also rejected. Inaccuracies in individual assumptions in the computation of esophageal Doppler cardiac output, especially unaccounted changes in aortic diameter, are responsible for the inconsistent and unpredictable values of Doppler cardiac output obtained in this experimental model of hemorrhage.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>2404431</pmid><doi>10.1097/00000542-199001000-00017</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-3022
ispartof Anesthesiology (Philadelphia), 1990, Vol.72 (1), p.95-99
issn 0003-3022
1528-1175
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79589569
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acute Disease
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiac Output
Emergency and intensive care: techniques, logistics
Esophagus
Hemorrhage - physiopathology
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Monitoring
Swine
Ultrasonics
Ultrasonography - methods
title Inconsistent esophageal doppler cardiac output during acute blood loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inconsistent%20esophageal%20doppler%20cardiac%20output%20during%20acute%20blood%20loss&rft.jtitle=Anesthesiology%20(Philadelphia)&rft.au=KAMAL,%20G.%20D&rft.date=1990&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=0003-3022&rft.eissn=1528-1175&rft.coden=ANESAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00000542-199001000-00017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79589569%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79589569&rft_id=info:pmid/2404431&rfr_iscdi=true