Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy
Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiof...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1989-12, Vol.80 (6), p.1527-1535 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1535 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1527 |
container_title | Circulation (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | LANGBERG, J. J CHIN, M. C ROSENQVIST, M COCKRELL, J DULLET, N VAN HARE, G GRIFFIN, J. C SCHEINMAN, M. M |
description | Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy. A standard 7F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned to record the largest unipolar His potential (580 +/- 640 microV) from the distal electrode. An electrocoagulator (Microvasive Bicap 4005) supplied continuous, unmodulated energy at 550 kHz. One to 14 applications of radiofrequency current were delivered between the distal electrode and a large-diameter chest wall electrode. Transient, mild chest discomfort was reported by seven of 16 patients. None had significant arrhythmias or blood pressure changes during radiofrequency ablation. Complete atrioventricular block was produced in nine of 16 patients and high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block was produced in one patient with radiofrequency current. Attenuated His bundle electrograms could still be recorded in the remaining six patients, four of whom underwent successful atrioventricular junctional ablation using direct-current shock during the same session. Atrioventricular block persisted in all 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation during a mean follow-up of 4.2 months. Compared with a group of historic control subjects treated with direct-current shock ablation, the 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency current had significantly less creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release (5.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 22 +/- 13 IU, p = 0.006). A junctional escape rhythm was present in all patients after radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block. In contrast, three of 10 control patients had an idioventricular escape after direct current shock ablation, and four patients had no escape rhythm at all. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1161/01.CIR.80.6.1527 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79390802</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79390802</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ee0aa074157d0268c003c3f8744fbeeeac1308d319abba0a1f17de382cd3f9943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFP3DAQhS0EWraUOxekXOCWMBM7cXysVi1FokJC9GxNnDEblE2onbTaf48pq_b0NPPePI0-IS4QCsQabwCLzd1j0UBRF1iV-kisk6hcVdIcizUAmFzLsjwVn2J8SWMtdbUSq7IyjUKzFj82NG955pBRO9DcT2M2-SytMppDP_3mMYlbBgrZyzK6v4E__bzNAnX95AP_Wnh0-4xHDs_7z-LE0xD5_KBn4ue3r0-b7_n9w-3d5st97hToOWcGItAKK91BWTcOQDrpG62Ub5mZHEpoOomG2paA0KPuWDal66Q3Rskzcf3R-xqm9ECc7a6PjoeBRp6WaLWRBhooUxA-gi5MMQb29jX0Owp7i2DfCVpAmwjaBmxt3wmmk8tD99LuuPt3cECW_KuDT9HR4AONro__e02NiErLN_E-elI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79390802</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Heart Association Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>LANGBERG, J. J ; CHIN, M. C ; ROSENQVIST, M ; COCKRELL, J ; DULLET, N ; VAN HARE, G ; GRIFFIN, J. C ; SCHEINMAN, M. M</creator><creatorcontrib>LANGBERG, J. J ; CHIN, M. C ; ROSENQVIST, M ; COCKRELL, J ; DULLET, N ; VAN HARE, G ; GRIFFIN, J. C ; SCHEINMAN, M. M</creatorcontrib><description>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy. A standard 7F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned to record the largest unipolar His potential (580 +/- 640 microV) from the distal electrode. An electrocoagulator (Microvasive Bicap 4005) supplied continuous, unmodulated energy at 550 kHz. One to 14 applications of radiofrequency current were delivered between the distal electrode and a large-diameter chest wall electrode. Transient, mild chest discomfort was reported by seven of 16 patients. None had significant arrhythmias or blood pressure changes during radiofrequency ablation. Complete atrioventricular block was produced in nine of 16 patients and high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block was produced in one patient with radiofrequency current. Attenuated His bundle electrograms could still be recorded in the remaining six patients, four of whom underwent successful atrioventricular junctional ablation using direct-current shock during the same session. Atrioventricular block persisted in all 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation during a mean follow-up of 4.2 months. Compared with a group of historic control subjects treated with direct-current shock ablation, the 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency current had significantly less creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release (5.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 22 +/- 13 IU, p = 0.006). A junctional escape rhythm was present in all patients after radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block. In contrast, three of 10 control patients had an idioventricular escape after direct current shock ablation, and four patients had no escape rhythm at all.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-7322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-4539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.80.6.1527</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2598419</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CIRCAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</publisher><subject>Atrioventricular Node - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiac dysrhythmias ; Cardiology. Vascular system ; Electric Countershock ; Electrocardiography ; Electrocoagulation - methods ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Heart ; Heart Block - etiology ; Heart Conduction System - physiopathology ; Heart Conduction System - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radio Waves ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology ; Tachycardia, Supraventricular - surgery ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1989-12, Vol.80 (6), p.1527-1535</ispartof><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ee0aa074157d0268c003c3f8744fbeeeac1308d319abba0a1f17de382cd3f9943</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3685,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=19611147$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2598419$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LANGBERG, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHIN, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENQVIST, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCKRELL, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULLET, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HARE, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFIN, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEINMAN, M. M</creatorcontrib><title>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy</title><title>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><description>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy. A standard 7F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned to record the largest unipolar His potential (580 +/- 640 microV) from the distal electrode. An electrocoagulator (Microvasive Bicap 4005) supplied continuous, unmodulated energy at 550 kHz. One to 14 applications of radiofrequency current were delivered between the distal electrode and a large-diameter chest wall electrode. Transient, mild chest discomfort was reported by seven of 16 patients. None had significant arrhythmias or blood pressure changes during radiofrequency ablation. Complete atrioventricular block was produced in nine of 16 patients and high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block was produced in one patient with radiofrequency current. Attenuated His bundle electrograms could still be recorded in the remaining six patients, four of whom underwent successful atrioventricular junctional ablation using direct-current shock during the same session. Atrioventricular block persisted in all 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation during a mean follow-up of 4.2 months. Compared with a group of historic control subjects treated with direct-current shock ablation, the 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency current had significantly less creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release (5.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 22 +/- 13 IU, p = 0.006). A junctional escape rhythm was present in all patients after radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block. In contrast, three of 10 control patients had an idioventricular escape after direct current shock ablation, and four patients had no escape rhythm at all.</description><subject>Atrioventricular Node - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiac dysrhythmias</subject><subject>Cardiology. Vascular system</subject><subject>Electric Countershock</subject><subject>Electrocardiography</subject><subject>Electrocoagulation - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Heart Block - etiology</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Conduction System - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology</subject><subject>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - surgery</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0009-7322</issn><issn>1524-4539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkEFP3DAQhS0EWraUOxekXOCWMBM7cXysVi1FokJC9GxNnDEblE2onbTaf48pq_b0NPPePI0-IS4QCsQabwCLzd1j0UBRF1iV-kisk6hcVdIcizUAmFzLsjwVn2J8SWMtdbUSq7IyjUKzFj82NG955pBRO9DcT2M2-SytMppDP_3mMYlbBgrZyzK6v4E__bzNAnX95AP_Wnh0-4xHDs_7z-LE0xD5_KBn4ue3r0-b7_n9w-3d5st97hToOWcGItAKK91BWTcOQDrpG62Ub5mZHEpoOomG2paA0KPuWDal66Q3Rskzcf3R-xqm9ECc7a6PjoeBRp6WaLWRBhooUxA-gi5MMQb29jX0Owp7i2DfCVpAmwjaBmxt3wmmk8tD99LuuPt3cECW_KuDT9HR4AONro__e02NiErLN_E-elI</recordid><startdate>19891201</startdate><enddate>19891201</enddate><creator>LANGBERG, J. J</creator><creator>CHIN, M. C</creator><creator>ROSENQVIST, M</creator><creator>COCKRELL, J</creator><creator>DULLET, N</creator><creator>VAN HARE, G</creator><creator>GRIFFIN, J. C</creator><creator>SCHEINMAN, M. M</creator><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891201</creationdate><title>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy</title><author>LANGBERG, J. J ; CHIN, M. C ; ROSENQVIST, M ; COCKRELL, J ; DULLET, N ; VAN HARE, G ; GRIFFIN, J. C ; SCHEINMAN, M. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-ee0aa074157d0268c003c3f8744fbeeeac1308d319abba0a1f17de382cd3f9943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Atrioventricular Node - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiac dysrhythmias</topic><topic>Cardiology. Vascular system</topic><topic>Electric Countershock</topic><topic>Electrocardiography</topic><topic>Electrocoagulation - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Heart Block - etiology</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Conduction System - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology</topic><topic>Tachycardia, Supraventricular - surgery</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LANGBERG, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHIN, M. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSENQVIST, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COCKRELL, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DULLET, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HARE, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRIFFIN, J. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHEINMAN, M. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LANGBERG, J. J</au><au>CHIN, M. C</au><au>ROSENQVIST, M</au><au>COCKRELL, J</au><au>DULLET, N</au><au>VAN HARE, G</au><au>GRIFFIN, J. C</au><au>SCHEINMAN, M. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy</atitle><jtitle>Circulation (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Circulation</addtitle><date>1989-12-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1527</spage><epage>1535</epage><pages>1527-1535</pages><issn>0009-7322</issn><eissn>1524-4539</eissn><coden>CIRCAZ</coden><abstract>Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using direct-current defibrillator discharges requires general anesthesia and may have serious side effects. Sixteen patients with drug-refractory supraventricular tachycardia underwent catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction using radiofrequency energy. A standard 7F quadripolar electrode catheter was positioned to record the largest unipolar His potential (580 +/- 640 microV) from the distal electrode. An electrocoagulator (Microvasive Bicap 4005) supplied continuous, unmodulated energy at 550 kHz. One to 14 applications of radiofrequency current were delivered between the distal electrode and a large-diameter chest wall electrode. Transient, mild chest discomfort was reported by seven of 16 patients. None had significant arrhythmias or blood pressure changes during radiofrequency ablation. Complete atrioventricular block was produced in nine of 16 patients and high-grade second-degree atrioventricular block was produced in one patient with radiofrequency current. Attenuated His bundle electrograms could still be recorded in the remaining six patients, four of whom underwent successful atrioventricular junctional ablation using direct-current shock during the same session. Atrioventricular block persisted in all 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency ablation during a mean follow-up of 4.2 months. Compared with a group of historic control subjects treated with direct-current shock ablation, the 10 patients successfully treated with radiofrequency current had significantly less creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme release (5.7 +/- 5.1 vs. 22 +/- 13 IU, p = 0.006). A junctional escape rhythm was present in all patients after radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block. In contrast, three of 10 control patients had an idioventricular escape after direct current shock ablation, and four patients had no escape rhythm at all.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</pub><pmid>2598419</pmid><doi>10.1161/01.CIR.80.6.1527</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-7322 |
ispartof | Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 1989-12, Vol.80 (6), p.1527-1535 |
issn | 0009-7322 1524-4539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79390802 |
source | MEDLINE; American Heart Association Journals; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Atrioventricular Node - surgery Biological and medical sciences Cardiac dysrhythmias Cardiology. Vascular system Electric Countershock Electrocardiography Electrocoagulation - methods Female Follow-Up Studies Heart Heart Block - etiology Heart Conduction System - physiopathology Heart Conduction System - surgery Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Radio Waves Tachycardia, Supraventricular - physiopathology Tachycardia, Supraventricular - surgery Time Factors |
title | Catheter ablation of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A48%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Catheter%20ablation%20of%20the%20atrioventricular%20junction%20with%20radiofrequency%20energy&rft.jtitle=Circulation%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=LANGBERG,%20J.%20J&rft.date=1989-12-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1527&rft.epage=1535&rft.pages=1527-1535&rft.issn=0009-7322&rft.eissn=1524-4539&rft.coden=CIRCAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1161/01.CIR.80.6.1527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79390802%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79390802&rft_id=info:pmid/2598419&rfr_iscdi=true |