The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study

The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Burns 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489
Hauptverfasser: Şenyuva, Cemal, Yücel, Akin, Erdamar, Sibel, Çetinkale, Oğuz, Seradjmir, Mesud, Özdemir, Cengizhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 489
container_issue 6
container_start_page 484
container_title Burns
container_volume 23
creator Şenyuva, Cemal
Yücel, Akin
Erdamar, Sibel
Çetinkale, Oğuz
Seradjmir, Mesud
Özdemir, Cengizhan
description The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79518097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0305417997000430</els_id><sourcerecordid>79518097</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2G7S_oSADiU0BycjybasXEIJaRsIhNC9i7E0oi5eeyPZpfn30X6w154GZp53ZngYuxBwLUDUN79AQVWUQpuvRl8BQKkK-MCWotGmECWYE7Y8Ih_ZWUp_MgRVAwu2MKU0IOsle1n9Jh5wIj4Gjn0_bnpMU-f4Ovdih33iuePI83nwFDnydo4DTw7jLceB079NxtY0TNjzNM3-7RM7DTlGnw_1nK2-P6zufxZPzz8e7789FU41ZiqMKbUMrVKtksG3jamcFlpKqp0r2yAFOUJEVSqQOnhUUpEkj7V3dXBKnbPL_dpNHF9nSpNdd8lR3-NA45ysNpVowOgMVnvQxTGlSMFu8sMY36wAuzVpdybtVpM12u5MWsi5i8OBuV2TP6YO6vL8y2GO2UYfIg6uS0dMgqlFvT1_t8cou_jbUbTJdTRko10kN1k_dv955B1bFpA6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79518097</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><description>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4179</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1409</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9429026</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BURND8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alloplast ; Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; burn scar ; Burns - pathology ; Burns - physiopathology ; Burns - surgery ; Cicatrix - pathology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Female ; Medical sciences ; Medpor ; Polyethylenes - administration &amp; dosage ; Proplast ; Proplast - administration &amp; dosage ; Prostheses and Implants ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Sprague-Dawley ; Reference Values ; Silicone ; Silicones - administration &amp; dosage ; Skin plastic surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Wound Healing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Burns, 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417997000430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2096167$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9429026$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Akin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdamar, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seradjmir, Mesud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><title>Burns</title><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><description>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</description><subject>Alloplast</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>burn scar</subject><subject>Burns - pathology</subject><subject>Burns - physiopathology</subject><subject>Burns - surgery</subject><subject>Cicatrix - pathology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medpor</subject><subject>Polyethylenes - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Proplast</subject><subject>Proplast - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Silicone</subject><subject>Silicones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Skin plastic surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Wound Healing - physiology</subject><issn>0305-4179</issn><issn>1879-1409</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1r3DAQhkVJ2G7S_oSADiU0BycjybasXEIJaRsIhNC9i7E0oi5eeyPZpfn30X6w154GZp53ZngYuxBwLUDUN79AQVWUQpuvRl8BQKkK-MCWotGmECWYE7Y8Ih_ZWUp_MgRVAwu2MKU0IOsle1n9Jh5wIj4Gjn0_bnpMU-f4Ovdih33iuePI83nwFDnydo4DTw7jLceB079NxtY0TNjzNM3-7RM7DTlGnw_1nK2-P6zufxZPzz8e7789FU41ZiqMKbUMrVKtksG3jamcFlpKqp0r2yAFOUJEVSqQOnhUUpEkj7V3dXBKnbPL_dpNHF9nSpNdd8lR3-NA45ysNpVowOgMVnvQxTGlSMFu8sMY36wAuzVpdybtVpM12u5MWsi5i8OBuV2TP6YO6vL8y2GO2UYfIg6uS0dMgqlFvT1_t8cou_jbUbTJdTRko10kN1k_dv955B1bFpA6</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Şenyuva, Cemal</creator><creator>Yücel, Akin</creator><creator>Erdamar, Sibel</creator><creator>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creator><creator>Seradjmir, Mesud</creator><creator>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</title><author>Şenyuva, Cemal ; Yücel, Akin ; Erdamar, Sibel ; Çetinkale, Oğuz ; Seradjmir, Mesud ; Özdemir, Cengizhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-99472fb33b32fdb895c71722e6cc4bf21eceaaa343027fda323e2eda6dc6fc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Alloplast</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>burn scar</topic><topic>Burns - pathology</topic><topic>Burns - physiopathology</topic><topic>Burns - surgery</topic><topic>Cicatrix - pathology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medpor</topic><topic>Polyethylenes - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Proplast</topic><topic>Proplast - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Sprague-Dawley</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Silicone</topic><topic>Silicones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Skin plastic surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Wound Healing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Şenyuva, Cemal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yücel, Akin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdamar, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Çetinkale, Oğuz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seradjmir, Mesud</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Cengizhan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Burns</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Şenyuva, Cemal</au><au>Yücel, Akin</au><au>Erdamar, Sibel</au><au>Çetinkale, Oğuz</au><au>Seradjmir, Mesud</au><au>Özdemir, Cengizhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study</atitle><jtitle>Burns</jtitle><addtitle>Burns</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>484</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>484-489</pages><issn>0305-4179</issn><eissn>1879-1409</eissn><coden>BURND8</coden><abstract>The behavior, under burn sears, of three different alloplastic materials, silicone, Medpor and Proplast, was compared in an animal model. A standard burn wound was created in rats, and 3 months later silicone, medpor and proplast alloplasts were placed under the burn scar. The rats were followed for another 3 months and ulceration and/or alloplast exposure rates were evaluated. At the end of this period specimens were examined histologically for the thickness of the fibrous capsule around the implant, thickness of the overlying tissue, tissue ingrowth and vascularization of the implants. Ulceration and exposure occurred in 2 of the 12 Medpor, 2 of the 12 Proplast and none of the 12 silicone implants. Fibrous capsule was significantly thicker around the silicone implants. Tissue ingrowth and vascularization were most prominent in Medpor implants while thickness of the overlying tissue was maximum in Proplast implants. These findings suggest that complications with silicone implants may be less than with other porous implants when used under burn scarred tissue.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9429026</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-4179
ispartof Burns, 1997-09, Vol.23 (6), p.484-489
issn 0305-4179
1879-1409
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79518097
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Alloplast
Analysis of Variance
Animals
Biocompatible Materials - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
burn scar
Burns - pathology
Burns - physiopathology
Burns - surgery
Cicatrix - pathology
Disease Models, Animal
Female
Medical sciences
Medpor
Polyethylenes - administration & dosage
Proplast
Proplast - administration & dosage
Prostheses and Implants
Random Allocation
Rats
Rats, Sprague-Dawley
Reference Values
Silicone
Silicones - administration & dosage
Skin plastic surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Wound Healing - physiology
title The fate of alloplastic materials placed under a burn scar: an experimental study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A09%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20fate%20of%20alloplastic%20materials%20placed%20under%20a%20burn%20scar:%20an%20experimental%20study&rft.jtitle=Burns&rft.au=%C5%9Eenyuva,%20Cemal&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=484&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=484-489&rft.issn=0305-4179&rft.eissn=1879-1409&rft.coden=BURND8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0305-4179(97)00043-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79518097%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79518097&rft_id=info:pmid/9429026&rft_els_id=S0305417997000430&rfr_iscdi=true