Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device
While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical imaging 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 374 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 372 |
container_title | Clinical imaging |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Botash, Robert J. |
description | While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79324671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707196000812</els_id><sourcerecordid>79324671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpSF03PyGwh1DSwzb6Wn2cQghpUzC0kOYs5NlZUNldbaW1wfn1kWPja06DmOedGT2EXDL6nVGmbp6osbbWVLNrq75RSg2r-QeyYEaLWkprP5LFCflEPuf8j5aclfqcnFvBlG7sgvxZxZyr2FXJtyFOHsK8qwa_q8IwYYtVH8H34cXPIY57LIxz8psZUxixgrh_AU5z2GLV4jYAfiFnne8zXhzrkjz_ePh7_1ivfv_8dX-3qkEYO9dCaAneotJMcWGYXHeN4WYtpVfGrE2nuAThJTXSokEB0rScA0XtfUPBiCX5epg7pfh_g3l2Q8iAfe9HjJvstBVclukFbA4gpPLVhJ2bUhh82jlG3d6kezPp9pqcVe7NpOMld3lcsFkP2J5SR3Wlf3Xs-1wcdcmPEPIJ40Y0ismC3R4wLDK2AZPLEHAEbENCmF0bwzuHvAKV3o_v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79324671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Botash, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9316759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLIMEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging ; Actinomycosis - pathology ; Actinomycosis - surgery ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Dilatation and Curettage ; Endometritis - diagnostic imaging ; Endometritis - pathology ; Endometritis - surgery ; Endometrium - pathology ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging ; Foreign Bodies - pathology ; Foreign Bodies - surgery ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hysterosalpingography ; Intrauterine contraceptive device ; Intrauterine Devices, Copper ; Medical sciences ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Population ; Radiopacity ; Sterilization, Tubal ; Uterus - pathology ; Uterus - surgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707196000812$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2835614$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9316759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</description><subject>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Actinomycosis - pathology</subject><subject>Actinomycosis - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Dilatation and Curettage</subject><subject>Endometritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endometritis - pathology</subject><subject>Endometritis - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - pathology</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography</subject><subject>Intrauterine contraceptive device</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices, Copper</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Radiopacity</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal</subject><subject>Uterus - pathology</subject><subject>Uterus - surgery</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpSF03PyGwh1DSwzb6Wn2cQghpUzC0kOYs5NlZUNldbaW1wfn1kWPja06DmOedGT2EXDL6nVGmbp6osbbWVLNrq75RSg2r-QeyYEaLWkprP5LFCflEPuf8j5aclfqcnFvBlG7sgvxZxZyr2FXJtyFOHsK8qwa_q8IwYYtVH8H34cXPIY57LIxz8psZUxixgrh_AU5z2GLV4jYAfiFnne8zXhzrkjz_ePh7_1ivfv_8dX-3qkEYO9dCaAneotJMcWGYXHeN4WYtpVfGrE2nuAThJTXSokEB0rScA0XtfUPBiCX5epg7pfh_g3l2Q8iAfe9HjJvstBVclukFbA4gpPLVhJ2bUhh82jlG3d6kezPp9pqcVe7NpOMld3lcsFkP2J5SR3Wlf3Xs-1wcdcmPEPIJ40Y0ismC3R4wLDK2AZPLEHAEbENCmF0bwzuHvAKV3o_v</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Botash, Robert J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><author>Botash, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Actinomycosis - pathology</topic><topic>Actinomycosis - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Dilatation and Curettage</topic><topic>Endometritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endometritis - pathology</topic><topic>Endometritis - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - pathology</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography</topic><topic>Intrauterine contraceptive device</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices, Copper</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Radiopacity</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal</topic><topic>Uterus - pathology</topic><topic>Uterus - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Botash, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>372-374</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><coden>CLIMEB</coden><abstract>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9316759</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-7071 |
ispartof | Clinical imaging, 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374 |
issn | 0899-7071 1873-4499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79324671 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging Actinomycosis - pathology Actinomycosis - surgery Adult Biological and medical sciences Birth control Dilatation and Curettage Endometritis - diagnostic imaging Endometritis - pathology Endometritis - surgery Endometrium - pathology Female Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging Foreign Bodies - pathology Foreign Bodies - surgery Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Hysterosalpingography Intrauterine contraceptive device Intrauterine Devices, Copper Medical sciences Other methods of contraception. Sterilization Population Radiopacity Sterilization, Tubal Uterus - pathology Uterus - surgery |
title | Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20of%20radiopacity%20may%20impede%20localization%20of%20intrauterine%20contraceptive%20device&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Botash,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=372-374&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft.coden=CLIMEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79324671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79324671&rft_id=info:pmid/9316759&rft_els_id=S0899707196000812&rfr_iscdi=true |