Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects

RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of immunology (1950) 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972
Hauptverfasser: Beck, LA, Dalke, S, Leiferman, KM, Bickel, CA, Hamilton, R, Rosen, H, Bochner, BS, Schleimer, RP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2972
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2962
container_title The Journal of immunology (1950)
container_volume 159
creator Beck, LA
Dalke, S
Leiferman, KM
Bickel, CA
Hamilton, R
Rosen, H
Bochner, BS
Schleimer, RP
description RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.
doi_str_mv 10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79284623</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79284623</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJSTdpP0Ep6JSevB3JkmzlFpb8g9BCkp6FrJWzWixpI1ks_fb14m3IradhmPfeMPND6CuBJQMmf2yd9yXEYUm4XIollYJ-QAvCOVRCgDhBCwBKK9KI5hM6y3kLAAIoO0WnsgZoKCxQWpVRBxtLxi5srRldDDj2-PHq5_P1Eza6ZJuxjdmFuNu4ASdrUnGjt2G8xCb6nU4uz54Qgx4Gm16cwTqs8VuzKV4HnEt3WJA_o4-9HrL9cqzn6PfN9fPqrnr4dXu_unqoDKNyrHjHtZFQ18JSkITanre8073gmplubaURnHVGc2JaoimrGQUgIKxuiOxB1OfoYs7dpfhabB6Vd9nYYZjvVY2kLRO0_q-QCGg5beUkrGehSTHnZHu1S87r9EcRUAck6h8SNSFRQh2QTK5vx_jSebt-8xwZTPPv83zjXjZ7l6zKfnrdpCZqv9-_S_oL6XWY_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16085289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</creator><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><description>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1767</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-6606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9300720</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Am Assoc Immnol</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adult ; Antigens, CD - immunology ; Chemokine CCL5 - administration &amp; dosage ; Eosinophils - immunology ; Eosinophils - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypersensitivity - immunology ; Hypersensitivity - pathology ; Immunophenotyping ; Leukocyte Count - drug effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Skin - immunology ; Skin - pathology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of immunology (1950), 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9300720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, CA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><title>The Journal of immunology (1950)</title><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><description>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antigens, CD - immunology</subject><subject>Chemokine CCL5 - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Eosinophils - immunology</subject><subject>Eosinophils - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - immunology</subject><subject>Hypersensitivity - pathology</subject><subject>Immunophenotyping</subject><subject>Leukocyte Count - drug effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Skin - immunology</subject><subject>Skin - pathology</subject><issn>0022-1767</issn><issn>1550-6606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9r3DAQxUVJSTdpP0Ep6JSevB3JkmzlFpb8g9BCkp6FrJWzWixpI1ks_fb14m3IradhmPfeMPND6CuBJQMmf2yd9yXEYUm4XIollYJ-QAvCOVRCgDhBCwBKK9KI5hM6y3kLAAIoO0WnsgZoKCxQWpVRBxtLxi5srRldDDj2-PHq5_P1Eza6ZJuxjdmFuNu4ASdrUnGjt2G8xCb6nU4uz54Qgx4Gm16cwTqs8VuzKV4HnEt3WJA_o4-9HrL9cqzn6PfN9fPqrnr4dXu_unqoDKNyrHjHtZFQ18JSkITanre8073gmplubaURnHVGc2JaoimrGQUgIKxuiOxB1OfoYs7dpfhabB6Vd9nYYZjvVY2kLRO0_q-QCGg5beUkrGehSTHnZHu1S87r9EcRUAck6h8SNSFRQh2QTK5vx_jSebt-8xwZTPPv83zjXjZ7l6zKfnrdpCZqv9-_S_oL6XWY_Q</recordid><startdate>19970915</startdate><enddate>19970915</enddate><creator>Beck, LA</creator><creator>Dalke, S</creator><creator>Leiferman, KM</creator><creator>Bickel, CA</creator><creator>Hamilton, R</creator><creator>Rosen, H</creator><creator>Bochner, BS</creator><creator>Schleimer, RP</creator><general>Am Assoc Immnol</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970915</creationdate><title>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</title><author>Beck, LA ; Dalke, S ; Leiferman, KM ; Bickel, CA ; Hamilton, R ; Rosen, H ; Bochner, BS ; Schleimer, RP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5b5ac90336e20912ef585baf65a4cbde9c654bca51c81a2434200106ea719f063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antigens, CD - immunology</topic><topic>Chemokine CCL5 - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Eosinophils - immunology</topic><topic>Eosinophils - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - immunology</topic><topic>Hypersensitivity - pathology</topic><topic>Immunophenotyping</topic><topic>Leukocyte Count - drug effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Skin - immunology</topic><topic>Skin - pathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beck, LA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dalke, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leiferman, KM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, CA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosen, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bochner, BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schleimer, RP</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beck, LA</au><au>Dalke, S</au><au>Leiferman, KM</au><au>Bickel, CA</au><au>Hamilton, R</au><au>Rosen, H</au><au>Bochner, BS</au><au>Schleimer, RP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of immunology (1950)</jtitle><addtitle>J Immunol</addtitle><date>1997-09-15</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>159</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2962</spage><epage>2972</epage><pages>2962-2972</pages><issn>0022-1767</issn><eissn>1550-6606</eissn><abstract>RANTES, a member of the C-C chemokine family, is a potent chemoattractant for T lymphocytes and eosinophils, but not neutrophils. To determine the effect of RANTES on cell recruitment in vivo, we injected up to 4 microg of RANTES intradermally into both allergic and nonallergic subjects and obtained biopsies 30 min, 6 h, and 24 h later. A dose- and time-dependent recruitment of eosinophils, CD45RO+ cells, and CD3+ cells was observed, with no effect seen on polymononuclear, cutaneous lymphocyte Ag+, CD68+, or tryptase+ cells. Eosinophil recruitment occurred more rapidly in allergic subjects than in nonallergic subjects. No eosinophil infiltrate was observed in nonallergic biopsies at 30 min and 6 h, whereas significant eosinophil recruitment was observed in allergic subjects by 30 min, reaching near-maximum levels by 6 h. The peak responses at 24 h were similar in both groups (nonallergic, 110 +/- 24 eosinophils/mm2; allergic, 113 +/- 38 eosinophils/mm2). The two groups had comparable numbers of circulating eosinophils. Major basic protein staining demonstrated eosinophil degranulation in both allergic and nonallergic groups. RANTES injection resulted in activation of endothelial E-selectin expression at 24 h. Incubation of cultured HUVECs with RANTES had no effect on adhesion molecule expression, suggesting that the in vivo effect may have been indirect. Our studies demonstrate that RANTES is a potent chemoattractant for eosinophils, CD3+ cells, and CD45RO+ cells in human skin. The accelerated eosinophil recruitment in allergic subjects provides support for the hypothesis that eosinophils from these subjects are primed in vivo.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Am Assoc Immnol</pub><pmid>9300720</pmid><doi>10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1767
ispartof The Journal of immunology (1950), 1997-09, Vol.159 (6), p.2962-2972
issn 0022-1767
1550-6606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79284623
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Cutaneous
Adult
Antigens, CD - immunology
Chemokine CCL5 - administration & dosage
Eosinophils - immunology
Eosinophils - pathology
Female
Humans
Hypersensitivity - immunology
Hypersensitivity - pathology
Immunophenotyping
Leukocyte Count - drug effects
Male
Middle Aged
Skin - immunology
Skin - pathology
title Cutaneous injection of RANTES causes eosinophil recruitment: comparison of nonallergic and allergic human subjects
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T13%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cutaneous%20injection%20of%20RANTES%20causes%20eosinophil%20recruitment:%20comparison%20of%20nonallergic%20and%20allergic%20human%20subjects&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20immunology%20(1950)&rft.au=Beck,%20LA&rft.date=1997-09-15&rft.volume=159&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2962&rft.epage=2972&rft.pages=2962-2972&rft.issn=0022-1767&rft.eissn=1550-6606&rft_id=info:doi/10.4049/jimmunol.159.6.2962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79284623%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16085289&rft_id=info:pmid/9300720&rfr_iscdi=true