Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity

The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categorie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain and cognition 1997-11, Vol.35 (2), p.207-224
Hauptverfasser: Heinrichs, R.Walter, Ruttan, Lesley, Zakzanis, Konstantine K., Case, Danielle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 224
container_issue 2
container_start_page 207
container_title Brain and cognition
container_volume 35
creator Heinrichs, R.Walter
Ruttan, Lesley
Zakzanis, Konstantine K.
Case, Danielle
description The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categories (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), free recall intrusions (California Verbal Learning Test), and bilateral motor performance (Purdue Pegboard). Stability was examined by analyzing subtype assignment at the original assessment and 3 years later at follow-up. Stability over this interval was variable with an overall kappa of .45 and individual kappas from .12 to .66. Adjunct cognitive and clinical data gathered at follow-up provide evidence for the validity of several subtypes, especially in terms of their cognitive and functional differences. There was no evidence of symptom differences in this relatively asymptomatic medicated sample of patients. The results are discussed in terms of the possibility that several patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction may underlie schizophrenia, with implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness and its variable functional outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1006/brcg.1997.0938
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79388607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278262697909386</els_id><sourcerecordid>79388607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1def8dae86793e4fc1c6fa3f1373032d3612c5d6d8bbbdc5e8f3f6377e4b2ad43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1rGzEQhkVpcR03194KOpTc1tHHWqvtrYQkLYQ04DRXoZVG9pT1riutHZJfHy02vuUwDMM88zI8hHzlbM4ZU5dNdKs5r-tqzmqpP5ApZzUrBC-rj2TKRKULoYT6TM5S-scYq0shJmRSy4XiSkzJ8sHGhN2KLt0aX_vtOkKHlj7jsKb3sIu961cdDrgH-ghpSD_o9R49dA5oH-hysA22OLxQ23n6ZFv0efhCPgXbJjg_9hn5e3P9ePWruPtz-_vq513hpNJDwT0E7S1oVdUSyuC4U8HKwGUlmRReKi7cwiuvm6bxbgE6yKBkVUHZCOtLOSMXh9xt7P_v8ndmg8lB29oO-l0yOVZrxaoMzg-gi31KEYLZRtzY-GI4M6NFM1o0o0UzWswH347Ju2YD_oQfteX99-PeJmfbEG3nMJ0wkUMWuWZEHzDIFvYI0SSHozuPEdxgfI_vffAGyOyPKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79388607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Heinrichs, R.Walter ; Ruttan, Lesley ; Zakzanis, Konstantine K. ; Case, Danielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, R.Walter ; Ruttan, Lesley ; Zakzanis, Konstantine K. ; Case, Danielle</creatorcontrib><description>The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categories (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), free recall intrusions (California Verbal Learning Test), and bilateral motor performance (Purdue Pegboard). Stability was examined by analyzing subtype assignment at the original assessment and 3 years later at follow-up. Stability over this interval was variable with an overall kappa of .45 and individual kappas from .12 to .66. Adjunct cognitive and clinical data gathered at follow-up provide evidence for the validity of several subtypes, especially in terms of their cognitive and functional differences. There was no evidence of symptom differences in this relatively asymptomatic medicated sample of patients. The results are discussed in terms of the possibility that several patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction may underlie schizophrenia, with implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness and its variable functional outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-2626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1997.0938</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9356162</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRCOEI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adult and adolescent clinical studies ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chronic Disease ; Cognition Disorders - diagnosis ; Cognition Disorders - etiology ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Psychoses ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - complications</subject><ispartof>Brain and cognition, 1997-11, Vol.35 (2), p.207-224</ispartof><rights>1997 Academic Press</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 1997 Academic Press.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1def8dae86793e4fc1c6fa3f1373032d3612c5d6d8bbbdc5e8f3f6377e4b2ad43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1def8dae86793e4fc1c6fa3f1373032d3612c5d6d8bbbdc5e8f3f6377e4b2ad43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1997.0938$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3554,27933,27934,46004</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2093509$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9356162$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, R.Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttan, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakzanis, Konstantine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, Danielle</creatorcontrib><title>Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity</title><title>Brain and cognition</title><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><description>The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categories (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), free recall intrusions (California Verbal Learning Test), and bilateral motor performance (Purdue Pegboard). Stability was examined by analyzing subtype assignment at the original assessment and 3 years later at follow-up. Stability over this interval was variable with an overall kappa of .45 and individual kappas from .12 to .66. Adjunct cognitive and clinical data gathered at follow-up provide evidence for the validity of several subtypes, especially in terms of their cognitive and functional differences. There was no evidence of symptom differences in this relatively asymptomatic medicated sample of patients. The results are discussed in terms of the possibility that several patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction may underlie schizophrenia, with implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness and its variable functional outcomes.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - etiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychoses</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - complications</subject><issn>0278-2626</issn><issn>1090-2147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1rGzEQhkVpcR03194KOpTc1tHHWqvtrYQkLYQ04DRXoZVG9pT1riutHZJfHy02vuUwDMM88zI8hHzlbM4ZU5dNdKs5r-tqzmqpP5ApZzUrBC-rj2TKRKULoYT6TM5S-scYq0shJmRSy4XiSkzJ8sHGhN2KLt0aX_vtOkKHlj7jsKb3sIu961cdDrgH-ghpSD_o9R49dA5oH-hysA22OLxQ23n6ZFv0efhCPgXbJjg_9hn5e3P9ePWruPtz-_vq513hpNJDwT0E7S1oVdUSyuC4U8HKwGUlmRReKi7cwiuvm6bxbgE6yKBkVUHZCOtLOSMXh9xt7P_v8ndmg8lB29oO-l0yOVZrxaoMzg-gi31KEYLZRtzY-GI4M6NFM1o0o0UzWswH347Ju2YD_oQfteX99-PeJmfbEG3nMJ0wkUMWuWZEHzDIFvYI0SSHozuPEdxgfI_vffAGyOyPKg</recordid><startdate>19971101</startdate><enddate>19971101</enddate><creator>Heinrichs, R.Walter</creator><creator>Ruttan, Lesley</creator><creator>Zakzanis, Konstantine K.</creator><creator>Case, Danielle</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971101</creationdate><title>Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity</title><author>Heinrichs, R.Walter ; Ruttan, Lesley ; Zakzanis, Konstantine K. ; Case, Danielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-1def8dae86793e4fc1c6fa3f1373032d3612c5d6d8bbbdc5e8f3f6377e4b2ad43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult and adolescent clinical studies</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - etiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychoses</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heinrichs, R.Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruttan, Lesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zakzanis, Konstantine K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Case, Danielle</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heinrichs, R.Walter</au><au>Ruttan, Lesley</au><au>Zakzanis, Konstantine K.</au><au>Case, Danielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity</atitle><jtitle>Brain and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>Brain Cogn</addtitle><date>1997-11-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>224</epage><pages>207-224</pages><issn>0278-2626</issn><eissn>1090-2147</eissn><coden>BRCOEI</coden><abstract>The stability and validity of a neurocognitive typology for schizophrenia were studied in 55 chronic patients who met DSMIII-R criteria for the illness. Subtypes were based on an earlier cluster analytic study by Heinrichs and Awad (1993) that utilized the following variables: IQ (WAIS-R), categories (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), free recall intrusions (California Verbal Learning Test), and bilateral motor performance (Purdue Pegboard). Stability was examined by analyzing subtype assignment at the original assessment and 3 years later at follow-up. Stability over this interval was variable with an overall kappa of .45 and individual kappas from .12 to .66. Adjunct cognitive and clinical data gathered at follow-up provide evidence for the validity of several subtypes, especially in terms of their cognitive and functional differences. There was no evidence of symptom differences in this relatively asymptomatic medicated sample of patients. The results are discussed in terms of the possibility that several patterns of neurocognitive dysfunction may underlie schizophrenia, with implications for understanding the heterogeneity of the illness and its variable functional outcomes.</abstract><cop>San Diego, CA</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9356162</pmid><doi>10.1006/brcg.1997.0938</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-2626
ispartof Brain and cognition, 1997-11, Vol.35 (2), p.207-224
issn 0278-2626
1090-2147
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79388607
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Adult and adolescent clinical studies
Biological and medical sciences
Chronic Disease
Cognition Disorders - diagnosis
Cognition Disorders - etiology
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neuropsychological Tests
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Psychoses
Reproducibility of Results
Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia - complications
title Parsing Schizophrenia with Neurocognitive Tests: Evidence of Stability and Validity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T09%3A47%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parsing%20Schizophrenia%20with%20Neurocognitive%20Tests:%20Evidence%20of%20Stability%20and%20Validity&rft.jtitle=Brain%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Heinrichs,%20R.Walter&rft.date=1997-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=224&rft.pages=207-224&rft.issn=0278-2626&rft.eissn=1090-2147&rft.coden=BRCOEI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/brcg.1997.0938&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79388607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79388607&rft_id=info:pmid/9356162&rft_els_id=S0278262697909386&rfr_iscdi=true