Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?

Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of pediatric surgery 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330
Hauptverfasser: Misra, D., Akhter, A., Potts, S. R., Brown, S., Boston, V. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 330
container_issue 6
container_start_page 328
container_title European journal of pediatric surgery
container_volume 7
creator Misra, D.
Akhter, A.
Potts, S. R.
Brown, S.
Boston, V. E.
description Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed. CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.
doi_str_mv 10.1055/s-2008-1071185
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79571482</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79571482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LHEEQhhuJ6MZ49Sb0IeQ22p87PV4kiEmEJQaN4K3p6anRltnutWtG4r-3ZQdvOVXB-9Rb8BByxNkJZ1qfYiUYMxVnNedG75AFV7KppG7uP5EFa8peC2X2yWfEJ8a4agTbI3uNKokRC3L_53VIOXh6O0JMGPCMXiG9foFc3cAQXPRAU6R3w5gdpil29Na7iHQFrgvxgY6J_oYHN4YXoJf_NqWr7Cni-Rey27sB4XCeB-Tux-Xfi1_V6vrn1cX3VeWlWY6V6tqm0X27FEpxw1oHsm97pXyr5VJL0XHPlqpjAMqAkXVX97VxmsnOt7I3rTwg37a9m5yeJ8DRrgN6GAYXIU1o60bXXBlRwJMt6HNCzNDbTQ5rl18tZ_ZdpUX7rtLOKsvB8dw8tWvoPvDZXcm_zrlD74Y-F1kBPzDBRW04L1i1xcbHAGuwT2nKsRj539s3EYCJrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79571482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed. CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0939-7248</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-359X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1071185</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9493982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Thieme</publisher><subject>Barium Sulfate ; Biological and medical sciences ; Contrast Media ; Digestive system. Abdomen ; False Positive Reactions ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Laparotomy ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Original article ; Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology ; Pyloric Stenosis - surgery ; Radiography ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Ultrasonic investigative techniques ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>European journal of pediatric surgery, 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330</ispartof><rights>Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-2008-1071185.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3006,3007,27907,27908,54542</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2127811$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9493982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Misra, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><title>European journal of pediatric surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed. CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</description><subject>Barium Sulfate</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Digestive system. Abdomen</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Pyloric Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>0939-7248</issn><issn>1439-359X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LHEEQhhuJ6MZ49Sb0IeQ22p87PV4kiEmEJQaN4K3p6anRltnutWtG4r-3ZQdvOVXB-9Rb8BByxNkJZ1qfYiUYMxVnNedG75AFV7KppG7uP5EFa8peC2X2yWfEJ8a4agTbI3uNKokRC3L_53VIOXh6O0JMGPCMXiG9foFc3cAQXPRAU6R3w5gdpil29Na7iHQFrgvxgY6J_oYHN4YXoJf_NqWr7Cni-Rey27sB4XCeB-Tux-Xfi1_V6vrn1cX3VeWlWY6V6tqm0X27FEpxw1oHsm97pXyr5VJL0XHPlqpjAMqAkXVX97VxmsnOt7I3rTwg37a9m5yeJ8DRrgN6GAYXIU1o60bXXBlRwJMt6HNCzNDbTQ5rl18tZ_ZdpUX7rtLOKsvB8dw8tWvoPvDZXcm_zrlD74Y-F1kBPzDBRW04L1i1xcbHAGuwT2nKsRj539s3EYCJrQ</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Misra, D.</creator><creator>Akhter, A.</creator><creator>Potts, S. R.</creator><creator>Brown, S.</creator><creator>Boston, V. E.</creator><general>Thieme</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</title><author>Misra, D. ; Akhter, A. ; Potts, S. R. ; Brown, S. ; Boston, V. E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-4db995fb6244180bae3fbf44cb536532d1c064d0ee48e837d7f78a503dcb3f8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Barium Sulfate</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Digestive system. Abdomen</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Pyloric Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonic investigative techniques</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Misra, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhter, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potts, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boston, V. E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Misra, D.</au><au>Akhter, A.</au><au>Potts, S. R.</au><au>Brown, S.</au><au>Boston, V. E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of pediatric surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Pediatr Surg</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>328</spage><epage>330</epage><pages>328-330</pages><issn>0939-7248</issn><eissn>1439-359X</eissn><abstract>Abstract AIM: To see whether increasing use of ultrasound scans in pyloric stenosis is leading to false-positive diagnoses, and even negative laparotomies. METHODS: Over a 2-year period, 76 neonates underwent laparotomy with a preoperative diagnosis of pyloric stenosis (PS). There were 57 males and 19 females, age ranged from 10 days to 7 weeks. RESULTS: Six patients proceeded straight to surgery after undergoing a test feed. The remaining 70 patients had one or more imaging investigations. Of these; 56 patients had an ultrasound only, 5 had a barium meal only while 9 patients had both investigations. Ultrasound showed evolving lesions in 2 patients. It was equivocal or falsely negative in 8 - all were diagnosed correctly after undergoing barium meals. Fifty-two patients were diagnosed correctly on ultrasound. There were, however, 3 false-positive ultrasonic diagnosis - i.e., at laparotomy the pylorus was found to be normal. One of these patients even had a "diagnostic" barium meal. The factors leading to these negative explorations are discussed. CONCLUSION: Pyloric "tumours" can be difficult to palpate early in the evolution of the disease. Reliance upon the ultrasound appearance of the pylorus without taking into account other important diagnostic evidence will increase the risk of false-positive diagnoses and unnecessary laparotomy. The importance of clinical examination and test feed is emphasised.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Thieme</pub><pmid>9493982</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-2008-1071185</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0939-7248
ispartof European journal of pediatric surgery, 1997-12, Vol.7 (6), p.328-330
issn 0939-7248
1439-359X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79571482
source MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals
subjects Barium Sulfate
Biological and medical sciences
Contrast Media
Digestive system. Abdomen
False Positive Reactions
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Laparotomy
Male
Medical sciences
Original article
Pyloric Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Pyloric Stenosis - epidemiology
Pyloric Stenosis - surgery
Radiography
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Ultrasonic investigative techniques
Ultrasonography
title Pyloric Stenosis: Is Over-Reliance on Ultrasound Scans Leading to Negative Explorations?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A56%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pyloric%20Stenosis:%20Is%20Over-Reliance%20on%20Ultrasound%20Scans%20Leading%20to%20Negative%20Explorations?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20pediatric%20surgery&rft.au=Misra,%20D.&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=328&rft.epage=330&rft.pages=328-330&rft.issn=0939-7248&rft.eissn=1439-359X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-2008-1071185&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79571482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79571482&rft_id=info:pmid/9493982&rfr_iscdi=true