Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction

Vascularized fibula transfer has become a preferred method of mandibular restoration after oncologic surgical ablation. In order to elucidate the long-term effect on fibular mass after mandibular reconstruction, change in fibular height was utilized as an indirect measure of change in bone mass over...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 1997-11, Vol.174 (5), p.503-506
Hauptverfasser: DISA, J. J, WINTERS, R. M, HIDALGO, D. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 506
container_issue 5
container_start_page 503
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 174
creator DISA, J. J
WINTERS, R. M
HIDALGO, D. A
description Vascularized fibula transfer has become a preferred method of mandibular restoration after oncologic surgical ablation. In order to elucidate the long-term effect on fibular mass after mandibular reconstruction, change in fibular height was utilized as an indirect measure of change in bone mass over time. Other potentially influential factors in long-term bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of re-construction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing free fibula mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1993 was performed. Postoperative panorex examinations were used to evaluate fibular height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. Only patients with at least 24 months follow-up were included in this study. There were 27 patients (15 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 43 years (range 14 to 65) included in this study. Mandibular defects were anterior (16) and lateral (11). There were between two and five segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Thirty percent of patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months (mean 2) postoperatively. Follow-up panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months (mean 54) postoperatively. The bony union rate after osteotomy was 93%. Comparative measurements of fibular height revealed that central segments underwent a mean decrease in height by 4% (range 0% to 22%); body segments decreased in height by 7% (range 0% to 33%); ramus segments decreased in height by 5% (range 0% to 15%). In each anatomic segment, fibular height varied by 10% or less when compared with respect to patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, and the presence of osseointegrated dental implants. We conclude that the retention of fibula height seen in this study indicates that fibula bone mass is preserved after free flap mandible reconstruction. Furthermore, these findings are not affected by the site of reconstruction, patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, or presence of osseointegrated dental implants. This study further supports the efficacy of vascularized fibula grafts for mandible reconstr
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00152-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79420149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961097001529</els_id><sourcerecordid>2847458407</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c54c7123f3d26b2b5fc0534305ed73fd2b9634c0ae703d20d66e29061702a2143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoO4rOPoT1gIKIseWisfnXSfRBa_YBYP6jmk0xXJ0p2MSfeC_34zO8McvHhJKN6niqqHkCsG7xgw9f4HAPCmVwze9PotAGtr9YRsWKf7hnWdeEo2Z-QZeV7KXS0Zk-KSXPZCS87bDbndpfi7WTDPFO_ttNolpEiTp0OKSGdbCg2R-oxIfRjWyVI_2X0N4hiGCWlGl2JZ8uoOjS_IhbdTwZenf0t-ff708-Zrs_v-5dvNx13jWgFLfaXTjAsvRq4GPrTeQSukgBZHLfzIh14J6cCihorAqBTyHhTTwC2vF2zJ9XHuPqc_K5bFzKE4nCYbMa3F6F5yYLKv4Kt_wLu05lh3M7yTWradBF2p9ki5nErJ6M0-h9nmv4aBOcg2j7LNwaTptXmUbQ7Tr07T12HG8dx1slvz16fcFmcnn210oZwxDlqpeuGWfDhiWJXdB8ymuIDR4Riq3sWMKfxnkQfZ55kY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847458407</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>DISA, J. J ; WINTERS, R. M ; HIDALGO, D. A</creator><creatorcontrib>DISA, J. J ; WINTERS, R. M ; HIDALGO, D. A</creatorcontrib><description>Vascularized fibula transfer has become a preferred method of mandibular restoration after oncologic surgical ablation. In order to elucidate the long-term effect on fibular mass after mandibular reconstruction, change in fibular height was utilized as an indirect measure of change in bone mass over time. Other potentially influential factors in long-term bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of re-construction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing free fibula mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1993 was performed. Postoperative panorex examinations were used to evaluate fibular height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. Only patients with at least 24 months follow-up were included in this study. There were 27 patients (15 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 43 years (range 14 to 65) included in this study. Mandibular defects were anterior (16) and lateral (11). There were between two and five segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Thirty percent of patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months (mean 2) postoperatively. Follow-up panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months (mean 54) postoperatively. The bony union rate after osteotomy was 93%. Comparative measurements of fibular height revealed that central segments underwent a mean decrease in height by 4% (range 0% to 22%); body segments decreased in height by 7% (range 0% to 33%); ramus segments decreased in height by 5% (range 0% to 15%). In each anatomic segment, fibular height varied by 10% or less when compared with respect to patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, and the presence of osseointegrated dental implants. We conclude that the retention of fibula height seen in this study indicates that fibula bone mass is preserved after free flap mandible reconstruction. Furthermore, these findings are not affected by the site of reconstruction, patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, or presence of osseointegrated dental implants. This study further supports the efficacy of vascularized fibula grafts for mandible reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00152-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9374225</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSUAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Adult ; Age ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body measurements ; Bone Density ; Bone mass ; Bone Transplantation ; Defects ; Dental implants ; Dental prosthetics ; Error analysis ; Evaluation ; Female ; Fibula ; Follow-Up Studies ; Height ; Humans ; Long bone ; Male ; Mandible ; Mandible - surgery ; Mandibular Neoplasms - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Osseointegration ; Osteotomy ; Patients ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Reconstructive surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Segments ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgical Flaps ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 1997-11, Vol.174 (5), p.503-506</ispartof><rights>1997 Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>1997. Excerpta Medica, Inc. All rights reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c54c7123f3d26b2b5fc0534305ed73fd2b9634c0ae703d20d66e29061702a2143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c54c7123f3d26b2b5fc0534305ed73fd2b9634c0ae703d20d66e29061702a2143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2847458407?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,3537,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2076670$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9374225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DISA, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTERS, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIDALGO, D. A</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Vascularized fibula transfer has become a preferred method of mandibular restoration after oncologic surgical ablation. In order to elucidate the long-term effect on fibular mass after mandibular reconstruction, change in fibular height was utilized as an indirect measure of change in bone mass over time. Other potentially influential factors in long-term bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of re-construction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing free fibula mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1993 was performed. Postoperative panorex examinations were used to evaluate fibular height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. Only patients with at least 24 months follow-up were included in this study. There were 27 patients (15 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 43 years (range 14 to 65) included in this study. Mandibular defects were anterior (16) and lateral (11). There were between two and five segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Thirty percent of patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months (mean 2) postoperatively. Follow-up panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months (mean 54) postoperatively. The bony union rate after osteotomy was 93%. Comparative measurements of fibular height revealed that central segments underwent a mean decrease in height by 4% (range 0% to 22%); body segments decreased in height by 7% (range 0% to 33%); ramus segments decreased in height by 5% (range 0% to 15%). In each anatomic segment, fibular height varied by 10% or less when compared with respect to patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, and the presence of osseointegrated dental implants. We conclude that the retention of fibula height seen in this study indicates that fibula bone mass is preserved after free flap mandible reconstruction. Furthermore, these findings are not affected by the site of reconstruction, patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, or presence of osseointegrated dental implants. This study further supports the efficacy of vascularized fibula grafts for mandible reconstruction.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body measurements</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone mass</subject><subject>Bone Transplantation</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fibula</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long bone</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Mandible - surgery</subject><subject>Mandibular Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Osseointegration</subject><subject>Osteotomy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Reconstructive surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Segments</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE2LFDEQhoO4rOPoT1gIKIseWisfnXSfRBa_YBYP6jmk0xXJ0p2MSfeC_34zO8McvHhJKN6niqqHkCsG7xgw9f4HAPCmVwze9PotAGtr9YRsWKf7hnWdeEo2Z-QZeV7KXS0Zk-KSXPZCS87bDbndpfi7WTDPFO_ttNolpEiTp0OKSGdbCg2R-oxIfRjWyVI_2X0N4hiGCWlGl2JZ8uoOjS_IhbdTwZenf0t-ff708-Zrs_v-5dvNx13jWgFLfaXTjAsvRq4GPrTeQSukgBZHLfzIh14J6cCihorAqBTyHhTTwC2vF2zJ9XHuPqc_K5bFzKE4nCYbMa3F6F5yYLKv4Kt_wLu05lh3M7yTWradBF2p9ki5nErJ6M0-h9nmv4aBOcg2j7LNwaTptXmUbQ7Tr07T12HG8dx1slvz16fcFmcnn210oZwxDlqpeuGWfDhiWJXdB8ymuIDR4Riq3sWMKfxnkQfZ55kY</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>DISA, J. J</creator><creator>WINTERS, R. M</creator><creator>HIDALGO, D. A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction</title><author>DISA, J. J ; WINTERS, R. M ; HIDALGO, D. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c530t-c54c7123f3d26b2b5fc0534305ed73fd2b9634c0ae703d20d66e29061702a2143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body measurements</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone mass</topic><topic>Bone Transplantation</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fibula</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long bone</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Mandible - surgery</topic><topic>Mandibular Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Osseointegration</topic><topic>Osteotomy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Reconstructive surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Segments</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DISA, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINTERS, R. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HIDALGO, D. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DISA, J. J</au><au>WINTERS, R. M</au><au>HIDALGO, D. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>174</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>506</epage><pages>503-506</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><coden>AJSUAB</coden><abstract>Vascularized fibula transfer has become a preferred method of mandibular restoration after oncologic surgical ablation. In order to elucidate the long-term effect on fibular mass after mandibular reconstruction, change in fibular height was utilized as an indirect measure of change in bone mass over time. Other potentially influential factors in long-term bone mass preservation were evaluated; these included site of re-construction (central, body, ramus), patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiotherapy, and the delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing free fibula mandible reconstruction for oncologic surgical defects between 1987 and 1993 was performed. Postoperative panorex examinations were used to evaluate fibular height and bony union after osteotomy. Fixation hardware was used as a reference to eliminate magnification as a possible source of error in measurement. Only patients with at least 24 months follow-up were included in this study. There were 27 patients (15 males and 12 females) with a mean age of 43 years (range 14 to 65) included in this study. Mandibular defects were anterior (16) and lateral (11). There were between two and five segmental osteotomies per patient (excluding the ends of the graft). Thirty percent of patients had delayed placement of osseointegrated dental implants. Initial panorex examinations were taken between 1 and 9 months (mean 2) postoperatively. Follow-up panorex examinations were taken 24 to 104 months (mean 54) postoperatively. The bony union rate after osteotomy was 93%. Comparative measurements of fibular height revealed that central segments underwent a mean decrease in height by 4% (range 0% to 22%); body segments decreased in height by 7% (range 0% to 33%); ramus segments decreased in height by 5% (range 0% to 15%). In each anatomic segment, fibular height varied by 10% or less when compared with respect to patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, and the presence of osseointegrated dental implants. We conclude that the retention of fibula height seen in this study indicates that fibula bone mass is preserved after free flap mandible reconstruction. Furthermore, these findings are not affected by the site of reconstruction, patient age, length of follow-up, adjuvant radiation therapy, or presence of osseointegrated dental implants. This study further supports the efficacy of vascularized fibula grafts for mandible reconstruction.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9374225</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00152-9</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 1997-11, Vol.174 (5), p.503-506
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79420149
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Ablation
Adult
Age
Biological and medical sciences
Body measurements
Bone Density
Bone mass
Bone Transplantation
Defects
Dental implants
Dental prosthetics
Error analysis
Evaluation
Female
Fibula
Follow-Up Studies
Height
Humans
Long bone
Male
Mandible
Mandible - surgery
Mandibular Neoplasms - surgery
Medical sciences
Orthopedic surgery
Osseointegration
Osteotomy
Patients
Radiation
Radiation therapy
Reconstructive surgery
Retrospective Studies
Segments
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgical Flaps
Time Factors
title Long-term evaluation of bone mass in free fibula flap mandible reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20evaluation%20of%20bone%20mass%20in%20free%20fibula%20flap%20mandible%20reconstruction&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=DISA,%20J.%20J&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=174&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=506&rft.pages=503-506&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft.coden=AJSUAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0002-9610(97)00152-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847458407%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847458407&rft_id=info:pmid/9374225&rft_els_id=S0002961097001529&rfr_iscdi=true