HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas
The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical oncology 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2904 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2894 |
container_title | Journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | PRESS, M. F BERNSTEIN, L SLAMON, D. J PHILLIPS, R. N ROSS, J. S WOLMAN, S. R FLOM, K. J THOMAS, P. A MEISNER, L. F ZHOU, J.-Y MA, Y HUNG, G ROBINSON, R. A HARRIS, C EL-NAGGAR, A |
description | The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis.
HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification.
Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied.
FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79183474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79183474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUcFu1DAUtBCoLIUfQELyAXFLGttJHHNDq0JBlSqhVuJmvTjPu64Se7ET0PbaH8dLV9vTO7yZeTPzCHnPqpLxqrq4N6FkSsmSNWVX8k7VL8iKNVwWUjbNS7KqpOAF68Sv1-RNSvdVxepONGfkTPGmZUKsyOPV5c-CX3hc6AY9Uph2o7POwOyCp2YLEcyM0T3gQPs9teMSIiaD3iB1niY3L3S776Mb3MN_zme6CyHSXQwbH5JLB5QPAxYeNxnwB2kfEdJMDUTjfJggvSWvLIwJ3x3nObn7enm7viqub759X3-5LkzN27lQjbSy7xViZ6XtBwGQU7S9rZVoGUJbmxwLBq6YEqrtRGURmeEAphO2luKcfHrSzeZ-L5hmPbkcZRzBY1iSlipXVcs6A_kT0MSQUkSrd9FNEPeaVfrQvP6xvtGH5jVrdKcPzWfSh6P60k84nCjHqvP-43EPycBoI3jj0gnGpWxFNn0yuXWb7V8XUacJxjGLcp3__XzvH7LrnEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79183474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</creator><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><description>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis.
HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification.
Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied.
FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9256133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Gene Amplification ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Immunoblotting ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Prognosis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Survival Rate ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2776368$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9256133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNSTEIN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAMON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLMAN, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLOM, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEISNER, L. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis.
HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification.
Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied.
FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Amplification</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUcFu1DAUtBCoLIUfQELyAXFLGttJHHNDq0JBlSqhVuJmvTjPu64Se7ET0PbaH8dLV9vTO7yZeTPzCHnPqpLxqrq4N6FkSsmSNWVX8k7VL8iKNVwWUjbNS7KqpOAF68Sv1-RNSvdVxepONGfkTPGmZUKsyOPV5c-CX3hc6AY9Uph2o7POwOyCp2YLEcyM0T3gQPs9teMSIiaD3iB1niY3L3S776Mb3MN_zme6CyHSXQwbH5JLB5QPAxYeNxnwB2kfEdJMDUTjfJggvSWvLIwJ3x3nObn7enm7viqub759X3-5LkzN27lQjbSy7xViZ6XtBwGQU7S9rZVoGUJbmxwLBq6YEqrtRGURmeEAphO2luKcfHrSzeZ-L5hmPbkcZRzBY1iSlipXVcs6A_kT0MSQUkSrd9FNEPeaVfrQvP6xvtGH5jVrdKcPzWfSh6P60k84nCjHqvP-43EPycBoI3jj0gnGpWxFNn0yuXWb7V8XUacJxjGLcp3__XzvH7LrnEA</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>PRESS, M. F</creator><creator>BERNSTEIN, L</creator><creator>SLAMON, D. J</creator><creator>PHILLIPS, R. N</creator><creator>ROSS, J. S</creator><creator>WOLMAN, S. R</creator><creator>FLOM, K. J</creator><creator>THOMAS, P. A</creator><creator>MEISNER, L. F</creator><creator>ZHOU, J.-Y</creator><creator>MA, Y</creator><creator>HUNG, G</creator><creator>ROBINSON, R. A</creator><creator>HARRIS, C</creator><creator>EL-NAGGAR, A</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams & Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><author>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Amplification</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNSTEIN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAMON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLMAN, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLOM, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEISNER, L. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PRESS, M. F</au><au>BERNSTEIN, L</au><au>SLAMON, D. J</au><au>PHILLIPS, R. N</au><au>ROSS, J. S</au><au>WOLMAN, S. R</au><au>FLOM, K. J</au><au>THOMAS, P. A</au><au>MEISNER, L. F</au><au>ZHOU, J.-Y</au><au>MA, Y</au><au>HUNG, G</au><au>ROBINSON, R. A</au><au>HARRIS, C</au><au>EL-NAGGAR, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2894</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2894-2904</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis.
HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification.
Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied.
FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>9256133</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-183X |
ispartof | Journal of clinical oncology, 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904 |
issn | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79183474 |
source | MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Aged Biological and medical sciences Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics Breast Neoplasms - genetics Breast Neoplasms - mortality Breast Neoplasms - pathology Female Gene Amplification Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Immunoblotting In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Lymphatic Metastasis Mammary gland diseases Medical sciences Middle Aged Neoplasm Metastasis Neoplasm Recurrence, Local Prognosis Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics Sensitivity and Specificity Survival Rate Tumors |
title | HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A24%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HER-2/neu%20gene%20amplification%20characterized%20by%20fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization:%20poor%20prognosis%20in%20node-negative%20breast%20carcinomas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=PRESS,%20M.%20F&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2894&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2894-2904&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79183474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79183474&rft_id=info:pmid/9256133&rfr_iscdi=true |