Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener

The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study. An appropriate sample size...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Optometry and vision science 1997-10, Vol.74 (10), p.859-864
Hauptverfasser: Hatch, S, Tibbles, C D, Mestito, I R, Read, R, Traveis, L, Richman, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 864
container_issue 10
container_start_page 859
container_title Optometry and vision science
container_volume 74
creator Hatch, S
Tibbles, C D
Mestito, I R
Read, R
Traveis, L
Richman, J
description The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study. An appropriate sample size (> 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect. Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low. Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79437034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>311608</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba41afe562dc3ffe35bfc31d610727b5341b2987b8ec892ecb775bc0ebb355593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhnNQaq0-grAnb6tJJtkkRylqCxUv1WtIshO6su3WZHvo27u1tVcHhuGHb2bgI6Rg9IFRox7pUBVwUTJjFDukcmguL8iYUUFLKbS-Itc5f1HKFMhqREYGNGhKx4R9urapm35fuE1dJGwb55v2kLtY9Css3pbzYrvq-i6HhLjBdEMuo2sz3p7mhHy8PC-ns3Lx_jqfPi3KAIL1pXeCuYiy4nWAGBGkjwFYXTGquPJygDw3WnmNQRuOwSslfaDoPUgpDUzI_fHuNnXfO8y9XTc5YNu6DXa7bJURoCiIf0HOgIlKVgOoj2BIXc4Jo92mZu3S3jJqDyrtn0p7Vml_VQ6rd6cfO7_G-rx48gg_3ohvtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21314656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hatch, S ; Tibbles, C D ; Mestito, I R ; Read, R ; Traveis, L ; Richman, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Hatch, S ; Tibbles, C D ; Mestito, I R ; Read, R ; Traveis, L ; Richman, J</creatorcontrib><description>The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study. An appropriate sample size (&gt; 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect. Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low. Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9383800</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Computational methods ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; False Positive Reactions ; Humans ; Light refraction ; Pediatrics ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Refractive Errors - diagnosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Transients and Migrants ; Vision ; Vision Disorders - diagnosis ; Vision Screening - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Optometry and vision science, 1997-10, Vol.74 (10), p.859-864</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba41afe562dc3ffe35bfc31d610727b5341b2987b8ec892ecb775bc0ebb355593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9383800$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hatch, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbles, C D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestito, I R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traveis, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, J</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener</title><title>Optometry and vision science</title><addtitle>Optom Vis Sci</addtitle><description>The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study. An appropriate sample size (&gt; 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect. Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low. Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Computational methods</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light refraction</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Refractive Errors - diagnosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Transients and Migrants</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Vision Screening - instrumentation</subject><issn>1040-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKAzEQhnNQaq0-grAnb6tJJtkkRylqCxUv1WtIshO6su3WZHvo27u1tVcHhuGHb2bgI6Rg9IFRox7pUBVwUTJjFDukcmguL8iYUUFLKbS-Itc5f1HKFMhqREYGNGhKx4R9urapm35fuE1dJGwb55v2kLtY9Css3pbzYrvq-i6HhLjBdEMuo2sz3p7mhHy8PC-ns3Lx_jqfPi3KAIL1pXeCuYiy4nWAGBGkjwFYXTGquPJygDw3WnmNQRuOwSslfaDoPUgpDUzI_fHuNnXfO8y9XTc5YNu6DXa7bJURoCiIf0HOgIlKVgOoj2BIXc4Jo92mZu3S3jJqDyrtn0p7Vml_VQ6rd6cfO7_G-rx48gg_3ohvtw</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>Hatch, S</creator><creator>Tibbles, C D</creator><creator>Mestito, I R</creator><creator>Read, R</creator><creator>Traveis, L</creator><creator>Richman, J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener</title><author>Hatch, S ; Tibbles, C D ; Mestito, I R ; Read, R ; Traveis, L ; Richman, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-ba41afe562dc3ffe35bfc31d610727b5341b2987b8ec892ecb775bc0ebb355593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Computational methods</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light refraction</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Refractive Errors - diagnosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Transients and Migrants</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Vision Screening - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hatch, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tibbles, C D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestito, I R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traveis, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Optometry and vision science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hatch, S</au><au>Tibbles, C D</au><au>Mestito, I R</au><au>Read, R</au><au>Traveis, L</au><au>Richman, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener</atitle><jtitle>Optometry and vision science</jtitle><addtitle>Optom Vis Sci</addtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>859</spage><epage>864</epage><pages>859-864</pages><issn>1040-5488</issn><abstract>The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study. An appropriate sample size (&gt; 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect. Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low. Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>9383800</pmid><doi>10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-5488
ispartof Optometry and vision science, 1997-10, Vol.74 (10), p.859-864
issn 1040-5488
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79437034
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Computational methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
False Positive Reactions
Humans
Light refraction
Pediatrics
Predictive Value of Tests
Refractive Errors - diagnosis
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Transients and Migrants
Vision
Vision Disorders - diagnosis
Vision Screening - instrumentation
title Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T08%3A07%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20the%20MTI%20photoscreener&rft.jtitle=Optometry%20and%20vision%20science&rft.au=Hatch,%20S&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=859&rft.epage=864&rft.pages=859-864&rft.issn=1040-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00006324-199710000-00025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E311608%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21314656&rft_id=info:pmid/9383800&rfr_iscdi=true