Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects
RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of immunology (1950) 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2972 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2962 |
container_title | The Journal of immunology (1950) |
container_volume | 159 |
creator | Beck, LA Dalke, S Leiferman, KM Bickel, CA Hamilton, R Rosen, H Bochner, BS Schleimer, RP |
description | RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79284623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79284623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJSTdpP0Ep6JSevB3JkmzlFpb8g9BCkp6FrJWzWixpI1ks_fb14m3IradhmPfeMPND6CuBJQMmf2yd9yXEYUm4XIollYJ-QAvCOVRCgDhBCwBKK9KI5hM6y3kLAAIoO0WnsgZoKCxQWpVRBxtLxi5srRldDDj2-PHq5_P1Eza6ZJuxjdmFuNu4ASdrUnGjt2G8xCb6nU4uz54Qgx4Gm16cwTqs8VuzKV4HnEt3WJA_o4-9HrL9cqzn6PfN9fPqrnr4dXu_unqoDKNyrHjHtZFQ18JSkITanre8073gmplubaURnHVGc2JaoimrGQUgIKxuiOxB1OfoYs7dpfhabB6Vd9nYYZjvVY2kLRO0_q-QCGg5beUkrGehSTHnZHu1S87r9EcRUAck6h8SNSFRQh2QTK5vx_jSebt-8xwZTPPv83zjXjZ7l6zKfnrdpCZqv9-_S_oL6XWY_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16085289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><description>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9300720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Assoc Immnol</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Antigens, CD - immunology ; Chemokine CCL5 - administration & dosage ; Eosinophils - immunology ; Eosinophils - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - immunology ; Hypersensitivity - pathology ; Immunophenotyping ; Leukocyte Count - drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Skin - immunology ; Skin - pathology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9300720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, CA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - immunology</subject><subject>Chemokine CCL5 - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Eosinophils - immunology</subject><subject>Eosinophils - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - immunology</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - pathology</subject><subject>Immunophenotyping</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Skin - immunology</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJSTdpP0Ep6JSevB3JkmzlFpb8g9BCkp6FrJWzWixpI1ks_fb14m3IradhmPfeMPND6CuBJQMmf2yd9yXEYUm4XIollYJ-QAvCOVRCgDhBCwBKK9KI5hM6y3kLAAIoO0WnsgZoKCxQWpVRBxtLxi5srRldDDj2-PHq5_P1Eza6ZJuxjdmFuNu4ASdrUnGjt2G8xCb6nU4uz54Qgx4Gm16cwTqs8VuzKV4HnEt3WJA_o4-9HrL9cqzn6PfN9fPqrnr4dXu_unqoDKNyrHjHtZFQ18JSkITanre8073gmplubaURnHVGc2JaoimrGQUgIKxuiOxB1OfoYs7dpfhabB6Vd9nYYZjvVY2kLRO0_q-QCGg5beUkrGehSTHnZHu1S87r9EcRUAck6h8SNSFRQh2QTK5vx_jSebt-8xwZTPPv83zjXjZ7l6zKfnrdpCZqv9-_S_oL6XWY_Q</recordid><startdate>19970915</startdate><enddate>19970915</enddate><creator>Beck, LA</creator><creator>Dalke, S</creator><creator>Leiferman, KM</creator><creator>Bickel, CA</creator><creator>Hamilton, R</creator><creator>Rosen, H</creator><creator>Bochner, BS</creator><creator>Schleimer, RP</creator><general>Am Assoc Immnol</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970915</creationdate><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><author>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - immunology</topic><topic>Chemokine CCL5 - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Eosinophils - immunology</topic><topic>Eosinophils - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - immunology</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - pathology</topic><topic>Immunophenotyping</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Skin - immunology</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, CA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, LA</au><au>Dalke, S</au><au>Leiferman, KM</au><au>Bickel, CA</au><au>Hamilton, R</au><au>Rosen, H</au><au>Bochner, BS</au><au>Schleimer, RP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>1997-09-15</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2962</spage><epage>2972</epage><pages>2962-2972</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Assoc Immnol</pub><pmid>9300720</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1767 |
ispartof | The Journal of immunology (1950), 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972 |
issn | 0022-1767 1550-6606 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79284623 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Cutaneous Adult Antigens, CD - immunology Chemokine CCL5 - administration & dosage Eosinophils - immunology Eosinophils - pathology Female Humans Hypersensitivity - immunology Hypersensitivity - pathology Immunophenotyping Leukocyte Count - drug effects Male Middle Aged Skin - immunology Skin - pathology |
title | Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutaneous%20injection%20of%20RANTES%20causes%20eosinophil%20recruitment:%20comparison%20of%20nonallergic%20and%20allergic%20human%20subjects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Beck,%20LA&rft.date=1997-09-15&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2962&rft.epage=2972&rft.pages=2962-2972&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79284623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16085289&rft_id=info:pmid/9300720&rfr_iscdi=true |