Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects

Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746
Hauptverfasser: Highgenboten, Carl L., Jackson, Allen, Meske, Neil B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 746
container_issue 6
container_start_page 743
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 17
creator Highgenboten, Carl L.
Jackson, Allen
Meske, Neil B.
description Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/036354658901700602
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79488786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A8332793</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_036354658901700602</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A8332793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgitbqFxCEPXnR1bwfRym-sOBBPYc0nS2ru9ma7Ir99qa0eBH0lMP8_pNMBqETgi8JUeoKM8kEl0IbTBTGEtMdNCJC0JIxKXbRaA3KtThAhym9YZyd1Pton0rKqWYjdHsHYfBde1E8vpQkg4vChXnx3MfVO8TiPQAUjfuq-1XRgktDrMOimMNn7aHIsaWLdepCOkJ7lWsSHG_PMXq9vXmZ3JfTp7uHyfW09EyrvnSeVdpVpnJYUMJIBVJXc0HBUeU0m0k945QTQrngXglqPMGGC88dJY5yYGN0tum7jN3HAKm3bZ08NI0L0A3JKsO1Vlr-CynGyhiD_4VEKyIYFhmeb-DCNWDr4LvQw1fvu6aBBdg85uTJXmvGqDIsa7rRPnYpRajsMtatiytLsF0vz_5eXg6dbt8yzFqY_0S228r1q009uXzjWzfEkD_7r47f1VSeGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18715305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><description>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2624283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Equipment and supplies ; Humans ; Hypermobility ; Joint instability ; Joints ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Medical examination ; Middle Aged ; Movement ; Orthopedic Equipment ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/036354658901700602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/036354658901700602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2624283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypermobility</subject><subject>Joint instability</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Orthopedic Equipment</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgitbqFxCEPXnR1bwfRym-sOBBPYc0nS2ru9ma7Ir99qa0eBH0lMP8_pNMBqETgi8JUeoKM8kEl0IbTBTGEtMdNCJC0JIxKXbRaA3KtThAhym9YZyd1Pton0rKqWYjdHsHYfBde1E8vpQkg4vChXnx3MfVO8TiPQAUjfuq-1XRgktDrMOimMNn7aHIsaWLdepCOkJ7lWsSHG_PMXq9vXmZ3JfTp7uHyfW09EyrvnSeVdpVpnJYUMJIBVJXc0HBUeU0m0k945QTQrngXglqPMGGC88dJY5yYGN0tum7jN3HAKm3bZ08NI0L0A3JKsO1Vlr-CynGyhiD_4VEKyIYFhmeb-DCNWDr4LvQw1fvu6aBBdg85uTJXmvGqDIsa7rRPnYpRajsMtatiytLsF0vz_5eXg6dbt8yzFqY_0S228r1q009uXzjWzfEkD_7r47f1VSeGg</recordid><startdate>19891101</startdate><enddate>19891101</enddate><creator>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creator><creator>Jackson, Allen</creator><creator>Meske, Neil B.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891101</creationdate><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons</title><author>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypermobility</topic><topic>Joint instability</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Orthopedic Equipment</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Highgenboten, Carl L.</au><au>Jackson, Allen</au><au>Meske, Neil B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>1989-11-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>743-746</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>2624283</pmid><doi>10.1177/036354658901700602</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79488786
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analysis of Variance
Equipment and supplies
Humans
Hypermobility
Joint instability
Joints
Knee
Knee Joint - physiology
Medical examination
Middle Aged
Movement
Orthopedic Equipment
Reproducibility of Results
Sports medicine
title Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genucom,%20KT-1000,%20and%20Stryker%20knee%20laxity%20measuring%20device%20comparisons:%20Device%20reproducibility%20and%20interdevice%20comparison%20in%20asymptomatic%20subjects&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Highgenboten,%20Carl%20L.&rft.date=1989-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=743-746&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/036354658901700602&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA8332793%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18715305&rft_id=info:pmid/2624283&rft_galeid=A8332793&rft_sage_id=10.1177_036354658901700602&rfr_iscdi=true