Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?
Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of pediatric surgery 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 330 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 328 |
container_title | European journal of pediatric surgery |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Misra, D. Akhter, A. Potts, S. R. Brown, S. Boston, V. E. |
description | Abstract
AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks.
RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-2008-1071185 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79571482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79571482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LHEEQhhuJ6MZ49Sb0IeQ22p87PV4kiEmEJQaN4K3p6anRltnutWtG4r-3ZQdvOVXB-9Rb8BByxNkJZ1qfYiUYMxVnNedG75AFV7KppG7uP5EFa8peC2X2yWfEJ8a4agTbI3uNKokRC3L_53VIOXh6O0JMGPCMXiG9foFc3cAQXPRAU6R3w5gdpil29Na7iHQFrgvxgY6J_oYHN4YXoJf_NqWr7Cni-Rey27sB4XCeB-Tux-Xfi1_V6vrn1cX3VeWlWY6V6tqm0X27FEpxw1oHsm97pXyr5VJL0XHPlqpjAMqAkXVX97VxmsnOt7I3rTwg37a9m5yeJ8DRrgN6GAYXIU1o60bXXBlRwJMt6HNCzNDbTQ5rl18tZ_ZdpUX7rtLOKsvB8dw8tWvoPvDZXcm_zrlD74Y-F1kBPzDBRW04L1i1xcbHAGuwT2nKsRj539s3EYCJrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79571482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks.
RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0939-7248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-359X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9493982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Barium Sulfate ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contrast Media ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparotomy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Original article ; Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology ; Pyloric Stenosis - surgery ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>European journal of pediatric surgery, 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2008-1071185.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3006,3007,27907,27908,54542</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2127811$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9493982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Misra, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><title>European journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract
AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks.
RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</description><subject>Barium Sulfate</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0939-7248</issn><issn>1439-359X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LHEEQhhuJ6MZ49Sb0IeQ22p87PV4kiEmEJQaN4K3p6anRltnutWtG4r-3ZQdvOVXB-9Rb8BByxNkJZ1qfYiUYMxVnNedG75AFV7KppG7uP5EFa8peC2X2yWfEJ8a4agTbI3uNKokRC3L_53VIOXh6O0JMGPCMXiG9foFc3cAQXPRAU6R3w5gdpil29Na7iHQFrgvxgY6J_oYHN4YXoJf_NqWr7Cni-Rey27sB4XCeB-Tux-Xfi1_V6vrn1cX3VeWlWY6V6tqm0X27FEpxw1oHsm97pXyr5VJL0XHPlqpjAMqAkXVX97VxmsnOt7I3rTwg37a9m5yeJ8DRrgN6GAYXIU1o60bXXBlRwJMt6HNCzNDbTQ5rl18tZ_ZdpUX7rtLOKsvB8dw8tWvoPvDZXcm_zrlD74Y-F1kBPzDBRW04L1i1xcbHAGuwT2nKsRj539s3EYCJrQ</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Misra, D.</creator><creator>Akhter, A.</creator><creator>Potts, S. R.</creator><creator>Brown, S.</creator><creator>Boston, V. E.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><author>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Barium Sulfate</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Misra, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Misra, D.</au><au>Akhter, A.</au><au>Potts, S. R.</au><au>Brown, S.</au><au>Boston, V. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>328-330</pages><issn>0939-7248</issn><eissn>1439-359X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies.
METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks.
RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>9493982</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2008-1071185</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0939-7248 |
ispartof | European journal of pediatric surgery, 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330 |
issn | 0939-7248 1439-359X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79571482 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Barium Sulfate Biological and medical sciences Contrast Media Digestive system. Abdomen False Positive Reactions Female Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Laparotomy Male Medical sciences Original article Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology Pyloric Stenosis - surgery Radiography Retrospective Studies Time Factors Ultrasonic investigative techniques Ultrasonography |
title | Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pyloric%20Stenosis:%20Is%20Over-Reliance%20on%20Ultrasound%20Scans%20Leading%20to%20Negative%20Explorations?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Misra,%20D.&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=328-330&rft.issn=0939-7248&rft.eissn=1439-359X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2008-1071185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79571482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79571482&rft_id=info:pmid/9493982&rfr_iscdi=true |