The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study
The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Burns 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 489 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 484 |
container_title | Burns |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Şenyuva, Cemal Yücel, Akin Erdamar, Sibel Çetinkale, Oğuz Seradjmir, Mesud Özdemir, Cengizhan |
description | The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79518097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417997000430</els_id><sourcerecordid>79518097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2G7S_oSADiU0BycjybasXEIJaRsIhNC9i7E0oi5eeyPZpfn30X6w154GZp53ZngYuxBwLUDUN79AQVWUQpuvRl8BQKkK-MCWotGmECWYE7Y8Ih_ZWUp_MgRVAwu2MKU0IOsle1n9Jh5wIj4Gjn0_bnpMU-f4Ovdih33iuePI83nwFDnydo4DTw7jLceB079NxtY0TNjzNM3-7RM7DTlGnw_1nK2-P6zufxZPzz8e7789FU41ZiqMKbUMrVKtksG3jamcFlpKqp0r2yAFOUJEVSqQOnhUUpEkj7V3dXBKnbPL_dpNHF9nSpNdd8lR3-NA45ysNpVowOgMVnvQxTGlSMFu8sMY36wAuzVpdybtVpM12u5MWsi5i8OBuV2TP6YO6vL8y2GO2UYfIg6uS0dMgqlFvT1_t8cou_jbUbTJdTRko10kN1k_dv955B1bFpA6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79518097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><description>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9429026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alloplast ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; burn scar ; Burns - pathology ; Burns - physiopathology ; Burns - surgery ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Female ; Medical sciences ; Medpor ; Polyethylenes - administration & dosage ; Proplast ; Proplast - administration & dosage ; Prostheses and Implants ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reference Values ; Silicone ; Silicones - administration & dosage ; Skin plastic surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Burns, 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417997000430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2096167$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9429026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Akin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdamar, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seradjmir, Mesud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</description><subject>Alloplast</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>burn scar</subject><subject>Burns - pathology</subject><subject>Burns - physiopathology</subject><subject>Burns - surgery</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medpor</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Proplast</subject><subject>Proplast - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Silicone</subject><subject>Silicones - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Skin plastic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2G7S_oSADiU0BycjybasXEIJaRsIhNC9i7E0oi5eeyPZpfn30X6w154GZp53ZngYuxBwLUDUN79AQVWUQpuvRl8BQKkK-MCWotGmECWYE7Y8Ih_ZWUp_MgRVAwu2MKU0IOsle1n9Jh5wIj4Gjn0_bnpMU-f4Ovdih33iuePI83nwFDnydo4DTw7jLceB079NxtY0TNjzNM3-7RM7DTlGnw_1nK2-P6zufxZPzz8e7789FU41ZiqMKbUMrVKtksG3jamcFlpKqp0r2yAFOUJEVSqQOnhUUpEkj7V3dXBKnbPL_dpNHF9nSpNdd8lR3-NA45ysNpVowOgMVnvQxTGlSMFu8sMY36wAuzVpdybtVpM12u5MWsi5i8OBuV2TP6YO6vL8y2GO2UYfIg6uS0dMgqlFvT1_t8cou_jbUbTJdTRko10kN1k_dv955B1bFpA6</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Şenyuva, Cemal</creator><creator>Yücel, Akin</creator><creator>Erdamar, Sibel</creator><creator>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creator><creator>Seradjmir, Mesud</creator><creator>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><author>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Alloplast</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>burn scar</topic><topic>Burns - pathology</topic><topic>Burns - physiopathology</topic><topic>Burns - surgery</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medpor</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Proplast</topic><topic>Proplast - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Silicone</topic><topic>Silicones - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Skin plastic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Akin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdamar, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seradjmir, Mesud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şenyuva, Cemal</au><au>Yücel, Akin</au><au>Erdamar, Sibel</au><au>Çetinkale, Oğuz</au><au>Seradjmir, Mesud</au><au>Özdemir, Cengizhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>484-489</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9429026</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4179 |
ispartof | Burns, 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489 |
issn | 0305-4179 1879-1409 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79518097 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Alloplast Analysis of Variance Animals Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage Biological and medical sciences burn scar Burns - pathology Burns - physiopathology Burns - surgery Cicatrix - pathology Disease Models, Animal Female Medical sciences Medpor Polyethylenes - administration & dosage Proplast Proplast - administration & dosage Prostheses and Implants Random Allocation Rats Rats, Sprague-Dawley Reference Values Silicone Silicones - administration & dosage Skin plastic surgery Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Wound Healing - physiology |
title | The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A09%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20fate%20of%20alloplastic%20materials%20placed%20under%20a%20burn%20scar:%20an%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=%C5%9Eenyuva,%20Cemal&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=484-489&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79518097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79518097&rft_id=info:pmid/9429026&rft_els_id=S0305417997000430&rfr_iscdi=true |