Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 1997-12, Vol.177 (6), p.1465-1470
Hauptverfasser: Bofill, James A., Vincent, Robert D., Ross, Elaine L., Martin, Rick W., Norman, Patricia F., Werhan, Carol F., Morrison, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1470
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1465
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 177
creator Bofill, James A.
Vincent, Robert D.
Ross, Elaine L.
Martin, Rick W.
Norman, Patricia F.
Werhan, Carol F.
Morrison, John C.
description OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor management was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomization and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outlet operative vaginal delivery was permitted. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0.71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the first ( p = 0.54) or second ( p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal delivery more frequently ( p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at randomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. The number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unlikely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rates in a trial of reasonable duration. CONCLUSIONS: With strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol for labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1465-70.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70092-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79505215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937897700929</els_id><sourcerecordid>79505215</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8dde19fcca52a14b5e06b5507b1113aa57255108831a8407acb64e4ae0a6fbda3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKEHEQWrSdo0yUlE_AJRQT2HaTKVSLZdk1bYf2_XXfbqKXmZJ5mZh5AjRi8YZdXlG6WU57qQ6lTLM0mpHtMWmTCqZV6pSm2TyQbZI_spfS0j13yX7OqSF1LwCXl9HkLwc4jdkDKwvf_BLEDdxfMM594NEUIGLYRPTB7Ox6vLLCaICG3mMIx4XGRNFzO3SH1nPRyQnQZCwsP1OSUfd7fvNw_508v94831U25LpvpcOYdMN9aC4MDKWiCtaiGorBljBYCQXAhGlSoYqJJKsHVVYglIoWpqB8WUnKz-ncfue8DUm5lPFkOAFsddjNSCCs7ECIoVaGOXUsTGzKOfQVwYRs3SpPkzaZaajJbmz-SYpuRo3WCoZ-g2r9bqxvrxug7JQmgitNanDcaprhRfYlcrDEcZPx6jSdZja9H5iLY3rvP_DPILa52QCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79505215</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bofill, James A. ; Vincent, Robert D. ; Ross, Elaine L. ; Martin, Rick W. ; Norman, Patricia F. ; Werhan, Carol F. ; Morrison, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bofill, James A. ; Vincent, Robert D. ; Ross, Elaine L. ; Martin, Rick W. ; Norman, Patricia F. ; Werhan, Carol F. ; Morrison, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor management was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomization and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outlet operative vaginal delivery was permitted. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0.71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the first ( p = 0.54) or second ( p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal delivery more frequently ( p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at randomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. The number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unlikely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rates in a trial of reasonable duration. CONCLUSIONS: With strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol for labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1465-70.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70092-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9423752</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Biological and medical sciences ; cesarean delivery ; Cesarean Section ; Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation ; Disorders ; dystocia ; Dystocia - physiopathology ; Dystocia - surgery ; Epidural analgesia ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Labor, Obstetric - physiology ; Medical sciences ; Narcotics - therapeutic use ; Pain Measurement ; Parity ; Pregnancy ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1997-12, Vol.177 (6), p.1465-1470</ispartof><rights>1997 Mosby, Inc.</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8dde19fcca52a14b5e06b5507b1113aa57255108831a8407acb64e4ae0a6fbda3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8dde19fcca52a14b5e06b5507b1113aa57255108831a8407acb64e4ae0a6fbda3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937897700929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2096822$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9423752$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bofill, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Elaine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Rick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Patricia F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werhan, Carol F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor management was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomization and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outlet operative vaginal delivery was permitted. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0.71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the first ( p = 0.54) or second ( p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal delivery more frequently ( p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at randomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. The number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unlikely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rates in a trial of reasonable duration. CONCLUSIONS: With strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol for labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1465-70.)</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cesarean delivery</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</subject><subject>Disorders</subject><subject>dystocia</subject><subject>Dystocia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Dystocia - surgery</subject><subject>Epidural analgesia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Narcotics - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BKEHEQWrSdo0yUlE_AJRQT2HaTKVSLZdk1bYf2_XXfbqKXmZJ5mZh5AjRi8YZdXlG6WU57qQ6lTLM0mpHtMWmTCqZV6pSm2TyQbZI_spfS0j13yX7OqSF1LwCXl9HkLwc4jdkDKwvf_BLEDdxfMM594NEUIGLYRPTB7Ox6vLLCaICG3mMIx4XGRNFzO3SH1nPRyQnQZCwsP1OSUfd7fvNw_508v94831U25LpvpcOYdMN9aC4MDKWiCtaiGorBljBYCQXAhGlSoYqJJKsHVVYglIoWpqB8WUnKz-ncfue8DUm5lPFkOAFsddjNSCCs7ECIoVaGOXUsTGzKOfQVwYRs3SpPkzaZaajJbmz-SYpuRo3WCoZ-g2r9bqxvrxug7JQmgitNanDcaprhRfYlcrDEcZPx6jSdZja9H5iLY3rvP_DPILa52QCA</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Bofill, James A.</creator><creator>Vincent, Robert D.</creator><creator>Ross, Elaine L.</creator><creator>Martin, Rick W.</creator><creator>Norman, Patricia F.</creator><creator>Werhan, Carol F.</creator><creator>Morrison, John C.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia</title><author>Bofill, James A. ; Vincent, Robert D. ; Ross, Elaine L. ; Martin, Rick W. ; Norman, Patricia F. ; Werhan, Carol F. ; Morrison, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-8dde19fcca52a14b5e06b5507b1113aa57255108831a8407acb64e4ae0a6fbda3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cesarean delivery</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation</topic><topic>Disorders</topic><topic>dystocia</topic><topic>Dystocia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Dystocia - surgery</topic><topic>Epidural analgesia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric - physiology</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Narcotics - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bofill, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ross, Elaine L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Rick W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Norman, Patricia F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werhan, Carol F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrison, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bofill, James A.</au><au>Vincent, Robert D.</au><au>Ross, Elaine L.</au><au>Martin, Rick W.</au><au>Norman, Patricia F.</au><au>Werhan, Carol F.</au><au>Morrison, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1465</spage><epage>1470</epage><pages>1465-1470</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to examine the effect of epidural analgesia on dystocia-related cesarean delivery in actively laboring nulliparous women. STUDY DESIGN: Active labor was confirmed in nulliparous women by uterine contractions, cervical dilatation of 4 cm, effacement of 80%, and fetopelvic engagement. Patients were randomized to one of two groups: epidural analgesia or narcotics. A strict protocol for labor management was in place. Patients recorded the level of pain at randomization and at hourly intervals on a visual analog scale. Elective outlet operative vaginal delivery was permitted. RESULTS: One hundred women were randomized. No difference in the rate of cesarean delivery for dystocia was noted between the groups (epidural 8%, narcotic 6%; p = 0.71). No significant differences were noted in the lengths of the first ( p = 0.54) or second ( p = 0.55) stages of labor or in any other time variable. Women with epidural analgesia underwent operative vaginal delivery more frequently ( p = 0.004). Pain scores were equivalent at randomization, but large differences existed at each hour thereafter. The number of patients randomized did not achieve prestudy estimates. A planned interim analysis of the results demonstrated that we were unlikely to find a statistically significant difference in cesarean delivery rates in a trial of reasonable duration. CONCLUSIONS: With strict criteria for the diagnosis of labor and with use of a rigid protocol for labor management, there was no increase in dystocia-related cesarean delivery with epidural analgesia.(Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1465-70.)</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9423752</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70092-9</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 1997-12, Vol.177 (6), p.1465-1470
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79505215
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
Biological and medical sciences
cesarean delivery
Cesarean Section
Delivery. Postpartum. Lactation
Disorders
dystocia
Dystocia - physiopathology
Dystocia - surgery
Epidural analgesia
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Labor, Obstetric - physiology
Medical sciences
Narcotics - therapeutic use
Pain Measurement
Parity
Pregnancy
Time Factors
title Nulliparous active labor, epidural analgesia, and cesarean delivery for dystocia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A15%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nulliparous%20active%20labor,%20epidural%20analgesia,%20and%20cesarean%20delivery%20for%20dystocia&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Bofill,%20James%20A.&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1465&rft.epage=1470&rft.pages=1465-1470&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70092-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79505215%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79505215&rft_id=info:pmid/9423752&rft_els_id=S0002937897700929&rfr_iscdi=true