Do juries listen to jury instructions?

The author reports the case in which he was sued for medical malpractice. A nonunanimous jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Interviews of two of the jurors revealed that the jury discounted the expert testimony on both sides, the evidence, and the jury instructions. The author, finding that the j...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 1997-01, Vol.25 (4), p.565-570
1. Verfasser:	Berger, S H
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Adult Attitude to Health Decision Making Humans Male Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence Physician-Patient Relations Psychiatry - legislation & jurisprudence Psychoanalytic Therapy - methods Social Perception United States
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	570
container_issue	4
container_start_page	565
container_title	The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
container_volume	25
creator	Berger, S H
description	The author reports the case in which he was sued for medical malpractice. A nonunanimous jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Interviews of two of the jurors revealed that the jury discounted the expert testimony on both sides, the evidence, and the jury instructions. The author, finding that the jury decided the case based upon it's perception of the physician's "bedside manner," concludes that juries expect psychiatrists to behave more like friendly family doctors than objective psychoanalysts.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79548440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79548440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-h236t-9102d6dd4465bda19e42a723d849a2ed0a8e5d7a7bf33fd8b5d1281e229d123c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMo4zj6E4RunF0hzbNZiYxPGHCj65A2tzZD2o5JSpl_b3EKB-7hnI8L5wKtC8VoToUgl7PHiuZCKnqNbmI8YEzlrBVaKSYwZmyNts9DdhiDg5h5FxP0WfoPTpnrYwpjndzQx8dbdNUYH-FuuRv0_frytXvP959vH7unfd4SKlKuCkyssJYxwStrCgWMGEmoLZkyBCw2JXArjawaShtbVtwWpCyAEDUbWtMN2p7_HsPwO0JMunOxBu9ND8MYtVSclYzhGbxfwLHqwOpjcJ0JJ70Mm_uHc9-6n3ZyAXTsjPczTfQ0TYRrprng9A84y1aM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79548440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do juries listen to jury instructions?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Berger, S H</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, S H</creatorcontrib><description>The author reports the case in which he was sued for medical malpractice. A nonunanimous jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Interviews of two of the jurors revealed that the jury discounted the expert testimony on both sides, the evidence, and the jury instructions. The author, finding that the jury decided the case based upon it's perception of the physician's "bedside manner," concludes that juries expect psychiatrists to behave more like friendly family doctors than objective psychoanalysts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-6793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3662</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9460044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude to Health ; Decision Making ; Humans ; Male ; Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Psychiatry - legislation & jurisprudence ; Psychoanalytic Therapy - methods ; Social Perception ; United States</subject><ispartof>The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1997-01, Vol.25 (4), p.565-570</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9460044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, S H</creatorcontrib><title>Do juries listen to jury instructions?</title><title>The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Psychiatry Law</addtitle><description>The author reports the case in which he was sued for medical malpractice. A nonunanimous jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Interviews of two of the jurors revealed that the jury discounted the expert testimony on both sides, the evidence, and the jury instructions. The author, finding that the jury decided the case based upon it's perception of the physician's "bedside manner," concludes that juries expect psychiatrists to behave more like friendly family doctors than objective psychoanalysts.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Physician-Patient Relations</subject><subject>Psychiatry - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Psychoanalytic Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Social Perception</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1093-6793</issn><issn>1943-3662</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0tLxDAUhYMo4zj6E4RunF0hzbNZiYxPGHCj65A2tzZD2o5JSpl_b3EKB-7hnI8L5wKtC8VoToUgl7PHiuZCKnqNbmI8YEzlrBVaKSYwZmyNts9DdhiDg5h5FxP0WfoPTpnrYwpjndzQx8dbdNUYH-FuuRv0_frytXvP959vH7unfd4SKlKuCkyssJYxwStrCgWMGEmoLZkyBCw2JXArjawaShtbVtwWpCyAEDUbWtMN2p7_HsPwO0JMunOxBu9ND8MYtVSclYzhGbxfwLHqwOpjcJ0JJ70Mm_uHc9-6n3ZyAXTsjPczTfQ0TYRrprng9A84y1aM</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Berger, S H</creator><general>American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>Do juries listen to jury instructions?</title><author>Berger, S H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-h236t-9102d6dd4465bda19e42a723d849a2ed0a8e5d7a7bf33fd8b5d1281e229d123c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Physician-Patient Relations</topic><topic>Psychiatry - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Psychoanalytic Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Social Perception</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, S H</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, S H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do juries listen to jury instructions?</atitle><jtitle>The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Psychiatry Law</addtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>565-570</pages><issn>1093-6793</issn><eissn>1943-3662</eissn><abstract>The author reports the case in which he was sued for medical malpractice. A nonunanimous jury found in favor of the plaintiff. Interviews of two of the jurors revealed that the jury discounted the expert testimony on both sides, the evidence, and the jury instructions. The author, finding that the jury decided the case based upon it's perception of the physician's "bedside manner," concludes that juries expect psychiatrists to behave more like friendly family doctors than objective psychoanalysts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law</pub><pmid>9460044</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 1093-6793
ispartof	The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 1997-01, Vol.25 (4), p.565-570
issn	1093-6793 1943-3662
language	eng
recordid	cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79548440
source	MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects	Adult Attitude to Health Decision Making Humans Male Malpractice - legislation & jurisprudence Physician-Patient Relations Psychiatry - legislation & jurisprudence Psychoanalytic Therapy - methods Social Perception United States
title	Do juries listen to jury instructions?
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A55%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20juries%20listen%20to%20jury%20instructions?&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Psychiatry%20and%20the%20Law&rft.au=Berger,%20S%20H&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=565-570&rft.issn=1093-6793&rft.eissn=1943-3662&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E79548440%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79548440&rft_id=info:pmid/9460044&rfr_iscdi=true