Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods

Plastic surgery for microtia had achieved fairly consistent good results since TANZER (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.23: 1–15, 1959) and recently the modified methods have become popular. The authors did plastic surgery of auricles with the rib cartilage framework method from 1968 until 1986, and with the s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Auris, nasus, larynx nasus, larynx, 1989, Vol.16 (2), p.75-88
Hauptverfasser: Matsunaga, Takashi, Fujita, Nobuya, Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki, Kashiwagi, Noriko, Ohta, Kazuhiro, Iwasaki, Hisami, Ohhira, Shinji, Sano, Mitsuhito, Tominaga, Yachiyo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 88
container_issue 2
container_start_page 75
container_title Auris, nasus, larynx
container_volume 16
creator Matsunaga, Takashi
Fujita, Nobuya
Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki
Kashiwagi, Noriko
Ohta, Kazuhiro
Iwasaki, Hisami
Ohhira, Shinji
Sano, Mitsuhito
Tominaga, Yachiyo
description Plastic surgery for microtia had achieved fairly consistent good results since TANZER (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.23: 1–15, 1959) and recently the modified methods have become popular. The authors did plastic surgery of auricles with the rib cartilage framework method from 1968 until 1986, and with the silicone rubber framework method from 1975 until 1986, and observed each postoperative course for 2 to 10 years. The operative results and the merits and the demerits of each method are reported here. The subjects were 49 ears for the rib cartilage framework method (17 of the former period, 1968–1977, and 32 of the latter, 1978–1986), and 20 ears for the silicone rubber framework method. The operation was performed in 3 stages according to the modified Tanzer's method. The results of operations were subjectively assessed as “satisfied”, “fairly satisfied”, “a little unsatisfied”, and “unsatisfied”. The results were as follows: 1) in the rib cartilage framework method, there were 21 satisfied cases (43 %), 17 fairly satisfied cases (35 %), and 5 unsatisfied cases (10%); 2) there were 8 satisfied cases (40%), 5 fairly satisfied cases (25 %), and 6 unsatisfied cases (30 %.) in the silicone rubber framework method. From the aspect of postoperative management, the rib cartilage framework method is now better but the authors expect the silicone rubber framework method will be improved and used more extensively in the future.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80039-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79270874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0385814689800392</els_id><sourcerecordid>79270874</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-43892653c11135f958e178254a27b23b4c1eca04f4cd023f07742a5bea62bbba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKtPCI1TyCsEi4J8kdtigasQUpFaVOnRt2c4NNTjxYDtUfRMet54fjdh1dWWd79wj34PQOSUfKaHtpzXhsqkkrdv3svsgCeFdxV6gBZWiq2gt2pdocUReo9OUfpECCd6doBMmCadULtC_VfA-PFR3G7zOc_-Iw4BvwYYp5TjbDD2-mKOzHrCb8LWzMWSnP-NlGDc6uhSmrSHfQzGl2ed0fDqDlzpm5_VPwKuoR3gI8TfWU7_T1867klLA2RiI_xHXkO9Dn96gV4P2Cd4e5hm6W339sfxWXd1cfl9eXFWWiSZXNZcdaxtuKaW8GbpGAhWSNbVmwjBuakvBalIPte0J4wMRoma6MaBbZozR_Ay92-_dxPBnhpTV6JIF7_UEYU5KdEwQKeoCNnuw3CClCIPaRDfq-KgoUdtG1K4RtT23kp3aNaJY8Z0fAmYzQn90HSoo-pe9DuWXfx1ElayDyULvItis-uCeSXgCh7ucig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79270874</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Matsunaga, Takashi ; Fujita, Nobuya ; Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki ; Kashiwagi, Noriko ; Ohta, Kazuhiro ; Iwasaki, Hisami ; Ohhira, Shinji ; Sano, Mitsuhito ; Tominaga, Yachiyo</creator><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takashi ; Fujita, Nobuya ; Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki ; Kashiwagi, Noriko ; Ohta, Kazuhiro ; Iwasaki, Hisami ; Ohhira, Shinji ; Sano, Mitsuhito ; Tominaga, Yachiyo</creatorcontrib><description>Plastic surgery for microtia had achieved fairly consistent good results since TANZER (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.23: 1–15, 1959) and recently the modified methods have become popular. The authors did plastic surgery of auricles with the rib cartilage framework method from 1968 until 1986, and with the silicone rubber framework method from 1975 until 1986, and observed each postoperative course for 2 to 10 years. The operative results and the merits and the demerits of each method are reported here. The subjects were 49 ears for the rib cartilage framework method (17 of the former period, 1968–1977, and 32 of the latter, 1978–1986), and 20 ears for the silicone rubber framework method. The operation was performed in 3 stages according to the modified Tanzer's method. The results of operations were subjectively assessed as “satisfied”, “fairly satisfied”, “a little unsatisfied”, and “unsatisfied”. The results were as follows: 1) in the rib cartilage framework method, there were 21 satisfied cases (43 %), 17 fairly satisfied cases (35 %), and 5 unsatisfied cases (10%); 2) there were 8 satisfied cases (40%), 5 fairly satisfied cases (25 %), and 6 unsatisfied cases (30 %.) in the silicone rubber framework method. From the aspect of postoperative management, the rib cartilage framework method is now better but the authors expect the silicone rubber framework method will be improved and used more extensively in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0385-8146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1476</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80039-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2803118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Cartilage - transplantation ; Cicatrix - etiology ; Ear - abnormalities ; Ear, External - surgery ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Postoperative Complications ; Prostheses and Implants ; Ribs ; Silicone Elastomers ; Surgery, Plastic - methods ; Thoracic Diseases - etiology</subject><ispartof>Auris, nasus, larynx, 1989, Vol.16 (2), p.75-88</ispartof><rights>1989 Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology (SPIO)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-43892653c11135f958e178254a27b23b4c1eca04f4cd023f07742a5bea62bbba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-43892653c11135f958e178254a27b23b4c1eca04f4cd023f07742a5bea62bbba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80039-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2803118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Nobuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hisami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohhira, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Yachiyo</creatorcontrib><title>Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods</title><title>Auris, nasus, larynx</title><addtitle>Auris Nasus Larynx</addtitle><description>Plastic surgery for microtia had achieved fairly consistent good results since TANZER (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.23: 1–15, 1959) and recently the modified methods have become popular. The authors did plastic surgery of auricles with the rib cartilage framework method from 1968 until 1986, and with the silicone rubber framework method from 1975 until 1986, and observed each postoperative course for 2 to 10 years. The operative results and the merits and the demerits of each method are reported here. The subjects were 49 ears for the rib cartilage framework method (17 of the former period, 1968–1977, and 32 of the latter, 1978–1986), and 20 ears for the silicone rubber framework method. The operation was performed in 3 stages according to the modified Tanzer's method. The results of operations were subjectively assessed as “satisfied”, “fairly satisfied”, “a little unsatisfied”, and “unsatisfied”. The results were as follows: 1) in the rib cartilage framework method, there were 21 satisfied cases (43 %), 17 fairly satisfied cases (35 %), and 5 unsatisfied cases (10%); 2) there were 8 satisfied cases (40%), 5 fairly satisfied cases (25 %), and 6 unsatisfied cases (30 %.) in the silicone rubber framework method. From the aspect of postoperative management, the rib cartilage framework method is now better but the authors expect the silicone rubber framework method will be improved and used more extensively in the future.</description><subject>Cartilage - transplantation</subject><subject>Cicatrix - etiology</subject><subject>Ear - abnormalities</subject><subject>Ear, External - surgery</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prostheses and Implants</subject><subject>Ribs</subject><subject>Silicone Elastomers</subject><subject>Surgery, Plastic - methods</subject><subject>Thoracic Diseases - etiology</subject><issn>0385-8146</issn><issn>1879-1476</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1989</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS0EKtPCI1TyCsEi4J8kdtigasQUpFaVOnRt2c4NNTjxYDtUfRMet54fjdh1dWWd79wj34PQOSUfKaHtpzXhsqkkrdv3svsgCeFdxV6gBZWiq2gt2pdocUReo9OUfpECCd6doBMmCadULtC_VfA-PFR3G7zOc_-Iw4BvwYYp5TjbDD2-mKOzHrCb8LWzMWSnP-NlGDc6uhSmrSHfQzGl2ed0fDqDlzpm5_VPwKuoR3gI8TfWU7_T1867klLA2RiI_xHXkO9Dn96gV4P2Cd4e5hm6W339sfxWXd1cfl9eXFWWiSZXNZcdaxtuKaW8GbpGAhWSNbVmwjBuakvBalIPte0J4wMRoma6MaBbZozR_Ay92-_dxPBnhpTV6JIF7_UEYU5KdEwQKeoCNnuw3CClCIPaRDfq-KgoUdtG1K4RtT23kp3aNaJY8Z0fAmYzQn90HSoo-pe9DuWXfx1ElayDyULvItis-uCeSXgCh7ucig</recordid><startdate>1989</startdate><enddate>1989</enddate><creator>Matsunaga, Takashi</creator><creator>Fujita, Nobuya</creator><creator>Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Kashiwagi, Noriko</creator><creator>Ohta, Kazuhiro</creator><creator>Iwasaki, Hisami</creator><creator>Ohhira, Shinji</creator><creator>Sano, Mitsuhito</creator><creator>Tominaga, Yachiyo</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1989</creationdate><title>Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods</title><author>Matsunaga, Takashi ; Fujita, Nobuya ; Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki ; Kashiwagi, Noriko ; Ohta, Kazuhiro ; Iwasaki, Hisami ; Ohhira, Shinji ; Sano, Mitsuhito ; Tominaga, Yachiyo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-43892653c11135f958e178254a27b23b4c1eca04f4cd023f07742a5bea62bbba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1989</creationdate><topic>Cartilage - transplantation</topic><topic>Cicatrix - etiology</topic><topic>Ear - abnormalities</topic><topic>Ear, External - surgery</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prostheses and Implants</topic><topic>Ribs</topic><topic>Silicone Elastomers</topic><topic>Surgery, Plastic - methods</topic><topic>Thoracic Diseases - etiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Nobuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kashiwagi, Noriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohta, Kazuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Hisami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohhira, Shinji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tominaga, Yachiyo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Auris, nasus, larynx</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matsunaga, Takashi</au><au>Fujita, Nobuya</au><au>Kitaoku, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Kashiwagi, Noriko</au><au>Ohta, Kazuhiro</au><au>Iwasaki, Hisami</au><au>Ohhira, Shinji</au><au>Sano, Mitsuhito</au><au>Tominaga, Yachiyo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods</atitle><jtitle>Auris, nasus, larynx</jtitle><addtitle>Auris Nasus Larynx</addtitle><date>1989</date><risdate>1989</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>75</spage><epage>88</epage><pages>75-88</pages><issn>0385-8146</issn><eissn>1879-1476</eissn><abstract>Plastic surgery for microtia had achieved fairly consistent good results since TANZER (Plast. Reconstr. Surg.23: 1–15, 1959) and recently the modified methods have become popular. The authors did plastic surgery of auricles with the rib cartilage framework method from 1968 until 1986, and with the silicone rubber framework method from 1975 until 1986, and observed each postoperative course for 2 to 10 years. The operative results and the merits and the demerits of each method are reported here. The subjects were 49 ears for the rib cartilage framework method (17 of the former period, 1968–1977, and 32 of the latter, 1978–1986), and 20 ears for the silicone rubber framework method. The operation was performed in 3 stages according to the modified Tanzer's method. The results of operations were subjectively assessed as “satisfied”, “fairly satisfied”, “a little unsatisfied”, and “unsatisfied”. The results were as follows: 1) in the rib cartilage framework method, there were 21 satisfied cases (43 %), 17 fairly satisfied cases (35 %), and 5 unsatisfied cases (10%); 2) there were 8 satisfied cases (40%), 5 fairly satisfied cases (25 %), and 6 unsatisfied cases (30 %.) in the silicone rubber framework method. From the aspect of postoperative management, the rib cartilage framework method is now better but the authors expect the silicone rubber framework method will be improved and used more extensively in the future.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>2803118</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80039-2</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0385-8146
ispartof Auris, nasus, larynx, 1989, Vol.16 (2), p.75-88
issn 0385-8146
1879-1476
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79270874
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Cartilage - transplantation
Cicatrix - etiology
Ear - abnormalities
Ear, External - surgery
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Postoperative Complications
Prostheses and Implants
Ribs
Silicone Elastomers
Surgery, Plastic - methods
Thoracic Diseases - etiology
title Follow-Up Study of Reconstructed Auricle in Microtia: Comparison of the Results of the Rib Cartilage Framework and the Silicone Rubber Framework Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Follow-Up%20Study%20of%20Reconstructed%20Auricle%20in%20Microtia:%20Comparison%20of%20the%20Results%20of%20the%20Rib%20Cartilage%20Framework%20and%20the%20Silicone%20Rubber%20Framework%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Auris,%20nasus,%20larynx&rft.au=Matsunaga,%20Takashi&rft.date=1989&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=75&rft.epage=88&rft.pages=75-88&rft.issn=0385-8146&rft.eissn=1879-1476&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0385-8146(89)80039-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79270874%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79270874&rft_id=info:pmid/2803118&rft_els_id=S0385814689800392&rfr_iscdi=true