Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?

This study investigated the reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) to identify appropriate candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to a panel of vascular specialists. Prospective study. 102 patients with 145 carotid bifurcation stenosis or occlusions. All patients who required...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 1997-12, Vol.14 (6), p.451-456
Hauptverfasser: Chen, J.C., Salvian, A.J., Taylor, D.C., Teal, P.A., Marotta, T.R., Hsiang, Y.N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 456
container_issue 6
container_start_page 451
container_title European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 14
creator Chen, J.C.
Salvian, A.J.
Taylor, D.C.
Teal, P.A.
Marotta, T.R.
Hsiang, Y.N.
description This study investigated the reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) to identify appropriate candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to a panel of vascular specialists. Prospective study. 102 patients with 145 carotid bifurcation stenosis or occlusions. All patients who required a carotid angiogram were evaluated using DUS followed by carotid angiography. A blinded panel of four vascular specialists individually decided whether CEA would be appropriate for each patient based on pre-angiographic information. Angiograms were then shown to panelists to see if their management decision was altered by the angiogram. For stenosis ≥ 80% on DUS (n = 60), panelists unanimously agreed on CEA without angiography in 57 lesions. In 50 lesions (87.7%), angiography showed ≥ 70% stenosis and the management plan remained unchanged. For the other seven lesions, intracranial aneurysms ( n = 2), tandem intracranial lesion ( n = 1), unsuspected proximal common carotid lesion ( n = 1), a 40% stenotic lesion ( n = 1), and high carotid bifurcations ( n = 2) were seen. In lesions with 50–79% stenosis on DUS ( n = 66), none of the panelists recommended CEA without prior angiography. Eighteen (27%) of these lesions were ≥ 70% stenosed on angiogram. Complications of angiograms included one stroke, one haematoma, and one severe allergic reaction. Carotid duplex ultrasonography without angiography can reliably select lesions appropriate for surgery only when critical stenosis ≥ 80% is chosen. Routine angiography is recommended for carotid stenosis of 50–79% when CEA is considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80123-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79549891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1078588497801232</els_id><sourcerecordid>79549891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-43fa7bb91909b09010a7042c964b201812e629fb08a160112087b3202b7f911b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxTAQhYMovn-C0JXoojqTPtKsRC6-QBB8rEPSTrXS29QkFe-_N9d7detqBs6ZOTMfY0cIZwhYnj8hiCotqio_keK0AuRZyjfYLhYZTzmWxWbsfy07bM_7dwAoMCu22bbMS1Gg3GWPMz0kzTT29JVMfXDa28G-Oj2-LRJPPdUh0ePo7Og6HSgZdehoCD5prUtq7WzomoSGRrtALprtfHFxwLZa3Xs6XNd99nJ99Ty7Te8fbu5ml_dpnYMIaZ61WhgjUYI0IAFBC8h5LcvccMAKOZVctgYqjSUgcqiEyThwI1qJaLJ9drzaG8_7mMgHNe98TX2vB7KTV0IWuawkRmOxMtbOeu-oVfGbuXYLhaCWLNUPS7UEpaRQPywVj3NH64DJzKn5m1rDi_rFSqf45WdHTvk60qmp6ZYsVGO7fxK-AVupg50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79549891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Chen, J.C. ; Salvian, A.J. ; Taylor, D.C. ; Teal, P.A. ; Marotta, T.R. ; Hsiang, Y.N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, J.C. ; Salvian, A.J. ; Taylor, D.C. ; Teal, P.A. ; Marotta, T.R. ; Hsiang, Y.N.</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) to identify appropriate candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to a panel of vascular specialists. Prospective study. 102 patients with 145 carotid bifurcation stenosis or occlusions. All patients who required a carotid angiogram were evaluated using DUS followed by carotid angiography. A blinded panel of four vascular specialists individually decided whether CEA would be appropriate for each patient based on pre-angiographic information. Angiograms were then shown to panelists to see if their management decision was altered by the angiogram. For stenosis ≥ 80% on DUS (n = 60), panelists unanimously agreed on CEA without angiography in 57 lesions. In 50 lesions (87.7%), angiography showed ≥ 70% stenosis and the management plan remained unchanged. For the other seven lesions, intracranial aneurysms ( n = 2), tandem intracranial lesion ( n = 1), unsuspected proximal common carotid lesion ( n = 1), a 40% stenotic lesion ( n = 1), and high carotid bifurcations ( n = 2) were seen. In lesions with 50–79% stenosis on DUS ( n = 66), none of the panelists recommended CEA without prior angiography. Eighteen (27%) of these lesions were ≥ 70% stenosed on angiogram. Complications of angiograms included one stroke, one haematoma, and one severe allergic reaction. Carotid duplex ultrasonography without angiography can reliably select lesions appropriate for surgery only when critical stenosis ≥ 80% is chosen. Routine angiography is recommended for carotid stenosis of 50–79% when CEA is considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-5884</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2165</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80123-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9467519</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Angiography ; Carotid endarterectomy ; Carotid stenosis ; Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Stenosis - surgery ; Cerebral Angiography ; Duplex ; Endarterectomy, Carotid ; Humans ; Patient Selection ; Prospective Studies ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1997-12, Vol.14 (6), p.451-456</ispartof><rights>1997 W.B. Saunders Company Ltd. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-43fa7bb91909b09010a7042c964b201812e629fb08a160112087b3202b7f911b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-43fa7bb91909b09010a7042c964b201812e629fb08a160112087b3202b7f911b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80123-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3541,27915,27916,45986</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9467519$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvian, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, P.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotta, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiang, Y.N.</creatorcontrib><title>Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?</title><title>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><description>This study investigated the reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) to identify appropriate candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to a panel of vascular specialists. Prospective study. 102 patients with 145 carotid bifurcation stenosis or occlusions. All patients who required a carotid angiogram were evaluated using DUS followed by carotid angiography. A blinded panel of four vascular specialists individually decided whether CEA would be appropriate for each patient based on pre-angiographic information. Angiograms were then shown to panelists to see if their management decision was altered by the angiogram. For stenosis ≥ 80% on DUS (n = 60), panelists unanimously agreed on CEA without angiography in 57 lesions. In 50 lesions (87.7%), angiography showed ≥ 70% stenosis and the management plan remained unchanged. For the other seven lesions, intracranial aneurysms ( n = 2), tandem intracranial lesion ( n = 1), unsuspected proximal common carotid lesion ( n = 1), a 40% stenotic lesion ( n = 1), and high carotid bifurcations ( n = 2) were seen. In lesions with 50–79% stenosis on DUS ( n = 66), none of the panelists recommended CEA without prior angiography. Eighteen (27%) of these lesions were ≥ 70% stenosed on angiogram. Complications of angiograms included one stroke, one haematoma, and one severe allergic reaction. Carotid duplex ultrasonography without angiography can reliably select lesions appropriate for surgery only when critical stenosis ≥ 80% is chosen. Routine angiography is recommended for carotid stenosis of 50–79% when CEA is considered.</description><subject>Angiography</subject><subject>Carotid endarterectomy</subject><subject>Carotid stenosis</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Cerebral Angiography</subject><subject>Duplex</subject><subject>Endarterectomy, Carotid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1078-5884</issn><issn>1532-2165</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxTAQhYMovn-C0JXoojqTPtKsRC6-QBB8rEPSTrXS29QkFe-_N9d7detqBs6ZOTMfY0cIZwhYnj8hiCotqio_keK0AuRZyjfYLhYZTzmWxWbsfy07bM_7dwAoMCu22bbMS1Gg3GWPMz0kzTT29JVMfXDa28G-Oj2-LRJPPdUh0ePo7Og6HSgZdehoCD5prUtq7WzomoSGRrtALprtfHFxwLZa3Xs6XNd99nJ99Ty7Te8fbu5ml_dpnYMIaZ61WhgjUYI0IAFBC8h5LcvccMAKOZVctgYqjSUgcqiEyThwI1qJaLJ9drzaG8_7mMgHNe98TX2vB7KTV0IWuawkRmOxMtbOeu-oVfGbuXYLhaCWLNUPS7UEpaRQPywVj3NH64DJzKn5m1rDi_rFSqf45WdHTvk60qmp6ZYsVGO7fxK-AVupg50</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Chen, J.C.</creator><creator>Salvian, A.J.</creator><creator>Taylor, D.C.</creator><creator>Teal, P.A.</creator><creator>Marotta, T.R.</creator><creator>Hsiang, Y.N.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?</title><author>Chen, J.C. ; Salvian, A.J. ; Taylor, D.C. ; Teal, P.A. ; Marotta, T.R. ; Hsiang, Y.N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-43fa7bb91909b09010a7042c964b201812e629fb08a160112087b3202b7f911b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Angiography</topic><topic>Carotid endarterectomy</topic><topic>Carotid stenosis</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Cerebral Angiography</topic><topic>Duplex</topic><topic>Endarterectomy, Carotid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, J.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salvian, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, D.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teal, P.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marotta, T.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiang, Y.N.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, J.C.</au><au>Salvian, A.J.</au><au>Taylor, D.C.</au><au>Teal, P.A.</au><au>Marotta, T.R.</au><au>Hsiang, Y.N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>451</spage><epage>456</epage><pages>451-456</pages><issn>1078-5884</issn><eissn>1532-2165</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the reliability of carotid duplex ultrasound (DUS) to identify appropriate candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) according to a panel of vascular specialists. Prospective study. 102 patients with 145 carotid bifurcation stenosis or occlusions. All patients who required a carotid angiogram were evaluated using DUS followed by carotid angiography. A blinded panel of four vascular specialists individually decided whether CEA would be appropriate for each patient based on pre-angiographic information. Angiograms were then shown to panelists to see if their management decision was altered by the angiogram. For stenosis ≥ 80% on DUS (n = 60), panelists unanimously agreed on CEA without angiography in 57 lesions. In 50 lesions (87.7%), angiography showed ≥ 70% stenosis and the management plan remained unchanged. For the other seven lesions, intracranial aneurysms ( n = 2), tandem intracranial lesion ( n = 1), unsuspected proximal common carotid lesion ( n = 1), a 40% stenotic lesion ( n = 1), and high carotid bifurcations ( n = 2) were seen. In lesions with 50–79% stenosis on DUS ( n = 66), none of the panelists recommended CEA without prior angiography. Eighteen (27%) of these lesions were ≥ 70% stenosed on angiogram. Complications of angiograms included one stroke, one haematoma, and one severe allergic reaction. Carotid duplex ultrasonography without angiography can reliably select lesions appropriate for surgery only when critical stenosis ≥ 80% is chosen. Routine angiography is recommended for carotid stenosis of 50–79% when CEA is considered.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9467519</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80123-2</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-5884
ispartof European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery, 1997-12, Vol.14 (6), p.451-456
issn 1078-5884
1532-2165
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79549891
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Angiography
Carotid endarterectomy
Carotid stenosis
Carotid Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Carotid Stenosis - surgery
Cerebral Angiography
Duplex
Endarterectomy, Carotid
Humans
Patient Selection
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Ultrasonography
title Can duplex ultrasonography select appropriate patients for carotid endarterectomy?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A55%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20duplex%20ultrasonography%20select%20appropriate%20patients%20for%20carotid%20endarterectomy?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Chen,%20J.C.&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=451&rft.epage=456&rft.pages=451-456&rft.issn=1078-5884&rft.eissn=1532-2165&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1078-5884(97)80123-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79549891%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79549891&rft_id=info:pmid/9467519&rft_els_id=S1078588497801232&rfr_iscdi=true