A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study

AbstractBoth regional intravenous guanethidine and reserpine have been reported as effective in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reserpine depletes storage of norepinephrine, and guanethidine interferes with transport of norepinephrine while depleting storage in the sympathetic nerve t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Clinical journal of pain 1989-09, Vol.5 (3), p.205-210
Hauptverfasser: Rocco, Angelo G, Kaul, Alan F, Reisman, Richard M, Gallo, Jeffrey P, Lief, Philip A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 205
container_title The Clinical journal of pain
container_volume 5
creator Rocco, Angelo G
Kaul, Alan F
Reisman, Richard M
Gallo, Jeffrey P
Lief, Philip A
description AbstractBoth regional intravenous guanethidine and reserpine have been reported as effective in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reserpine depletes storage of norepinephrine, and guanethidine interferes with transport of norepinephrine while depleting storage in the sympathetic nerve terminal. The purpose of this study was to compare drug efficacy in double-blind fashion. Twelve patients, 10 ofwhome had previous stellate or lumbar sympathetic blocks, were entered into this double-blind cross-over study. Each patient Successively received 20 mg guanethidine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, 1.25 mg reserpine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, and 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine with a 1-week interval between medications. At the end of the study and before the code was broken each patient had the option of continuing treatment with any of the three drugsthe patient merely asked for the first, second or third drug. Pain assessment used verbal ordinal, numeric, and visual analog scales. Follow-up asted for a minimum of 6 months. Changes in pain intensity for the first 3 days did not differ siginificantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control group. Pain relief from significantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control groups. Pain relief from 2 to 14 months was achieved in two patients receiving reserpine. One receiving guanethidine, and none receiving lidocaine. None of the patients experienced permanent relief. No different was found between reserpine and guanethidine.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00002508-198909000-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79579707</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79579707</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-95f98504ce686787483672a6ab69d9ff489ddaf67483325391d1e45f1d8663893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Ustu1TAUtBBVuRQ-AckbWBHqPPxallsolSohtbC2fONjYnDiYCct4UP4Xpze27LCG3vOmRn7aIwQLsm7kkh-SvKqKBFFKYUkMqPivvQEbUpas4I2RD5FG8IbWQjS8GfoeUrfCSlpJcgxOq5oRRrCNujPGd6GftTRpTDgYPE1fHNh0B5fDlPUtzCEOeGLWQ8wdc64AbAeTGYliOOK3JCB9fAL3yzZZ-pgci0-X9IUw9gtePXPTsF7MG_xdRaH3v1ez-dh3nko3nuXDbcxpBRuIeKbaTbLC3RktU_w8rCfoK8fP3zZfiquPl9cbs-uirYWtCoktVJQ0rTABOOCN6JmvNJM75g00tpGSGO0ZWujrmgtS1NCQ21pBGO1kPUJerP3HWP4OUOaVO9SC97nefPgikvKJSc8E8We2K4PjWDVGF2v46JKotZI1EMk6jGSfSlLXx3umHc9mEfhIYPcf33o69Rqb6MeWpf--Usqec4t85o97y74CWL64ec7iKoD7adO_e9H1H8BGumkVw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79579707</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Rocco, Angelo G ; Kaul, Alan F ; Reisman, Richard M ; Gallo, Jeffrey P ; Lief, Philip A</creator><creatorcontrib>Rocco, Angelo G ; Kaul, Alan F ; Reisman, Richard M ; Gallo, Jeffrey P ; Lief, Philip A</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractBoth regional intravenous guanethidine and reserpine have been reported as effective in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reserpine depletes storage of norepinephrine, and guanethidine interferes with transport of norepinephrine while depleting storage in the sympathetic nerve terminal. The purpose of this study was to compare drug efficacy in double-blind fashion. Twelve patients, 10 ofwhome had previous stellate or lumbar sympathetic blocks, were entered into this double-blind cross-over study. Each patient Successively received 20 mg guanethidine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, 1.25 mg reserpine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, and 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine with a 1-week interval between medications. At the end of the study and before the code was broken each patient had the option of continuing treatment with any of the three drugsthe patient merely asked for the first, second or third drug. Pain assessment used verbal ordinal, numeric, and visual analog scales. Follow-up asted for a minimum of 6 months. Changes in pain intensity for the first 3 days did not differ siginificantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control group. Pain relief from significantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control groups. Pain relief from 2 to 14 months was achieved in two patients receiving reserpine. One receiving guanethidine, and none receiving lidocaine. None of the patients experienced permanent relief. No different was found between reserpine and guanethidine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-8047</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-5409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002508-198909000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2520406</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJPAEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Temperature - drug effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Guanethidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Guanethidine - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Injections, Intravenous ; Lidocaine - therapeutic use ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nerve Block ; Neuropharmacology ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - complications ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - drug therapy ; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - physiopathology ; Reserpine - administration &amp; dosage ; Reserpine - therapeutic use</subject><ispartof>The Clinical journal of pain, 1989-09, Vol.5 (3), p.205-210</ispartof><rights>Lippincott-Raven Publishers.</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-95f98504ce686787483672a6ab69d9ff489ddaf67483325391d1e45f1d8663893</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19597152$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2520406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rocco, Angelo G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Alan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisman, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lief, Philip A</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study</title><title>The Clinical journal of pain</title><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><description>AbstractBoth regional intravenous guanethidine and reserpine have been reported as effective in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reserpine depletes storage of norepinephrine, and guanethidine interferes with transport of norepinephrine while depleting storage in the sympathetic nerve terminal. The purpose of this study was to compare drug efficacy in double-blind fashion. Twelve patients, 10 ofwhome had previous stellate or lumbar sympathetic blocks, were entered into this double-blind cross-over study. Each patient Successively received 20 mg guanethidine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, 1.25 mg reserpine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, and 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine with a 1-week interval between medications. At the end of the study and before the code was broken each patient had the option of continuing treatment with any of the three drugsthe patient merely asked for the first, second or third drug. Pain assessment used verbal ordinal, numeric, and visual analog scales. Follow-up asted for a minimum of 6 months. Changes in pain intensity for the first 3 days did not differ siginificantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control group. Pain relief from significantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control groups. Pain relief from 2 to 14 months was achieved in two patients receiving reserpine. One receiving guanethidine, and none receiving lidocaine. None of the patients experienced permanent relief. No different was found between reserpine and guanethidine.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Temperature - drug effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guanethidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Guanethidine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections, Intravenous</subject><subject>Lidocaine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - complications</subject><subject>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - drug therapy</subject><subject>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - physiopathology</subject><subject>Reserpine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Reserpine - therapeutic use</subject><issn>0749-8047</issn><issn>1536-5409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Ustu1TAUtBBVuRQ-AckbWBHqPPxallsolSohtbC2fONjYnDiYCct4UP4Xpze27LCG3vOmRn7aIwQLsm7kkh-SvKqKBFFKYUkMqPivvQEbUpas4I2RD5FG8IbWQjS8GfoeUrfCSlpJcgxOq5oRRrCNujPGd6GftTRpTDgYPE1fHNh0B5fDlPUtzCEOeGLWQ8wdc64AbAeTGYliOOK3JCB9fAL3yzZZ-pgci0-X9IUw9gtePXPTsF7MG_xdRaH3v1ez-dh3nko3nuXDbcxpBRuIeKbaTbLC3RktU_w8rCfoK8fP3zZfiquPl9cbs-uirYWtCoktVJQ0rTABOOCN6JmvNJM75g00tpGSGO0ZWujrmgtS1NCQ21pBGO1kPUJerP3HWP4OUOaVO9SC97nefPgikvKJSc8E8We2K4PjWDVGF2v46JKotZI1EMk6jGSfSlLXx3umHc9mEfhIYPcf33o69Rqb6MeWpf--Usqec4t85o97y74CWL64ec7iKoD7adO_e9H1H8BGumkVw</recordid><startdate>198909</startdate><enddate>198909</enddate><creator>Rocco, Angelo G</creator><creator>Kaul, Alan F</creator><creator>Reisman, Richard M</creator><creator>Gallo, Jeffrey P</creator><creator>Lief, Philip A</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><general>Lippincott Williams and Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198909</creationdate><title>A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study</title><author>Rocco, Angelo G ; Kaul, Alan F ; Reisman, Richard M ; Gallo, Jeffrey P ; Lief, Philip A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3852-95f98504ce686787483672a6ab69d9ff489ddaf67483325391d1e45f1d8663893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Temperature - drug effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guanethidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Guanethidine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections, Intravenous</topic><topic>Lidocaine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - complications</topic><topic>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - drug therapy</topic><topic>Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - physiopathology</topic><topic>Reserpine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Reserpine - therapeutic use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rocco, Angelo G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Alan F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reisman, Richard M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallo, Jeffrey P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lief, Philip A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rocco, Angelo G</au><au>Kaul, Alan F</au><au>Reisman, Richard M</au><au>Gallo, Jeffrey P</au><au>Lief, Philip A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study</atitle><jtitle>The Clinical journal of pain</jtitle><addtitle>Clin J Pain</addtitle><date>1989-09</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>205</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>205-210</pages><issn>0749-8047</issn><eissn>1536-5409</eissn><coden>CJPAEU</coden><abstract>AbstractBoth regional intravenous guanethidine and reserpine have been reported as effective in the treatment of reflex sympathetic dystrophy. Reserpine depletes storage of norepinephrine, and guanethidine interferes with transport of norepinephrine while depleting storage in the sympathetic nerve terminal. The purpose of this study was to compare drug efficacy in double-blind fashion. Twelve patients, 10 ofwhome had previous stellate or lumbar sympathetic blocks, were entered into this double-blind cross-over study. Each patient Successively received 20 mg guanethidine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, 1.25 mg reserpine in 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine, and 50 ml 0.5% lidocaine with a 1-week interval between medications. At the end of the study and before the code was broken each patient had the option of continuing treatment with any of the three drugsthe patient merely asked for the first, second or third drug. Pain assessment used verbal ordinal, numeric, and visual analog scales. Follow-up asted for a minimum of 6 months. Changes in pain intensity for the first 3 days did not differ siginificantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control group. Pain relief from significantly among guanethidine, reserpine, and control groups. Pain relief from 2 to 14 months was achieved in two patients receiving reserpine. One receiving guanethidine, and none receiving lidocaine. None of the patients experienced permanent relief. No different was found between reserpine and guanethidine.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub><pmid>2520406</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002508-198909000-00002</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-8047
ispartof The Clinical journal of pain, 1989-09, Vol.5 (3), p.205-210
issn 0749-8047
1536-5409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79579707
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Analgesics
Biological and medical sciences
Body Temperature - drug effects
Double-Blind Method
Female
Guanethidine - administration & dosage
Guanethidine - therapeutic use
Humans
Injections, Intravenous
Lidocaine - therapeutic use
Male
Medical sciences
Nerve Block
Neuropharmacology
Pain - drug therapy
Pain - etiology
Pain Measurement
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - complications
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - drug therapy
Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy - physiopathology
Reserpine - administration & dosage
Reserpine - therapeutic use
title A Comparison of Regional Intravenous Guanethidine and Reserpine in Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy A Controlled, Randomized, Double-Blind Crossover Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T15%3A03%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparison%20of%20Regional%20Intravenous%20Guanethidine%20and%20Reserpine%20in%20Reflex%20Sympathetic%20Dystrophy%20A%20Controlled,%20Randomized,%20Double-Blind%20Crossover%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Clinical%20journal%20of%20pain&rft.au=Rocco,%20Angelo%20G&rft.date=1989-09&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=205&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=205-210&rft.issn=0749-8047&rft.eissn=1536-5409&rft.coden=CJPAEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002508-198909000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79579707%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79579707&rft_id=info:pmid/2520406&rfr_iscdi=true