Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994
Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 147 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Graham, Ian D. Graham, Dawn Fowler |
description | Background:
The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994.
Method:
A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births.
Results:
For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%).
Conclusions:
The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79383851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79383851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0EGmXwEZAiIcELyXx9_SdmL0C0jcE0JiiCtys3caSUNAlxCu23x6VVH0H4wdbROfd3LR3GngHPIJ6zZQZKYKpQf8vAWpNxDhKyYcg299js6N1nM26Qp0Yr-5A9CmHJOTdS6hN2YlEpYcSMvb8YmtD0U7_aJkW_7qbwKpmPvqtC4roquRv9T9f6rvRJ0yWF61zlXiZgcziLl0imPgqLUVj5mD2oXRv8k8N7yr5cXsyLd-nNx6vr4s1NWqIASMvaCqtyXQlUNV9YtZC5dFXtQeWCO6t1rqDUCrCUWpQQhTe18KArQLMQeMqe77nD2P9Y-zDRqgmlb1vX-X4dyFjMMTJi8MXfg1py5GjNP5HKKIyfkzF4vg-WYx_C6Gsaxmblxi0Bp105tKRdAbQrgHbl0J9yaBhoE6efHtasFytfHWcPbUT_9d7_1bR--z9oenv9aR5FRKR7RBMmvzki3PidtEGj6OvtFV3CnVEfis90i78BVlepxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57538204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994.
Method:
A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births.
Results:
For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%).
Conclusions:
The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-536X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9355272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Science, Inc</publisher><subject>1981-1994 ; Canada ; Canada - epidemiology ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Episiotomy ; Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data ; Episiotomy - utilization ; Female ; Humans ; Nursing ; Pregnancy ; Prevalence ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9355272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><title>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Birth</addtitle><description>Background:
The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994.
Method:
A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births.
Results:
For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%).
Conclusions:
The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</description><subject>1981-1994</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Episiotomy</subject><subject>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Episiotomy - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0730-7659</issn><issn>1523-536X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0EGmXwEZAiIcELyXx9_SdmL0C0jcE0JiiCtys3caSUNAlxCu23x6VVH0H4wdbROfd3LR3GngHPIJ6zZQZKYKpQf8vAWpNxDhKyYcg299js6N1nM26Qp0Yr-5A9CmHJOTdS6hN2YlEpYcSMvb8YmtD0U7_aJkW_7qbwKpmPvqtC4roquRv9T9f6rvRJ0yWF61zlXiZgcziLl0imPgqLUVj5mD2oXRv8k8N7yr5cXsyLd-nNx6vr4s1NWqIASMvaCqtyXQlUNV9YtZC5dFXtQeWCO6t1rqDUCrCUWpQQhTe18KArQLMQeMqe77nD2P9Y-zDRqgmlb1vX-X4dyFjMMTJi8MXfg1py5GjNP5HKKIyfkzF4vg-WYx_C6Gsaxmblxi0Bp105tKRdAbQrgHbl0J9yaBhoE6efHtasFytfHWcPbUT_9d7_1bR--z9oenv9aR5FRKR7RBMmvzki3PidtEGj6OvtFV3CnVEfis90i78BVlepxw</recordid><startdate>199709</startdate><enddate>199709</enddate><creator>Graham, Ian D.</creator><creator>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creator><general>Blackwell Science, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199709</creationdate><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><author>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>1981-1994</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Episiotomy</topic><topic>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Episiotomy - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Ian D.</au><au>Graham, Dawn Fowler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</atitle><jtitle>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Birth</addtitle><date>1997-09</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>141-147</pages><issn>0730-7659</issn><eissn>1523-536X</eissn><abstract>Background:
The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994.
Method:
A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births.
Results:
For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%).
Conclusions:
The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</abstract><cop>Malden, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science, Inc</pub><pmid>9355272</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-7659 |
ispartof | Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147 |
issn | 0730-7659 1523-536X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79383851 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | 1981-1994 Canada Canada - epidemiology Epidemiologic Studies Episiotomy Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data Episiotomy - utilization Female Humans Nursing Pregnancy Prevalence United States - epidemiology |
title | Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Episiotomy%20Counts:%20Trends%20and%20Prevalence%20in%20Canada,%201981/1982%20to%201993/1994&rft.jtitle=Birth%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Graham,%20Ian%20D.&rft.date=1997-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=141-147&rft.issn=0730-7659&rft.eissn=1523-536X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79383851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57538204&rft_id=info:pmid/9355272&rfr_iscdi=true |