Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin

A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 1990-01, Vol.85 (1), p.5-14
Hauptverfasser: Hardesty, R A, Marsh, J L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 14
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 85
creator Hardesty, R A
Marsh, J L
description A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and contrasted at both periods of evaluation (1.5 and 3.0 months). The embryonic origin of onlay bone grafts to the rabbit snout is significantly correlated with graft surface area, volume, weight, and recipient bed union for up to 3 months postoperatively. Over this interval, membranous bone (calvaria) grafts either persist in their entirety or increase, whereas endochondral bone (iliac) grafts resorb. Neither the number of cortices (unicortical or bicortical) nor the orientation of unicortical grafts (cortex-to-bed relationship) affected graft fate regardless of embryonic origin. Bone density remained unaltered during both resorption and deposition. Osteogenesis, demonstrated by serial fluorochrome markers, occurs in both membranous and endochondral bone grafts. Histologically, bone grafts of membranous and endochondral origin differ greatly in their cortical to cancellous diploe ratios and architectural configuration. We hypothesize that the differences found are related to the three-dimensional osseous architecture rather than to the embryonic origin of bone per se.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006534-199001000-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79536557</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79536557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-ffceedace98b4310c4fcf8a14f9ede3f6c9e55a233c64af3095ce79070b529173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhn0AlVJ4BCSfODXgJU5qbqhikypxgXPkOONglNipk1Tq2-O0pXMZzcw_24cQpuSBEpk_kmiZ4GlCpSSExiiZUuwCzQnhLKFEsCt03fe_sZrzTMzQjDHJc57P0XYdlLPeKG1Vg71r1B6X3gGugzKDdfUTVrgLvu9AD3YHGHaqGdVgvcPeHFW49aH78Y2v90vsgwU3HARLrFyFoS3D3jurp1Jt3Q26NKrp4fbkF-j79eVr_Z5sPt8-1s-bRDMhhsQYDVApDXJVppwSnRptVoqmRkIF3GRaghCKca6zVBlOpNCQS5KTUjAZ_1yg--PceP12hH4oWttraBrlwI99kUsRWYhJuDoKdXyzD2CKLthWhX1BSTERLv4JF2fChxSLrXenHWPZQnVuPOHlf25le3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79536557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Hardesty, R A ; Marsh, J L</creator><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, R A ; Marsh, J L</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and contrasted at both periods of evaluation (1.5 and 3.0 months). The embryonic origin of onlay bone grafts to the rabbit snout is significantly correlated with graft surface area, volume, weight, and recipient bed union for up to 3 months postoperatively. Over this interval, membranous bone (calvaria) grafts either persist in their entirety or increase, whereas endochondral bone (iliac) grafts resorb. Neither the number of cortices (unicortical or bicortical) nor the orientation of unicortical grafts (cortex-to-bed relationship) affected graft fate regardless of embryonic origin. Bone density remained unaltered during both resorption and deposition. Osteogenesis, demonstrated by serial fluorochrome markers, occurs in both membranous and endochondral bone grafts. Histologically, bone grafts of membranous and endochondral origin differ greatly in their cortical to cancellous diploe ratios and architectural configuration. We hypothesize that the differences found are related to the three-dimensional osseous architecture rather than to the embryonic origin of bone per se.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199001000-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2293737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone and Bones - pathology ; Bone Resorption ; Bone Transplantation - methods ; Facial Bones - surgery ; Graft Survival ; Ilium ; Nasal Bone - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Rabbits ; Skull</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1990-01, Vol.85 (1), p.5-14</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2293737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, J L</creatorcontrib><title>Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and contrasted at both periods of evaluation (1.5 and 3.0 months). The embryonic origin of onlay bone grafts to the rabbit snout is significantly correlated with graft surface area, volume, weight, and recipient bed union for up to 3 months postoperatively. Over this interval, membranous bone (calvaria) grafts either persist in their entirety or increase, whereas endochondral bone (iliac) grafts resorb. Neither the number of cortices (unicortical or bicortical) nor the orientation of unicortical grafts (cortex-to-bed relationship) affected graft fate regardless of embryonic origin. Bone density remained unaltered during both resorption and deposition. Osteogenesis, demonstrated by serial fluorochrome markers, occurs in both membranous and endochondral bone grafts. Histologically, bone grafts of membranous and endochondral origin differ greatly in their cortical to cancellous diploe ratios and architectural configuration. We hypothesize that the differences found are related to the three-dimensional osseous architecture rather than to the embryonic origin of bone per se.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - pathology</subject><subject>Bone Resorption</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Facial Bones - surgery</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Ilium</subject><subject>Nasal Bone - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Skull</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMlOwzAQhn0AlVJ4BCSfODXgJU5qbqhikypxgXPkOONglNipk1Tq2-O0pXMZzcw_24cQpuSBEpk_kmiZ4GlCpSSExiiZUuwCzQnhLKFEsCt03fe_sZrzTMzQjDHJc57P0XYdlLPeKG1Vg71r1B6X3gGugzKDdfUTVrgLvu9AD3YHGHaqGdVgvcPeHFW49aH78Y2v90vsgwU3HARLrFyFoS3D3jurp1Jt3Q26NKrp4fbkF-j79eVr_Z5sPt8-1s-bRDMhhsQYDVApDXJVppwSnRptVoqmRkIF3GRaghCKca6zVBlOpNCQS5KTUjAZ_1yg--PceP12hH4oWttraBrlwI99kUsRWYhJuDoKdXyzD2CKLthWhX1BSTERLv4JF2fChxSLrXenHWPZQnVuPOHlf25le3E</recordid><startdate>199001</startdate><enddate>199001</enddate><creator>Hardesty, R A</creator><creator>Marsh, J L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199001</creationdate><title>Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin</title><author>Hardesty, R A ; Marsh, J L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c255t-ffceedace98b4310c4fcf8a14f9ede3f6c9e55a233c64af3095ce79070b529173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - pathology</topic><topic>Bone Resorption</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Facial Bones - surgery</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Ilium</topic><topic>Nasal Bone - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Skull</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hardesty, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marsh, J L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hardesty, R A</au><au>Marsh, J L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>1990-01</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>14</epage><pages>5-14</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><abstract>A prospective study using 46 young adult New Zealand rabbits was designed to evaluate onlay bone grafts to the craniofacial skeleton with respect to embryonic origin (membranous or endochondral), gross morphology (unicortical or bicortical), and orientation (cortex-to-bed relationship). Quantitative and qualitative data were analyzed and contrasted at both periods of evaluation (1.5 and 3.0 months). The embryonic origin of onlay bone grafts to the rabbit snout is significantly correlated with graft surface area, volume, weight, and recipient bed union for up to 3 months postoperatively. Over this interval, membranous bone (calvaria) grafts either persist in their entirety or increase, whereas endochondral bone (iliac) grafts resorb. Neither the number of cortices (unicortical or bicortical) nor the orientation of unicortical grafts (cortex-to-bed relationship) affected graft fate regardless of embryonic origin. Bone density remained unaltered during both resorption and deposition. Osteogenesis, demonstrated by serial fluorochrome markers, occurs in both membranous and endochondral bone grafts. Histologically, bone grafts of membranous and endochondral origin differ greatly in their cortical to cancellous diploe ratios and architectural configuration. We hypothesize that the differences found are related to the three-dimensional osseous architecture rather than to the embryonic origin of bone per se.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>2293737</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006534-199001000-00002</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 1990-01, Vol.85 (1), p.5-14
issn 0032-1052
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79536557
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Animals
Bone and Bones - pathology
Bone Resorption
Bone Transplantation - methods
Facial Bones - surgery
Graft Survival
Ilium
Nasal Bone - surgery
Prospective Studies
Rabbits
Skull
title Craniofacial onlay bone grafting: a prospective evaluation of graft morphology, orientation, and embryonic origin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T15%3A48%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Craniofacial%20onlay%20bone%20grafting:%20a%20prospective%20evaluation%20of%20graft%20morphology,%20orientation,%20and%20embryonic%20origin&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Hardesty,%20R%20A&rft.date=1990-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=14&rft.pages=5-14&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006534-199001000-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79536557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79536557&rft_id=info:pmid/2293737&rfr_iscdi=true