Comparative Clinical Study of Roxithromycin and Josamycin for Suppurative Skin and Soft Tissue Infections by a Double-Blind Method

The clinical efficacy and safety of Roxithromycin (RU 28965, RU), a new macrolide preparation, were compared with those of Josamycin (JM) in superficial suppurative skin infections. The study was designed as double-blind controlled trial with daily dosages of 300 mg in RU group and 1200 mg in JM gro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Kansenshogaku Zasshi 1989/03/20, Vol.63(3), pp.203-227
Hauptverfasser: NOHARA, Nozomi, AKAGI, Osamu, KANZAKI, Hiroko, KANAMOTO, Akiko, OHARA, Atsunobu, OHKAWARA, Akira, FUKAYA, Toru, KOBAYASHI, Hitoshi, YASUDA, Hidemi, TAGAMI, Hachiro, KURAMOTO, Yoko, ISHIBASHI, Yasumasa, SHIMOZUMA, Michiro, IOZUMI, Ken, YAMAO, Hiroyuki, IKE, Yoshihito, HARADA, Shotaro, OGAWA, Kimiko, NAKANISHI, Hiroshi, YUN, Shukuka, IGARASHI, Atsuyuki, KUKITA, Atsushi, OHATA, Hiroyuki, TAKAHASHI, Hirohumi, KIMURA, Yasutaka, SHIMIZU, Tatsuya, TAKAHASHI, Hisashi, KAWAGUCHI, Yoshiteru, KAWAGUCHI, Sanae, YAGI, Kumi, TODA, Jo, OHTA, Midori, ASADA, Yasuo, NISHIJIMA, Setsuko, UMEMURA, Shigeo, ARATA, Jiro, TAMAKI, Hiroyuki, YAMAMOTO, Yasuo, TAKEDA, Katsuyuki, TAKAHASHI, Osamu, URABE, Harukuni, MIYAOKA, Tatsuya, ARAO, Tatsuyoshi, OISHI, Munashi, TASHIRO, Masaaki, NOMOTO, Shigeru, OGAWA, Nobuya, DEGUCHI, Koichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; jpn
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The clinical efficacy and safety of Roxithromycin (RU 28965, RU), a new macrolide preparation, were compared with those of Josamycin (JM) in superficial suppurative skin infections. The study was designed as double-blind controlled trial with daily dosages of 300 mg in RU group and 1200 mg in JM group. A total of 209 cases (RU: 105, JM: 104) was analyzed and the final global improvement rating was 82.9% in the RU group and 80.8% in the JM group; there was no significant difference between the two groups. Slight adverse reactions were observed in 3.6%(4 cases) of the RU group and in 4.6%(5 cases) of the JM group. In conclusion, RU at daily doses of 300 mg is as effective as JM at daily doses of 1200 mg in superficial suppurative skin infections.
ISSN:0387-5911
1884-569X
DOI:10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.63.203