The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study
Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 393 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 388 |
container_title | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery |
container_volume | 117 |
creator | STEWART, MICHAEL G. HARRILL, WILLARD C. OHLMS, LAURIE A. |
description | Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79348937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1016_S0194-5998(97)70131-1</sage_id><els_id>S0194599897701311</els_id><sourcerecordid>79348937</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQha2qFV0WfgKST1V7SOtJYjuuVFWAuoCE4ACcLa892TXKJmnsgPbf4yUrrnCyrHnv-fkbQk6A_QQG4tcdA1VmXKnqu5I_JIMCMvhEZsCUzEQF8jOZvUm-ksMQHhljQkh5QA5UUaiKwYyY-zVSrGu0MdCupqal3Rh7Ez22kfaDsdFbpKvRO2x8i9REamhEY9e-XdF1F3ofTfObniZxuqQc_4S0900XaYij2x6RL7VpAh7vzzl5WPy7P7_Mrm8vrs5PrzNbcikyqZaYA-TK1EYyvkRROqW44i4vC7R5ba0sDXcomSgrxbkAxsFBLURV8FIWc_Jtyk09_o8Yot74YLFpTIvdGLRURfIVOyGfhDYVDgPWuh_8xgxbDUzv0OpXtHrHTSupX9FqSL6T_QPjcoPuzbVnmeZ_pvmzb3D7sVB9e3lztsjTF0Ty55M_mBXqx24c2sTr3VJ_JxMmtE8eBx1sWp1F54e0C-06_07CC9MsqSI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79348937</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creator><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A. ; From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><description>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9339801</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Adenoidectomy - standards ; Ambulatory Care - standards ; Child ; Female ; Hospitals, Municipal ; Hospitals, Teaching - standards ; Humans ; Male ; Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) ; Pediatrics ; Pilot Projects ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Texas ; Tonsillectomy - standards</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393</ispartof><rights>1997 American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc</rights><rights>1997 SAGE Publications</rights><rights>1997 American Association of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery Foundation (AAO‐HNSF)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0194-5998%2897%2970131-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS0194-5998%2897%2970131-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9339801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</description><subject>Adenoidectomy - standards</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care - standards</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals, Municipal</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Tonsillectomy - standards</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUFP3DAQha2qFV0WfgKST1V7SOtJYjuuVFWAuoCE4ACcLa892TXKJmnsgPbf4yUrrnCyrHnv-fkbQk6A_QQG4tcdA1VmXKnqu5I_JIMCMvhEZsCUzEQF8jOZvUm-ksMQHhljQkh5QA5UUaiKwYyY-zVSrGu0MdCupqal3Rh7Ez22kfaDsdFbpKvRO2x8i9REamhEY9e-XdF1F3ofTfObniZxuqQc_4S0900XaYij2x6RL7VpAh7vzzl5WPy7P7_Mrm8vrs5PrzNbcikyqZaYA-TK1EYyvkRROqW44i4vC7R5ba0sDXcomSgrxbkAxsFBLURV8FIWc_Jtyk09_o8Yot74YLFpTIvdGLRURfIVOyGfhDYVDgPWuh_8xgxbDUzv0OpXtHrHTSupX9FqSL6T_QPjcoPuzbVnmeZ_pvmzb3D7sVB9e3lztsjTF0Ty55M_mBXqx24c2sTr3VJ_JxMmtE8eBx1sWp1F54e0C-06_07CC9MsqSI</recordid><startdate>199710</startdate><enddate>199710</enddate><creator>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creator><creator>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creator><creator>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199710</creationdate><title>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</title><author>STEWART, MICHAEL G. ; HARRILL, WILLARD C. ; OHLMS, LAURIE A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4576-79be21129afa705be64d99595d243ec2fcc74a5de7064895561051d1f66835473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adenoidectomy - standards</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care - standards</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals, Municipal</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Tonsillectomy - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>STEWART, MICHAEL G.</au><au>HARRILL, WILLARD C.</au><au>OHLMS, LAURIE A.</au><aucorp>From the Bobby R. Alford Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Communicative Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>1997-10</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>117</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>388</spage><epage>393</epage><pages>388-393</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Practice guidelines (PGs) are becoming increasingly important in modern medicine. To study the effects of a PG, we performed a pilot study at a large, urban, public teaching hospital according to a prospective, observational research design with both concurrent and historic controls. Specifically, we studied the effects of a multidisciplinary PG for pediatric outpatient tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy on the process of health-care delivery. Variables in the health-care process included patient compliance with clinic and surgery appointments, surgery time, operating room turnover, time in recovery room, unplanned admission rate, patient compliance with postoperative follow-up, provider compliance with guidelines, and hospital charges. Patients in the PG were found to have fewer preoperative laboratory tests, decreased duplication of services, and shorter operating room turnover times. Provider compliance with the PG varied by service and was intermittent at first but improved gradually. There was a trend toward improved compliance with postoperative follow-up in patients in the PG. Provider opinions concerning the guideline were positive. This pilot study demonstrates several advantages and disadvantages of the use of PGs in the outpatient setting and in a teaching hospital. (Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:388-93.)</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>9339801</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-5998 |
ispartof | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 1997-10, Vol.117 (4), p.388-393 |
issn | 0194-5998 1097-6817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79348937 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adenoidectomy - standards Ambulatory Care - standards Child Female Hospitals, Municipal Hospitals, Teaching - standards Humans Male Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care) Pediatrics Pilot Projects Practice Guidelines as Topic Prospective Studies Statistics, Nonparametric Texas Tonsillectomy - standards |
title | The effects of an outpatient practice guideline at a teaching hospital: A prospective pilot study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A41%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20an%20outpatient%20practice%20guideline%20at%20a%20teaching%20hospital:%20A%20prospective%20pilot%20study&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=STEWART,%20MICHAEL%20G.&rft.aucorp=From%20the%20Bobby%20R.%20Alford%20Department%20of%20Otorhinolaryngology%20and%20Communicative%20Sciences,%20Baylor%20College%20of%20Medicine&rft.date=1997-10&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=388&rft.epage=393&rft.pages=388-393&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70131-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79348937%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79348937&rft_id=info:pmid/9339801&rft_sage_id=10.1016_S0194-5998(97)70131-1&rft_els_id=S0194599897701311&rfr_iscdi=true |