Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts
Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally ( BABY - STORK ) or bidirectionally ( BABY - CRY ). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1032 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1020 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Peterson, Robert R Simpson, Greg B |
description | Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally (
BABY
-
STORK
) or bidirectionally (
BABY
-
CRY
). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in
BABY
-
STORK
) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79292850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1839873384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDdpnyAUTEty562kkS3psl3yUwgkdFt6KWR5FJx6pY3lpcnbR-4uoRQS3Ugz55thNIeQY0bnjIL8TLlUpQQNc1bN65zjdI_MmAZdMq6qN2T2TLwlhynd0emAOiAHvAIKVMzI8sx7dGMRffHVut9_7NAWN0O36sJtEUPxK-b4O7p4G7qxy4kuFMus9Vj-lWxoiyWGEYPDYhHz42FM78i-t33C97v7iPw8P_uxuCyvri--Lb5clVYwPpa-BtQClAUmwLWImnlWW96KRlmNtRVVBa721nqBKn8OWAON8LxRyCU4OCKn277rId5vMI1m1SWHfW8Dxk0yUnOd90Az-PE_8C5uhpBnMzUTXMtK8NcgngeUIGvI0KeXIKZAKwmgRKZgS7khpjSgN-u8Ujs8GkbNZJ2ZjDGTMYZVpjaTdbnqw673pllh-1yz8yrrJ1vdrq1Zp0dnh7FzPSbz0K_-6fMEwXyd5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614297542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</creator><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><description>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally (
BABY
-
STORK
) or bidirectionally (
BABY
-
CRY
). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in
BABY
-
STORK
) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2530304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attention ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cues ; Human ; Humans ; Language ; Lexical Decision ; Memory ; Mental Recall ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Priming ; Reading ; Semantics ; Sentences ; Set (Psychology) ; Social research ; Word Recognition ; Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032</ispartof><rights>1989 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Nov 1989</rights><rights>1989, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27869,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2530304$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally (
BABY
-
STORK
) or bidirectionally (
BABY
-
CRY
). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in
BABY
-
STORK
) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Lexical Decision</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Priming</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Set (Psychology)</subject><subject>Social research</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><subject>Words (Phonetic Units)</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1q3DAQhUVoSDdpnyAUTEty562kkS3psl3yUwgkdFt6KWR5FJx6pY3lpcnbR-4uoRQS3Ugz55thNIeQY0bnjIL8TLlUpQQNc1bN65zjdI_MmAZdMq6qN2T2TLwlhynd0emAOiAHvAIKVMzI8sx7dGMRffHVut9_7NAWN0O36sJtEUPxK-b4O7p4G7qxy4kuFMus9Vj-lWxoiyWGEYPDYhHz42FM78i-t33C97v7iPw8P_uxuCyvri--Lb5clVYwPpa-BtQClAUmwLWImnlWW96KRlmNtRVVBa721nqBKn8OWAON8LxRyCU4OCKn277rId5vMI1m1SWHfW8Dxk0yUnOd90Az-PE_8C5uhpBnMzUTXMtK8NcgngeUIGvI0KeXIKZAKwmgRKZgS7khpjSgN-u8Ujs8GkbNZJ2ZjDGTMYZVpjaTdbnqw673pllh-1yz8yrrJ1vdrq1Zp0dnh7FzPSbz0K_-6fMEwXyd5g</recordid><startdate>19891101</startdate><enddate>19891101</enddate><creator>Peterson, Robert R</creator><creator>Simpson, Greg B</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19891101</creationdate><title>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</title><author>Peterson, Robert R ; Simpson, Greg B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a412t-f63e9438a3143cdee91f16a2d4b8a9e6a4553c6faaf4e802031b3b4f2b8e273c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Lexical Decision</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Priming</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Set (Psychology)</topic><topic>Social research</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><topic>Words (Phonetic Units)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peterson, Robert R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Greg B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Access via APA PsycArticles® (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peterson, Robert R</au><au>Simpson, Greg B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>1989-11-01</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1032</epage><pages>1020-1032</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>Backward priming was investigated under conditions similar to those used in lexical ambiguity research. Subjects received prime-target word pairs that were associated either unidirectionally (
BABY
-
STORK
) or bidirectionally (
BABY
-
CRY
). In the first experiment, targets were presented 500 ms following the onset of visual primes, and subjects made naming or lexical decision responses to the targets. Forward priming was obtained in all conditions, while backward priming (i.e., priming for pairs in which there was a unidirectional target-to-prime association, as in
BABY
-
STORK
) occurred only with lexical decision. In the second experiment, primes were presented auditorily, either in isolation or in a sentence. Targets followed the offset of the primes either immediately or after 200 ms. Backward priming occurred with both response tasks, but only when the prime was an isolated word. In addition, backward priming decreased over time with the naming task, but not with lexical decision. These results suggest that the locus of the backward priming effect is different for the two response tasks. Further, the lack of a backward priming effect with sentence contexts ggests that backward priming cannot account for the demonstrations of multiple access in the lexical ambiguity literature. These results, therefore, support a context-independent view of lexical access.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>2530304</pmid><doi>10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 1989-11, Vol.15 (6), p.1020-1032 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79292850 |
source | MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES; Periodicals Index Online |
subjects | Adult Attention Cognition & reasoning Cues Human Humans Language Lexical Decision Memory Mental Recall Paired-Associate Learning Priming Reading Semantics Sentences Set (Psychology) Social research Word Recognition Words (Phonetic Units) |
title | Effect of Backward Priming on Word Recognition in Single-Word and Sentence Contexts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A59%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Backward%20Priming%20on%20Word%20Recognition%20in%20Single-Word%20and%20Sentence%20Contexts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Peterson,%20Robert%20R&rft.date=1989-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1032&rft.pages=1020-1032&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839873384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614297542&rft_id=info:pmid/2530304&rfr_iscdi=true |