Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?

A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the resu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human reproduction (Oxford) 1997-10, Vol.12 (10), p.2147-2150
Hauptverfasser: Sowter, M C, Akande, V A, Williams, J A, Hull, M G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2150
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2147
container_title Human reproduction (Oxford)
container_volume 12
creator Sowter, M C
Akande, V A
Williams, J A
Hull, M G
description A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the results was performed of all women with infective tubal damage aged
doi_str_mv 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79465847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147</oup_id><sourcerecordid>79465847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-154aa0cb30bdebe98fb216f0a4bf3d41364dedb02864003d4397c51122631d093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9u1DAQxi0EKtvCA3BA8gFxalqP7TjJCcEKaKVFcACp6sWyY6drSOLUdqouD8Bz4yWrPXOaf9_MfPoh9ArIBZCGXW7nIdjpEmguLyjw6glaARekoKwkT9GKUFEXAAKeo9MYfxKS01qcoJOGE0orWKE_1xGnrcV-Tq0fcuywG4sHl4LHnQ3J9e63Ss6PWI0G20GHnccpqDHmaU6sSoMdE3bDFPyDNVjvcJz8mNRo_RyxDzjO4c61qscmKDequ39PFN7uTPBR9ZMbH9-9QM861Uf78hDP0I9PH7-vr4rN18_X6_eboi1ZnQoouVKk1YxoY7Vt6k5TEB1RXHfMcGCCG2s0obXghOQOa6q2BKBUMDCZ2Bl6u9zNbu9nG5McXGxt3y92ZdVwUda8ykJYhG02GYPt5BTcoMJOApF79nJhL4HuO3v2eef14fisB2uOGwfYef7mMFcx8-gyxdbFo4ySsuG0zrLzRebn6b--FovcxWQfjwsq_JKiYlUpr25u5e365tuX8gORG_YXRviuQQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79465847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Sowter, M C ; Akande, V A ; Williams, J A ; Hull, M G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sowter, M C ; Akande, V A ; Williams, J A ; Hull, M G</creatorcontrib><description>A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the results was performed of all women with infective tubal damage aged &lt;40 years old, who had ovulatory cycles, a normal uterus and a partner with normal spermatozoa. A standardized treatment regimen was used. A maximum of three embryos were transferred. Hydrosalpinx was defined by prior hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy with transcervical dye injection. A total of 237 embryo transfer cycles in women with hydrosalpinges (tubal distension not visible in 151, visible but not drained in 30 and drained in 56) were compared with 705 embryo transfer cycles in women with tubal disease but no hydrosalpinx. Results were analysed in the first three cycles but also separately in the first cycle to check for bias. Success rates were higher in the first cycle, but did not significantly influence overall differences. Implantation rates were significantly reduced overall in the hydrosalpinx group (8.0 versus 13.2% for controls; P &lt; 0.001), being 8.3% (P &lt; 0.01) in the subgroup without evident tubal distension and 7.5% (not significant) in the drained hydrosalpinx group. This study shows that tubal damage with distal occlusion is associated with a marked reduction in embryo implantation, even in the absence of obvious fluid distension. Surgical drainage of distended hydrosalpinges appears to offer no benefit.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9402271</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUREEE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Drainage ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer ; Fallopian Tube Diseases - complications ; Fallopian Tube Diseases - surgery ; Female ; Fertilization in Vitro ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Infertility, Female - etiology ; Infertility, Female - therapy ; Medical sciences ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy, Ectopic ; Retrospective Studies ; Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 1997-10, Vol.12 (10), p.2147-2150</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-154aa0cb30bdebe98fb216f0a4bf3d41364dedb02864003d4397c51122631d093</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2059428$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9402271$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sowter, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akande, V A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, M G</creatorcontrib><title>Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the results was performed of all women with infective tubal damage aged &lt;40 years old, who had ovulatory cycles, a normal uterus and a partner with normal spermatozoa. A standardized treatment regimen was used. A maximum of three embryos were transferred. Hydrosalpinx was defined by prior hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy with transcervical dye injection. A total of 237 embryo transfer cycles in women with hydrosalpinges (tubal distension not visible in 151, visible but not drained in 30 and drained in 56) were compared with 705 embryo transfer cycles in women with tubal disease but no hydrosalpinx. Results were analysed in the first three cycles but also separately in the first cycle to check for bias. Success rates were higher in the first cycle, but did not significantly influence overall differences. Implantation rates were significantly reduced overall in the hydrosalpinx group (8.0 versus 13.2% for controls; P &lt; 0.001), being 8.3% (P &lt; 0.01) in the subgroup without evident tubal distension and 7.5% (not significant) in the drained hydrosalpinx group. This study shows that tubal damage with distal occlusion is associated with a marked reduction in embryo implantation, even in the absence of obvious fluid distension. Surgical drainage of distended hydrosalpinges appears to offer no benefit.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer</subject><subject>Fallopian Tube Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Fallopian Tube Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertilization in Vitro</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - etiology</subject><subject>Infertility, Female - therapy</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Ectopic</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Sterility. Assisted procreation</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM9u1DAQxi0EKtvCA3BA8gFxalqP7TjJCcEKaKVFcACp6sWyY6drSOLUdqouD8Bz4yWrPXOaf9_MfPoh9ArIBZCGXW7nIdjpEmguLyjw6glaARekoKwkT9GKUFEXAAKeo9MYfxKS01qcoJOGE0orWKE_1xGnrcV-Tq0fcuywG4sHl4LHnQ3J9e63Ss6PWI0G20GHnccpqDHmaU6sSoMdE3bDFPyDNVjvcJz8mNRo_RyxDzjO4c61qscmKDequ39PFN7uTPBR9ZMbH9-9QM861Uf78hDP0I9PH7-vr4rN18_X6_eboi1ZnQoouVKk1YxoY7Vt6k5TEB1RXHfMcGCCG2s0obXghOQOa6q2BKBUMDCZ2Bl6u9zNbu9nG5McXGxt3y92ZdVwUda8ykJYhG02GYPt5BTcoMJOApF79nJhL4HuO3v2eef14fisB2uOGwfYef7mMFcx8-gyxdbFo4ySsuG0zrLzRebn6b--FovcxWQfjwsq_JKiYlUpr25u5e365tuX8gORG_YXRviuQQ</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Sowter, M C</creator><creator>Akande, V A</creator><creator>Williams, J A</creator><creator>Hull, M G</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?</title><author>Sowter, M C ; Akande, V A ; Williams, J A ; Hull, M G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c538t-154aa0cb30bdebe98fb216f0a4bf3d41364dedb02864003d4397c51122631d093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer</topic><topic>Fallopian Tube Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Fallopian Tube Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertilization in Vitro</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - etiology</topic><topic>Infertility, Female - therapy</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Ectopic</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Sterility. Assisted procreation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sowter, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akande, V A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, J A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, M G</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sowter, M C</au><au>Akande, V A</au><au>Williams, J A</au><au>Hull, M G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><stitle>Hum Reprod</stitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2147</spage><epage>2150</epage><pages>2147-2150</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><coden>HUREEE</coden><abstract>A pilot study was designed to examine whether the outcome of embryo transfer in women with a hydrosalpinx might be improved by surgical drainage of the hydrosalpinx at the time of oocyte collection for in-vitro fertilization treatment. A comparative, controlled but retrospective analysis of the results was performed of all women with infective tubal damage aged &lt;40 years old, who had ovulatory cycles, a normal uterus and a partner with normal spermatozoa. A standardized treatment regimen was used. A maximum of three embryos were transferred. Hydrosalpinx was defined by prior hysterosalpingography and/or laparoscopy with transcervical dye injection. A total of 237 embryo transfer cycles in women with hydrosalpinges (tubal distension not visible in 151, visible but not drained in 30 and drained in 56) were compared with 705 embryo transfer cycles in women with tubal disease but no hydrosalpinx. Results were analysed in the first three cycles but also separately in the first cycle to check for bias. Success rates were higher in the first cycle, but did not significantly influence overall differences. Implantation rates were significantly reduced overall in the hydrosalpinx group (8.0 versus 13.2% for controls; P &lt; 0.001), being 8.3% (P &lt; 0.01) in the subgroup without evident tubal distension and 7.5% (not significant) in the drained hydrosalpinx group. This study shows that tubal damage with distal occlusion is associated with a marked reduction in embryo implantation, even in the absence of obvious fluid distension. Surgical drainage of distended hydrosalpinges appears to offer no benefit.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9402271</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-1161
ispartof Human reproduction (Oxford), 1997-10, Vol.12 (10), p.2147-2150
issn 0268-1161
1460-2350
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79465847
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Drainage
Embryo Implantation
Embryo Transfer
Fallopian Tube Diseases - complications
Fallopian Tube Diseases - surgery
Female
Fertilization in Vitro
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Infertility, Female - etiology
Infertility, Female - therapy
Medical sciences
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Ectopic
Retrospective Studies
Sterility. Assisted procreation
title Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A35%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20outcome%20of%20in-vitro%20fertilization%20and%20embryo%20transfer%20treatment%20improved%20by%20spontaneous%20or%20surgical%20drainage%20of%20a%20hydrosalpinx?&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Sowter,%20M%20C&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2147&rft.epage=2150&rft.pages=2147-2150&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft.coden=HUREEE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79465847%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79465847&rft_id=info:pmid/9402271&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/12.10.2147&rfr_iscdi=true