Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition
In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter informs the participant what the target is and what action is required. For example, participants may be told to name the red drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of external selection, distractor inhibition is used to e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 1997-12, Vol.23 (6), p.1617-1630 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1630 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1617 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Baylis, Gordon C Tipper, Steven P Houghton, George |
description | In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter
informs the participant what the target is and what action is
required. For example, participants may be told to name the red
drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of
external
selection, distractor inhibition is used to
ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis
of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor
items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person
may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to
decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of
internal
selection, inhibition of distracting
information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully
analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1617 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79501216</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29038840</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-f263846d857cad8c6fdb12468c755cd66b3922810a5d2cf4274c320c6a387aec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOj9-gQhD1LvOnHw2lzL8AsEL9TqcpSlWurYmLWz_3pSNIV4YDiTkfc5JeAg5BzoDyvUtpUZlIBmfpVIzUKD3yAQMNxkwrffJZEcckeMYv2hakMtDcmgEk0rDhLD7Ve9Dg3W9ns4HX0yxKabPze7u0Tc-YJ-CN19711dtc0oOSqyjP9vuJ-Tj4f59_pS9vD4-z-9eMhTA-6xkiudCFbnUDovcqbJYABMqd1pKVyi14IaxHCjKgrlSMC0cZ9Qp5LlG7_gJudnM7UL7PfjY22UVna9rbHw7RKuNpMBAJfDyD_jVDuP_o1UgOFdKyv8gBkIYKfUI8Q3kQhtj8KXtQrXEsLZA7ejcjkbtaNSmSqfkPHVdbEcPi6Uvdj1bySm_2uYYHdZlwMZVcYcxmhsmTcKuNxh2aLu4dhj6ytU-2tVn9-u5H5Tgksk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614336655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Baylis, Gordon C ; Tipper, Steven P ; Houghton, George</creator><creatorcontrib>Baylis, Gordon C ; Tipper, Steven P ; Houghton, George</creatorcontrib><description>In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter
informs the participant what the target is and what action is
required. For example, participants may be told to name the red
drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of
external
selection, distractor inhibition is used to
ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis
of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor
items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person
may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to
decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of
internal
selection, inhibition of distracting
information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully
analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-1523</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1277</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1617</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9425671</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPHPDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Attention ; Biological and medical sciences ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cues ; Distraction ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human ; Humans ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Internal External Locus of Control ; Male ; Perception ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time ; Vision ; Visual Perception</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1997-12, Vol.23 (6), p.1617-1630</ispartof><rights>1997 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Dec 1997</rights><rights>1997, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-f263846d857cad8c6fdb12468c755cd66b3922810a5d2cf4274c320c6a387aec3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2089259$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9425671$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baylis, Gordon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipper, Steven P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, George</creatorcontrib><title>Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><description>In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter
informs the participant what the target is and what action is
required. For example, participants may be told to name the red
drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of
external
selection, distractor inhibition is used to
ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis
of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor
items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person
may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to
decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of
internal
selection, inhibition of distracting
information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully
analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Distraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Internal External Locus of Control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Visual Perception</subject><issn>0096-1523</issn><issn>1939-1277</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOj9-gQhD1LvOnHw2lzL8AsEL9TqcpSlWurYmLWz_3pSNIV4YDiTkfc5JeAg5BzoDyvUtpUZlIBmfpVIzUKD3yAQMNxkwrffJZEcckeMYv2hakMtDcmgEk0rDhLD7Ve9Dg3W9ns4HX0yxKabPze7u0Tc-YJ-CN19711dtc0oOSqyjP9vuJ-Tj4f59_pS9vD4-z-9eMhTA-6xkiudCFbnUDovcqbJYABMqd1pKVyi14IaxHCjKgrlSMC0cZ9Qp5LlG7_gJudnM7UL7PfjY22UVna9rbHw7RKuNpMBAJfDyD_jVDuP_o1UgOFdKyv8gBkIYKfUI8Q3kQhtj8KXtQrXEsLZA7ejcjkbtaNSmSqfkPHVdbEcPi6Uvdj1bySm_2uYYHdZlwMZVcYcxmhsmTcKuNxh2aLu4dhj6ytU-2tVn9-u5H5Tgksk</recordid><startdate>19971201</startdate><enddate>19971201</enddate><creator>Baylis, Gordon C</creator><creator>Tipper, Steven P</creator><creator>Houghton, George</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971201</creationdate><title>Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection</title><author>Baylis, Gordon C ; Tipper, Steven P ; Houghton, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a413t-f263846d857cad8c6fdb12468c755cd66b3922810a5d2cf4274c320c6a387aec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Distraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Internal External Locus of Control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Visual Perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baylis, Gordon C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tipper, Steven P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houghton, George</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baylis, Gordon C</au><au>Tipper, Steven P</au><au>Houghton, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform</addtitle><date>1997-12-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1617</spage><epage>1630</epage><pages>1617-1630</pages><issn>0096-1523</issn><eissn>1939-1277</eissn><coden>JPHPDH</coden><abstract>In most studies of selective attention, the experimenter
informs the participant what the target is and what action is
required. For example, participants may be told to name the red
drawing. The present study shows that under such conditions of
external
selection, distractor inhibition is used to
ensure that selection is efficient. In external selection, analysis
of distractors is limited, causing later recognition of distractor
items to be poor. In contrast, during real-world selection a person
may be confronted with a number of potential targets and may have to
decide what will be the target for action. Under these conditions of
internal
selection, inhibition of distracting
information does not occur. Moreover, distractors are more fully
analyzed and thus better recognized at a later test.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>9425671</pmid><doi>10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1617</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-1523 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 1997-12, Vol.23 (6), p.1617-1630 |
issn | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79501216 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Attention Biological and medical sciences Choice Behavior Cognition & reasoning Cues Distraction Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human Humans Inhibition (Psychology) Internal External Locus of Control Male Perception Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reaction Time Vision Visual Perception |
title | Externally Cued and Internally Generated Selection: Differences in Distractor Analysis and Inhibition |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A35%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Externally%20Cued%20and%20Internally%20Generated%20Selection:%20Differences%20in%20Distractor%20Analysis%20and%20Inhibition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Human%20perception%20and%20performance&rft.au=Baylis,%20Gordon%20C&rft.date=1997-12-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1617&rft.epage=1630&rft.pages=1617-1630&rft.issn=0096-1523&rft.eissn=1939-1277&rft.coden=JPHPDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0096-1523.23.6.1617&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29038840%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614336655&rft_id=info:pmid/9425671&rfr_iscdi=true |