Centralized cytogenetic analysis of pediatric acute leukemia: results of an Italian collaborative experience

Dipartimento di Pediatria, Universita di Padova, Italy. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cytogenetic analysis of acute leukemia yields important information which has been demonstrated to be correlated to patient survival. A reference laboratory was created in order to perform karyotype analysis on all cas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Haematologica (Roma) 1997-11, Vol.82 (6), p.654-659
Hauptverfasser: Sainati, L, Leszl, A, Putti, M, Pasquali, F, Maserati, E, Donti, E, Venti, G, Simi, P, Giuliani, C, Angioni, A, Stella, M, Montaldi, A, Sessarego, M, Zanesco, L, Biondi, A, Basso, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Dipartimento di Pediatria, Universita di Padova, Italy. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cytogenetic analysis of acute leukemia yields important information which has been demonstrated to be correlated to patient survival. A reference laboratory was created in order to perform karyotype analysis on all cases of acute leukemia enrolled in the AIEOP (Associazione Italiana Emato-Oncologia Pediatrica) protocols. METHODS: From January 1990 to December 1995, 1115 samples of children with ALL or AML were sent in for cytogenetic analysis. The results of cell cultures were screened in the Reference Laboratory and then the fixed metaphases were sent to one of the six cytogenetic laboratories for analysis. RESULTS: The leukemic karyotypes of 556 patients were successfully analyzed. An abnormal clone was detected in 49% of cases of ALL and in 66% of AML. In ALL the most frequent abnormality was 9p rearrangement. Other recurrent abnormalities were t(9;22), t(4;11) and t(1;19). In AML t(8;21), t(15;17) and 11q23 rearrangement were the most frequent structural abnormalities. These findings are similar to the results obtained in other multicenter studies using a similar approach. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the feasibility of performing cytogenetic analysis in a centralized laboratory on mailed samples of bone marrow and/or peripheral blood; this is very important considering that cytogenetic analysis of neoplastic tissue requires a special laboratory and expert staff.
ISSN:0390-6078
1592-8721