HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas

The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical oncology 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904
Hauptverfasser: PRESS, M. F, BERNSTEIN, L, SLAMON, D. J, PHILLIPS, R. N, ROSS, J. S, WOLMAN, S. R, FLOM, K. J, THOMAS, P. A, MEISNER, L. F, ZHOU, J.-Y, MA, Y, HUNG, G, ROBINSON, R. A, HARRIS, C, EL-NAGGAR, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2904
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2894
container_title Journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 15
creator PRESS, M. F
BERNSTEIN, L
SLAMON, D. J
PHILLIPS, R. N
ROSS, J. S
WOLMAN, S. R
FLOM, K. J
THOMAS, P. A
MEISNER, L. F
ZHOU, J.-Y
MA, Y
HUNG, G
ROBINSON, R. A
HARRIS, C
EL-NAGGAR, A
description The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79183474</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>79183474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFUcFu1DAUtBCoLIUfQELyAXFLGttJHHNDq0JBlSqhVuJmvTjPu64Se7ET0PbaH8dLV9vTO7yZeTPzCHnPqpLxqrq4N6FkSsmSNWVX8k7VL8iKNVwWUjbNS7KqpOAF68Sv1-RNSvdVxepONGfkTPGmZUKsyOPV5c-CX3hc6AY9Uph2o7POwOyCp2YLEcyM0T3gQPs9teMSIiaD3iB1niY3L3S776Mb3MN_zme6CyHSXQwbH5JLB5QPAxYeNxnwB2kfEdJMDUTjfJggvSWvLIwJ3x3nObn7enm7viqub759X3-5LkzN27lQjbSy7xViZ6XtBwGQU7S9rZVoGUJbmxwLBq6YEqrtRGURmeEAphO2luKcfHrSzeZ-L5hmPbkcZRzBY1iSlipXVcs6A_kT0MSQUkSrd9FNEPeaVfrQvP6xvtGH5jVrdKcPzWfSh6P60k84nCjHqvP-43EPycBoI3jj0gnGpWxFNn0yuXWb7V8XUacJxjGLcp3__XzvH7LrnEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>79183474</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</creator><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><description>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-7755</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9256133</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Baltimore, MD: American Society of Clinical Oncology</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - genetics ; Breast Neoplasms - mortality ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Gene Amplification ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Immunoblotting ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Mammary gland diseases ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local ; Prognosis ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Survival Rate ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical oncology, 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3716,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2776368$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9256133$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNSTEIN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAMON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLMAN, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLOM, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEISNER, L. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><title>Journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene Amplification</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunoblotting</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Mammary gland diseases</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0732-183X</issn><issn>1527-7755</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFUcFu1DAUtBCoLIUfQELyAXFLGttJHHNDq0JBlSqhVuJmvTjPu64Se7ET0PbaH8dLV9vTO7yZeTPzCHnPqpLxqrq4N6FkSsmSNWVX8k7VL8iKNVwWUjbNS7KqpOAF68Sv1-RNSvdVxepONGfkTPGmZUKsyOPV5c-CX3hc6AY9Uph2o7POwOyCp2YLEcyM0T3gQPs9teMSIiaD3iB1niY3L3S776Mb3MN_zme6CyHSXQwbH5JLB5QPAxYeNxnwB2kfEdJMDUTjfJggvSWvLIwJ3x3nObn7enm7viqub759X3-5LkzN27lQjbSy7xViZ6XtBwGQU7S9rZVoGUJbmxwLBq6YEqrtRGURmeEAphO2luKcfHrSzeZ-L5hmPbkcZRzBY1iSlipXVcs6A_kT0MSQUkSrd9FNEPeaVfrQvP6xvtGH5jVrdKcPzWfSh6P60k84nCjHqvP-43EPycBoI3jj0gnGpWxFNn0yuXWb7V8XUacJxjGLcp3__XzvH7LrnEA</recordid><startdate>19970801</startdate><enddate>19970801</enddate><creator>PRESS, M. F</creator><creator>BERNSTEIN, L</creator><creator>SLAMON, D. J</creator><creator>PHILLIPS, R. N</creator><creator>ROSS, J. S</creator><creator>WOLMAN, S. R</creator><creator>FLOM, K. J</creator><creator>THOMAS, P. A</creator><creator>MEISNER, L. F</creator><creator>ZHOU, J.-Y</creator><creator>MA, Y</creator><creator>HUNG, G</creator><creator>ROBINSON, R. A</creator><creator>HARRIS, C</creator><creator>EL-NAGGAR, A</creator><general>American Society of Clinical Oncology</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970801</creationdate><title>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</title><author>PRESS, M. F ; BERNSTEIN, L ; SLAMON, D. J ; PHILLIPS, R. N ; ROSS, J. S ; WOLMAN, S. R ; FLOM, K. J ; THOMAS, P. A ; MEISNER, L. F ; ZHOU, J.-Y ; MA, Y ; HUNG, G ; ROBINSON, R. A ; HARRIS, C ; EL-NAGGAR, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-957f7bb9ee8f7fbd3aa2566bf49361ea64c925ad2919396830fee1c2aac83f473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - genetics</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene Amplification</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunoblotting</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Mammary gland diseases</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>PRESS, M. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BERNSTEIN, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SLAMON, D. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PHILLIPS, R. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROSS, J. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WOLMAN, S. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FLOM, K. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>THOMAS, P. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEISNER, L. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZHOU, J.-Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MA, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HUNG, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ROBINSON, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HARRIS, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>EL-NAGGAR, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>PRESS, M. F</au><au>BERNSTEIN, L</au><au>SLAMON, D. J</au><au>PHILLIPS, R. N</au><au>ROSS, J. S</au><au>WOLMAN, S. R</au><au>FLOM, K. J</au><au>THOMAS, P. A</au><au>MEISNER, L. F</au><au>ZHOU, J.-Y</au><au>MA, Y</au><au>HUNG, G</au><au>ROBINSON, R. A</au><au>HARRIS, C</au><au>EL-NAGGAR, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>1997-08-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2894</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2894-2904</pages><issn>0732-183X</issn><eissn>1527-7755</eissn><abstract>The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.</abstract><cop>Baltimore, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Clinical Oncology</pub><pmid>9256133</pmid><doi>10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0732-183X
ispartof Journal of clinical oncology, 1997-08, Vol.15 (8), p.2894-2904
issn 0732-183X
1527-7755
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_79183474
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biomarkers, Tumor - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - genetics
Breast Neoplasms - mortality
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Gene Amplification
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Immunoblotting
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Lymphatic Metastasis
Mammary gland diseases
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
Prognosis
Receptor, ErbB-2 - genetics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Survival Rate
Tumors
title HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A24%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=HER-2/neu%20gene%20amplification%20characterized%20by%20fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization:%20poor%20prognosis%20in%20node-negative%20breast%20carcinomas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=PRESS,%20M.%20F&rft.date=1997-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2894&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2894-2904&rft.issn=0732-183X&rft.eissn=1527-7755&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/jco.1997.15.8.2894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E79183474%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=79183474&rft_id=info:pmid/9256133&rfr_iscdi=true