Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts

Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032
Hauptverfasser: Peterson, Robert R, Simpson, Greg B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1032
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1020
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 15
creator Peterson, Robert R
Simpson, Greg B
description Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in BABY - STORK ) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79292850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839873384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDdpnyAUTEty562kkS3psl3yUwgkdFt6KWR5FJx6pY3lpcnbR-4uoRQS3Ugz55thNIeQY0bnjIL8TLlUpQQNc1bN65zjdI_MmAZdMq6qN2T2TLwlhynd0emAOiAHvAIKVMzI8sx7dGMRffHVut9_7NAWN0O36sJtEUPxK-b4O7p4G7qxy4kuFMus9Vj-lWxoiyWGEYPDYhHz42FM78i-t33C97v7iPw8P_uxuCyvri--Lb5clVYwPpa-BtQClAUmwLWImnlWW96KRlmNtRVVBa721nqBKn8OWAON8LxRyCU4OCKn277rId5vMI1m1SWHfW8Dxk0yUnOd90Az-PE_8C5uhpBnMzUTXMtK8NcgngeUIGvI0KeXIKZAKwmgRKZgS7khpjSgN-u8Ujs8GkbNZJ2ZjDGTMYZVpjaTdbnqw673pllh-1yz8yrrJ1vdrq1Zp0dnh7FzPSbz0K_-6fMEwXyd5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614297542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><description>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in BABY - STORK ) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2530304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cues ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Priming ; Reading ; Semantics ; Sentences ; Set (Psychology) ; Social research ; Word Recognition ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032</ispartof><rights>1989 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 1989</rights><rights>1989, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2530304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in BABY - STORK ) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDdpnyAUTEty562kkS3psl3yUwgkdFt6KWR5FJx6pY3lpcnbR-4uoRQS3Ugz55thNIeQY0bnjIL8TLlUpQQNc1bN65zjdI_MmAZdMq6qN2T2TLwlhynd0emAOiAHvAIKVMzI8sx7dGMRffHVut9_7NAWN0O36sJtEUPxK-b4O7p4G7qxy4kuFMus9Vj-lWxoiyWGEYPDYhHz42FM78i-t33C97v7iPw8P_uxuCyvri--Lb5clVYwPpa-BtQClAUmwLWImnlWW96KRlmNtRVVBa721nqBKn8OWAON8LxRyCU4OCKn277rId5vMI1m1SWHfW8Dxk0yUnOd90Az-PE_8C5uhpBnMzUTXMtK8NcgngeUIGvI0KeXIKZAKwmgRKZgS7khpjSgN-u8Ujs8GkbNZJ2ZjDGTMYZVpjaTdbnqw673pllh-1yz8yrrJ1vdrq1Zp0dnh7FzPSbz0K_-6fMEwXyd5g</recordid><startdate>19891101</startdate><enddate>19891101</enddate><creator>Peterson, Robert R</creator><creator>Simpson, Greg B</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891101</creationdate><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><author>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Robert R</au><au>Simpson, Greg B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>1989-11-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1032</epage><pages>1020-1032</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in BABY - STORK ) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>2530304</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79292850
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online
subjects Adult
Attention
Cognition & reasoning
Cues
Human
Humans
Language
Lexical Decision
Memory
Mental Recall
Paired-Associate Learning
Priming
Reading
Semantics
Sentences
Set (Psychology)
Social research
Word Recognition
Words (Phonetic Units)
title Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Backward%20Priming%20on%20Word%20Recognition%20in%20Single-Word%20and%20Sentence%20Contexts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Peterson,%20Robert%20R&rft.date=1989-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1032&rft.pages=1020-1032&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839873384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614297542&rft_id=info:pmid/2530304&rfr_iscdi=true