Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques

This study compares liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management between single‐phase spiral CT and MRI using spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin echo, and serial post gadolinium SGE. All patients with suspected liver lesions who underwent spira...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 1997-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1040-1047
Hauptverfasser: Semelka, Richard C., Worawattanakul, Suvipapun, Kelekis, Nikolaos L., John, Gesine, Woosley, John T., Graham, Mark, Cance, William G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1047
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1040
container_title Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 7
creator Semelka, Richard C.
Worawattanakul, Suvipapun
Kelekis, Nikolaos L.
John, Gesine
Woosley, John T.
Graham, Mark
Cance, William G.
description This study compares liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management between single‐phase spiral CT and MRI using spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin echo, and serial post gadolinium SGE. All patients with suspected liver lesions who underwent spiral CT and MRI within a 1‐month period between January 1993 and September 1996 were included in the study. Spiral CT and MRI were interpreted prospectively in a blinded fashion by separate individual experienced investigators, and lesion detection and characterization were determined. Confirmation was obtained by surgery (6 patients), biopsy (18 patients), imaging follow‐up (36 patients), or combined reading of all imaging studies and clinical follow‐up (29 patients). Effect on patient management was determined by combined chart review and interview of the patients' physicians and by retrospective clinical assessment performed by a surgical oncologist and medical oncologist separately. Eighty‐nine patients were included in the study. Regarding true positive lesion detection, 295 and 519 lesions were detected on spiral CT and MR images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P < .001). More lesions were detected on MR than on spiral CT in 44 of 89 patients (49.4%), and 11 of these 44 patients had lesions shown on MRI in whom no lesions were apparent on CT images. No patients had true positive lesions shown on spiral CT that were not shown on MRI. Regarding lesion characterization, 129 and 466 lesions were characterized on spiral CT and MRI images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P < .001). More lesions were characterized on MR than CT images in 67 patients (75.3%). Regarding effect on patient management, chart review with physician interview demonstrated that findings on MRI provided information that altered patient management as compared with findings on spiral CT in 57 patients. Retrospective clinical evaluation by the surgical and medical oncologist showed that MRI was considered to have a greater effect on patient management than spiral CT in 58 and 55 patients, respectively. Comparing current MRI technique to single‐phase spiral CT, MRI detected more lesions in 49.4% and characterized more lesions in 75.3% of patients investigated for focal liver disease. MRI had a greater effect on patient management in each of the three methods than singlephase spiral CT in more than 61% o
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jmri.1880070616
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79456211</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79456211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-5abbb30e6b1b94010799743a97c5695fd3b441715d79fc879ce0462464401c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtv1DAUhSMEKm1hzQrJK1akvY5fMazKAKXVtEhV0Swtx7npuOSFnSmUn8CvxkNGRaxY-eje75wrnyx7QeGIAhTHt13wR7QsARRIKh9l-1QURV6IUj5OGgTLaQnqaXYQ4y0AaM3FXranOUDJ1X72a-nvMJAWox96UuOEbkrqNXFrG6ybMPifdp7YvibYNAkgCR3TFPuJdLa3N9gl-YYshm60wce0HhoSfX_TYj6ubUQSRx9sSxbXf2LcJoSt-eKKpIPr3n_bYHyWPWlsG_H57j3Mvnz8cL34lC8_n54tTpa5Y2Uhc2GrqmKAsqJV-gYFpbXizGrlhNSiqVnFOVVU1Eo3rlTaIXBZcMkT7Lhgh9mrOXcMw_buZDofHbat7XHYRKNSRbKgNIHHM-jCEGPAxozBdzbcGwpm277Ztm_-tp8cL3fRm6rD-oHf1Z32b-f9d9_i_f_izPnF1dk_6fns9nHCHw9uG74aqZgSZnV5ai7P368ErJh5x34DnpqiIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79456211</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Semelka, Richard C. ; Worawattanakul, Suvipapun ; Kelekis, Nikolaos L. ; John, Gesine ; Woosley, John T. ; Graham, Mark ; Cance, William G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Semelka, Richard C. ; Worawattanakul, Suvipapun ; Kelekis, Nikolaos L. ; John, Gesine ; Woosley, John T. ; Graham, Mark ; Cance, William G.</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management between single‐phase spiral CT and MRI using spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin echo, and serial post gadolinium SGE. All patients with suspected liver lesions who underwent spiral CT and MRI within a 1‐month period between January 1993 and September 1996 were included in the study. Spiral CT and MRI were interpreted prospectively in a blinded fashion by separate individual experienced investigators, and lesion detection and characterization were determined. Confirmation was obtained by surgery (6 patients), biopsy (18 patients), imaging follow‐up (36 patients), or combined reading of all imaging studies and clinical follow‐up (29 patients). Effect on patient management was determined by combined chart review and interview of the patients' physicians and by retrospective clinical assessment performed by a surgical oncologist and medical oncologist separately. Eighty‐nine patients were included in the study. Regarding true positive lesion detection, 295 and 519 lesions were detected on spiral CT and MR images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were detected on MR than on spiral CT in 44 of 89 patients (49.4%), and 11 of these 44 patients had lesions shown on MRI in whom no lesions were apparent on CT images. No patients had true positive lesions shown on spiral CT that were not shown on MRI. Regarding lesion characterization, 129 and 466 lesions were characterized on spiral CT and MRI images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were characterized on MR than CT images in 67 patients (75.3%). Regarding effect on patient management, chart review with physician interview demonstrated that findings on MRI provided information that altered patient management as compared with findings on spiral CT in 57 patients. Retrospective clinical evaluation by the surgical and medical oncologist showed that MRI was considered to have a greater effect on patient management than spiral CT in 58 and 55 patients, respectively. Comparing current MRI technique to single‐phase spiral CT, MRI detected more lesions in 49.4% and characterized more lesions in 75.3% of patients investigated for focal liver disease. MRI had a greater effect on patient management in each of the three methods than singlephase spiral CT in more than 61% of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880070616</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9400847</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Data Interpretation, Statistical ; Female ; Humans ; Liver ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver, magnetic resonance 761.1214 ; Liver, neoplasms 761.3 ; Liver, spiral CT 761.12115 ; magnetic resonance 761.1214 ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; neoplasms 761.3 ; Patient Care Planning ; spiral CT 761.12115 ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1997-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1040-1047</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-5abbb30e6b1b94010799743a97c5695fd3b441715d79fc879ce0462464401c453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-5abbb30e6b1b94010799743a97c5695fd3b441715d79fc879ce0462464401c453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880070616$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.1880070616$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9400847$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Semelka, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worawattanakul, Suvipapun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelekis, Nikolaos L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Gesine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woosley, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cance, William G.</creatorcontrib><title>Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><description>This study compares liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management between single‐phase spiral CT and MRI using spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin echo, and serial post gadolinium SGE. All patients with suspected liver lesions who underwent spiral CT and MRI within a 1‐month period between January 1993 and September 1996 were included in the study. Spiral CT and MRI were interpreted prospectively in a blinded fashion by separate individual experienced investigators, and lesion detection and characterization were determined. Confirmation was obtained by surgery (6 patients), biopsy (18 patients), imaging follow‐up (36 patients), or combined reading of all imaging studies and clinical follow‐up (29 patients). Effect on patient management was determined by combined chart review and interview of the patients' physicians and by retrospective clinical assessment performed by a surgical oncologist and medical oncologist separately. Eighty‐nine patients were included in the study. Regarding true positive lesion detection, 295 and 519 lesions were detected on spiral CT and MR images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were detected on MR than on spiral CT in 44 of 89 patients (49.4%), and 11 of these 44 patients had lesions shown on MRI in whom no lesions were apparent on CT images. No patients had true positive lesions shown on spiral CT that were not shown on MRI. Regarding lesion characterization, 129 and 466 lesions were characterized on spiral CT and MRI images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were characterized on MR than CT images in 67 patients (75.3%). Regarding effect on patient management, chart review with physician interview demonstrated that findings on MRI provided information that altered patient management as compared with findings on spiral CT in 57 patients. Retrospective clinical evaluation by the surgical and medical oncologist showed that MRI was considered to have a greater effect on patient management than spiral CT in 58 and 55 patients, respectively. Comparing current MRI technique to single‐phase spiral CT, MRI detected more lesions in 49.4% and characterized more lesions in 75.3% of patients investigated for focal liver disease. MRI had a greater effect on patient management in each of the three methods than singlephase spiral CT in more than 61% of patients.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Data Interpretation, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver, magnetic resonance 761.1214</subject><subject>Liver, neoplasms 761.3</subject><subject>Liver, spiral CT 761.12115</subject><subject>magnetic resonance 761.1214</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>neoplasms 761.3</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>spiral CT 761.12115</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtv1DAUhSMEKm1hzQrJK1akvY5fMazKAKXVtEhV0Swtx7npuOSFnSmUn8CvxkNGRaxY-eje75wrnyx7QeGIAhTHt13wR7QsARRIKh9l-1QURV6IUj5OGgTLaQnqaXYQ4y0AaM3FXranOUDJ1X72a-nvMJAWox96UuOEbkrqNXFrG6ybMPifdp7YvibYNAkgCR3TFPuJdLa3N9gl-YYshm60wce0HhoSfX_TYj6ubUQSRx9sSxbXf2LcJoSt-eKKpIPr3n_bYHyWPWlsG_H57j3Mvnz8cL34lC8_n54tTpa5Y2Uhc2GrqmKAsqJV-gYFpbXizGrlhNSiqVnFOVVU1Eo3rlTaIXBZcMkT7Lhgh9mrOXcMw_buZDofHbat7XHYRKNSRbKgNIHHM-jCEGPAxozBdzbcGwpm277Ztm_-tp8cL3fRm6rD-oHf1Z32b-f9d9_i_f_izPnF1dk_6fns9nHCHw9uG74aqZgSZnV5ai7P368ErJh5x34DnpqiIw</recordid><startdate>199711</startdate><enddate>199711</enddate><creator>Semelka, Richard C.</creator><creator>Worawattanakul, Suvipapun</creator><creator>Kelekis, Nikolaos L.</creator><creator>John, Gesine</creator><creator>Woosley, John T.</creator><creator>Graham, Mark</creator><creator>Cance, William G.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199711</creationdate><title>Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques</title><author>Semelka, Richard C. ; Worawattanakul, Suvipapun ; Kelekis, Nikolaos L. ; John, Gesine ; Woosley, John T. ; Graham, Mark ; Cance, William G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3826-5abbb30e6b1b94010799743a97c5695fd3b441715d79fc879ce0462464401c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Data Interpretation, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver, magnetic resonance 761.1214</topic><topic>Liver, neoplasms 761.3</topic><topic>Liver, spiral CT 761.12115</topic><topic>magnetic resonance 761.1214</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>neoplasms 761.3</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>spiral CT 761.12115</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Semelka, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worawattanakul, Suvipapun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelekis, Nikolaos L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>John, Gesine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woosley, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cance, William G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Semelka, Richard C.</au><au>Worawattanakul, Suvipapun</au><au>Kelekis, Nikolaos L.</au><au>John, Gesine</au><au>Woosley, John T.</au><au>Graham, Mark</au><au>Cance, William G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J. Magn. Reson. Imaging</addtitle><date>1997-11</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1040</spage><epage>1047</epage><pages>1040-1047</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>This study compares liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management between single‐phase spiral CT and MRI using spoiled gradient echo (SGE), T2‐weighted fat‐suppressed spin echo, and serial post gadolinium SGE. All patients with suspected liver lesions who underwent spiral CT and MRI within a 1‐month period between January 1993 and September 1996 were included in the study. Spiral CT and MRI were interpreted prospectively in a blinded fashion by separate individual experienced investigators, and lesion detection and characterization were determined. Confirmation was obtained by surgery (6 patients), biopsy (18 patients), imaging follow‐up (36 patients), or combined reading of all imaging studies and clinical follow‐up (29 patients). Effect on patient management was determined by combined chart review and interview of the patients' physicians and by retrospective clinical assessment performed by a surgical oncologist and medical oncologist separately. Eighty‐nine patients were included in the study. Regarding true positive lesion detection, 295 and 519 lesions were detected on spiral CT and MR images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were detected on MR than on spiral CT in 44 of 89 patients (49.4%), and 11 of these 44 patients had lesions shown on MRI in whom no lesions were apparent on CT images. No patients had true positive lesions shown on spiral CT that were not shown on MRI. Regarding lesion characterization, 129 and 466 lesions were characterized on spiral CT and MRI images, respectively, which was significantly different on a patient‐by‐patient basis (P &lt; .001). More lesions were characterized on MR than CT images in 67 patients (75.3%). Regarding effect on patient management, chart review with physician interview demonstrated that findings on MRI provided information that altered patient management as compared with findings on spiral CT in 57 patients. Retrospective clinical evaluation by the surgical and medical oncologist showed that MRI was considered to have a greater effect on patient management than spiral CT in 58 and 55 patients, respectively. Comparing current MRI technique to single‐phase spiral CT, MRI detected more lesions in 49.4% and characterized more lesions in 75.3% of patients investigated for focal liver disease. MRI had a greater effect on patient management in each of the three methods than singlephase spiral CT in more than 61% of patients.</abstract><cop>Baltimore</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>9400847</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.1880070616</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-1807
ispartof Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 1997-11, Vol.7 (6), p.1040-1047
issn 1053-1807
1522-2586
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79456211
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Female
Humans
Liver
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver, magnetic resonance 761.1214
Liver, neoplasms 761.3
Liver, spiral CT 761.12115
magnetic resonance 761.1214
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
neoplasms 761.3
Patient Care Planning
spiral CT 761.12115
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
title Liver lesion detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: Comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A59%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liver%20lesion%20detection,%20characterization,%20and%20effect%20on%20patient%20management:%20Comparison%20of%20single-phase%20spiral%20CT%20and%20current%20MR%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Semelka,%20Richard%20C.&rft.date=1997-11&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1040&rft.epage=1047&rft.pages=1040-1047&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.1880070616&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79456211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79456211&rft_id=info:pmid/9400847&rfr_iscdi=true