Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance
Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospecti...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of epidemiology 1997-09, Vol.146 (5), p.418-428 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 428 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 418 |
| container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
| container_volume | 146 |
| creator | MAGAZINER, J ZIMMERMAN, S. I GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L HEBEL, J. R FOX, K. M |
| description | Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospective study of hip fracture patients aged 65 years or more in Baltimore, Maryland (1990-1991). Agreement between proxy and subject reports was highest for a summary measure of instrumental functioning and lowest for a measure of depression. Proxies tended to report more disability than did subjects, although bias varied by function. Patterns of agreement for proxy reports versus observations of performance compared with patterns for proxy reports versus subject reports were lower for measures of instrumental functioning, and bias was generally more extreme for instrumental and physical functioning measures. The authors conclude that agreement and bias differ by functional domain, by the way summary measures are created and scored, and by the criterion against which proxy reports are compared. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009295 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79274854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79274854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-edee4ad07528c824f8805fa23dc91ff3daff0b81e9c341f08396ef0f8512706c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtr3DAQx0VJSbZpP0JAhNCbtyPZsqXcwpI-INAe2rPRyjOtFttyJDuPb1-lawI9zeH_mJkfY5cCtgJM-Sk8UYjdISxxtH3a2gNuLYCRRr1hG1E1dVFLVZ-wDQDIwshanrF3KR0AhDAKTtlp9oICuWH3P2J4euYRpxBnP_7mfuTkH5DbiDbxQJyW0c0-5E08zXZeEr_muzBMNvoURv7o5z88YU_FsSNxO3Y87BPGB_uS-1cyYcwnD3Z0-J69pXw1fljnOfv1-fbn7mtx9_3Lt93NXeFKo-YCO8TKdtAoqZ2WFWkNiqwsO2cEUdlZIthrgcaVlSDQpamRgLQSsoHalefs47F3iuF-wTS3g08O-96OGJbUNkY2lVZVNl4fjS6GlCJSO0U_2PjcCmhfeLf_824z73blncMX65ZlP2D3Gl0BZ_1q1W1ytqeYEfj0apP5KVHr8i-Y-ZJD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79274854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>MAGAZINER, J ; ZIMMERMAN, S. I ; GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L ; HEBEL, J. R ; FOX, K. M</creator><creatorcontrib>MAGAZINER, J ; ZIMMERMAN, S. I ; GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L ; HEBEL, J. R ; FOX, K. M</creatorcontrib><description>Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospective study of hip fracture patients aged 65 years or more in Baltimore, Maryland (1990-1991). Agreement between proxy and subject reports was highest for a summary measure of instrumental functioning and lowest for a measure of depression. Proxies tended to report more disability than did subjects, although bias varied by function. Patterns of agreement for proxy reports versus observations of performance compared with patterns for proxy reports versus subject reports were lower for measures of instrumental functioning, and bias was generally more extreme for instrumental and physical functioning measures. The authors conclude that agreement and bias differ by functional domain, by the way summary measures are created and scored, and by the criterion against which proxy reports are compared.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009295</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9290502</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Activities of Daily Living ; Affect ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cognition ; Female ; Frail Elderly - psychology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Observer Variation ; Prospective Studies ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics. Sociometry ; Psychomotor Performance ; Self-Assessment ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1997-09, Vol.146 (5), p.418-428</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-edee4ad07528c824f8805fa23dc91ff3daff0b81e9c341f08396ef0f8512706c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2805168$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9290502$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAGAZINER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIMMERMAN, S. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBEL, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOX, K. M</creatorcontrib><title>Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospective study of hip fracture patients aged 65 years or more in Baltimore, Maryland (1990-1991). Agreement between proxy and subject reports was highest for a summary measure of instrumental functioning and lowest for a measure of depression. Proxies tended to report more disability than did subjects, although bias varied by function. Patterns of agreement for proxy reports versus observations of performance compared with patterns for proxy reports versus subject reports were lower for measures of instrumental functioning, and bias was generally more extreme for instrumental and physical functioning measures. The authors conclude that agreement and bias differ by functional domain, by the way summary measures are created and scored, and by the criterion against which proxy reports are compared.</description><subject>Activities of Daily Living</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly - psychology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics. Sociometry</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Self-Assessment</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkEtr3DAQx0VJSbZpP0JAhNCbtyPZsqXcwpI-INAe2rPRyjOtFttyJDuPb1-lawI9zeH_mJkfY5cCtgJM-Sk8UYjdISxxtH3a2gNuLYCRRr1hG1E1dVFLVZ-wDQDIwshanrF3KR0AhDAKTtlp9oICuWH3P2J4euYRpxBnP_7mfuTkH5DbiDbxQJyW0c0-5E08zXZeEr_muzBMNvoURv7o5z88YU_FsSNxO3Y87BPGB_uS-1cyYcwnD3Z0-J69pXw1fljnOfv1-fbn7mtx9_3Lt93NXeFKo-YCO8TKdtAoqZ2WFWkNiqwsO2cEUdlZIthrgcaVlSDQpamRgLQSsoHalefs47F3iuF-wTS3g08O-96OGJbUNkY2lVZVNl4fjS6GlCJSO0U_2PjcCmhfeLf_824z73blncMX65ZlP2D3Gl0BZ_1q1W1ytqeYEfj0apP5KVHr8i-Y-ZJD</recordid><startdate>19970901</startdate><enddate>19970901</enddate><creator>MAGAZINER, J</creator><creator>ZIMMERMAN, S. I</creator><creator>GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L</creator><creator>HEBEL, J. R</creator><creator>FOX, K. M</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970901</creationdate><title>Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance</title><author>MAGAZINER, J ; ZIMMERMAN, S. I ; GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L ; HEBEL, J. R ; FOX, K. M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-edee4ad07528c824f8805fa23dc91ff3daff0b81e9c341f08396ef0f8512706c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Activities of Daily Living</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly - psychology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics. Sociometry</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Self-Assessment</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAGAZINER, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZIMMERMAN, S. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBEL, J. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FOX, K. M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAGAZINER, J</au><au>ZIMMERMAN, S. I</au><au>GRUBER-BALDINI, A. L</au><au>HEBEL, J. R</au><au>FOX, K. M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1997-09-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>146</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>418</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>418-428</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Proxy ratings of functional status were compared with subject self-reports in five domains relevant to the study of older persons and with observations of subject performance in two areas (physical and instrumental functioning). Data were derived from 233 proxy-subject pairs evaluated in a prospective study of hip fracture patients aged 65 years or more in Baltimore, Maryland (1990-1991). Agreement between proxy and subject reports was highest for a summary measure of instrumental functioning and lowest for a measure of depression. Proxies tended to report more disability than did subjects, although bias varied by function. Patterns of agreement for proxy reports versus observations of performance compared with patterns for proxy reports versus subject reports were lower for measures of instrumental functioning, and bias was generally more extreme for instrumental and physical functioning measures. The authors conclude that agreement and bias differ by functional domain, by the way summary measures are created and scored, and by the criterion against which proxy reports are compared.</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>9290502</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009295</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
| ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 1997-09, Vol.146 (5), p.418-428 |
| issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79274854 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Activities of Daily Living Affect Aged Aged, 80 and over Biological and medical sciences Cognition Female Frail Elderly - psychology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Humans Male Observer Variation Prospective Studies Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics. Sociometry Psychomotor Performance Self-Assessment Social psychology |
| title | Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status : Comparison with self-reports and observations of performance |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T08%3A04%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Proxy%20reporting%20in%20five%20areas%20of%20functional%20status%20:%20Comparison%20with%20self-reports%20and%20observations%20of%20performance&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=MAGAZINER,%20J&rft.date=1997-09-01&rft.volume=146&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=418&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=418-428&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009295&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79274854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79274854&rft_id=info:pmid/9290502&rfr_iscdi=true |