Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors
Background.The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Preventive medicine 1997-09, Vol.26 (5), p.664-673 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 673 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 664 |
| container_title | Preventive medicine |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Rakowski, William Clark, Melissa A. Pearlman, Deborah N. Ehrich, Beverly Rimer, Barbara K. Goldstein, Michael G. Dube, Catherine E. Woolverton, Hugh |
| description | Background.The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change.
Method.Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40–74 (N= 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening.
Results.The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions.
Conclusions.The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1006/pmed.1997.0188 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79326706</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091743597901882</els_id><sourcerecordid>79326706</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-67eb0688958d1a8a74fb932aa4b49d9aa390e230fe529609393ab5c82be8b9513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiQeKmXbsV4NRN7lGUKDJb4yRtgATN4M4ERZ1iFpaoknQS__tQsTt2uuH9wHsPIZ8ZLBmA-DYN2C2ZUs0SmJTvyIKBEgWUAt6TBYBiRVPx-ox8iPEPAGMCqlNyqnjZVE29IPvbMeFjMMmNj_Qh-EjN2NGVHyPtfaD3Zhh8lqfN_k14MBNdY5zdF_T6JeHYzcG0wbdMCjubqO_pFVoXnR_Nll6arRkt0uTp-tnTS9yYJ-dD_EhOerON-Ol4z8nvm-v16mdx9-vH7er7XWE5V6kQDbYgpFS17JiRpqn6Nq83pmor1SljuAIsOfRYl0qA4oqbtraybFG2qmb8nHw99E7B_93l7Xpw0eI2r0K_i7rJbaIBkY3Lg9FmDDFgr6fgBhP2moGeWeuZtZ5Z65l1Dnw5Nu_aWflnP8LNujzomN97chh0tA4zi84FtEl33v2v-hW6D45k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79326706</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Rakowski, William ; Clark, Melissa A. ; Pearlman, Deborah N. ; Ehrich, Beverly ; Rimer, Barbara K. ; Goldstein, Michael G. ; Dube, Catherine E. ; Woolverton, Hugh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rakowski, William ; Clark, Melissa A. ; Pearlman, Deborah N. ; Ehrich, Beverly ; Rimer, Barbara K. ; Goldstein, Michael G. ; Dube, Catherine E. ; Woolverton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><description>Background.The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change.
Method.Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40–74 (N= 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening.
Results.The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions.
Conclusions.The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0188</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9327475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; attitude toward health—health behavior ; Decision Making ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Behavior ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; knowledge, attitude, practice ; mammography ; Mammography - psychology ; mass screening ; Mass Screening - psychology ; Middle Aged ; Models, Psychological ; Papanicoloau smear ; preventive health services ; psychological theory ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Time Factors ; Vaginal Smears - psychology ; women's health</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 1997-09, Vol.26 (5), p.664-673</ispartof><rights>1997 American Health Foundation and Academic Press</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-67eb0688958d1a8a74fb932aa4b49d9aa390e230fe529609393ab5c82be8b9513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-67eb0688958d1a8a74fb932aa4b49d9aa390e230fe529609393ab5c82be8b9513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743597901882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9327475$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rakowski, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Deborah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrich, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimer, Barbara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dube, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolverton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background.The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change.
Method.Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40–74 (N= 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening.
Results.The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions.
Conclusions.The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>attitude toward health—health behavior</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>knowledge, attitude, practice</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - psychology</subject><subject>mass screening</subject><subject>Mass Screening - psychology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Models, Psychological</subject><subject>Papanicoloau smear</subject><subject>preventive health services</subject><subject>psychological theory</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vaginal Smears - psychology</subject><subject>women's health</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1v2zAQhomiQeKmXbsV4NRN7lGUKDJb4yRtgATN4M4ERZ1iFpaoknQS__tQsTt2uuH9wHsPIZ8ZLBmA-DYN2C2ZUs0SmJTvyIKBEgWUAt6TBYBiRVPx-ox8iPEPAGMCqlNyqnjZVE29IPvbMeFjMMmNj_Qh-EjN2NGVHyPtfaD3Zhh8lqfN_k14MBNdY5zdF_T6JeHYzcG0wbdMCjubqO_pFVoXnR_Nll6arRkt0uTp-tnTS9yYJ-dD_EhOerON-Ol4z8nvm-v16mdx9-vH7er7XWE5V6kQDbYgpFS17JiRpqn6Nq83pmor1SljuAIsOfRYl0qA4oqbtraybFG2qmb8nHw99E7B_93l7Xpw0eI2r0K_i7rJbaIBkY3Lg9FmDDFgr6fgBhP2moGeWeuZtZ5Z65l1Dnw5Nu_aWflnP8LNujzomN97chh0tA4zi84FtEl33v2v-hW6D45k</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Rakowski, William</creator><creator>Clark, Melissa A.</creator><creator>Pearlman, Deborah N.</creator><creator>Ehrich, Beverly</creator><creator>Rimer, Barbara K.</creator><creator>Goldstein, Michael G.</creator><creator>Dube, Catherine E.</creator><creator>Woolverton, Hugh</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors</title><author>Rakowski, William ; Clark, Melissa A. ; Pearlman, Deborah N. ; Ehrich, Beverly ; Rimer, Barbara K. ; Goldstein, Michael G. ; Dube, Catherine E. ; Woolverton, Hugh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-67eb0688958d1a8a74fb932aa4b49d9aa390e230fe529609393ab5c82be8b9513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>attitude toward health—health behavior</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>knowledge, attitude, practice</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - psychology</topic><topic>mass screening</topic><topic>Mass Screening - psychology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Models, Psychological</topic><topic>Papanicoloau smear</topic><topic>preventive health services</topic><topic>psychological theory</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vaginal Smears - psychology</topic><topic>women's health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rakowski, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Melissa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearlman, Deborah N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehrich, Beverly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rimer, Barbara K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dube, Catherine E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolverton, Hugh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rakowski, William</au><au>Clark, Melissa A.</au><au>Pearlman, Deborah N.</au><au>Ehrich, Beverly</au><au>Rimer, Barbara K.</au><au>Goldstein, Michael G.</au><au>Dube, Catherine E.</au><au>Woolverton, Hugh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>664</spage><epage>673</epage><pages>664-673</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background.The ability to study health-related behaviors in combination rather than singly will lead to a more comprehensive approach to health promotion. This investigation focused on mammography and Pap testing. One index was created to reflect the recency of receiving both examinations. A second index integrated opinions about the two procedures into a single measure, guided by the pros, cons, and decisional balance constructs of the Transtheoretical Model of behavior change.
Method.Data were drawn from the baseline and 1-year follow-up surveys of an HMO sample of women ages 40–74 (N= 1,605). Data collection occurred by telephone. A series of analyses examined whether recency of screening was associated with opinions about screening.
Results.The first analysis showed that recency of Pap testing and whether or not a Pap test was obtained between the two surveys were associated with opinions about Pap testing. The next analysis examined the association between the indicator for regularity of both Pap testing and mammography, with the measure of opinions toward the two procedures. The variable measuring receipt of Pap test and mammography was associated with the combined measure of opinions.
Conclusions.The ability to employ combined indicators for recency of testing and test-related opinions is promising for being able to take a more comprehensive approach to women's health. The paper discusses methodological considerations that arise when attempting to integrate two or more behaviors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9327475</pmid><doi>10.1006/pmed.1997.0188</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0091-7435 |
| ispartof | Preventive medicine, 1997-09, Vol.26 (5), p.664-673 |
| issn | 0091-7435 1096-0260 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79326706 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged attitude toward health—health behavior Decision Making Female Follow-Up Studies Health Behavior Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans knowledge, attitude, practice mammography Mammography - psychology mass screening Mass Screening - psychology Middle Aged Models, Psychological Papanicoloau smear preventive health services psychological theory Reproducibility of Results Research Design Statistics, Nonparametric Time Factors Vaginal Smears - psychology women's health |
| title | Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T19%3A22%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Pros%20and%20Cons%20for%20Mammography%20and%20Pap%20Testing:%20Extending%20the%20Construct%20of%20Decisional%20Balance%20to%20Two%20Behaviors&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Rakowski,%20William&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=664&rft.epage=673&rft.pages=664-673&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/pmed.1997.0188&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79326706%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79326706&rft_id=info:pmid/9327475&rft_els_id=S0091743597901882&rfr_iscdi=true |