Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for out-patient knee arthroscopy?
Background: We have compared three different methods of anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy in terms of perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, time taken and economy. Methods: 91 ASA I–II patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy were included. After premedication with diazepa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1997-11, Vol.41 (10), p.1341-1345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background: We have compared three different methods of anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy in terms of perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, time taken and economy.
Methods: 91 ASA I–II patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy were included. After premedication with diazepam 10 mg and naproxene 500 mg orally, they were randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group S (n=32) received spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 50 mg/ml 1.5–2 ml in 7.5% glucose through a 27–G Quincke needle, Group E (n=29) received epidural anaesthesia with mepivacaine 20 mg/ml and epinephrine 5 μg/ml, 15–20 ml, and Group P (n=30) received propofol anaesthesia with a bolus induction of 2 mg/kg followed by infusion.
Results: The time from start of anaesthesia until start of operation was significantly less in Group P than in the two other Groups: 7.45.4 min as compared to 23.04.8 min in Group S and 31.09.1 min in Group E (meanSD, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0001-5172 1399-6576 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04655.x |