Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits

The deposition efficiency of three methods of aerosol delivery of salbutamol into lungs of ventilated rabbits was compared: 1) metered dose inhaler (MDI) with holding chamber (HC), 2) jet nebulizer (JN), and 3) ultrasonic (US) nebulizer. The latter system was tested using two different sized medicat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric research 1997-11, Vol.42 (5), p.721-727
Hauptverfasser: FOK, T.-F, AL-ESSA, M, MONKMAN, S, DOLOVICH, M, GIRARD, L, COATES, G, KIRPALANI, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 727
container_issue 5
container_start_page 721
container_title Pediatric research
container_volume 42
creator FOK, T.-F
AL-ESSA, M
MONKMAN, S
DOLOVICH, M
GIRARD, L
COATES, G
KIRPALANI, H
description The deposition efficiency of three methods of aerosol delivery of salbutamol into lungs of ventilated rabbits was compared: 1) metered dose inhaler (MDI) with holding chamber (HC), 2) jet nebulizer (JN), and 3) ultrasonic (US) nebulizer. The latter system was tested using two different sized medication reservoirs, a large (20 mL) cup (US20) and a small (10 mL) cup (US10). After delivery of technetium-99m-labeled salbutamol aerosol, deposition in the lungs, trachea, and ventilator circuit were estimated by a gamma counter. Total pulmonary deposition [mean(SEM)] as a percentage of the prescribed drug was: MDI + HC 0.22(0.05)%; JN 0.48(0.05)%; US20 0.90(0.13)%; US10 3.05(0.49)%. Only the deposition from the US10 was statistically significantly higher than the other modes (p < 0.05). Dynamic scintigraphy showed that, among the nebulizers, the US10 continued to deliver medication for longer than either the JN or the US20. We conclude that the US10 appears to be more efficient in delivering aerosol to the lung in this rabbit model and merits further evaluation for clinical efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1203/00006450-199711000-00027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79389929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79389929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a5c48aa94b5411db9c8b3601df0c4ec91f658300bd6e6b30f56cbaed94d5c6563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUdFuFSEQJUZTb6ufYMKD8clVWGB3eTRN1SZN9EGfNwPMpjQsXIFtcv0SP1faXq8kZBjOmTPJOYRQzj7wnomPrJ1BKtZxrUfOW9e124_PyI4r0Ropx-dkx5jgndB6eknOS7ljjEs1yTNypoUatdQ78uf7FtYUIR-ow30qvvoUaVpogWC2CmsKFDCn0qrD4O8xo6PmQFesj0-XClIfbyFgfk_vsNKIZgv-90ML0dEt1AwlRW__I22gCdhbaL8QwoHeY6w-QG2CGYzxtbwiLxYIBV8f6wX5-fnqx-XX7ubbl-vLTzedFZOuHSgrJwAtjZKcO6PtZMTAuFuYlWg1XwY1CcaMG3Awgi1qsAbQaemUHdQgLsi7J919Tr82LHVefbEYAkRMW5lH3fboXjfi9ES0zY2ScZn32a_NuJmz-SGU-V8o8ymU-TGUNvrmuGMzK7rT4DGFhr894lCaH0uGaH050XqmlFS9-AvG7JjC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79389929</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>FOK, T.-F ; AL-ESSA, M ; MONKMAN, S ; DOLOVICH, M ; GIRARD, L ; COATES, G ; KIRPALANI, H</creator><creatorcontrib>FOK, T.-F ; AL-ESSA, M ; MONKMAN, S ; DOLOVICH, M ; GIRARD, L ; COATES, G ; KIRPALANI, H</creatorcontrib><description>The deposition efficiency of three methods of aerosol delivery of salbutamol into lungs of ventilated rabbits was compared: 1) metered dose inhaler (MDI) with holding chamber (HC), 2) jet nebulizer (JN), and 3) ultrasonic (US) nebulizer. The latter system was tested using two different sized medication reservoirs, a large (20 mL) cup (US20) and a small (10 mL) cup (US10). After delivery of technetium-99m-labeled salbutamol aerosol, deposition in the lungs, trachea, and ventilator circuit were estimated by a gamma counter. Total pulmonary deposition [mean(SEM)] as a percentage of the prescribed drug was: MDI + HC 0.22(0.05)%; JN 0.48(0.05)%; US20 0.90(0.13)%; US10 3.05(0.49)%. Only the deposition from the US10 was statistically significantly higher than the other modes (p &lt; 0.05). Dynamic scintigraphy showed that, among the nebulizers, the US10 continued to deliver medication for longer than either the JN or the US20. We conclude that the US10 appears to be more efficient in delivering aerosol to the lung in this rabbit model and merits further evaluation for clinical efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-3998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-0447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1203/00006450-199711000-00027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9357949</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PEREBL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Administration, Inhalation ; Aerosols ; Albuterol - pharmacokinetics ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacokinetics ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death ; Gamma Rays ; Intensive care medicine ; Medical sciences ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; Particle Size ; Rabbits ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Respiration, Artificial ; Trachea - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Pediatric research, 1997-11, Vol.42 (5), p.721-727</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a5c48aa94b5411db9c8b3601df0c4ec91f658300bd6e6b30f56cbaed94d5c6563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a5c48aa94b5411db9c8b3601df0c4ec91f658300bd6e6b30f56cbaed94d5c6563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2055452$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9357949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FOK, T.-F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-ESSA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONKMAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLOVICH, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIRARD, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COATES, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRPALANI, H</creatorcontrib><title>Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits</title><title>Pediatric research</title><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><description>The deposition efficiency of three methods of aerosol delivery of salbutamol into lungs of ventilated rabbits was compared: 1) metered dose inhaler (MDI) with holding chamber (HC), 2) jet nebulizer (JN), and 3) ultrasonic (US) nebulizer. The latter system was tested using two different sized medication reservoirs, a large (20 mL) cup (US20) and a small (10 mL) cup (US10). After delivery of technetium-99m-labeled salbutamol aerosol, deposition in the lungs, trachea, and ventilator circuit were estimated by a gamma counter. Total pulmonary deposition [mean(SEM)] as a percentage of the prescribed drug was: MDI + HC 0.22(0.05)%; JN 0.48(0.05)%; US20 0.90(0.13)%; US10 3.05(0.49)%. Only the deposition from the US10 was statistically significantly higher than the other modes (p &lt; 0.05). Dynamic scintigraphy showed that, among the nebulizers, the US10 continued to deliver medication for longer than either the JN or the US20. We conclude that the US10 appears to be more efficient in delivering aerosol to the lung in this rabbit model and merits further evaluation for clinical efficiency.</description><subject>Administration, Inhalation</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Albuterol - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Trachea - metabolism</subject><issn>0031-3998</issn><issn>1530-0447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUdFuFSEQJUZTb6ufYMKD8clVWGB3eTRN1SZN9EGfNwPMpjQsXIFtcv0SP1faXq8kZBjOmTPJOYRQzj7wnomPrJ1BKtZxrUfOW9e124_PyI4r0Ropx-dkx5jgndB6eknOS7ljjEs1yTNypoUatdQ78uf7FtYUIR-ow30qvvoUaVpogWC2CmsKFDCn0qrD4O8xo6PmQFesj0-XClIfbyFgfk_vsNKIZgv-90ML0dEt1AwlRW__I22gCdhbaL8QwoHeY6w-QG2CGYzxtbwiLxYIBV8f6wX5-fnqx-XX7ubbl-vLTzedFZOuHSgrJwAtjZKcO6PtZMTAuFuYlWg1XwY1CcaMG3Awgi1qsAbQaemUHdQgLsi7J919Tr82LHVefbEYAkRMW5lH3fboXjfi9ES0zY2ScZn32a_NuJmz-SGU-V8o8ymU-TGUNvrmuGMzK7rT4DGFhr894lCaH0uGaH050XqmlFS9-AvG7JjC</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>FOK, T.-F</creator><creator>AL-ESSA, M</creator><creator>MONKMAN, S</creator><creator>DOLOVICH, M</creator><creator>GIRARD, L</creator><creator>COATES, G</creator><creator>KIRPALANI, H</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits</title><author>FOK, T.-F ; AL-ESSA, M ; MONKMAN, S ; DOLOVICH, M ; GIRARD, L ; COATES, G ; KIRPALANI, H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-a5c48aa94b5411db9c8b3601df0c4ec91f658300bd6e6b30f56cbaed94d5c6563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Administration, Inhalation</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Albuterol - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Trachea - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FOK, T.-F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-ESSA, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONKMAN, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DOLOVICH, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GIRARD, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>COATES, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KIRPALANI, H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FOK, T.-F</au><au>AL-ESSA, M</au><au>MONKMAN, S</au><au>DOLOVICH, M</au><au>GIRARD, L</au><au>COATES, G</au><au>KIRPALANI, H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric research</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Res</addtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>721</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>721-727</pages><issn>0031-3998</issn><eissn>1530-0447</eissn><coden>PEREBL</coden><abstract>The deposition efficiency of three methods of aerosol delivery of salbutamol into lungs of ventilated rabbits was compared: 1) metered dose inhaler (MDI) with holding chamber (HC), 2) jet nebulizer (JN), and 3) ultrasonic (US) nebulizer. The latter system was tested using two different sized medication reservoirs, a large (20 mL) cup (US20) and a small (10 mL) cup (US10). After delivery of technetium-99m-labeled salbutamol aerosol, deposition in the lungs, trachea, and ventilator circuit were estimated by a gamma counter. Total pulmonary deposition [mean(SEM)] as a percentage of the prescribed drug was: MDI + HC 0.22(0.05)%; JN 0.48(0.05)%; US20 0.90(0.13)%; US10 3.05(0.49)%. Only the deposition from the US10 was statistically significantly higher than the other modes (p &lt; 0.05). Dynamic scintigraphy showed that, among the nebulizers, the US10 continued to deliver medication for longer than either the JN or the US20. We conclude that the US10 appears to be more efficient in delivering aerosol to the lung in this rabbit model and merits further evaluation for clinical efficiency.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>9357949</pmid><doi>10.1203/00006450-199711000-00027</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-3998
ispartof Pediatric research, 1997-11, Vol.42 (5), p.721-727
issn 0031-3998
1530-0447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79389929
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Inhalation
Aerosols
Albuterol - pharmacokinetics
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Animals
Biological and medical sciences
Bronchodilator Agents - pharmacokinetics
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Emergency and intensive care: neonates and children. Prematurity. Sudden death
Gamma Rays
Intensive care medicine
Medical sciences
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
Particle Size
Rabbits
Radionuclide Imaging
Respiration, Artificial
Trachea - metabolism
title Pulmonary deposition of salbutamol aerosol delivered by metered dose inhaler, jet nebulizer, and ultrasonic nebulizer in mechanically ventilated rabbits
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T07%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pulmonary%20deposition%20of%20salbutamol%20aerosol%20delivered%20by%20metered%20dose%20inhaler,%20jet%20nebulizer,%20and%20ultrasonic%20nebulizer%20in%20mechanically%20ventilated%20rabbits&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20research&rft.au=FOK,%20T.-F&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=721&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=721-727&rft.issn=0031-3998&rft.eissn=1530-0447&rft.coden=PEREBL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1203/00006450-199711000-00027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79389929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79389929&rft_id=info:pmid/9357949&rfr_iscdi=true