Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for out-patient knee arthroscopy?

Background: We have compared three different methods of anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy in terms of perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, time taken and economy. Methods: 91 ASA I–II patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy were included. After premedication with diazepa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 1997-11, Vol.41 (10), p.1341-1345
Hauptverfasser: DAHL, V., GIERLØFF, C., OMLAND, E., RÆDER, J. C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: We have compared three different methods of anaesthesia for out–patient knee arthroscopy in terms of perioperative conditions, postoperative pain, time taken and economy. Methods: 91 ASA I–II patients scheduled for elective knee arthroscopy were included. After premedication with diazepam 10 mg and naproxene 500 mg orally, they were randomly assigned into one of three groups: Group S (n=32) received spinal anaesthesia with lidocaine 50 mg/ml 1.5–2 ml in 7.5% glucose through a 27–G Quincke needle, Group E (n=29) received epidural anaesthesia with mepivacaine 20 mg/ml and epinephrine 5 μg/ml, 15–20 ml, and Group P (n=30) received propofol anaesthesia with a bolus induction of 2 mg/kg followed by infusion. Results: The time from start of anaesthesia until start of operation was significantly less in Group P than in the two other Groups: 7.45.4 min as compared to 23.04.8 min in Group S and 31.09.1 min in Group E (meanSD, P
ISSN:0001-5172
1399-6576
DOI:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04655.x