Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects
Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 746 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 743 |
container_title | The American journal of sports medicine |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Highgenboten, Carl L. Jackson, Allen Meske, Neil B. |
description | Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/036354658901700602 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79488786</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A8332793</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_036354658901700602</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A8332793</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgitbqFxCEPXnR1bwfRym-sOBBPYc0nS2ru9ma7Ir99qa0eBH0lMP8_pNMBqETgi8JUeoKM8kEl0IbTBTGEtMdNCJC0JIxKXbRaA3KtThAhym9YZyd1Pton0rKqWYjdHsHYfBde1E8vpQkg4vChXnx3MfVO8TiPQAUjfuq-1XRgktDrMOimMNn7aHIsaWLdepCOkJ7lWsSHG_PMXq9vXmZ3JfTp7uHyfW09EyrvnSeVdpVpnJYUMJIBVJXc0HBUeU0m0k945QTQrngXglqPMGGC88dJY5yYGN0tum7jN3HAKm3bZ08NI0L0A3JKsO1Vlr-CynGyhiD_4VEKyIYFhmeb-DCNWDr4LvQw1fvu6aBBdg85uTJXmvGqDIsa7rRPnYpRajsMtatiytLsF0vz_5eXg6dbt8yzFqY_0S228r1q009uXzjWzfEkD_7r47f1VSeGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18715305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><description>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700602</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2624283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis of Variance ; Equipment and supplies ; Humans ; Hypermobility ; Joint instability ; Joints ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Medical examination ; Middle Aged ; Movement ; Orthopedic Equipment ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sports medicine</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/036354658901700602$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/036354658901700602$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21810,27915,27916,43612,43613</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2624283$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Equipment and supplies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypermobility</subject><subject>Joint instability</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Movement</subject><subject>Orthopedic Equipment</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtLAzEQB_AgitbqFxCEPXnR1bwfRym-sOBBPYc0nS2ru9ma7Ir99qa0eBH0lMP8_pNMBqETgi8JUeoKM8kEl0IbTBTGEtMdNCJC0JIxKXbRaA3KtThAhym9YZyd1Pton0rKqWYjdHsHYfBde1E8vpQkg4vChXnx3MfVO8TiPQAUjfuq-1XRgktDrMOimMNn7aHIsaWLdepCOkJ7lWsSHG_PMXq9vXmZ3JfTp7uHyfW09EyrvnSeVdpVpnJYUMJIBVJXc0HBUeU0m0k945QTQrngXglqPMGGC88dJY5yYGN0tum7jN3HAKm3bZ08NI0L0A3JKsO1Vlr-CynGyhiD_4VEKyIYFhmeb-DCNWDr4LvQw1fvu6aBBdg85uTJXmvGqDIsa7rRPnYpRajsMtatiytLsF0vz_5eXg6dbt8yzFqY_0S228r1q009uXzjWzfEkD_7r47f1VSeGg</recordid><startdate>19891101</startdate><enddate>19891101</enddate><creator>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creator><creator>Jackson, Allen</creator><creator>Meske, Neil B.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891101</creationdate><title>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons</title><author>Highgenboten, Carl L. ; Jackson, Allen ; Meske, Neil B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-ac3f8af9fa052131fe68fd52ea27a83b68b424112454c7529c10945c4a21a24e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Equipment and supplies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypermobility</topic><topic>Joint instability</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Movement</topic><topic>Orthopedic Equipment</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Highgenboten, Carl L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Allen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meske, Neil B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Highgenboten, Carl L.</au><au>Jackson, Allen</au><au>Meske, Neil B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>1989-11-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>743</spage><epage>746</epage><pages>743-746</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Generally, three devices (the Genucom Knee Analysis System, the MEDmetric KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the Stryker Knee Laxity Tester), which have been pre sented in the literature, may be used to assess clinically the amount of knee laxity in an objective manner. This study compared the reproducibility of the anterior and posterior knee laxity values for each and made direct comparisons of the results obtained. Thirty asympto matic subjects were given a test-retest protocol on both legs with all three devices. Devices were tested in a counterbalanced order. Repeatability of test values within devices was variable, but all were acceptable, the lowest being r = 0.74. Analysis of variance (AN- OVA), and correlational analysis revealed that device- specific anterior and posterior laxity values were pro duced. We concluded that each commercially available knee laxity testing device can provide reproducible quantitative measurements of knee laxity; however, due to differences in device sensitivities and functional design, numerical results from one device cannot be generalized to another device.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>2624283</pmid><doi>10.1177/036354658901700602</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0363-5465 |
ispartof | The American journal of sports medicine, 1989-11, Vol.17 (6), p.743-746 |
issn | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79488786 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Analysis of Variance Equipment and supplies Humans Hypermobility Joint instability Joints Knee Knee Joint - physiology Medical examination Middle Aged Movement Orthopedic Equipment Reproducibility of Results Sports medicine |
title | Genucom, KT-1000, and Stryker knee laxity measuring device comparisons: Device reproducibility and interdevice comparison in asymptomatic subjects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T07%3A31%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genucom,%20KT-1000,%20and%20Stryker%20knee%20laxity%20measuring%20device%20comparisons:%20Device%20reproducibility%20and%20interdevice%20comparison%20in%20asymptomatic%20subjects&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Highgenboten,%20Carl%20L.&rft.date=1989-11-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=743&rft.epage=746&rft.pages=743-746&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/036354658901700602&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA8332793%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18715305&rft_id=info:pmid/2624283&rft_galeid=A8332793&rft_sage_id=10.1177_036354658901700602&rfr_iscdi=true |