A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine

Cimetidine (CIM) is an H2-receptor antagonist with a long history of clinical use in peptic ulcer disease. In addition to its inhibitory effect upon gastric acid secretion, CIM can also block histamine-mediated immunosuppression by inhibiting H2 receptors on suppressor T cells. CIM results in immuno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 1997-07, Vol.15 (10), p.1144-1148
Hauptverfasser: Drabick, Joseph J., Tang, Douglas B., Moran, E.E., Trofa, Andrew F., Foster, Janet S., Zollinger, Wendell D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1148
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1144
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 15
creator Drabick, Joseph J.
Tang, Douglas B.
Moran, E.E.
Trofa, Andrew F.
Foster, Janet S.
Zollinger, Wendell D.
description Cimetidine (CIM) is an H2-receptor antagonist with a long history of clinical use in peptic ulcer disease. In addition to its inhibitory effect upon gastric acid secretion, CIM can also block histamine-mediated immunosuppression by inhibiting H2 receptors on suppressor T cells. CIM results in immunoaugmentation of both cellular and humoral immunity by this mechanism and has been used clinically in the treatment of chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases. We postulated that orally administered CIM, like an adjuvant, could augment the immunologic response to a parenteral vaccine. To test this hypothesis, a randomized placebo (PLB)-controlled, double-blinded study in 14 healthy volunteers was performed using a Group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (OMP) vaccine administered twice, 6 weeks apart. Volunteers were randomized within pairs defined by their screening OMP antibody titers to receive either CIM or PLB which was administered for 5 days, beginning 2 days before each of the two immunizations. All 14 volunteers completed the study with excellent compliance. Sera were tested for anti-OMP and bactericidal antibodies. The groups were comparable in terms of gender distribution, age and baseline anti-OMP titers. Reactogenicity to the vaccine was mild and comparable between groups. There was little effect of CIM (over PLB) on anti-OMP or functional bactericidal antibody levels over time. Geometric means of maximum OMP antibody increase over baseline was 3.3-fold (95% CI: 1.8–6.3) for CIM and 2.4 for PLB (CI: 1.6–3.7). CIM had a corresponding 3.9-fold increase (CI: 1.9–8.3) in bactericidal antibody level compared to 2.2 for PLB (CI: 1.4–3.4). We conclude that oral CIM was not effective as an immunopotentiator of immunization with this group B meningococcal vaccine.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00311-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79229788</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X96003118</els_id><sourcerecordid>16080383</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-92dec4c5f5f9a6030ec3a0e7d5e476a335b04d30bb2ffd9b64dcda022aeb5c1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkdtqFTEUhoModbf6CIVciCg4upLM8UpqqQcoeKGCdyGzsqZGZpIxyVTat_CNnX1g3_YqhP9bB9bH2LmAtwJE_e4byLosSgE_X3X1awAlRNE-YhvRNqqQlWgfs80RecpOU_oNAJUS3Qk76WTdQQ0b9u-CR-NtmNw92Td8Hg1SHwoMPscwjmR5you942HgIZqRo5soO-s8cZO48dxN0-LDHDL57EwOcYvOJq5f2hbscndvsgue_3X5Fzf8JoZl5h_4RN75m4ABcSVvDeLa9xl7Mpgx0fPDe8Z-fLz6fvm5uP766cvlxXWBpYRcdNISllgN1dCZGhQQKgPU2IrKpjZKVT2UVkHfy2GwXV-XFq0BKQ31FQpUZ-zlvu8cw5-FUtaTS0jjaDyFJemmk7Jr2vZBUNTQgmrVClZ7EGNIKdKg5-gmE--0AL11pnfO9FaI7mq9c6a3A84PA5Z-InusOkha8xeH3KT1UMMqDF06YrJpRbnD3u8xWq926yjqhI48knWRMGsb3AOL_Acch7dy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16080383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Drabick, Joseph J. ; Tang, Douglas B. ; Moran, E.E. ; Trofa, Andrew F. ; Foster, Janet S. ; Zollinger, Wendell D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drabick, Joseph J. ; Tang, Douglas B. ; Moran, E.E. ; Trofa, Andrew F. ; Foster, Janet S. ; Zollinger, Wendell D.</creatorcontrib><description>Cimetidine (CIM) is an H2-receptor antagonist with a long history of clinical use in peptic ulcer disease. In addition to its inhibitory effect upon gastric acid secretion, CIM can also block histamine-mediated immunosuppression by inhibiting H2 receptors on suppressor T cells. CIM results in immunoaugmentation of both cellular and humoral immunity by this mechanism and has been used clinically in the treatment of chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases. We postulated that orally administered CIM, like an adjuvant, could augment the immunologic response to a parenteral vaccine. To test this hypothesis, a randomized placebo (PLB)-controlled, double-blinded study in 14 healthy volunteers was performed using a Group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (OMP) vaccine administered twice, 6 weeks apart. Volunteers were randomized within pairs defined by their screening OMP antibody titers to receive either CIM or PLB which was administered for 5 days, beginning 2 days before each of the two immunizations. All 14 volunteers completed the study with excellent compliance. Sera were tested for anti-OMP and bactericidal antibodies. The groups were comparable in terms of gender distribution, age and baseline anti-OMP titers. Reactogenicity to the vaccine was mild and comparable between groups. There was little effect of CIM (over PLB) on anti-OMP or functional bactericidal antibody levels over time. Geometric means of maximum OMP antibody increase over baseline was 3.3-fold (95% CI: 1.8–6.3) for CIM and 2.4 for PLB (CI: 1.6–3.7). CIM had a corresponding 3.9-fold increase (CI: 1.9–8.3) in bactericidal antibody level compared to 2.2 for PLB (CI: 1.4–3.4). We conclude that oral CIM was not effective as an immunopotentiator of immunization with this group B meningococcal vaccine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00311-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9269060</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>adjuvant ; Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage ; Administration, Oral ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Antibodies, Bacterial - blood ; Bacterial Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Bacteriology ; Biological and medical sciences ; cimetidine ; Cimetidine - administration &amp; dosage ; Double-Blind Method ; Epidemiology. Vaccinations ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Histamine H2 Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage ; Humans ; immunoaugmentation ; Immunomodulators ; Infectious diseases ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Meningitis, Meningococcal - immunology ; Meningitis, Meningococcal - prevention &amp; control ; meningococcal ; Meningococcal Vaccines ; Microbiology ; Neisseria meningitidis - classification ; Neisseria meningitidis - immunology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Streptococcus ; vaccine ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 1997-07, Vol.15 (10), p.1144-1148</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-92dec4c5f5f9a6030ec3a0e7d5e476a335b04d30bb2ffd9b64dcda022aeb5c1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-92dec4c5f5f9a6030ec3a0e7d5e476a335b04d30bb2ffd9b64dcda022aeb5c1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00311-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2781460$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9269060$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drabick, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trofa, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Janet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zollinger, Wendell D.</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Cimetidine (CIM) is an H2-receptor antagonist with a long history of clinical use in peptic ulcer disease. In addition to its inhibitory effect upon gastric acid secretion, CIM can also block histamine-mediated immunosuppression by inhibiting H2 receptors on suppressor T cells. CIM results in immunoaugmentation of both cellular and humoral immunity by this mechanism and has been used clinically in the treatment of chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases. We postulated that orally administered CIM, like an adjuvant, could augment the immunologic response to a parenteral vaccine. To test this hypothesis, a randomized placebo (PLB)-controlled, double-blinded study in 14 healthy volunteers was performed using a Group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (OMP) vaccine administered twice, 6 weeks apart. Volunteers were randomized within pairs defined by their screening OMP antibody titers to receive either CIM or PLB which was administered for 5 days, beginning 2 days before each of the two immunizations. All 14 volunteers completed the study with excellent compliance. Sera were tested for anti-OMP and bactericidal antibodies. The groups were comparable in terms of gender distribution, age and baseline anti-OMP titers. Reactogenicity to the vaccine was mild and comparable between groups. There was little effect of CIM (over PLB) on anti-OMP or functional bactericidal antibody levels over time. Geometric means of maximum OMP antibody increase over baseline was 3.3-fold (95% CI: 1.8–6.3) for CIM and 2.4 for PLB (CI: 1.6–3.7). CIM had a corresponding 3.9-fold increase (CI: 1.9–8.3) in bactericidal antibody level compared to 2.2 for PLB (CI: 1.4–3.4). We conclude that oral CIM was not effective as an immunopotentiator of immunization with this group B meningococcal vaccine.</description><subject>adjuvant</subject><subject>Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</subject><subject>Bacterial Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bacteriology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cimetidine</subject><subject>Cimetidine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Histamine H2 Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immunoaugmentation</subject><subject>Immunomodulators</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Meningitis, Meningococcal - immunology</subject><subject>Meningitis, Meningococcal - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>meningococcal</subject><subject>Meningococcal Vaccines</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Neisseria meningitidis - classification</subject><subject>Neisseria meningitidis - immunology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Streptococcus</subject><subject>vaccine</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkdtqFTEUhoModbf6CIVciCg4upLM8UpqqQcoeKGCdyGzsqZGZpIxyVTat_CNnX1g3_YqhP9bB9bH2LmAtwJE_e4byLosSgE_X3X1awAlRNE-YhvRNqqQlWgfs80RecpOU_oNAJUS3Qk76WTdQQ0b9u-CR-NtmNw92Td8Hg1SHwoMPscwjmR5you942HgIZqRo5soO-s8cZO48dxN0-LDHDL57EwOcYvOJq5f2hbscndvsgue_3X5Fzf8JoZl5h_4RN75m4ABcSVvDeLa9xl7Mpgx0fPDe8Z-fLz6fvm5uP766cvlxXWBpYRcdNISllgN1dCZGhQQKgPU2IrKpjZKVT2UVkHfy2GwXV-XFq0BKQ31FQpUZ-zlvu8cw5-FUtaTS0jjaDyFJemmk7Jr2vZBUNTQgmrVClZ7EGNIKdKg5-gmE--0AL11pnfO9FaI7mq9c6a3A84PA5Z-InusOkha8xeH3KT1UMMqDF06YrJpRbnD3u8xWq926yjqhI48knWRMGsb3AOL_Acch7dy</recordid><startdate>19970701</startdate><enddate>19970701</enddate><creator>Drabick, Joseph J.</creator><creator>Tang, Douglas B.</creator><creator>Moran, E.E.</creator><creator>Trofa, Andrew F.</creator><creator>Foster, Janet S.</creator><creator>Zollinger, Wendell D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970701</creationdate><title>A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine</title><author>Drabick, Joseph J. ; Tang, Douglas B. ; Moran, E.E. ; Trofa, Andrew F. ; Foster, Janet S. ; Zollinger, Wendell D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-92dec4c5f5f9a6030ec3a0e7d5e476a335b04d30bb2ffd9b64dcda022aeb5c1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>adjuvant</topic><topic>Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Bacterial - blood</topic><topic>Bacterial Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bacteriology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cimetidine</topic><topic>Cimetidine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Epidemiology. Vaccinations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Histamine H2 Antagonists - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immunoaugmentation</topic><topic>Immunomodulators</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Meningitis, Meningococcal - immunology</topic><topic>Meningitis, Meningococcal - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>meningococcal</topic><topic>Meningococcal Vaccines</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Neisseria meningitidis - classification</topic><topic>Neisseria meningitidis - immunology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Streptococcus</topic><topic>vaccine</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drabick, Joseph J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Douglas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trofa, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foster, Janet S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zollinger, Wendell D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drabick, Joseph J.</au><au>Tang, Douglas B.</au><au>Moran, E.E.</au><au>Trofa, Andrew F.</au><au>Foster, Janet S.</au><au>Zollinger, Wendell D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>1997-07-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1144</spage><epage>1148</epage><pages>1144-1148</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>Cimetidine (CIM) is an H2-receptor antagonist with a long history of clinical use in peptic ulcer disease. In addition to its inhibitory effect upon gastric acid secretion, CIM can also block histamine-mediated immunosuppression by inhibiting H2 receptors on suppressor T cells. CIM results in immunoaugmentation of both cellular and humoral immunity by this mechanism and has been used clinically in the treatment of chronic infectious and neoplastic diseases. We postulated that orally administered CIM, like an adjuvant, could augment the immunologic response to a parenteral vaccine. To test this hypothesis, a randomized placebo (PLB)-controlled, double-blinded study in 14 healthy volunteers was performed using a Group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (OMP) vaccine administered twice, 6 weeks apart. Volunteers were randomized within pairs defined by their screening OMP antibody titers to receive either CIM or PLB which was administered for 5 days, beginning 2 days before each of the two immunizations. All 14 volunteers completed the study with excellent compliance. Sera were tested for anti-OMP and bactericidal antibodies. The groups were comparable in terms of gender distribution, age and baseline anti-OMP titers. Reactogenicity to the vaccine was mild and comparable between groups. There was little effect of CIM (over PLB) on anti-OMP or functional bactericidal antibody levels over time. Geometric means of maximum OMP antibody increase over baseline was 3.3-fold (95% CI: 1.8–6.3) for CIM and 2.4 for PLB (CI: 1.6–3.7). CIM had a corresponding 3.9-fold increase (CI: 1.9–8.3) in bactericidal antibody level compared to 2.2 for PLB (CI: 1.4–3.4). We conclude that oral CIM was not effective as an immunopotentiator of immunization with this group B meningococcal vaccine.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>9269060</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00311-8</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 1997-07, Vol.15 (10), p.1144-1148
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79229788
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects adjuvant
Adjuvants, Immunologic - administration & dosage
Administration, Oral
Adolescent
Adult
Antibodies, Bacterial - blood
Bacterial Vaccines - administration & dosage
Bacteriology
Biological and medical sciences
cimetidine
Cimetidine - administration & dosage
Double-Blind Method
Epidemiology. Vaccinations
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Histamine H2 Antagonists - administration & dosage
Humans
immunoaugmentation
Immunomodulators
Infectious diseases
Injections, Intramuscular
Male
Medical sciences
Meningitis, Meningococcal - immunology
Meningitis, Meningococcal - prevention & control
meningococcal
Meningococcal Vaccines
Microbiology
Neisseria meningitidis - classification
Neisseria meningitidis - immunology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Streptococcus
vaccine
Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies
title A randomized, placebo-controlled study of oral cimetidine as an immunopotentiator of parenteral immunization with a group B meningococcal vaccine
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A12%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20placebo-controlled%20study%20of%20oral%20cimetidine%20as%20an%20immunopotentiator%20of%20parenteral%20immunization%20with%20a%20group%20B%20meningococcal%20vaccine&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Drabick,%20Joseph%20J.&rft.date=1997-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1144&rft.epage=1148&rft.pages=1144-1148&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0264-410X(96)00311-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16080383%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16080383&rft_id=info:pmid/9269060&rft_els_id=S0264410X96003118&rfr_iscdi=true