Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty

Results after 184 primary and 227 revision total hip arthroplasties were compared with an emphasis on rates of failure leading to reoperation and intra- and postoperative complications and on the clinical outcome of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series. The failure rate was 7% (11 of 156)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 1989-12, Vol.4 (4), p.297-302
Hauptverfasser: Retpen, Jens B., Varmarken, Jens-Erik, Stürup, Jens, Olsen, Claus, Sölund, Keld, Steen Jensen, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 302
container_issue 4
container_start_page 297
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 4
creator Retpen, Jens B.
Varmarken, Jens-Erik
Stürup, Jens
Olsen, Claus
Sölund, Keld
Steen Jensen, J.
description Results after 184 primary and 227 revision total hip arthroplasties were compared with an emphasis on rates of failure leading to reoperation and intra- and postoperative complications and on the clinical outcome of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series. The failure rate was 7% (11 of 156) in the primary series, versus 27% (54 of 195) in the revision series. The rate of complications was substantially higher after revision, due to 16% (36 of 227) intraoperative fractures of the femoral shaft and 6% (14 of 227) postoperative dislocations. Clinical assessment of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series revealed no difference with regard to relief of pain. For patients with concomitant disabling conditions functional outcome was inferior after revision, but for patients without such conditions the functional results of the two series were equal. The favorable clinical results of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the revision series must be seen in relation to the very high rate of failure leading to reoperation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80030-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79476971</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540389800300</els_id><sourcerecordid>79476971</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fc3970539f5762e84ae57af656afc01c1bbb8f7e298f66024ac02d8d22d5cbed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwEyrlhOAQWDux45wQVLykShyAs-U4a9UoTYrtVOq_J32oV06r1czsaj5CphTuKFBx_wlSZinPIbuR5a0EyCCFEzKmPGOpzEGckvHRck4uQvgBoJTzfERGTDCaCzYmT7PGtc7oJvEY-iaGRNuIftjWLriuTXRbJyvvltpvktjFwbhwq0T7uPDdqtEhbi7JmdVNwKvDnJDvl-ev2Vs6_3h9nz3OU8MKHlNrsrIAnpWWF4KhzDXyQlvBhbYGqKFVVUlbICulFQJYrg2wWtaM1dxUWGcTcr2_u_Ldb48hqqULBptGt9j1QRVlXoiyoIOR743GdyF4tOpQQFFQW3Zqx05twShZqh07BUNuenjQV0usj6kDrEF_2Os4tFw79CoYh63B2nk0UdWd--fDH51rfwI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79476971</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Retpen, Jens B. ; Varmarken, Jens-Erik ; Stürup, Jens ; Olsen, Claus ; Sölund, Keld ; Steen Jensen, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Retpen, Jens B. ; Varmarken, Jens-Erik ; Stürup, Jens ; Olsen, Claus ; Sölund, Keld ; Steen Jensen, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Results after 184 primary and 227 revision total hip arthroplasties were compared with an emphasis on rates of failure leading to reoperation and intra- and postoperative complications and on the clinical outcome of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series. The failure rate was 7% (11 of 156) in the primary series, versus 27% (54 of 195) in the revision series. The rate of complications was substantially higher after revision, due to 16% (36 of 227) intraoperative fractures of the femoral shaft and 6% (14 of 227) postoperative dislocations. Clinical assessment of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series revealed no difference with regard to relief of pain. For patients with concomitant disabling conditions functional outcome was inferior after revision, but for patients without such conditions the functional results of the two series were equal. The favorable clinical results of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the revision series must be seen in relation to the very high rate of failure leading to reoperation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80030-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2621462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; clinical evaluation ; clinical outcome ; complications ; failure ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hip Prosthesis ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain, Postoperative - etiology ; Postoperative Complications ; Prosthesis Failure ; Reoperation ; revision total hip arthroplasty ; total hip arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 1989-12, Vol.4 (4), p.297-302</ispartof><rights>1989 Churchill Livingstone Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fc3970539f5762e84ae57af656afc01c1bbb8f7e298f66024ac02d8d22d5cbed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fc3970539f5762e84ae57af656afc01c1bbb8f7e298f66024ac02d8d22d5cbed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540389800300$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2621462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Retpen, Jens B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, Jens-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stürup, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sölund, Keld</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen Jensen, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Results after 184 primary and 227 revision total hip arthroplasties were compared with an emphasis on rates of failure leading to reoperation and intra- and postoperative complications and on the clinical outcome of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series. The failure rate was 7% (11 of 156) in the primary series, versus 27% (54 of 195) in the revision series. The rate of complications was substantially higher after revision, due to 16% (36 of 227) intraoperative fractures of the femoral shaft and 6% (14 of 227) postoperative dislocations. Clinical assessment of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series revealed no difference with regard to relief of pain. For patients with concomitant disabling conditions functional outcome was inferior after revision, but for patients without such conditions the functional results of the two series were equal. The favorable clinical results of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the revision series must be seen in relation to the very high rate of failure leading to reoperation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>clinical evaluation</subject><subject>clinical outcome</subject><subject>complications</subject><subject>failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prosthesis Failure</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>revision total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>total hip arthroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EKqXwEyrlhOAQWDux45wQVLykShyAs-U4a9UoTYrtVOq_J32oV06r1czsaj5CphTuKFBx_wlSZinPIbuR5a0EyCCFEzKmPGOpzEGckvHRck4uQvgBoJTzfERGTDCaCzYmT7PGtc7oJvEY-iaGRNuIftjWLriuTXRbJyvvltpvktjFwbhwq0T7uPDdqtEhbi7JmdVNwKvDnJDvl-ev2Vs6_3h9nz3OU8MKHlNrsrIAnpWWF4KhzDXyQlvBhbYGqKFVVUlbICulFQJYrg2wWtaM1dxUWGcTcr2_u_Ldb48hqqULBptGt9j1QRVlXoiyoIOR743GdyF4tOpQQFFQW3Zqx05twShZqh07BUNuenjQV0usj6kDrEF_2Os4tFw79CoYh63B2nk0UdWd--fDH51rfwI</recordid><startdate>198912</startdate><enddate>198912</enddate><creator>Retpen, Jens B.</creator><creator>Varmarken, Jens-Erik</creator><creator>Stürup, Jens</creator><creator>Olsen, Claus</creator><creator>Sölund, Keld</creator><creator>Steen Jensen, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198912</creationdate><title>Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Retpen, Jens B. ; Varmarken, Jens-Erik ; Stürup, Jens ; Olsen, Claus ; Sölund, Keld ; Steen Jensen, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-fc3970539f5762e84ae57af656afc01c1bbb8f7e298f66024ac02d8d22d5cbed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>clinical evaluation</topic><topic>clinical outcome</topic><topic>complications</topic><topic>failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prosthesis Failure</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>revision total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>total hip arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Retpen, Jens B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varmarken, Jens-Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stürup, Jens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, Claus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sölund, Keld</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steen Jensen, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Retpen, Jens B.</au><au>Varmarken, Jens-Erik</au><au>Stürup, Jens</au><au>Olsen, Claus</au><au>Sölund, Keld</au><au>Steen Jensen, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>1989-12</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>302</epage><pages>297-302</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Results after 184 primary and 227 revision total hip arthroplasties were compared with an emphasis on rates of failure leading to reoperation and intra- and postoperative complications and on the clinical outcome of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series. The failure rate was 7% (11 of 156) in the primary series, versus 27% (54 of 195) in the revision series. The rate of complications was substantially higher after revision, due to 16% (36 of 227) intraoperative fractures of the femoral shaft and 6% (14 of 227) postoperative dislocations. Clinical assessment of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the two series revealed no difference with regard to relief of pain. For patients with concomitant disabling conditions functional outcome was inferior after revision, but for patients without such conditions the functional results of the two series were equal. The favorable clinical results of the nonrevised arthroplasties in the revision series must be seen in relation to the very high rate of failure leading to reoperation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2621462</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80030-0</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 1989-12, Vol.4 (4), p.297-302
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79476971
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
clinical evaluation
clinical outcome
complications
failure
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hip Prosthesis
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pain, Postoperative - etiology
Postoperative Complications
Prosthesis Failure
Reoperation
revision total hip arthroplasty
total hip arthroplasty
title Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T10%3A56%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20results%20after%20revision%20and%20primary%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Retpen,%20Jens%20B.&rft.date=1989-12&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=302&rft.pages=297-302&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0883-5403(89)80030-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79476971%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79476971&rft_id=info:pmid/2621462&rft_els_id=S0883540389800300&rfr_iscdi=true