Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device

While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical imaging 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374
1. Verfasser: Botash, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 5
container_start_page 372
container_title Clinical imaging
container_volume 21
creator Botash, Robert J.
description While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79324671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707196000812</els_id><sourcerecordid>79324671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpSF03PyGwh1DSwzb6Wn2cQghpUzC0kOYs5NlZUNldbaW1wfn1kWPja06DmOedGT2EXDL6nVGmbp6osbbWVLNrq75RSg2r-QeyYEaLWkprP5LFCflEPuf8j5aclfqcnFvBlG7sgvxZxZyr2FXJtyFOHsK8qwa_q8IwYYtVH8H34cXPIY57LIxz8psZUxixgrh_AU5z2GLV4jYAfiFnne8zXhzrkjz_ePh7_1ivfv_8dX-3qkEYO9dCaAneotJMcWGYXHeN4WYtpVfGrE2nuAThJTXSokEB0rScA0XtfUPBiCX5epg7pfh_g3l2Q8iAfe9HjJvstBVclukFbA4gpPLVhJ2bUhh82jlG3d6kezPp9pqcVe7NpOMld3lcsFkP2J5SR3Wlf3Xs-1wcdcmPEPIJ40Y0ismC3R4wLDK2AZPLEHAEbENCmF0bwzuHvAKV3o_v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79324671</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Botash, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9316759</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CLIMEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging ; Actinomycosis - pathology ; Actinomycosis - surgery ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth control ; Dilatation and Curettage ; Endometritis - diagnostic imaging ; Endometritis - pathology ; Endometritis - surgery ; Endometrium - pathology ; Female ; Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging ; Foreign Bodies - pathology ; Foreign Bodies - surgery ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Hysterosalpingography ; Intrauterine contraceptive device ; Intrauterine Devices, Copper ; Medical sciences ; Other methods of contraception. Sterilization ; Population ; Radiopacity ; Sterilization, Tubal ; Uterus - pathology ; Uterus - surgery</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707196000812$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2835614$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9316759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><description>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</description><subject>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Actinomycosis - pathology</subject><subject>Actinomycosis - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth control</subject><subject>Dilatation and Curettage</subject><subject>Endometritis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Endometritis - pathology</subject><subject>Endometritis - surgery</subject><subject>Endometrium - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - pathology</subject><subject>Foreign Bodies - surgery</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography</subject><subject>Intrauterine contraceptive device</subject><subject>Intrauterine Devices, Copper</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Radiopacity</subject><subject>Sterilization, Tubal</subject><subject>Uterus - pathology</subject><subject>Uterus - surgery</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1rGzEQhkVpSF03PyGwh1DSwzb6Wn2cQghpUzC0kOYs5NlZUNldbaW1wfn1kWPja06DmOedGT2EXDL6nVGmbp6osbbWVLNrq75RSg2r-QeyYEaLWkprP5LFCflEPuf8j5aclfqcnFvBlG7sgvxZxZyr2FXJtyFOHsK8qwa_q8IwYYtVH8H34cXPIY57LIxz8psZUxixgrh_AU5z2GLV4jYAfiFnne8zXhzrkjz_ePh7_1ivfv_8dX-3qkEYO9dCaAneotJMcWGYXHeN4WYtpVfGrE2nuAThJTXSokEB0rScA0XtfUPBiCX5epg7pfh_g3l2Q8iAfe9HjJvstBVclukFbA4gpPLVhJ2bUhh82jlG3d6kezPp9pqcVe7NpOMld3lcsFkP2J5SR3Wlf3Xs-1wcdcmPEPIJ40Y0ismC3R4wLDK2AZPLEHAEbENCmF0bwzuHvAKV3o_v</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>Botash, Robert J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</title><author>Botash, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c389t-3374ca9e671623814bf5828b44a688b8f624c3a40849e8e3c48d22c0e7aa50c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Actinomycosis - pathology</topic><topic>Actinomycosis - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth control</topic><topic>Dilatation and Curettage</topic><topic>Endometritis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Endometritis - pathology</topic><topic>Endometritis - surgery</topic><topic>Endometrium - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - pathology</topic><topic>Foreign Bodies - surgery</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography</topic><topic>Intrauterine contraceptive device</topic><topic>Intrauterine Devices, Copper</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Other methods of contraception. Sterilization</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Radiopacity</topic><topic>Sterilization, Tubal</topic><topic>Uterus - pathology</topic><topic>Uterus - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Botash, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Botash, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Imaging</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>372</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>372-374</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><coden>CLIMEB</coden><abstract>While ultrasound is the primary modality for localization of an intrauterine contraceptive device, plain films are often employed if the ultrasound examination is negative. A case is reported in which loss of radiopacity hampered identification of an intrauterine device.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9316759</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-7071
ispartof Clinical imaging, 1997-09, Vol.21 (5), p.372-374
issn 0899-7071
1873-4499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79324671
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Actinomycosis - diagnostic imaging
Actinomycosis - pathology
Actinomycosis - surgery
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Birth control
Dilatation and Curettage
Endometritis - diagnostic imaging
Endometritis - pathology
Endometritis - surgery
Endometrium - pathology
Female
Foreign Bodies - diagnostic imaging
Foreign Bodies - pathology
Foreign Bodies - surgery
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Hysterosalpingography
Intrauterine contraceptive device
Intrauterine Devices, Copper
Medical sciences
Other methods of contraception. Sterilization
Population
Radiopacity
Sterilization, Tubal
Uterus - pathology
Uterus - surgery
title Loss of radiopacity may impede localization of intrauterine contraceptive device
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T10%3A38%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20of%20radiopacity%20may%20impede%20localization%20of%20intrauterine%20contraceptive%20device&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Botash,%20Robert%20J.&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=372&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=372-374&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft.coden=CLIMEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0899-7071(96)00081-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79324671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79324671&rft_id=info:pmid/9316759&rft_els_id=S0899707196000812&rfr_iscdi=true