Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class

SUMMARY Peer assessment is a valuable tool for developing student skills whereby they gain insight into evaluating their own level of understanding within a subject. It encourages student participation in the processes of learning and assessment, but is not widely utilized. This paper reports on the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Medical education 1997-07, Vol.31 (4), p.281-286
Hauptverfasser:	Heylings, D J, Stefani, L A J
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Anatomy Educational Measurement Feedback Humans Peer Group Scotland
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	286
container_issue	4
container_start_page	281
container_title	Medical education
container_volume	31
creator	Heylings, D J Stefani, L A J
description	SUMMARY Peer assessment is a valuable tool for developing student skills whereby they gain insight into evaluating their own level of understanding within a subject. It encourages student participation in the processes of learning and assessment, but is not widely utilized. This paper reports on the issues raised by this method of assessment when used to mark clinical case studies in a large anatomy class of first year medical students.
doi_str_mv	10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79562506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79562506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-8ec8b6a9570946711e50eaf4907eae8bdd480a091100fa96c0d315d9eeac965f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BCSLBbuEcRO_2CDEoyCVhwSoS8txJlXaJC1xKtq_x1Wr7pmNNbpz73gOIZcMYhbqehqzRPBooAdJzLSWcZdBaES8OiC9vXRIepCAioAxOCGn3k8BQPJUHZNjnSql0rRH7j4QW2q9R-9rbDpaIOaZdTNa23ZWNhNaNtTSyrYTpDXmpbMVtY3t5vWauioYz8hRYSuP57u3T76fHr_un6PR-_Dl_m4UuRQUixQ6lQmruQSdCskYckBbpBokWlRZnqcKLOjwWSisFg7yhPFcI1qnBS-SPrna5i7a-c8SfWfq0jusKtvgfOmN1FwMOIgweLMddO3c-xYLs2jLcM3aMDAbfmZqNpDMBpLZ8DM7fmYVzBe7LcssnLu37oAF_Xar_5YVrv-RbF4fH74HioWEaJtQ-g5X-4RA2wiZSG7Gb0Ojxw-SPX9KM0r-AG9njwQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79562506</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Heylings, D J ; Stefani, L A J</creator><creatorcontrib>Heylings, D J ; Stefani, L A J</creatorcontrib><description>SUMMARY Peer assessment is a valuable tool for developing student skills whereby they gain insight into evaluating their own level of understanding within a subject. It encourages student participation in the processes of learning and assessment, but is not widely utilized. This paper reports on the issues raised by this method of assessment when used to mark clinical case studies in a large anatomy class of first year medical students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-0110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2923</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9488844</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Anatomy ; Educational Measurement ; Feedback ; Humans ; Peer Group ; Scotland</subject><ispartof>Medical education, 1997-07, Vol.31 (4), p.281-286</ispartof><rights>1997 Blackwell Publishing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-8ec8b6a9570946711e50eaf4907eae8bdd480a091100fa96c0d315d9eeac965f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-8ec8b6a9570946711e50eaf4907eae8bdd480a091100fa96c0d315d9eeac965f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9488844$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heylings, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, L A J</creatorcontrib><title>Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class</title><title>Medical education</title><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><description>SUMMARY Peer assessment is a valuable tool for developing student skills whereby they gain insight into evaluating their own level of understanding within a subject. It encourages student participation in the processes of learning and assessment, but is not widely utilized. This paper reports on the issues raised by this method of assessment when used to mark clinical case studies in a large anatomy class of first year medical students.</description><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Peer Group</subject><subject>Scotland</subject><issn>0308-0110</issn><issn>1365-2923</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkMtOwzAQRS0EglL4BCSLBbuEcRO_2CDEoyCVhwSoS8txJlXaJC1xKtq_x1Wr7pmNNbpz73gOIZcMYhbqehqzRPBooAdJzLSWcZdBaES8OiC9vXRIepCAioAxOCGn3k8BQPJUHZNjnSql0rRH7j4QW2q9R-9rbDpaIOaZdTNa23ZWNhNaNtTSyrYTpDXmpbMVtY3t5vWauioYz8hRYSuP57u3T76fHr_un6PR-_Dl_m4UuRQUixQ6lQmruQSdCskYckBbpBokWlRZnqcKLOjwWSisFg7yhPFcI1qnBS-SPrna5i7a-c8SfWfq0jusKtvgfOmN1FwMOIgweLMddO3c-xYLs2jLcM3aMDAbfmZqNpDMBpLZ8DM7fmYVzBe7LcssnLu37oAF_Xar_5YVrv-RbF4fH74HioWEaJtQ-g5X-4RA2wiZSG7Gb0Ojxw-SPX9KM0r-AG9njwQ</recordid><startdate>199707</startdate><enddate>199707</enddate><creator>Heylings, D J</creator><creator>Stefani, L A J</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199707</creationdate><title>Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class</title><author>Heylings, D J ; Stefani, L A J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4081-8ec8b6a9570946711e50eaf4907eae8bdd480a091100fa96c0d315d9eeac965f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Peer Group</topic><topic>Scotland</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heylings, D J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefani, L A J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heylings, D J</au><au>Stefani, L A J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class</atitle><jtitle>Medical education</jtitle><addtitle>Med Educ</addtitle><date>1997-07</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>0308-0110</issn><eissn>1365-2923</eissn><abstract>SUMMARY Peer assessment is a valuable tool for developing student skills whereby they gain insight into evaluating their own level of understanding within a subject. It encourages student participation in the processes of learning and assessment, but is not widely utilized. This paper reports on the issues raised by this method of assessment when used to mark clinical case studies in a large anatomy class of first year medical students.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>9488844</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0308-0110
ispartof	Medical education, 1997-07, Vol.31 (4), p.281-286
issn	0308-0110 1365-2923
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79562506
source	MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects	Anatomy Educational Measurement Feedback Humans Peer Group Scotland
title	Peer assessment feedback marking in a large medical anatomy class
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A09%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer%20assessment%20feedback%20marking%20in%20a%20large%20medical%20anatomy%20class&rft.jtitle=Medical%20education&rft.au=Heylings,%20D%20J&rft.date=1997-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=0308-0110&rft.eissn=1365-2923&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1997.tb02926.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79562506%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79562506&rft_id=info:pmid/9488844&rfr_iscdi=true