The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study

Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393
Hauptverfasser: STEWART, MICHAEL G., HARRILL, WILLARD C., OHLMS, LAURIE A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 393
container_issue 4
container_start_page 388
container_title Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery
container_volume 117
creator STEWART, MICHAEL G.
HARRILL, WILLARD C.
OHLMS, LAURIE A.
description Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79348937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1016_S0194-5998(97)70131-1</sage_id><els_id>S0194599897701311</els_id><sourcerecordid>79348937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQha2qFV0WfgKST1V7SOtJYjuuVFWAuoCE4ACcLa892TXKJmnsgPbf4yUrrnCyrHnv-fkbQk6A_QQG4tcdA1VmXKnqu5I_JIMCMvhEZsCUzEQF8jOZvUm-ksMQHhljQkh5QA5UUaiKwYyY-zVSrGu0MdCupqal3Rh7Ez22kfaDsdFbpKvRO2x8i9REamhEY9e-XdF1F3ofTfObniZxuqQc_4S0900XaYij2x6RL7VpAh7vzzl5WPy7P7_Mrm8vrs5PrzNbcikyqZaYA-TK1EYyvkRROqW44i4vC7R5ba0sDXcomSgrxbkAxsFBLURV8FIWc_Jtyk09_o8Yot74YLFpTIvdGLRURfIVOyGfhDYVDgPWuh_8xgxbDUzv0OpXtHrHTSupX9FqSL6T_QPjcoPuzbVnmeZ_pvmzb3D7sVB9e3lztsjTF0Ty55M_mBXqx24c2sTr3VJ_JxMmtE8eBx1sWp1F54e0C-06_07CC9MsqSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79348937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creator><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A. ; From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><description>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9339801</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoidectomy - standards ; Ambulatory Care - standards ; Child ; Female ; Hospitals, Municipal ; Hospitals, Teaching - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Pediatrics ; Pilot Projects ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Texas ; Tonsillectomy - standards</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393</ispartof><rights>1997 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc</rights><rights>1997 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>1997 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0194-5998%2897%2970131-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS0194-5998%2897%2970131-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9339801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</description><subject>Adenoidectomy - standards</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - standards</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Municipal</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Tonsillectomy - standards</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQha2qFV0WfgKST1V7SOtJYjuuVFWAuoCE4ACcLa892TXKJmnsgPbf4yUrrnCyrHnv-fkbQk6A_QQG4tcdA1VmXKnqu5I_JIMCMvhEZsCUzEQF8jOZvUm-ksMQHhljQkh5QA5UUaiKwYyY-zVSrGu0MdCupqal3Rh7Ez22kfaDsdFbpKvRO2x8i9REamhEY9e-XdF1F3ofTfObniZxuqQc_4S0900XaYij2x6RL7VpAh7vzzl5WPy7P7_Mrm8vrs5PrzNbcikyqZaYA-TK1EYyvkRROqW44i4vC7R5ba0sDXcomSgrxbkAxsFBLURV8FIWc_Jtyk09_o8Yot74YLFpTIvdGLRURfIVOyGfhDYVDgPWuh_8xgxbDUzv0OpXtHrHTSupX9FqSL6T_QPjcoPuzbVnmeZ_pvmzb3D7sVB9e3lztsjTF0Ty55M_mBXqx24c2sTr3VJ_JxMmtE8eBx1sWp1F54e0C-06_07CC9MsqSI</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creator><creator>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creator><creator>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><author>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adenoidectomy - standards</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - standards</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Municipal</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Tonsillectomy - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</au><au>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</au><au>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</au><aucorp>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>388-393</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9339801</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0194-5998
ispartof Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393
issn 0194-5998
1097-6817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79348937
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adenoidectomy - standards
Ambulatory Care - standards
Child
Female
Hospitals, Municipal
Hospitals, Teaching - standards
Humans
Male
Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)
Pediatrics
Pilot Projects
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
Texas
Tonsillectomy - standards
title The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A41%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20an%20outpatient%20practice%20guideline%20at%20a%20teaching%20hospital:%20A%20prospective%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=STEWART,%20MICHAEL%20G.&rft.aucorp=From%20the%20Bobby%20R.%20Alford%20Department%20of%20Otorhinolaryngology%20and%20Communicative%20Sciences,%20Baylor%20College%20of%20Medicine&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=388-393&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79348937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79348937&rft_id=info:pmid/9339801&rft_sage_id=10.1016_S0194-5998(97)70131-1&rft_els_id=S0194599897701311&rfr_iscdi=true