Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass

Although a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been shown to be a risk factor for future weight gain, little is known about the mechanisms determining its level. We tested the hypothesis that the composition of the fat-free mass (FFM) is a main determinant of RMR. If this hypothesis is true, a regr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metabolism, clinical and experimental clinical and experimental, 1997-10, Vol.46 (10), p.1225-1230
Hauptverfasser: Sparti, Andrea, DeLany, James P., de la Bretonne, Jacques A., Sander, Gary E., Bray, George A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1230
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1225
container_title Metabolism, clinical and experimental
container_volume 46
creator Sparti, Andrea
DeLany, James P.
de la Bretonne, Jacques A.
Sander, Gary E.
Bray, George A.
description Although a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been shown to be a risk factor for future weight gain, little is known about the mechanisms determining its level. We tested the hypothesis that the composition of the fat-free mass (FFM) is a main determinant of RMR. If this hypothesis is true, a regression model including internal organ masses as independent variables should explain a larger fraction of the variance in RMR than is explained using only FFM as a predictor. We measured fat mass by hydrodensitometry, liver and kidney volumes by computed tomography (CT), heart mass by echocardiography, muscle mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and RMR by calorimetry in 40 subjects. FFM and fat mass explained 83% of the variability in RMR (standard error of the estimate [SEE], 420 kJ/d) in a multiple regression analysis. Combinations of organ and muscle masses performed as well as but not better than stepwise multiple regression models. The fact that the composition of the lean mass could not improve the prediction of RMR in comparison to the traditional FFM-fat mass model suggests that the weight of internal organs is not a main determinant of RMR. This may indicate that the variability in RMR is associated with variation in energy expenditure per kilogram of tissue of the individual organs.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90222-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79312115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0026049597902225</els_id><sourcerecordid>79312115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b4401969d81ab98a5f863353f62ee61e7cbfd45706fee13f85698914dab1c7d63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BCEHET1Uk7RJk5OI-AWC4Mc5pOlEI22zJlnFf-92d9mrp4GZ550ZHoSOKDmnhIqLF0KYKEil-KmqzxRhjBV8C00oL1khBSHbaLJB9tB-Sp-EkLqWYhftqpIxSdkEvT5DZ7IPQ_rwM9xA_gEYcISU_fCOe8imCZ23OJoM2Awtzh-AbehnIfkxhoNbtpzJhYsAuDcpHaAdZ7oEh-s6RW-3N6_X98Xj093D9dVjYSvOc9FUFaFKqFZS0yhpuJOiLHnpBAMQFGrbuLbiNREOgJZOcqGkolVrGmrrVpRTdLLaO4vha774Wfc-Weg6M0CYJ12rkjK6EDJFfAXaGFKK4PQs-t7EX02JHm3qpU09qtKq1kubeswdrQ_Mmx7aTWqtbzE_Xs9NsqZz0QzWpw3GZCUqMmKXKwwWMr49RJ2sh8FC6yPYrNvg_3nkD5inkP4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79312115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sparti, Andrea ; DeLany, James P. ; de la Bretonne, Jacques A. ; Sander, Gary E. ; Bray, George A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sparti, Andrea ; DeLany, James P. ; de la Bretonne, Jacques A. ; Sander, Gary E. ; Bray, George A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been shown to be a risk factor for future weight gain, little is known about the mechanisms determining its level. We tested the hypothesis that the composition of the fat-free mass (FFM) is a main determinant of RMR. If this hypothesis is true, a regression model including internal organ masses as independent variables should explain a larger fraction of the variance in RMR than is explained using only FFM as a predictor. We measured fat mass by hydrodensitometry, liver and kidney volumes by computed tomography (CT), heart mass by echocardiography, muscle mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and RMR by calorimetry in 40 subjects. FFM and fat mass explained 83% of the variability in RMR (standard error of the estimate [SEE], 420 kJ/d) in a multiple regression analysis. Combinations of organ and muscle masses performed as well as but not better than stepwise multiple regression models. The fact that the composition of the lean mass could not improve the prediction of RMR in comparison to the traditional FFM-fat mass model suggests that the weight of internal organs is not a main determinant of RMR. This may indicate that the variability in RMR is associated with variation in energy expenditure per kilogram of tissue of the individual organs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-0495</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8600</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90222-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9322812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology ; Adult ; Basal Metabolism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Constitution ; Body Height ; Body Weight ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Heart - anatomy &amp; histology ; Humans ; Intermediate and energetic metabolism ; Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology ; Liver - anatomy &amp; histology ; Male ; Metabolisms and neurohumoral controls ; Models, Biological ; Regression Analysis ; Risk Factors ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems ; Weight Gain</subject><ispartof>Metabolism, clinical and experimental, 1997-10, Vol.46 (10), p.1225-1230</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b4401969d81ab98a5f863353f62ee61e7cbfd45706fee13f85698914dab1c7d63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b4401969d81ab98a5f863353f62ee61e7cbfd45706fee13f85698914dab1c7d63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026049597902225$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2846402$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9322812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sparti, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLany, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Bretonne, Jacques A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Gary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, George A.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass</title><title>Metabolism, clinical and experimental</title><addtitle>Metabolism</addtitle><description>Although a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been shown to be a risk factor for future weight gain, little is known about the mechanisms determining its level. We tested the hypothesis that the composition of the fat-free mass (FFM) is a main determinant of RMR. If this hypothesis is true, a regression model including internal organ masses as independent variables should explain a larger fraction of the variance in RMR than is explained using only FFM as a predictor. We measured fat mass by hydrodensitometry, liver and kidney volumes by computed tomography (CT), heart mass by echocardiography, muscle mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and RMR by calorimetry in 40 subjects. FFM and fat mass explained 83% of the variability in RMR (standard error of the estimate [SEE], 420 kJ/d) in a multiple regression analysis. Combinations of organ and muscle masses performed as well as but not better than stepwise multiple regression models. The fact that the composition of the lean mass could not improve the prediction of RMR in comparison to the traditional FFM-fat mass model suggests that the weight of internal organs is not a main determinant of RMR. This may indicate that the variability in RMR is associated with variation in energy expenditure per kilogram of tissue of the individual organs.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Basal Metabolism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Constitution</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Echocardiography</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intermediate and energetic metabolism</subject><subject>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Liver - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolisms and neurohumoral controls</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><subject>Weight Gain</subject><issn>0026-0495</issn><issn>1532-8600</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhoMouq7-BCEHET1Uk7RJk5OI-AWC4Mc5pOlEI22zJlnFf-92d9mrp4GZ550ZHoSOKDmnhIqLF0KYKEil-KmqzxRhjBV8C00oL1khBSHbaLJB9tB-Sp-EkLqWYhftqpIxSdkEvT5DZ7IPQ_rwM9xA_gEYcISU_fCOe8imCZ23OJoM2Awtzh-AbehnIfkxhoNbtpzJhYsAuDcpHaAdZ7oEh-s6RW-3N6_X98Xj093D9dVjYSvOc9FUFaFKqFZS0yhpuJOiLHnpBAMQFGrbuLbiNREOgJZOcqGkolVrGmrrVpRTdLLaO4vha774Wfc-Weg6M0CYJ12rkjK6EDJFfAXaGFKK4PQs-t7EX02JHm3qpU09qtKq1kubeswdrQ_Mmx7aTWqtbzE_Xs9NsqZz0QzWpw3GZCUqMmKXKwwWMr49RJ2sh8FC6yPYrNvg_3nkD5inkP4</recordid><startdate>19971001</startdate><enddate>19971001</enddate><creator>Sparti, Andrea</creator><creator>DeLany, James P.</creator><creator>de la Bretonne, Jacques A.</creator><creator>Sander, Gary E.</creator><creator>Bray, George A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19971001</creationdate><title>Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass</title><author>Sparti, Andrea ; DeLany, James P. ; de la Bretonne, Jacques A. ; Sander, Gary E. ; Bray, George A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-b4401969d81ab98a5f863353f62ee61e7cbfd45706fee13f85698914dab1c7d63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Basal Metabolism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Constitution</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Echocardiography</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Heart - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intermediate and energetic metabolism</topic><topic>Kidney - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Liver - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolisms and neurohumoral controls</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><topic>Weight Gain</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sparti, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLany, James P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de la Bretonne, Jacques A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sander, Gary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bray, George A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Metabolism, clinical and experimental</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sparti, Andrea</au><au>DeLany, James P.</au><au>de la Bretonne, Jacques A.</au><au>Sander, Gary E.</au><au>Bray, George A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass</atitle><jtitle>Metabolism, clinical and experimental</jtitle><addtitle>Metabolism</addtitle><date>1997-10-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1225</spage><epage>1230</epage><pages>1225-1230</pages><issn>0026-0495</issn><eissn>1532-8600</eissn><abstract>Although a low resting metabolic rate (RMR) has been shown to be a risk factor for future weight gain, little is known about the mechanisms determining its level. We tested the hypothesis that the composition of the fat-free mass (FFM) is a main determinant of RMR. If this hypothesis is true, a regression model including internal organ masses as independent variables should explain a larger fraction of the variance in RMR than is explained using only FFM as a predictor. We measured fat mass by hydrodensitometry, liver and kidney volumes by computed tomography (CT), heart mass by echocardiography, muscle mass by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and RMR by calorimetry in 40 subjects. FFM and fat mass explained 83% of the variability in RMR (standard error of the estimate [SEE], 420 kJ/d) in a multiple regression analysis. Combinations of organ and muscle masses performed as well as but not better than stepwise multiple regression models. The fact that the composition of the lean mass could not improve the prediction of RMR in comparison to the traditional FFM-fat mass model suggests that the weight of internal organs is not a main determinant of RMR. This may indicate that the variability in RMR is associated with variation in energy expenditure per kilogram of tissue of the individual organs.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>9322812</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90222-5</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-0495
ispartof Metabolism, clinical and experimental, 1997-10, Vol.46 (10), p.1225-1230
issn 0026-0495
1532-8600
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79312115
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adipose Tissue - anatomy & histology
Adult
Basal Metabolism
Biological and medical sciences
Body Constitution
Body Height
Body Weight
Echocardiography
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Heart - anatomy & histology
Humans
Intermediate and energetic metabolism
Kidney - anatomy & histology
Liver - anatomy & histology
Male
Metabolisms and neurohumoral controls
Models, Biological
Regression Analysis
Risk Factors
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
Weight Gain
title Relationship between resting metabolic rate and the composition of the fat-free mass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T04%3A46%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationship%20between%20resting%20metabolic%20rate%20and%20the%20composition%20of%20the%20fat-free%20mass&rft.jtitle=Metabolism,%20clinical%20and%20experimental&rft.au=Sparti,%20Andrea&rft.date=1997-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1225&rft.epage=1230&rft.pages=1225-1230&rft.issn=0026-0495&rft.eissn=1532-8600&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0026-0495(97)90222-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79312115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79312115&rft_id=info:pmid/9322812&rft_els_id=S0026049597902225&rfr_iscdi=true