Differential roles of IRS‐1 and SHC signaling pathways in breast cancer cells

Several polypeptide growth factors stimulate breast cancer growth and may be involved in tumor progression. However, the relative importance of diverse growth factor signaling pathways in the development and maintenance of the neoplastic phenotype is largely unknown. The activation of such growth fa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 1997-09, Vol.72 (5), p.828-834
Hauptverfasser: Nolan, Mary K., Jankowska, Lidia, Prisco, Marco, Xu, Shi‐qiong, Guvakova, Marina A., Surmacz, Ewa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several polypeptide growth factors stimulate breast cancer growth and may be involved in tumor progression. However, the relative importance of diverse growth factor signaling pathways in the development and maintenance of the neoplastic phenotype is largely unknown. The activation of such growth factor receptors as the insulin‐like growth factor I receptor (IGF‐I R), erbB‐type receptors (erbB Rs) and FGF receptors (FGF Rs) controls the phenotype of a model breast cancer cell line MCF‐7. To evaluate the function of 2 post‐receptor signaling molecules, insulin receptor substrate‐1 (IRS‐1) (a major substrate of the IGF‐IR) and SHC (a common substrate of tyrosine kinase receptors), we developed several MCF‐7‐derived cell clones in which the synthesis of either IRS‐1 or SHC was blocked by antisense RNA. In MCF‐7 cells, down‐regulation of IRS‐1 by 80–85% strongly suppressed anchorage‐dependent and ‐independent growth and induced apoptotic cell death under growth factor‐ and estrogen‐reduced conditions. The reduction of SHC levels by approximately 50% resulted in the inhibition of monolayer and anchorage‐independent growth but did not decrease cell survival. Importantly, cell aggregation and the ability of cells to survive on the extracellular matrix were inhibited in MCF‐7/anti‐SHC clones, but not in MCF‐7/anti‐IRS‐1 clones. Cell motility toward IGF was not attenuated in any of the tested cell lines, but motility toward EGF was decreased in MCF‐7/anti‐SHC clones. Our results suggest that in MCF‐7 cells: 1) both IRS‐1 and SHC are implicated in the control of monolayer and anchorage‐independent growth; 2) IRS‐1 is critical to support cell survival; 3) SHC is involved in EGF‐dependent motility; and 4) normal levels of SHC, but not IRS‐1, are necessary for the formation and maintenance of cell‐cell interactions. Int. J. Cancer 72:828–834, 1997. © 1997 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0020-7136
1097-0215
DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19970904)72:5<828::AID-IJC20>3.0.CO;2-3