Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994

Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147
Hauptverfasser: Graham, Ian D., Graham, Dawn Fowler
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue 3
container_start_page 141
container_title Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)
container_volume 24
creator Graham, Ian D.
Graham, Dawn Fowler
description Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births. Results: For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%). Conclusions: The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79383851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79383851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0EGmXwEZAiIcELyXx9_SdmL0C0jcE0JiiCtys3caSUNAlxCu23x6VVH0H4wdbROfd3LR3GngHPIJ6zZQZKYKpQf8vAWpNxDhKyYcg299js6N1nM26Qp0Yr-5A9CmHJOTdS6hN2YlEpYcSMvb8YmtD0U7_aJkW_7qbwKpmPvqtC4roquRv9T9f6rvRJ0yWF61zlXiZgcziLl0imPgqLUVj5mD2oXRv8k8N7yr5cXsyLd-nNx6vr4s1NWqIASMvaCqtyXQlUNV9YtZC5dFXtQeWCO6t1rqDUCrCUWpQQhTe18KArQLMQeMqe77nD2P9Y-zDRqgmlb1vX-X4dyFjMMTJi8MXfg1py5GjNP5HKKIyfkzF4vg-WYx_C6Gsaxmblxi0Bp105tKRdAbQrgHbl0J9yaBhoE6efHtasFytfHWcPbUT_9d7_1bR--z9oenv9aR5FRKR7RBMmvzki3PidtEGj6OvtFV3CnVEfis90i78BVlepxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57538204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</creator><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births. Results: For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%). Conclusions: The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-7659</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-536X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9355272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Science, Inc</publisher><subject>1981-1994 ; Canada ; Canada - epidemiology ; Epidemiologic Studies ; Episiotomy ; Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Episiotomy - utilization ; Female ; Humans ; Nursing ; Pregnancy ; Prevalence ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147</ispartof><rights>Blackwell Science Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9355272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><title>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</title><addtitle>Birth</addtitle><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births. Results: For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%). Conclusions: The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</description><subject>1981-1994</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Canada - epidemiology</subject><subject>Epidemiologic Studies</subject><subject>Episiotomy</subject><subject>Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Episiotomy - utilization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0730-7659</issn><issn>1523-536X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkV9v0zAUxS0EGmXwEZAiIcELyXx9_SdmL0C0jcE0JiiCtys3caSUNAlxCu23x6VVH0H4wdbROfd3LR3GngHPIJ6zZQZKYKpQf8vAWpNxDhKyYcg299js6N1nM26Qp0Yr-5A9CmHJOTdS6hN2YlEpYcSMvb8YmtD0U7_aJkW_7qbwKpmPvqtC4roquRv9T9f6rvRJ0yWF61zlXiZgcziLl0imPgqLUVj5mD2oXRv8k8N7yr5cXsyLd-nNx6vr4s1NWqIASMvaCqtyXQlUNV9YtZC5dFXtQeWCO6t1rqDUCrCUWpQQhTe18KArQLMQeMqe77nD2P9Y-zDRqgmlb1vX-X4dyFjMMTJi8MXfg1py5GjNP5HKKIyfkzF4vg-WYx_C6Gsaxmblxi0Bp105tKRdAbQrgHbl0J9yaBhoE6efHtasFytfHWcPbUT_9d7_1bR--z9oenv9aR5FRKR7RBMmvzki3PidtEGj6OvtFV3CnVEfis90i78BVlepxw</recordid><startdate>199709</startdate><enddate>199709</enddate><creator>Graham, Ian D.</creator><creator>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creator><general>Blackwell Science, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199709</creationdate><title>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</title><author>Graham, Ian D. ; Graham, Dawn Fowler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3211-cf929586d235f0b95b484adfe15820a966851c6513c462c151ce7f2e16d137b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>1981-1994</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Canada - epidemiology</topic><topic>Epidemiologic Studies</topic><topic>Episiotomy</topic><topic>Episiotomy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Episiotomy - utilization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graham, Ian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Dawn Fowler</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graham, Ian D.</au><au>Graham, Dawn Fowler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994</atitle><jtitle>Birth (Berkeley, Calif.)</jtitle><addtitle>Birth</addtitle><date>1997-09</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>141-147</pages><issn>0730-7659</issn><eissn>1523-536X</eissn><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to produce a minimum estimate of the prevalence of episiotomy use in Canada, and to investigate the trend in its use between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994. Method: A retrospective population case series study was conducted using hospital discharge s. Outcome measures were the count of episiotomies performed during a 12‐month period and the episiotomy rate per 100 vaginal births. Results: For more than a decade, official statistics have significantly underreported episiotomy use by as much as 50 percent. In 1993/1994 at least 37.7 percent of women giving birth vaginally in Canada are known to have received an episiotomy. Between 1981/1982 and 1993/1994 its prevalence declined 29.1 percent, with the greatest decline occurring during the 1990s. This decline did not result from changes in parity in the population. The decrease in episiotomy use during this 13‐year period is more than twice that found in the United States (a decline of only 13.6%). Conclusions: The reporting of official statistics on obstetric procedures in Canada should be modified to include all known cases of episiotomy. The observed downward trend in the rate of this procedure is encouraging, and is in the direction of evidence‐based recommendations advocating its restrictive use. (BIRTH 24:3, September 1997)</abstract><cop>Malden, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science, Inc</pub><pmid>9355272</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-7659
ispartof Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 1997-09, Vol.24 (3), p.141-147
issn 0730-7659
1523-536X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79383851
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects 1981-1994
Canada
Canada - epidemiology
Epidemiologic Studies
Episiotomy
Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data
Episiotomy - utilization
Female
Humans
Nursing
Pregnancy
Prevalence
United States - epidemiology
title Episiotomy Counts: Trends and Prevalence in Canada, 1981/1982 to 1993/1994
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A11%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Episiotomy%20Counts:%20Trends%20and%20Prevalence%20in%20Canada,%201981/1982%20to%201993/1994&rft.jtitle=Birth%20(Berkeley,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Graham,%20Ian%20D.&rft.date=1997-09&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=141-147&rft.issn=0730-7659&rft.eissn=1523-536X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.00141.pp.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79383851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57538204&rft_id=info:pmid/9355272&rfr_iscdi=true