Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy

Since its introduction, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) has played a major role in the diagnosis of narcolepsy. We assessed its diagnostic value in a series of 2,083 subjects of whom 170 (8.2%) were diagnosed with narcolepsy. The sensitivity of the combination of two or more sleep onset rapid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sleep (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 1997-08, Vol.20 (8), p.620-629
Hauptverfasser: ALDRICH, M. S, CHERVIN, R. D, MALOW, B. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 629
container_issue 8
container_start_page 620
container_title Sleep (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 20
creator ALDRICH, M. S
CHERVIN, R. D
MALOW, B. A
description Since its introduction, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) has played a major role in the diagnosis of narcolepsy. We assessed its diagnostic value in a series of 2,083 subjects of whom 170 (8.2%) were diagnosed with narcolepsy. The sensitivity of the combination of two or more sleep onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) with a mean sleep latency of < 5 minutes on an initial MSLT was 70% with a specificity of 97%, but 30% of all subjects with this combination of findings did not have narcolepsy. In some narcoleptics who had more than one MSLT, the proportion of naps with SOREMPs varied substantially from the initial MSLT to the follow-up test. The highest specificity (99.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (87%) for MSLT findings was obtained with the criteria of three or more SOREMPs combined with a mean sleep latency of < 5 minutes, but the sensitivity of this combination was only 46%. The combination of a SOREMP with a sleep latency < 10 minutes on polysomnography yielded a specificity (98.9%) and PPV (73%) almost equal to those obtained from combinations of MSLT findings, but the sensitivity was much lower. Our results suggest that the MSLT cannot be used in isolation to confirm or exclude narcolepsy, is indicated only in selected patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, and is most valuable when interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/sleep/20.8.620
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79372385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79372385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-291a54372569e1e18df8df7ed3f6c6f9a4a51396cf08124fdc3a126f7f4998c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtLAzEQxoMotVav3oQcRPSw2zw22-QoxRdUerB4DTE70ZXsw83uof-9absUBobh-83HzIfQNSUpJYrPgwdo54ykMs0ZOUFTKgRJVNRO0ZTQnCaSEnGOLkL4JXHOFJ-gieKCUqamaP1p_AC4cbj_AVwNvi9bD3jvir3pobZb3EPo8f37x2rzgF3T7dGiNN91E8qw261NZxsPbdheojNnfICrsc_Q5vlps3xNVuuXt-XjKrFcqD5hihqR8QUTuQIKVBYu1gIK7nKbO2UyIyhXuXVEUpa5wnJDWe4WLlNKWj5Ddwfbtmv-hnierspgwXtTQzMEvVDRm0sRwfQA2q4JoQOn266sTLfVlOhdgHr_qmZESx0DjAs3o_PwVUFxxMfEon476iZY411naluGI8ZkpqQg_B94K3jm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79372385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>ALDRICH, M. S ; CHERVIN, R. D ; MALOW, B. A</creator><creatorcontrib>ALDRICH, M. S ; CHERVIN, R. D ; MALOW, B. A</creatorcontrib><description>Since its introduction, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) has played a major role in the diagnosis of narcolepsy. We assessed its diagnostic value in a series of 2,083 subjects of whom 170 (8.2%) were diagnosed with narcolepsy. The sensitivity of the combination of two or more sleep onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes on an initial MSLT was 70% with a specificity of 97%, but 30% of all subjects with this combination of findings did not have narcolepsy. In some narcoleptics who had more than one MSLT, the proportion of naps with SOREMPs varied substantially from the initial MSLT to the follow-up test. The highest specificity (99.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (87%) for MSLT findings was obtained with the criteria of three or more SOREMPs combined with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes, but the sensitivity of this combination was only 46%. The combination of a SOREMP with a sleep latency &lt; 10 minutes on polysomnography yielded a specificity (98.9%) and PPV (73%) almost equal to those obtained from combinations of MSLT findings, but the sensitivity was much lower. Our results suggest that the MSLT cannot be used in isolation to confirm or exclude narcolepsy, is indicated only in selected patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, and is most valuable when interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-8105</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-9109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sleep/20.8.620</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9351129</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SLEED6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rochester, MN: American Academy of Sleep Medicine</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cataplexy - diagnosis ; Child ; Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Narcolepsy - diagnosis ; Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes) ; Neurology ; Polysomnography ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Sleep Apnea Syndromes - diagnosis ; Sleep, REM</subject><ispartof>Sleep (New York, N.Y.), 1997-08, Vol.20 (8), p.620-629</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-291a54372569e1e18df8df7ed3f6c6f9a4a51396cf08124fdc3a126f7f4998c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2849850$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9351129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>ALDRICH, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHERVIN, R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALOW, B. A</creatorcontrib><title>Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy</title><title>Sleep (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Sleep</addtitle><description>Since its introduction, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) has played a major role in the diagnosis of narcolepsy. We assessed its diagnostic value in a series of 2,083 subjects of whom 170 (8.2%) were diagnosed with narcolepsy. The sensitivity of the combination of two or more sleep onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes on an initial MSLT was 70% with a specificity of 97%, but 30% of all subjects with this combination of findings did not have narcolepsy. In some narcoleptics who had more than one MSLT, the proportion of naps with SOREMPs varied substantially from the initial MSLT to the follow-up test. The highest specificity (99.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (87%) for MSLT findings was obtained with the criteria of three or more SOREMPs combined with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes, but the sensitivity of this combination was only 46%. The combination of a SOREMP with a sleep latency &lt; 10 minutes on polysomnography yielded a specificity (98.9%) and PPV (73%) almost equal to those obtained from combinations of MSLT findings, but the sensitivity was much lower. Our results suggest that the MSLT cannot be used in isolation to confirm or exclude narcolepsy, is indicated only in selected patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, and is most valuable when interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cataplexy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Narcolepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Polysomnography</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Sleep Apnea Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Sleep, REM</subject><issn>0161-8105</issn><issn>1550-9109</issn><issn>1550-9109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtLAzEQxoMotVav3oQcRPSw2zw22-QoxRdUerB4DTE70ZXsw83uof-9absUBobh-83HzIfQNSUpJYrPgwdo54ykMs0ZOUFTKgRJVNRO0ZTQnCaSEnGOLkL4JXHOFJ-gieKCUqamaP1p_AC4cbj_AVwNvi9bD3jvir3pobZb3EPo8f37x2rzgF3T7dGiNN91E8qw261NZxsPbdheojNnfICrsc_Q5vlps3xNVuuXt-XjKrFcqD5hihqR8QUTuQIKVBYu1gIK7nKbO2UyIyhXuXVEUpa5wnJDWe4WLlNKWj5Ddwfbtmv-hnierspgwXtTQzMEvVDRm0sRwfQA2q4JoQOn266sTLfVlOhdgHr_qmZESx0DjAs3o_PwVUFxxMfEon476iZY411naluGI8ZkpqQg_B94K3jm</recordid><startdate>199708</startdate><enddate>199708</enddate><creator>ALDRICH, M. S</creator><creator>CHERVIN, R. D</creator><creator>MALOW, B. A</creator><general>American Academy of Sleep Medicine</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199708</creationdate><title>Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy</title><author>ALDRICH, M. S ; CHERVIN, R. D ; MALOW, B. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-291a54372569e1e18df8df7ed3f6c6f9a4a51396cf08124fdc3a126f7f4998c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cataplexy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Narcolepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Polysomnography</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Sleep Apnea Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Sleep, REM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>ALDRICH, M. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHERVIN, R. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MALOW, B. A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Sleep (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>ALDRICH, M. S</au><au>CHERVIN, R. D</au><au>MALOW, B. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy</atitle><jtitle>Sleep (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Sleep</addtitle><date>1997-08</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>629</epage><pages>620-629</pages><issn>0161-8105</issn><issn>1550-9109</issn><eissn>1550-9109</eissn><coden>SLEED6</coden><abstract>Since its introduction, the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) has played a major role in the diagnosis of narcolepsy. We assessed its diagnostic value in a series of 2,083 subjects of whom 170 (8.2%) were diagnosed with narcolepsy. The sensitivity of the combination of two or more sleep onset rapid eye movement (REM) periods (SOREMPs) with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes on an initial MSLT was 70% with a specificity of 97%, but 30% of all subjects with this combination of findings did not have narcolepsy. In some narcoleptics who had more than one MSLT, the proportion of naps with SOREMPs varied substantially from the initial MSLT to the follow-up test. The highest specificity (99.2%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (87%) for MSLT findings was obtained with the criteria of three or more SOREMPs combined with a mean sleep latency of &lt; 5 minutes, but the sensitivity of this combination was only 46%. The combination of a SOREMP with a sleep latency &lt; 10 minutes on polysomnography yielded a specificity (98.9%) and PPV (73%) almost equal to those obtained from combinations of MSLT findings, but the sensitivity was much lower. Our results suggest that the MSLT cannot be used in isolation to confirm or exclude narcolepsy, is indicated only in selected patients with excessive daytime sleepiness, and is most valuable when interpreted in conjunction with clinical findings.</abstract><cop>Rochester, MN</cop><pub>American Academy of Sleep Medicine</pub><pmid>9351129</pmid><doi>10.1093/sleep/20.8.620</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-8105
ispartof Sleep (New York, N.Y.), 1997-08, Vol.20 (8), p.620-629
issn 0161-8105
1550-9109
1550-9109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79372385
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Cataplexy - diagnosis
Child
Disorders of higher nervous function. Focal brain diseases. Central vestibular syndrome and deafness. Brain stem syndromes
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Narcolepsy - diagnosis
Nervous system (semeiology, syndromes)
Neurology
Polysomnography
Predictive Value of Tests
Sleep Apnea Syndromes - diagnosis
Sleep, REM
title Value of the multiple sleep latency test (MSLT) for the diagnosis of narcolepsy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A31%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Value%20of%20the%20multiple%20sleep%20latency%20test%20(MSLT)%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20narcolepsy&rft.jtitle=Sleep%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=ALDRICH,%20M.%20S&rft.date=1997-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=629&rft.pages=620-629&rft.issn=0161-8105&rft.eissn=1550-9109&rft.coden=SLEED6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sleep/20.8.620&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79372385%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79372385&rft_id=info:pmid/9351129&rfr_iscdi=true